Risks, Benefits, and Regulation of GMOs

Robert Vavala Author

05/11/2018 Added

569 Plays

Description

Instruction and explanation of the risks, benefits, and regulations of genetically-modified organisms

Searchable Transcript

Search:

[00:00:04.810]Farmers, Consumers and GMOs.
[00:00:07.510]We're gonna focus on social dimensions
[00:00:09.770]and better understand consumer acceptance,
[00:00:12.290]and here's our learning targets.
[00:00:14.710]We'll start with how do scientists
[00:00:17.300]study social dimensions of GMOs?
[00:00:20.350]Of course, from our introduction,
[00:00:21.920]we met a social scientist, Carmen Bain,
[00:00:26.200]and we could see that through the careful use
[00:00:30.300]of interviews and surveys, they could gather data
[00:00:34.520]that would give them better insights on social dimensions
[00:00:38.540]and how people are thinking and reacting
[00:00:42.730]to new technologies in agriculture,
[00:00:46.200]such as the use of GMOs in our foods and crops.
[00:00:51.200]So, based on having a general idea
[00:00:54.970]of how social scientists do their work,
[00:00:57.610]now we wanna focus on some of the things
[00:01:00.520]that social scientists have helped us understand
[00:01:04.860]about the social dimensions and how the public reacts
[00:01:08.850]or a segment of the public reacts
[00:01:11.450]to the use of GMOs in our food.
[00:01:14.160]So, we're gonna start with
[00:01:16.610]what the initial consumer oppositions were to GMOs,
[00:01:22.140]and we're gonna take advantage of some of the insights
[00:01:27.020]that Carmen Bain and her co-author shared
[00:01:32.680]in this article in the journal called Sustainability
[00:01:36.350]that gives us some background
[00:01:38.870]on the history of GMOs
[00:01:42.350]and their integration into our food system.
[00:01:46.010]So I've created a couple of timelines,
[00:01:48.480]and these timelines could be based
[00:01:52.123]on some of the historical perspective that Dr. Bain shared,
[00:01:56.910]but it's also a timeline
[00:01:58.865]that kind of coincidentally spans my career as a teacher.
[00:02:03.080]I started my college teaching career in about 1989,
[00:02:07.970]and I'm still going today.
[00:02:10.990]My teaching career overlaps
[00:02:15.050]with the integration of this new technology,
[00:02:19.900]genetic engineering technology,
[00:02:22.200]as a part of our food system.
[00:02:23.630]So I made a timeline with the two main applications
[00:02:27.710]of genetic engineering technology
[00:02:29.470]to develop herbicide resisting crops
[00:02:32.200]and to develop insect resistant crops.
[00:02:36.360]And let's take a look
[00:02:37.740]at the Commercial Transgenic Crop Time Line.
[00:02:41.040]Now, we should remember that prior to the application
[00:02:45.700]of genetic engineering,
[00:02:47.400]the creation of GMOs that were part of our food system,
[00:02:51.480]scientists had already developed
[00:02:55.150]transgenic strategies
[00:02:57.900]to develop microorganisms that could make human proteins.
[00:03:02.120]Humulin or the human insulin protein
[00:03:04.920]was commercialized in 1982.
[00:03:07.860]And like a lot of science,
[00:03:10.540]as the science has developed and improved
[00:03:13.390]and transitions to become a reliable technology,
[00:03:18.380]what tends to happen is consumers become more comfortable
[00:03:23.520]and more accustomed to using that technology.
[00:03:27.350]I think there was a great deal of motivation
[00:03:30.760]when you saw the success
[00:03:32.470]of applying genetic engineering technology
[00:03:34.880]in solving this medical challenge, this medical problem,
[00:03:39.270]that we could use this technology to solve problems
[00:03:42.790]that we encountered in growing crops
[00:03:45.150]that were part of our food system.
[00:03:47.790]In 1995, the very first commercialized
[00:03:52.040]transgenic crops were released,
[00:03:53.810]Roundup Ready soybean, which had a gene from a microorganism
[00:03:57.640]that provided it with resistance to a herbicide,
[00:04:00.880]and Bt corn, in this case BT corn
[00:04:06.160]that would resist an insect called European corn borer,
[00:04:09.590]again because of the cross-species transfer
[00:04:13.470]of a microbial gene, in this case to a corn plant.
[00:04:17.860]Those were both commercialized in 1995.
[00:04:22.010]But prior to that commercialization
[00:04:25.090]when the science and the discovery was proceeding,
[00:04:30.150]there was a lot of speculation
[00:04:34.130]about problems that would occur
[00:04:36.790]if this technology was used in mainstream agriculture.
[00:04:42.640]In the early '90s when I first started teaching
[00:04:45.310]about genetically engineered crops, how they were developed,
[00:04:48.700]and how they might be used in our food system,
[00:04:52.290]along with the science, there was already controversy,
[00:04:55.990]speculation about problems that might occur.
[00:04:59.280]And I recall using a program as a part of my teaching
[00:05:03.780]in my college genetics course
[00:05:05.960]called The Mouse that Laid the Golden Egg
[00:05:07.900]which told the story
[00:05:09.630]of how these products were being developed,
[00:05:12.170]but some of the controversy surrounding the application
[00:05:15.300]of genetic engineering to animals, to plants,
[00:05:19.460]as well as to microorganisms.
[00:05:21.940]At that same time, about 1990,
[00:05:27.384]'91, '92, '93,
[00:05:30.160]the movie Jurassic Park came out,
[00:05:32.250]and of course that was a genetic engineering story,
[00:05:35.020]although extensive science fiction here
[00:05:39.680]with the idea that you could transfer a few genes
[00:05:44.090]that were discovered, left behind
[00:05:46.670]by ancient prehistoric dinosaurs
[00:05:50.170]and you could genetically engineer amphibians
[00:05:54.330]into becoming these
[00:05:58.140]living dinosaurs on the planet.
[00:05:59.920]That was absolutely science fiction,
[00:06:03.290]but it conjured up some uneasiness and some of those ideas
[00:06:08.570]that maybe genetic engineering is different,
[00:06:10.890]maybe it's not a good idea.
[00:06:13.980]Thus in the mid 1990s,
[00:06:17.580]Roundup Ready soybeans, Bt corn
[00:06:21.710]were first grown by farmers in the United States.
[00:06:27.040]But before those products could be released
[00:06:31.150]and available for farmers to use
[00:06:33.840]as a part of mainstream crop production,
[00:06:38.350]the questions of what are the benefits from these products,
[00:06:44.080]versus what are the risks of using these products
[00:06:47.430]had already been addressed.
[00:06:49.550]So, let's take a look
[00:06:52.141]at some of these benefits versus risks questions,
[00:06:57.290]and we'll focus on the risks.
[00:07:00.590]So I'm gonna pose these as questions,
[00:07:04.540]and you can think of these as potential risks or issues
[00:07:09.680]that somebody could state as oppositions
[00:07:14.630]to the integration of GMOs into our food system.
[00:07:18.150]So I'm gonna list those questions here,
[00:07:20.520]and I've placed these questions in different categories.
[00:07:24.670]And when you take a look at the two categories of questions,
[00:07:30.020]those on the left we could put into the category
[00:07:33.230]of being addressed by biologists.
[00:07:36.910]These are biological science questions that biologists have
[00:07:42.080]the technical capabilities of answering.
[00:07:45.920]The questions on the right are just as important,
[00:07:49.560]but these are questions that are more social science issues
[00:07:55.140]and need to be looked at and addressed in a different way.
[00:08:00.960]So, we'll talk a little bit more here next
[00:08:04.950]about how biologists address these questions
[00:08:08.250]of are the plants and animals that have been subjected
[00:08:13.460]to the genetic engineering process safe to grow?
[00:08:17.681]Is the use of these genetically engineered plants
[00:08:22.490]or animals safe for the environment?
[00:08:24.230]And for the consumers in particular,
[00:08:29.250]are they safe to eat?
[00:08:31.860]Social scientists have ways of getting us
[00:08:35.400]to better understand these questions.
[00:08:38.460]For example, some people see genetic engineering
[00:08:43.661]is a more extreme intervention
[00:08:47.440]of genetic changes that we have taken advantage of
[00:08:52.320]in developing our crops or our animals.
[00:08:56.110]Have we exceeded our bounds
[00:08:59.630]in utilizing this process?
[00:09:02.810]Or perhaps the facts that these technologies
[00:09:07.800]have been mostly developed and commercialized
[00:09:11.140]by larger companies might have an impact on business
[00:09:16.160]or might have an impact on consumers' rights
[00:09:20.050]as they're buying the products
[00:09:22.590]of these genetically engineered plants and animals.
[00:09:26.730]And then there's other questions
[00:09:29.240]about cross-species transfer
[00:09:31.940]and the social science implications of that.
[00:09:36.010]Let's take a look at the issues on the left next.
[00:09:41.810]I wanna start with this diagram,
[00:09:43.520]'cause what it does is contrast the scientific process
[00:09:47.410]in developing a genetically engineered crop
[00:09:50.910]for farmers to use, that's on the top,
[00:09:53.180]about nine years to develop that.
[00:09:55.640]Compared to the conventional plant breeding process
[00:10:00.640]to develop a new variety or hybrid for a farmer to grow,
[00:10:03.990]that's about 12 processes.
[00:10:05.700]But the colors here make a difference.
[00:10:10.600]And part of the genetic engineering process takes advantage
[00:10:14.880]of the progress that plant breeders have made.
[00:10:18.360]Where it's different is at the beginning.
[00:10:20.040]It's focused on laboratory procedures, discovering genes,
[00:10:25.300]and working with plants at the cell and tissue level
[00:10:30.270]in a different way
[00:10:32.100]before you're eventually ready to work
[00:10:36.230]with the plant breeders in the field
[00:10:37.960]in evaluating these processes.
[00:10:39.940]The two processes have some similarities,
[00:10:43.110]but they also have some distinct differences
[00:10:47.080]in terms of their use of science and technology.
[00:10:50.000]And it's because of that difference
[00:10:52.190]in genetically engineered crop development
[00:10:54.750]that the regulatory agencies have imposed
[00:10:57.860]much greater regulatory restrictions
[00:11:01.690]on products that use this genetic engineering process.
[00:11:06.070]And there are three main regulatory agencies
[00:11:09.500]that come into play in evaluating the safety
[00:11:14.310]of these genetically engineered products
[00:11:19.360]in the United States.
[00:11:20.870]In addition, there are legal patent issues
[00:11:24.890]that are involved as well.
[00:11:25.890]So, it's a much more highly regulated process
[00:11:29.080]compared to traditional breeding.
[00:11:32.000]And the different agencies answer different questions.
[00:11:34.940]USDA/APHIS helps us understand
[00:11:38.220]is this something that's safe to grow?
[00:11:42.460]The EPA wants to know if it's safe for the environment.
[00:11:45.910]And the FDA wants to know if it's safe for the consumer.
[00:11:49.600]In addition to developing the technology,
[00:11:53.540]you also have to provide information
[00:11:56.730]that allows these regulatory agencies
[00:11:59.350]to answer these questions.
[00:12:01.350]And the goal is to address these questions
[00:12:05.810]and determine if the genetically engineered product
[00:12:08.760]can be deregulated.
[00:12:10.940]Well, what does that mean?
[00:12:12.630]That means it's gonna be grown the same
[00:12:15.010]as a non-genetically engineered crop variety or hybrid.
[00:12:21.190]And therefore, once it meets deregulated status,
[00:12:26.530]it's gonna be a part of our main food production system.
[00:12:31.850]So, getting to that point of deregulation
[00:12:35.880]requires the regulatory agencies to really weigh in
[00:12:39.800]on what are the benefits of these new products
[00:12:43.500]compared to the risks that they pose,
[00:12:46.930]and then make a decision
[00:12:48.940]based on a examination of that balance.
[00:12:52.710]So, the regulatory agencies had developed their strategies,
[00:12:57.650]and those were applied to the very first products
[00:13:01.160]that were developed, Roundup Ready soybeans, Bt corn.
[00:13:04.680]They were grown as non-regulated products.
[00:13:08.690]And the belief was that if these are grown
[00:13:12.050]and no problems are observed, no problems occur,
[00:13:16.520]the controversy surrounding the use
[00:13:19.990]of GMO technology will fade away.
[00:13:23.310]But what we discovered is that in the past 20 years
[00:13:28.190]since these have been incorporated
[00:13:30.990]and have now become mainstream in our food system,
[00:13:35.090]the controversy still persists,
[00:13:38.660]and there's several reasons for that.
[00:13:40.290]So, we'll ask you to come back
[00:13:43.230]and view part two of the social dimensions
[00:13:49.010]part of our learning environment.
[00:13:51.520]And let's take a look at what some of the
[00:13:55.890]events were that occurred
[00:13:58.600]as these new crops were being grown by farmers
[00:14:02.220]that might have contributed to the fact
[00:14:05.090]that we still see controversy today.

The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!

You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.

Comments

0 Comments

Risks, Benefits, and Regulation of GMOs

Description

Searchable Transcript

Comments icon comment

Related Channels

Comments