Prairie STRIPS: From research to action
Lisa Schulte-Moore
Author
10/21/2016
Added
74
Plays
Description
Part of the 2016 Fall Seminar Series at the School of Natural Resources
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:00.532]Great, thanks Liza and also thanks Larkin
- [00:00:02.722]also for hosting my visit.
- [00:00:05.661]It's exciting to be in the great state of Nebraska today
- [00:00:08.639]and this is actually my first time
- [00:00:10.238]on the University of Nebraska Lincoln campus
- [00:00:12.929]so yeah, it's a great day for me.
- [00:00:16.183]So they brought me here to talk about the STRIPS project
- [00:00:19.827]and STRIPS might not be as exciting as it initially sounds.
- [00:00:23.884]It stands for Science-based Trials
- [00:00:25.682]of Rowcrops Integrated with Prairie Strips,
- [00:00:29.187]so it's this idea of putting a little bit
- [00:00:30.892]of prairie into agricultural landscapes
- [00:00:33.869]and I would be very remiss if I didn't point out
- [00:00:36.957]that it's the work of many people.
- [00:00:39.561]I'm excited to be able to present to you today on our work
- [00:00:43.031]but clearly there's been lots of people involved
- [00:00:47.819]including the lead PIs on various grants
- [00:00:51.824]and a whole host of other scientists
- [00:00:55.445]that have been involved over time
- [00:00:57.290]and then graduate students and post-docs.
- [00:01:00.482]This doesn't even include the, you know,
- [00:01:02.347]the multitudes of undergraduate researchers
- [00:01:05.572]that have been so critical in collecting data.
- [00:01:08.380]And we've been running the project for,
- [00:01:10.749]well we started back in (laughing) the fall of 2003
- [00:01:14.227]in the conceptual phase and to keep a project going
- [00:01:16.998]that long you need whole host of funders
- [00:01:20.216]and now some of these folks are also supplying land
- [00:01:25.179]that we're working on so the whole diverse consortium
- [00:01:28.004]of folks that have kept this running.
- [00:01:30.278]And especially I want to point out Matt Helmers,
- [00:01:32.307]who's my co-lead on the project
- [00:01:34.538]and he's a University of Nebraska Lincoln alumnus,
- [00:01:40.487]and so you should be very proud of him.
- [00:01:43.281]He's an awesome graduate of this institution.
- [00:01:46.280]So, just to kind of then get us started
- [00:01:49.184]with some of the context for our work,
- [00:01:52.222]Iowa like Nebraska is a heavily agricultural state.
- [00:01:56.424]We produce, by state statistics,
- [00:02:01.386]we produce the most corn in the country.
- [00:02:04.082]We oftentimes produce the most soybeans as well,
- [00:02:07.493]although we contend for that position with Illinois.
- [00:02:11.125]We produce the most eggs and the most hogs, the most ethanol
- [00:02:15.681]and I think we're fourth in cattle production.
- [00:02:17.969]I'm sure you guys beat us out on that metric.
- [00:02:21.590]Anyway, it's about 20% of the state economy
- [00:02:24.469]and agriculture is our culture.
- [00:02:26.197]It's something that we're very proud of and of course,
- [00:02:28.782]we want to maintain those statistics in the future.
- [00:02:31.427]However, when you cover about 70% of a state area
- [00:02:36.962]with two plants, corn or soybean, and they are only active
- [00:02:42.664]for a portion of the year, there's some challenges
- [00:02:46.083]that go along with that kind of land use.
- [00:02:49.392]And in particular, a key challenge that we're trying
- [00:02:52.453]to deal with in the state of Iowa, we have for decades,
- [00:02:56.241]is the loss of our soil, which is the foundation
- [00:02:59.129]of all this productivity to begin with.
- [00:03:02.585]Rates of soil erosion that are, we know are not sustainable
- [00:03:06.736]and you know critical to maintaining the prosperity
- [00:03:11.265]of our farms and out state moving forward.
- [00:03:14.701]And of course once soil is moved off these fields,
- [00:03:18.743]with water, the water's bringing lots of other materials
- [00:03:22.329]with it in addition to soil, the soil itself is a pollutant
- [00:03:25.833]once it gets into our waterways.
- [00:03:27.611]It's also bringing valuable nutrients from the crop field,
- [00:03:30.545]in particular phosphorous and nitrogen
- [00:03:33.148]that also become pollutants in our waterways.
- [00:03:37.285]So that's a challenge that we need to deal with.
- [00:03:39.692]And we're also very concerned about the loss
- [00:03:42.394]of critical wildlife in the state.
- [00:03:45.594]Grassland birds that have been on the decline for a century
- [00:03:49.750]and then more recently the loss of,
- [00:03:52.389]the declines in Monarch butterfly population, a species
- [00:03:56.612]the migratory population of which is an iconic part
- [00:04:00.173]of our biodiversity here in North America.
- [00:04:03.736]So while we are really excited about, you know,
- [00:04:08.749]this agricultural sector and everything
- [00:04:11.350]that it provides to our culture and our economy,
- [00:04:14.354]we recognize that there's some things about it
- [00:04:17.030]that we need to shore up and in the state of Iowa,
- [00:04:20.083]for the most part, the question we've gotten beyond the,
- [00:04:23.999]you know, should we try to balance to the question
- [00:04:27.083]of how do we try to balance these things?
- [00:04:30.170]And the research that I've done
- [00:04:32.284]at Iowa State is really centered on that whole question,
- [00:04:35.330]is how do we provide balance, how do we continue
- [00:04:37.349]to produce immense quantities of agricultural goods
- [00:04:41.758]but yet shore up some of the environmental impacts
- [00:04:45.709]in a way that also helps to sustain real livelihoods?
- [00:04:50.081]And a key hypothesis underlining my work
- [00:04:54.079]and certainly the work of the STRIPS team is shown here.
- [00:04:59.396]We call it the Strategic Integration
- [00:05:01.293]Disproportionate Benefits Hypothesis,
- [00:05:04.016]or simply Disproportionate Benefits Hypothesis for short.
- [00:05:08.009]And the idea is that we know
- [00:05:11.454]that agricultural landscapes that are based on annuals
- [00:05:15.844]produce a lot of agricultural goods
- [00:05:18.429]but when it comes to other environmental benefits,
- [00:05:23.501]they're challenged.
- [00:05:25.572]But, and on the contrast, we know
- [00:05:27.764]that perennial plants are great
- [00:05:30.347]at providing environmental benefits,
- [00:05:32.984]but they're simply, in most cases, not as productive
- [00:05:37.558]or not as easy to manage as some of those annual crops.
- [00:05:41.534]So the question is is, can we, you know, be really strategic
- [00:05:44.950]about integrating in perennial land uses
- [00:05:47.823]into our annually dominated landscapes
- [00:05:50.394]in ways where we can capture
- [00:05:52.200]these disproportionate benefits,
- [00:05:56.069]recognizing that the state as a whole is going
- [00:05:58.510]to be continued to be dominated by corn
- [00:06:01.185]and soybean for long to come.
- [00:06:03.407]However, can we be really smart about the kind of perennials
- [00:06:08.049]that we put in this landscape, where we put them
- [00:06:10.231]and how much we introduce to try to sort of achieve
- [00:06:14.483]this portion of the curve where we maximize the benefit
- [00:06:18.263]while maintaining still landscapes
- [00:06:21.189]that are largely in those annual,
- [00:06:24.375]dominated by those annual plants and the support
- [00:06:27.165]for this Disproportionate Benefits Hypothesis,
- [00:06:29.985]we reviewed literature form across the globe
- [00:06:32.557]and overall the idea is strongly supported
- [00:06:36.279]within ecological environmental literature.
- [00:06:40.502]So this kinda basic hypothesis is what was underlying
- [00:06:46.113]and that literature review is
- [00:06:48.128]what underlies the STRIPS experiment.
- [00:06:51.215]And the STRIPS experiment initially was conducted
- [00:06:54.265]on small watersheds at Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge
- [00:06:58.231]which is located just to east of Des Moines, Iowa.
- [00:07:02.128]It's a small-scale, well watershed scale,
- [00:07:05.994]but watersheds of two to eight acres in size
- [00:07:09.500]research location where we could highly control
- [00:07:13.123]both the integration of the perennial
- [00:07:16.114]as well as the management of the agricultural crops
- [00:07:19.386]around that perennial that we'd strategically integrated.
- [00:07:24.494]And in this case we've, in the overall research,
- [00:07:29.710]a portfolio we're looking at all sorts
- [00:07:32.456]of different perennials
- [00:07:33.945]and integrating them into the annual landscape.
- [00:07:36.007]In this particular experiment, the perennial
- [00:07:38.373]that we chose to focus on is reconstructed prairie
- [00:07:42.184]and there's several key reasons why
- [00:07:44.367]in this experiment we chose to focus on prairie.
- [00:07:47.918]Okay, let's see, alright come on.
- [00:07:54.401]Okay, there we go.
- [00:07:56.588]So why prairie?
- [00:07:57.956]And again there's support for this choice of prairie
- [00:08:01.101]within the literature.
- [00:08:03.813]So first of all is relating back to that hypothesis,
- [00:08:07.074]it's a perennial cover type, a perennial community,
- [00:08:11.647]meaning that, you know, it has, it's covering the land
- [00:08:15.017]throughout the entire year and there's plants
- [00:08:17.912]within that community that together are active
- [00:08:21.096]across almost all of the growing season
- [00:08:23.969]and certainly below ground there's continual activity
- [00:08:27.140]within that ecosystem.
- [00:08:29.769]Part of that activity is really fostered
- [00:08:33.311]by the deep roots associated with the perennial plants.
- [00:08:37.502]And here you see on the, on your right there,
- [00:08:42.212]a picture provided by the Land Institute
- [00:08:45.208]comparing Little Bluestem, a native perennial plant,
- [00:08:48.745]to new wheat, an annual plant, and you can see
- [00:08:51.973]from this picture, you know, while the above ground stature
- [00:08:55.348]of these two plants is quite similar,
- [00:08:57.366]the below ground structure is quite different.
- [00:09:01.740]The third reason is that unlike many perennial cover types
- [00:09:05.929]that are integrated into our current annual landscape,
- [00:09:08.633]plants like Smooth Groam.
- [00:09:11.330]Prairie plants have stiff upright stems that hold up
- [00:09:14.514]in a pounding rain and also hold up
- [00:09:16.840]when water is running across a landscape.
- [00:09:20.330]It doesn't just lie flat the way that Groam does.
- [00:09:23.456]Fourth, they're diverse.
- [00:09:25.914]Of course the native prairies in our region, you know,
- [00:09:29.161]200+ species in a prairie,
- [00:09:32.633]200+ species of plants in a patch.
- [00:09:36.695]In a reconstructed prairie we're not planting that many.
- [00:09:39.887]We're planting about 33 species
- [00:09:41.628]but certainly it's a lot more diverse
- [00:09:43.563]than the annual landscape that,
- [00:09:46.977]or the annual cover-type that we're replacing in this case.
- [00:09:49.905]So primarily dominated by just one species,
- [00:09:52.393]the corn or the soybean.
- [00:09:54.951]And fifth, they're native and so
- [00:09:56.951]because of that prairie plants are well adapted
- [00:09:59.833]to our mid-Western soils, they're adapted
- [00:10:02.898]to our Mid-Western climates,
- [00:10:04.584]and our native bioda are adapted to it.
- [00:10:08.901]The experimental treatments that we've integrated in
- [00:10:12.266]in this experiment look like this.
- [00:10:14.687]We looked at four different treatments
- [00:10:16.518]that are replicated three times, for a total
- [00:10:19.332]of 12 total catchments that we are looking at.
- [00:10:22.964]The first treatment was our baseline of 100% rowcrops,
- [00:10:28.525]shown here on the left.
- [00:10:31.782]The second one is a catchment that is dominated by rowcrops
- [00:10:38.009]and in this case it's 90% of that area is in rowcrop
- [00:10:42.339]and then we put just 10% of that catchment area
- [00:10:46.066]in prairie all at the base.
- [00:10:48.608]The third treatment over is another 90% rowcrop 10% prairie
- [00:10:53.889]but you can see the prairie is integrated in
- [00:10:55.875]in multiple strips along the contour
- [00:10:58.808]and finally, a 20% prairie 80% rowcrop treatment there
- [00:11:03.637]on the right, again, within multiple prairie strips.
- [00:11:07.729]The slopes in this experiment range from about six to 11%
- [00:11:12.378]so they're more steep, there's not flat land
- [00:11:16.801]and also the rowcrops are managed
- [00:11:19.200]using no-till soil management techniques,
- [00:11:23.178]so from a soil conservation perspective,
- [00:11:24.926]it's the best of the best.
- [00:11:28.855]We established this experiment in 2007.
- [00:11:31.614]As I mentioned,
- [00:11:33.421]we planted about 33 native perennial species,
- [00:11:37.301]at least that was in what was in the seed analysis
- [00:11:40.604]that we looked at and by 2011,
- [00:11:44.421]the summer of 2011, four years later,
- [00:11:46.923]we actually found 39 native perennials in our plant surveys
- [00:11:53.264]so either those species were already there
- [00:11:55.538]or they were in the seed mix
- [00:11:57.060]and we didn't account for them or they'd moved in
- [00:11:59.461]to our prairie strips and overall by 2007,
- [00:12:02.553]we achieved 115% cover in terms of the plants,
- [00:12:08.196]so with overlapping and canopy structure,
- [00:12:10.233]that's why it adds up to more than 100%.
- [00:12:14.164]So by 2011 we would say
- [00:12:16.230]that we effectively had established a reconstructed prairie
- [00:12:20.467]within the prairie strips on these sites.
- [00:12:24.333]As I mentioned the crops were managed.
- [00:12:26.505]It was a corn and soybean rotation managed
- [00:12:30.061]with no-till and the crops are managed by a local farmer
- [00:12:33.552]who rented land on other parts of the refuge as well
- [00:12:37.061]and he just did crop management the way
- [00:12:39.555]that he did also at his own farm.
- [00:12:44.475]A really cool thing that we were able to do
- [00:12:47.987]in this study is really in-depth scientific monitoring
- [00:12:51.504]and looking at what was happening in these watersheds
- [00:12:54.355]from multiple perspectives.
- [00:12:56.605]So what we're seeing here in this slide is up here
- [00:13:00.002]you'll see one of our experimental catchments.
- [00:13:02.802]It's 10% prairie strips treatment,
- [00:13:06.099]so of this catchment area, 90% is in crops
- [00:13:10.482]and 10% in prairie with these multiple contour strips
- [00:13:15.281]as well as a larger patch of prairie
- [00:13:17.465]in the footslope position and down here you see our
- [00:13:20.012]hydrological monitoring devices.
- [00:13:22.535]Here's a closer picture of the H-Flume
- [00:13:25.195]in addition to being able to measure all of the runoff
- [00:13:28.360]as well as some of the chemical constituents associated
- [00:13:31.737]with that runoff, we are also able
- [00:13:33.747]to look at groundwater soil moisture within these catchments
- [00:13:38.515]and we monitored for plant biodiversity, bird biodiversity,
- [00:13:41.579]and insect biodiversity as well.
- [00:13:44.710]Also, some soil chemistry and structure measures.
- [00:13:49.567]As I mentioned, we've been at this awhile
- [00:13:52.138]and we've been lucky to have a really productive team
- [00:13:55.156]and have overall produced 56 scientific publications,
- [00:13:59.493]including about, I don't know, 35 or so
- [00:14:02.181]that have been reviewed in the peer review,
- [00:14:04.499]have been published in the peer review literature.
- [00:14:07.186]I point this out, in this case,
- [00:14:08.958]because I'm gonna keep my summary of these research results
- [00:14:13.274]pretty high level and you'll see
- [00:14:15.773]that I'm citing the publications
- [00:14:17.938]that I'm drawing the overall conclusions from
- [00:14:20.168]down here at the bottom, so if you want more information
- [00:14:23.495]on the detailed data, you can refer
- [00:14:25.951]to those already published research articles to find that.
- [00:14:31.132]Certainly, our soil and water measurements
- [00:14:35.679]have probably been the ones
- [00:14:38.405]that have garnered the most attention from this experiment
- [00:14:42.429]and these three pictures kind of summarize many
- [00:14:46.958]of our results in a very visual way,
- [00:14:51.365]although we've got quantitative data spanning,
- [00:14:55.098]you know, almost a decade now that backs up these pictures.
- [00:15:00.326]These pictures were taken in 2008
- [00:15:02.543]after a four inch rainstorm in June
- [00:15:07.411]and what you can see is here in the leftmost picture,
- [00:15:12.898]that watersheds that are managed with no-till,
- [00:15:17.464]that's the best soil conservation,
- [00:15:20.003]are still losing a lot of soil from these areas.
- [00:15:26.279]There's a lot of movement of the soil and in this case
- [00:15:29.869]we're losing about 4.5 tons per acre per year on average.
- [00:15:35.994]What we found is that if you put a little bit of prairie in
- [00:15:39.176]and in this case in the middle,
- [00:15:42.019]you see a 10% prairie at the base treatment,
- [00:15:45.461]we can reduce the amount of soil
- [00:15:48.378]that we see leaving these catchments by 95%,
- [00:15:52.382]so it's about .2, .3 tons per acre per year.
- [00:15:56.905]Not that we're not losing any soil,
- [00:15:58.554]we just reduce the amount of soil that we lose by 95%.
- [00:16:03.044]And another area of the Refuge that has an H-Flume
- [00:16:06.407]that was part of a companion study
- [00:16:09.005]we can see here that watersheds that are entirely in prairie
- [00:16:12.507]don't lose soil, so that's another baseline.
- [00:16:18.066]Also comparing this 100% crops to the 90% crops 10% prairie
- [00:16:26.233]in addition to the soil measures, there's a lot
- [00:16:29.436]of nutrients that are also moving
- [00:16:31.185]with that water and the soil.
- [00:16:34.317]So phosphorous tends to move with soil.
- [00:16:36.308]We keep 90% more of that valuable nutrient phosphorous
- [00:16:39.858]in the field when we put the 10% prairie on there.
- [00:16:43.170]We keep 84% more of that nitrogen
- [00:16:45.642]that otherwise would be lost through surface water runoff
- [00:16:49.067]in that watershed and overall we reduce the amount
- [00:16:52.365]of surface water runoff by 42%
- [00:16:55.223]when we have that 10% prairie solution.
- [00:16:58.112]So numerous, you know, positive measures
- [00:17:00.947]with regards to water measures.
- [00:17:04.271]We also looked at groundwater as I mentioned before.
- [00:17:08.370]The sites that we're looking at here are not
- [00:17:10.467]effectively tiled.
- [00:17:12.306]They're some old broken tile on the site from way back when
- [00:17:15.240]but effectively not drained by tile anymore.
- [00:17:18.366]What we see is that by the time you move
- [00:17:21.262]to that footslope position
- [00:17:22.938]if you've got a prairie strip there,
- [00:17:25.466]we reduce the amount of nitrate nitrogen leaving
- [00:17:29.591]through the groundwater sources by about 70%
- [00:17:34.038]and we have some of our initial results on this published
- [00:17:38.065]in a paper in 2010 where we were surprised
- [00:17:42.667]by how quickly the groundwater responded
- [00:17:45.468]but we haven't yet published some of the longer term results
- [00:17:49.060]and so here you can see in the graphic
- [00:17:51.282]that there's very little, there's no separation among any
- [00:17:55.411]of the treatments that have a little bit of prairie
- [00:17:58.139]but if it's all in rowcrop there's a strong,
- [00:18:01.984]there's much higher levels of nitrate nitrogen in,
- [00:18:06.327]moving with that groundwater and of course
- [00:18:09.755]the EPA limit for drinking water is 10 milligrams per liter,
- [00:18:14.435]so in that all rowcrop watershed we're getting
- [00:18:17.854]up there over time in terms of getting close
- [00:18:21.404]to that particular threshold.
- [00:18:25.033]As I mentioned we also looked at soil.
- [00:18:26.966]Another thing that we were really surprised to see is
- [00:18:29.820]that we improved the quality of soils
- [00:18:32.983]within the footslope position, so right here in front
- [00:18:35.968]of the flume within just three years.
- [00:18:39.261]Usually it takes a really long time
- [00:18:41.586]to measure changes in soil.
- [00:18:43.521]In terms of quality that means,
- [00:18:45.340]what we're talking about there is
- [00:18:47.942]an increase in total nitrogen by 100%
- [00:18:51.386]and in increase in soil organic carbon by 37%.
- [00:18:56.323]If any of you work on soil carbon you know
- [00:18:58.915]it takes a long time to build soil carbon.
- [00:19:01.312]They way that we're accounting for this is that,
- [00:19:03.671]of course, soil is moving from the upper portion
- [00:19:07.345]of the watershed and we're just capturing it,
- [00:19:10.160]primarily we're just capturing that carbon
- [00:19:12.224]in that prairie strip at the base as well
- [00:19:14.941]as capturing those nutrients at the base
- [00:19:16.996]within the prairie strip.
- [00:19:19.635]Another important feature of the prairie strip is
- [00:19:22.515]that with all that biological activity in that position,
- [00:19:26.222]we're able to, you know, I said we're losing less nitrogen,
- [00:19:30.296]both through surface water and groundwater.
- [00:19:32.536]What's happening to that nitrogen?
- [00:19:34.820]We know from work done by Mike Castellano and Javed Iqbal
- [00:19:40.591]that that nitrogen is being completely converted
- [00:19:44.059]to di-nitrogen gas, an inert gas,
- [00:19:47.849]and it's not being emitted as nitrous oxide,
- [00:19:50.814]which is a potent greenhouse gas.
- [00:19:53.838]This was important because we didn't want
- [00:19:55.856]to trade a water quality problem for an air quality problem
- [00:19:58.807]and we found out that that's not the case.
- [00:20:02.742]In terms of some of the biological measures,
- [00:20:05.126]I mentioned overall we're able to establish
- [00:20:07.525]that prairie strips within a few years,
- [00:20:10.812]if you build a habitat the organisms will come.
- [00:20:15.597]We've seen a 2.6 times increase in insect species richness
- [00:20:21.197]and we see both more natural enemy insects,
- [00:20:24.836]so insects that eat crop pests,
- [00:20:27.548]as well as improvements in pollinators.
- [00:20:30.603]And it's about doubling in the number of species
- [00:20:34.494]of natural enemies that we're able to provide habitat for
- [00:20:38.463]and a over a tripling in the native pollinators
- [00:20:42.368]that we're able to support and the pollinator difference
- [00:20:45.799]is both in richness as well as abundance.
- [00:20:50.086]If you provide the structure and you provide the food source
- [00:20:52.639]the birds will also come.
- [00:20:54.203](laughing) Moving up the food chain.
- [00:20:56.557]We've seen a two times level increase
- [00:21:00.225]in bird species richness and abundance of birds
- [00:21:04.255]and exciting is that some of the species
- [00:21:08.321]of greatest conservation need in the state of Iowa,
- [00:21:11.744]species like the the Dickcissle and Common Yellow-throats
- [00:21:14.547]are also responding to that habitat.
- [00:21:18.006]If we look at grassland birds as a whole guild, however,
- [00:21:22.822]we're not seeing an increase in grassland bird numbers.
- [00:21:26.390]Basically the habitat we're providing just isn't big enough
- [00:21:29.700]for things like well, pheasants are included in that guild,
- [00:21:36.551]as well as things like Upland Sandpiper,
- [00:21:41.047]but we're not seeing Bobolinks,
- [00:21:43.015]we're not seeing those, we're not providing habitats
- [00:21:45.437]for those with our prairie strips.
- [00:21:47.489]But still, overall, we are able to provide habitat
- [00:21:49.921]for at least a certain segment of our bird population.
- [00:21:54.274]Importantly to the farmers that we work with
- [00:21:57.623]we've also documented that there's no interaction
- [00:22:01.081]between the prairie strip and the adjacent crop land
- [00:22:04.068]that's affecting yield in a negative way.
- [00:22:07.325]Basically the prairie strip stays in the prairie strip
- [00:22:11.456]and isn't drawing nutrients or water away from that crop.
- [00:22:15.848]We've shown that we don't introduce additional weed pressure
- [00:22:19.344]into the agricultural areas of that catchment
- [00:22:21.658]as a result of establishing that prairie.
- [00:22:24.445]We don't wanna be creating weed problems for farmers.
- [00:22:28.342]We've also harvested the prairie biomass from these sites
- [00:22:32.715]using just, you know, typical haying equipment
- [00:22:36.250]and on average, the prairie strips establish,
- [00:22:39.434]or have been growing about 3.1 tons per acre
- [00:22:43.833]of prairie grasses and informs that
- [00:22:47.541]if there were a bioenergy market to develop
- [00:22:51.861]around diversified plant feed stocks,
- [00:22:54.885]this would not be too shabby of a yield,
- [00:22:57.673]especially when the primary motive is oftentimes,
- [00:23:00.835]for farmers to put these on their land,
- [00:23:02.916]is for soil and water conservation.
- [00:23:05.705]And we've looked at the economics as well and we've shown
- [00:23:09.258]that prairie strips are an affordable option.
- [00:23:11.721]They cost about 29 cents a linear foot
- [00:23:15.552]and another comparable practice that's commonly put
- [00:23:17.986]on farm field in Iowa to conserve soil are terraces.
- [00:23:22.721]By comparison terraces cost almost $4 per linear foot,
- [00:23:27.455]so an order of magnitude less.
- [00:23:30.295]And we can bring that cost per treated acre,
- [00:23:34.137]if we think about treating all of the farmland's
- [00:23:37.129]with prairie strips, down to $3 per acre
- [00:23:39.979]if the landed prairie strip is able to enrolled
- [00:23:42.614]in the USDA's Conservation Reserve Program.
- [00:23:49.194]This is a graphic, I don't expect you to be able
- [00:23:52.699]to interpret all by yourself in this small format
- [00:23:56.335]but I do want to point out that one of the things
- [00:23:58.711]that we're working on right now is an integrated analysis
- [00:24:01.854]across all of those measures.
- [00:24:03.650]What I've showed you have been published
- [00:24:05.931]in separate disciplinary papers,
- [00:24:07.992]so now we're looking at analysis that allows us
- [00:24:10.262]to compare hydrological measures with biodiversity measures
- [00:24:14.168]with soil measures, for example.
- [00:24:16.837]And a really key thing that I want to point out here
- [00:24:20.409]is we've looked at three different contrasts,
- [00:24:23.126]prairie versus no prairie, 10% prairie versus 20% prairie
- [00:24:27.913]and that's strips at the bottom
- [00:24:29.754]versus multiple contour strips
- [00:24:31.674]and there's almost no difference in any measure
- [00:24:35.501]among strips 10 to 20% or 10% and then strips
- [00:24:41.872]in multiple strips versus all at the bottom,
- [00:24:44.843]but there's dramatic differences
- [00:24:46.509]when you just put a little bit of prairie in.
- [00:24:49.488]And to summarize this in a way
- [00:24:51.755]that you can see a little bit better.
- [00:24:54.093]So this is the measured impact of 10 to 20%,
- [00:24:58.007]those combined versus that 100% no-till,
- [00:25:01.277]and the largest magnitude of the response as I pointed out
- [00:25:06.689]in the picture slide has been in the area of soil retention.
- [00:25:10.759]So we're able to keep 95% more soil,
- [00:25:13.599]or 20 times more soil with just a little bit of prairie
- [00:25:16.605]integrating in strategically a little bit
- [00:25:19.027]of prairie in these watersheds.
- [00:25:21.227]We establish a little over 13 times more native perennials
- [00:25:30.369]in those areas and the native perennials
- [00:25:33.937]then are associated with retaining that soil
- [00:25:37.038]as well as improvement in several water quality measures
- [00:25:41.814]and here you see the response of the water quality measures.
- [00:25:46.691]We also see improvements in insect and bird taxa
- [00:25:51.961]while and the 0 here.
- [00:25:55.876]See if you, this line corresponds to the number one
- [00:25:59.500]which would correspond to no difference among the treatments
- [00:26:03.625]and we can see that we have no difference
- [00:26:06.255]in the number of weeds in the crop field
- [00:26:08.283]as well as per acre cropland yield.
- [00:26:11.752]The only measure that decreases slightly is that
- [00:26:15.070]at that whole catchment scale we do see a reduction
- [00:26:20.932]in yield because remember we're taking 10 to 20%
- [00:26:23.608]of that area out of corn and soybeans,
- [00:26:27.094]and putting it into the prairie strip,
- [00:26:29.163]so you're trading off, basically.
- [00:26:31.239]When you're integrate prairie strips
- [00:26:33.118]you're trading off this little slice for all of this.
- [00:26:40.829]If this seems to make sense to you
- [00:26:43.564]in terms of a conservation practice,
- [00:26:46.145]you're not the only one.
- [00:26:47.667]Our initial results started to get out there
- [00:26:51.222]within the agricultural population in Iowa
- [00:26:55.459]and we started to have farmers come forward and say,
- [00:26:58.765]"Hmm, I want to try this on my farm.
- [00:27:01.498]"I think it makes sense for my farm.
- [00:27:03.818]"Can you help us with that?"
- [00:27:06.130]Well as a person that understands how to make measurements
- [00:27:09.449]and analyze data, there was a big jump in learning curves
- [00:27:14.787]between actually implementing a highly controlled experiment
- [00:27:18.118]and thinking about how you would integrate a practice
- [00:27:20.803]on a commercial farm field and that's what we've been
- [00:27:24.473]trying to overcome in the last few years of the experiment.
- [00:27:28.859]2012 was our first chance to help a farmer
- [00:27:32.118]put prairie strips on his field down in southwest Iowa
- [00:27:38.628]and over the last few years, we've added, oh, sorry.
- [00:27:45.344]We've added 29 more.
- [00:27:48.635]We've also found that some farmers had already independently
- [00:27:52.016]come up with this idea and now we're working
- [00:27:54.649]with those farmers as well to try to understand
- [00:27:57.872]what the benefit is of that prairie strip
- [00:28:01.236]on their commercial farm field.
- [00:28:03.481]The red star in the middle is our initial research site.
- [00:28:06.198]That's where the Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge is.
- [00:28:08.799]The disparate stars across the state of Iowa,
- [00:28:12.023]moving into Wisconsin and into Missouri are now all
- [00:28:15.942]of the locations that we're working on today.
- [00:28:18.883]So within a very short period of time,
- [00:28:20.795]we've seen a substantial scale up in the number
- [00:28:25.054]of places where we're working and the number of people
- [00:28:28.815]that are interested in implementing prairie strips
- [00:28:31.477]on their own land.
- [00:28:33.280]Some of them, like Mr. and Mrs. Stone shown here,
- [00:28:35.918]have actually garnered the attention of their community
- [00:28:39.503]and for example, they're now the, considered,
- [00:28:42.216]they were just awarded the
- [00:28:44.411]Conservation Leader for 2016 Award
- [00:28:47.703]for putting prairie strips on their land in Tama County.
- [00:28:51.166]So it's really fun to see some of these people now
- [00:28:53.551]getting recognition for themselves and their own farm
- [00:28:56.600]as a result of picking up the practice
- [00:28:59.392]and integrating it in on their own farm.
- [00:29:03.497]So why are these people doing this?
- [00:29:07.347](laughing)
- [00:29:08.988]Do their neighbors think they're crazy?
- [00:29:10.720]Probably, but from their standpoint it makes sense
- [00:29:14.595]and here's where we've conducted ad hoc interviews
- [00:29:18.172]or some surveys with our farmers.
- [00:29:21.389]These are the reasons why they say
- [00:29:23.490]they are adapting prairie strips for their land.
- [00:29:26.746]First of all, and this is probably the best compliment
- [00:29:29.426]you could ever get from a farmer, is they see it
- [00:29:31.646]as a practical option for their farm.
- [00:29:35.338]It's something that makes sense to them.
- [00:29:38.154]Why does it make sense?
- [00:29:39.359]Well, one of the concerns about some
- [00:29:41.832]other conservation practices, such as cover crops,
- [00:29:44.687]is that they interfere potentially with spring management
- [00:29:49.389]and if you, as one of our farmers put it,
- [00:29:51.718]Gary, he says, you know,
- [00:29:53.282]"If you farm, you do not want to lose your soil,"
- [00:29:55.793]and certainly for almost all the farmers and landowners
- [00:29:58.040]that we worked with, that's a primary motivation.
- [00:30:00.590]They don't want to lose their soil.
- [00:30:02.235]So cover crops is another great option
- [00:30:04.018]for keeping your soil however there's a concern
- [00:30:06.180]in terms of interference with spring management
- [00:30:10.314]of their cash crop, the corn and the soybean.
- [00:30:13.456]Also, some of these people already have terraces
- [00:30:16.651]on their land and they know it's not quite doing the job,
- [00:30:20.375]so why not put on more terraces?
- [00:30:23.250]So one of the challenges with terraces is
- [00:30:25.866]that it has an infrastructural practice.
- [00:30:29.193]If you change your equipment size,
- [00:30:31.340]it can be very challenging to farm around those terraces.
- [00:30:35.055]You can't move the terrace as you change equipment size.
- [00:30:38.392]So they like the idea of prairie strips
- [00:30:40.325]as a vegetative practice
- [00:30:42.263]in that it gives them more options for the future
- [00:30:45.674]and we can design them such that they minimize conflict
- [00:30:49.981]with their existing tractor movement.
- [00:30:52.589]And then finally they talk about other goals for their farm
- [00:30:55.595]in addition to the soil conservation.
- [00:30:58.269]For example, one of our farmers is also a sailor.
- [00:31:00.971]He sails on the Gulf of Mexico.
- [00:31:02.561]He doesn't want to go down to the Gulf of Mexico,
- [00:31:04.506]or he wants to go down to the Gulf of Mexico and say,
- [00:31:07.651]"I'm not your problem, I'm your solution."
- [00:31:10.503]Other farmers talk about wanting
- [00:31:12.265]to introduce more wildness to their farm.
- [00:31:14.373]Some of the folks are really interested
- [00:31:16.242]in maintaining our native pollinators.
- [00:31:18.558]So there's a whole host of reasons.
- [00:31:20.485]They all make sense to them for their farms.
- [00:31:22.926]And certainly we've started
- [00:31:24.710]to gain traction at the state level as well.
- [00:31:28.661]Bills introduced, for example, to the Iowa House
- [00:31:32.144]that would help pay for putting prairie strips on land.
- [00:31:35.465]And the reason why is that,
- [00:31:37.366]this is some of our survey data from all of Iowa.
- [00:31:40.868]What you see is that these are Iowans' priorities
- [00:31:45.305]for agricultural policies and programs
- [00:31:48.103]and prairie strips can address many of them.
- [00:31:50.384]So for example the water quality,
- [00:31:53.046]which shows up in many different ways
- [00:31:56.427]in our survey responses.
- [00:31:58.491]By increasing infiltration, potential
- [00:32:01.334]to reduce flood control, providing habitat for wildlife,
- [00:32:05.537]and then greenhouse gas emissions
- [00:32:08.303]as well as non-game wildlife habitat.
- [00:32:11.349]So it fits priorities that Iowans hold
- [00:32:13.895]for the state in addition to farmers for their farms.
- [00:32:20.483]So as I mentioned at least in some conversations
- [00:32:23.062]that we've kind of expanded beyond the Refuge
- [00:32:26.171]in terms of what we're doing in research.
- [00:32:28.212]We're now in what we call the Phase II Research
- [00:32:30.757]and Demonstration phase of the project
- [00:32:33.045]and basically we think that, you know,
- [00:32:35.666]with that 10 to 20% prairie strips,
- [00:32:38.670]that we've kind of figured out
- [00:32:40.583]where the shoulder is on this curve.
- [00:32:42.973]But how well does that hold up in different locations,
- [00:32:45.795]on different soil types, on different slopes,
- [00:32:49.149]in different landscape contexts,
- [00:32:51.081]which is important from a wildlife perspective?
- [00:32:53.208]So in Phase II now that we're working on commercial farms
- [00:32:56.682]rather than in small experimental catchments
- [00:33:00.173]on a wildlife refuge, we're really trying
- [00:33:02.947]to figure out where the air bars are in this graphic
- [00:33:06.530]and right around here at
- [00:33:08.245]that 10 to 20% prairie strip treatment.
- [00:33:11.181]And here are some of the things
- [00:33:13.088]that we're hoping we can address in the Phase II experiment.
- [00:33:17.394]Some of these are based on questions that we've received
- [00:33:20.319]from farmers and farmland owners.
- [00:33:23.911]Others are questions that come up from policymakers
- [00:33:26.522]or just from questions in audiences such as yourself.
- [00:33:31.861]What does this look like when we move it
- [00:33:35.071]out into the commercial farm environment?
- [00:33:37.166]Here's one example from Wright County,
- [00:33:40.353]which has some of the highest land values in all of Iowa.
- [00:33:46.696]It's up in north-central Iowa on the Des Moines lobe.
- [00:33:50.328]It's some of the best of the best soil.
- [00:33:52.931]In Wright County the land is flat to undulating
- [00:33:56.769]and in this case, working with the landowner,
- [00:34:01.760]he already had this area along the stream
- [00:34:05.863]that was in groam and was really interested
- [00:34:10.379]in just slowing down the water
- [00:34:12.585]that was moving across this hill slope.
- [00:34:14.716]So we integrated in two prairie strips on his farm.
- [00:34:17.765]This one is a little bit odd shaped
- [00:34:20.488]and the idea behind that one was actually
- [00:34:22.968]to improve the movement of his tractor in this field
- [00:34:27.321]and his interest was, in addition to slowing down the water,
- [00:34:31.999]improving water quality, he wanted to connect this area
- [00:34:35.315]of his farm up here, which has never been tilled,
- [00:34:39.058]with an area in the Conservation Reserve Program down here.
- [00:34:42.884]So he was looking at his prairie strip in terms
- [00:34:44.869]of a corridor for wildlife from this area to this area.
- [00:34:50.595]Not all land is flat
- [00:34:53.849]to sloping however. (laughing)
- [00:34:57.361]This is the Tama County farm, which is heavily sloped
- [00:35:00.816]and in this case the prairie strips are integrated
- [00:35:05.292]in this way in terms of very regular contour buffer strips
- [00:35:12.047]and we needed to design them this way
- [00:35:15.497]so that this land would qualify
- [00:35:17.766]for the Conservation Reserve Program.
- [00:35:20.643]So the prairie strips can look very different
- [00:35:23.009]depending on the farm that we're working on.
- [00:35:29.961]Another thing that we've had to adapt a little bit is
- [00:35:33.330]when we're working on the refuge we use the same seed mix
- [00:35:36.176]throughout our 12, well our nine catchments
- [00:35:39.840]that we put the prairie strips on,
- [00:35:41.996]that 33 species mix.
- [00:35:43.562]Now that we're working in very different parts of the state,
- [00:35:46.975]the seed mix is now variable, partly based
- [00:35:50.369]on seed availability in different areas,
- [00:35:52.623]but also because the way that we pay
- [00:35:55.226]to put these prairie strips on
- [00:35:57.229]and the farm level goals are different.
- [00:35:59.303]In some cases, people are really just interested
- [00:36:01.273]in that soil conservation benefit.
- [00:36:03.255]They can probably achieve that with fairly low diversity,
- [00:36:06.733]in one case a 15 species prairie mix.
- [00:36:11.214]In other cases the farmer or farmland owners
- [00:36:14.347]really interested in the biodiversity conservation aspects,
- [00:36:17.944]in addition to the soil conservation aspects.
- [00:36:22.358]And in some cases we have seed mixes
- [00:36:24.505]that have been planted on the order of 85 species.
- [00:36:28.941]So quite a difference in the range
- [00:36:31.068]of seed mixes being planted, so less control
- [00:36:34.865]in terms of our research component when you move out there.
- [00:36:38.866]There's another logistical factor in that
- [00:36:41.634]trying to conduct research across such a wide variety
- [00:36:45.566]of sites is expensive, just from a travel standpoint
- [00:36:48.860]as well as some farms just lend themselves better
- [00:36:52.095]to the kinds of measurements we want to make than others.
- [00:36:55.789]So we kind of divided up the farms that we're working on
- [00:36:58.800]in terms of places where we're doing very basic monitoring
- [00:37:02.686]and I'll talk about what that looks like in a minute here,
- [00:37:04.620]and then places where we're doing in-depth research.
- [00:37:07.403]And with the in-depth research we're trying to get
- [00:37:10.105]at most of the same measures that we were able
- [00:37:12.979]to capture in our initial experiment
- [00:37:15.895]at that Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge.
- [00:37:20.028]And here are the environmental benefits
- [00:37:22.322]that we're trying to measure on these farms.
- [00:37:24.953]As I mentioned on some we're able to collect them
- [00:37:29.116]on more sites than others.
- [00:37:33.436]So for example the bulb measures are being collected
- [00:37:36.587]on 12 different farms whereas six paired sites
- [00:37:40.292]in which we can address the soil and water,
- [00:37:43.208]especially the water quality measures
- [00:37:48.791]where we can actually implement the flumes.
- [00:37:50.718]And here's what one of our sites looks like
- [00:37:53.889]where we have a comparison,
- [00:37:56.183]where we have a control field that's just being farmed
- [00:37:59.661]they way this farmer always farmed this field,
- [00:38:03.227]and then in this case we have our treatment field.
- [00:38:06.154]The difference between the control and the treatment is
- [00:38:08.393]that the treatment field has the prairie strips.
- [00:38:12.009]Here you can see two there and then one up in this location
- [00:38:16.068]and then some of the monitoring devices
- [00:38:19.641]that we have implemented out here
- [00:38:21.767]to try to capture what the impact is.
- [00:38:25.341]Just about everybody wants a flume on their property,
- [00:38:29.183]which ideally it would be great to do that
- [00:38:32.365]but these cost $10,000 apiece,
- [00:38:35.395]so (laughing)
- [00:38:37.236]altogether and then it takes a technician
- [00:38:40.525]to go out and service these
- [00:38:42.856]at various intervals and analyze the data.
- [00:38:46.007]We're not able to do that.
- [00:38:47.893]We're lucky that we're able to implement the flumes
- [00:38:50.860]using the control comparison, so control treatment
- [00:38:56.801]without prairie strips on at six different locations,
- [00:39:00.827]so we can get good hydrological measures.
- [00:39:03.340]One thing we can use those flumes though
- [00:39:05.325]for is to help us calibrate a much cheaper method
- [00:39:10.371]of looking at soil erosion.
- [00:39:12.781]So these are erosion pads.
- [00:39:14.989]They cost, you know, maybe $4 apiece.
- [00:39:17.928]You put a raze of these erosion pads out
- [00:39:21.077]across a farm field and you collect them.
- [00:39:23.708]They've collected soil that's run across the surface
- [00:39:26.717]of the land with water and we can use those H-Flumes
- [00:39:31.228]to, like I said, calibrate how much soil
- [00:39:33.743]is associated with, how much soil loss is associated
- [00:39:37.794]with how much soil these actual erosion pads capture.
- [00:39:41.849]A goal that we have is to at least provide every single
- [00:39:45.587]farmer or farmland owner some measure of the reduction
- [00:39:49.888]in soil erosion associated with the prairie strips,
- [00:39:52.599]because, like I said, that's the primary motivation
- [00:39:54.908]for folks to put these on.
- [00:39:58.628]We're able to do bird point counts on a variety
- [00:40:02.309]of, I think we're working, I should know this exactly,
- [00:40:06.415]but it should be 12 different farms,
- [00:40:08.480]but we're also now able to compare prairie strips
- [00:40:11.184]to a variety of conservation practices.
- [00:40:13.151]So for example, what's the lift that you get
- [00:40:17.963]from a prairie strip as opposed to a contour buffer strip
- [00:40:21.222]made out of groam, and how much do you get
- [00:40:23.947]from a prairie strip as opposed to a larger block
- [00:40:26.324]of CRP that's located close to this farm?
- [00:40:29.873]And here are some of our results
- [00:40:31.688]from this last field season and you can see,
- [00:40:36.391]this is just the number of observations,
- [00:40:38.921]not by treatment at this case, but a lot
- [00:40:41.655]of the birds that we initially saw in our catchment
- [00:40:44.737]base experiment are again showing up
- [00:40:46.861]in this more field level,
- [00:40:48.872]commercial farm field level application of prairie strips.
- [00:40:53.947]Because we're not able to get to everywhere early
- [00:40:56.671]in the morning and most people want some kind
- [00:41:00.629]of measure of the biodiversity using the strips,
- [00:41:03.342]we are now using these automated recording units to try
- [00:41:06.320]to at least give them some sense
- [00:41:08.407]of the presence of certain species
- [00:41:11.383]and from these automated recording units we're able
- [00:41:14.990]to look at, through sound, what birds are using these farms
- [00:41:21.238]and get a sense of the seasonality of use
- [00:41:24.902]and Larkin, do you recognize this song?
- [00:41:29.255](laughing)
- [00:41:32.615]Does anybody? (laughing)
- [00:41:35.621]This one's an Upland Sandpiper song
- [00:41:38.860]that you'd see in this picture here.
- [00:41:42.794]We're also using some other cool technology
- [00:41:45.714]to try to increase the number of nests that we find.
- [00:41:49.231]One of the criticisms of our Phase I research is
- [00:41:53.320]that we couldn't get at the fecundity of the birds,
- [00:41:56.566]the experimental catchments were just too small.
- [00:41:59.227]We couldn't get enough nests to get any kind
- [00:42:02.359]of reliable measure of the survival of bird nests.
- [00:42:07.052]We were able to do this in Phase II.
- [00:42:09.164]We're using some technology, such as infrared thermal imager
- [00:42:15.019]to try to increase the number of nests
- [00:42:17.631]that we find in this environment.
- [00:42:19.956]Here you see our two technicians with a little sparrow nest
- [00:42:23.670]right there as well as using iButtons
- [00:42:26.333]so that we don't have to visit these nests
- [00:42:30.372]as often as one normally does
- [00:42:32.828]by calibrating that iButton technology.
- [00:42:35.852]Here's an example of using iButton data
- [00:42:38.040]from a Vesper Sparrow nest.
- [00:42:40.818]Here the nest was discovered on somewhere around,
- [00:42:46.859]looks like the 13th of May last year.
- [00:42:51.699]We can capture different phases.
- [00:42:54.270]Each one of these black lines represent visiting the nest.
- [00:42:58.395]We know something about what happened to that nest
- [00:43:01.366]base on those people observing it.
- [00:43:04.412]And then on the 6th of June last year,
- [00:43:09.929]that nest was run over by a sprayer
- [00:43:12.358]before we had visited it.
- [00:43:14.680]Had it not been for the iButton
- [00:43:16.364]we would have chocked that nest up as a failed nest,
- [00:43:19.449]but based on these data, we knew that, you know,
- [00:43:23.690]that nest was empty prior to that next visit.
- [00:43:27.147]So hopefully we can improve the precision
- [00:43:29.702]of some of our statistical models
- [00:43:31.862]by using some of this iButton technology.
- [00:43:35.017]Another thing we're looking at is also trying
- [00:43:37.776]to understand some of the socioeconomic benefits
- [00:43:40.938]of putting in small proportions
- [00:43:43.670]of perennials in the landscape
- [00:43:45.410]in addition to the environmental benefits.
- [00:43:47.923]And one of the ways that we're looking at this is
- [00:43:51.074]that not all farmland is created equal.
- [00:43:54.657]And what these graphics show is profitability
- [00:43:58.167]of Iowa farmland across four different years here.
- [00:44:03.646]We can see the high crop prices in 2010,
- [00:44:06.662]11 it was profitable farm just about anywhere in Iowa
- [00:44:10.859]during those years, but starting in 2012, drought year,
- [00:44:15.314]and then 2013, some areas were less profitable than others
- [00:44:19.484]and then by 2015, with a downturn in prices,
- [00:44:24.628]most areas were not profitable to farm
- [00:44:28.653]without some kind of help from insurance.
- [00:44:33.012]The cool thing about this is,
- [00:44:35.959]that cycle is already well known,
- [00:44:38.027]but with these precision data we can scale down
- [00:44:40.314]to specific areas of farms
- [00:44:42.141]to see which areas have been consistently unprofitable
- [00:44:45.858]to farm and look at the potential to integrate perennials
- [00:44:49.213]in those locations where we know
- [00:44:51.362]farmers are consistently losing money.
- [00:44:54.127]Therefore, overall, trying to shore up farm level economics.
- [00:45:00.434]And here are some of my take home points.
- [00:45:03.228]So, when we look at the STRIPS Program, what are we doing?
- [00:45:06.926]What we're trying to do is hypothesis driven
- [00:45:09.693]experimental research and develop systems-level
- [00:45:13.627]understanding for the prairie strips practice,
- [00:45:16.855]instead of, you know, most studies just looking
- [00:45:19.232]at one measure or one disciplinary perspective,
- [00:45:22.089]just water or just birds, we're seeking to integrate
- [00:45:25.043]across all of these measures
- [00:45:27.469]to get a more holistic understanding
- [00:45:29.627]of the performance of this practice.
- [00:45:31.933]We're working with farmers,
- [00:45:34.278]we're working with other stakeholder groups
- [00:45:37.188]and trying to address problems that they have brought
- [00:45:41.076]forward for their farms or their groups.
- [00:45:44.513]We're trying to address some of the soil erosion,
- [00:45:46.714]the water quality problems,
- [00:45:48.051]the biodiversity loss issues in the state.
- [00:45:51.746]In terms of our initial hypothesis,
- [00:45:54.310]our initial experiment suggests that yes,
- [00:45:57.794]you do get disproportionate benefits
- [00:46:00.398]when you integrate little bits of perennials in
- [00:46:03.376]to those catchment areas and in Phase II we want to see
- [00:46:06.808]if that holds up now that we're working
- [00:46:09.119]at the commercial farm level.
- [00:46:11.090]And we still have a lot of research to do.
- [00:46:13.214]We've only been at the commercial farm level research
- [00:46:16.369]for about two years now, so if this interests you at all,
- [00:46:19.562]I encourage you to stay tuned.
- [00:46:21.636]There's a lot more great science to come.
- [00:46:25.121]And with that, again, I'll point out our funders
- [00:46:27.123]and point you to some places
- [00:46:28.757]where you can get more information or download some
- [00:46:33.129]of the publications associated with the project.
- [00:46:36.460]Thanks.
- [00:46:37.799]Questions?
- [00:46:38.776](audience applauding)
- [00:46:45.357]And so does anybody have
- [00:46:46.872]questions they would like to ask with the microphone?
- [00:46:53.367]Yeah, it's interesting.
- [00:46:54.681]I was curious to know if, down the road,
- [00:46:57.442]if what the, you're looking at these watersheds
- [00:47:00.520]but I'm thinking of even bigger watersheds
- [00:47:02.970]and the water quality.
- [00:47:05.152]Down the road are you thinking something like that,
- [00:47:08.483]'cause I know there were some issues in Iowa
- [00:47:10.507]regarding flooding and even some lawsuits developed
- [00:47:14.247]from that and I'm wondering if this isn't some way
- [00:47:18.428]of finding a solution to
- [00:47:21.049]that flooding issue that's occurring.
- [00:47:23.977]So is there thoughts about moving that
- [00:47:27.130]to a bigger watershed scale even?
- [00:47:30.428]Yeah, so moving it up from just the field scale
- [00:47:34.122]to the watershed scale and certainly we show to reduction
- [00:47:38.942]in the amount of runoff with the prairie strips
- [00:47:42.920]in our initial experiment.
- [00:47:44.183]We see a 42% reduction in the amount of runoff
- [00:47:46.862]and we know that most, from some other work associated
- [00:47:50.861]with this, we know that most of that water transpires back
- [00:47:53.172]to the atmosphere.
- [00:47:55.110]So there is a potential to address the amount
- [00:48:00.813]of water flowing from the land, but of course,
- [00:48:03.192]to actually achieve a reduction in flood,
- [00:48:05.784]you would need to have the practice implemented
- [00:48:08.417]across lots and lots of farm fields
- [00:48:10.884]to actually show that kind of impact.
- [00:48:17.655]Working with groups like the Iowa Soybean Association
- [00:48:20.253]and the Nature Conservancy that are attempting watershed
- [00:48:23.113]scale experiments in the state of Iowa,
- [00:48:26.152]it's very difficult to do.
- [00:48:29.316]Probably the best that we can do is continue
- [00:48:31.674]to collect data now at the commercial farm field scale
- [00:48:35.174]and then parametize models that will then be able
- [00:48:39.719]to address the expected impact of, you know,
- [00:48:42.675]lots and lots of fields in prairie strips
- [00:48:44.853]and where, at what point, would you actually see a reduction
- [00:48:48.182]in flooding as a result of scaling up the practice.
- [00:48:52.327]I think, probably, the only way we could do that,
- [00:48:56.544]at least within my career, is through modeling.
- [00:49:07.847][Female Audience Member] Thank you.
- [00:49:08.839]I really enjoyed your presentation.
- [00:49:10.636]The 37% soil carbon number was pretty astonishing
- [00:49:14.183]and I'm wondering if that's mostly
- [00:49:16.634]in the more active carbon pools if you're familiar.
- [00:49:19.750]So if that's the case, is there any worry
- [00:49:23.217]that if this moves to commercial scales
- [00:49:26.941]that farmers are going to take those perennial strips
- [00:49:30.479]out of prairie and into production
- [00:49:33.166]to kind of access that carbon
- [00:49:35.116]and if you do have sort of this rotating strip crop,
- [00:49:38.719]you know, system, if that's going
- [00:49:41.027]to influence on these benefits you're seeing.
- [00:49:44.707]Great question and when I present to farm groups
- [00:49:49.456]that's almost always a question that comes up is
- [00:49:52.935]how long do I need to leave the prairie strip
- [00:49:55.119]in place (laughing)
- [00:49:57.076]before I can start to farm it and capture the soil
- [00:49:59.757]quality as well as the nutrients
- [00:50:02.224]that have been stored there.
- [00:50:04.213]And while we don't have a direct research based answer
- [00:50:08.103]to that question from our experiment,
- [00:50:09.840]everybody knows that when you take land out of CRP
- [00:50:13.125]and put it into production over a few years
- [00:50:15.690]you have a yield boost because of, you know,
- [00:50:17.829]that build up in soil quality.
- [00:50:20.222]You know, to be honest, for some of the people
- [00:50:23.910]that we work with, you know, thinking about helping farmers
- [00:50:29.296]put these on their land, just to have them take them out,
- [00:50:32.930]they are not so excited about that.
- [00:50:36.798]On the flip side, however, right now we're still talking
- [00:50:42.149]about tolerable soil loss in the state
- [00:50:45.712]and really if we want to sustain our population,
- [00:50:49.384]if we want to sustain our economy beyond this century,
- [00:50:54.020]we need to start talking about soil renewal
- [00:50:56.270]and right now, we know that cover crops help,
- [00:50:59.950]but we don't have a real good system to build soil
- [00:51:06.524]in this part of the world and so I hope
- [00:51:10.201]that we can study this long enough and work
- [00:51:14.412]with enough farmers to actually develop a system
- [00:51:16.940]where they would put prairie strips
- [00:51:19.671]on their land for some amount of time,
- [00:51:22.021]then think about, and build that soil, and then think
- [00:51:25.881]about moving that prairie strip just downslope
- [00:51:28.664]and start farming that area
- [00:51:30.758]where they had just built up that soil quality.
- [00:51:34.640]Not, you know, sacrifice all the benefits by saying,
- [00:51:38.547]"We're gonna remove all the soil, prairie strips,"
- [00:51:41.602]but let's just move them.
- [00:51:43.492]And you can think about it as sort of a, you know,
- [00:51:47.166]within our annual corn rotation or our corn soy rotation,
- [00:51:51.872]you would have parts of the field that would be
- [00:51:54.001]in a 10 to 15 year prairie rotation at that field level
- [00:51:58.813]and thereby maintaining, you know, the environmental benefit
- [00:52:02.639]that we measured as well as help that farmer
- [00:52:05.868]to sustain their operation by building soil
- [00:52:11.433]over a decade long time-scale.
- [00:52:14.140]So, great question.
- [00:52:24.899][Male Audience Member] Somewhat as a followup to that.
- [00:52:27.121]I was thinking about, you know,
- [00:52:29.172]"What do we need to do or what needs to be done
- [00:52:31.226]"to maintain the strip biodiversity traits."
- [00:52:35.395]Do they decline after time?
- [00:52:38.084]Do you have to maintain them someway or not?
- [00:52:40.765]And if it does decline, it makes sense
- [00:52:42.831]to move the strips and just restart some of them.
- [00:52:47.725]Yeah, it certainly, from the bird data
- [00:52:50.708]that we collected from our initial experiment,
- [00:52:53.177]we saw the birds come in very quickly
- [00:52:56.274]and then kind of taper off and that's oftentimes seen
- [00:52:59.765]in reconstructions, is that you get a,
- [00:53:03.376]it takes, for the plants it takes awhile
- [00:53:06.616]to establish the conservative plants,
- [00:53:08.912]but the bioda respond to that change in structure
- [00:53:12.456]and resource availability right away
- [00:53:15.548]and that as, and there's lots of nutrients
- [00:53:18.809](laughing)
- [00:53:20.168]in those plants that are established first
- [00:53:22.234]and then as so many of the nutrients get captured
- [00:53:24.569]in that soil and root system, the plants,
- [00:53:27.701]the above ground biomass isn't as awesome of a resource.
- [00:53:33.264]And so we did see that in our initial bird and insect data.
- [00:53:37.258]It boosted right away and then it kind of declined a little
- [00:53:39.705]but, you know, I think from the standpoint
- [00:53:41.984]of thinking about maintaining productive agricultural
- [00:53:46.810]landscapes that also provide, you know, these benefits,
- [00:53:51.180]it may make sense,
- [00:53:53.928]from the standpoint of biodiversity as well.
- [00:53:59.308]Certainly folks that I work with that are coming
- [00:54:02.393]at this from the standpoint of trying to get as much prairie
- [00:54:06.507]out there on the idle landscape as possible,
- [00:54:10.222]they're not so excited about that
- [00:54:12.297]because of course they would like to be establishing more
- [00:54:14.757]of the historical and conservative prairie ecosystem.
- [00:54:21.415]You know, it just depends on sort of what your baseline is.
- [00:54:25.875]If your baseline is a 200 species native prairie,
- [00:54:29.963]you're probably not gonna be
- [00:54:31.187]so excited about rotating the strip.
- [00:54:33.746]If your perspective is, you know, this is a landscape
- [00:54:38.024]that's dominated by annual crops that are only active
- [00:54:40.711]for a part of the year and that we want
- [00:54:42.905]to improve that system, then the idea of turning it over
- [00:54:49.152]in time to provide the greatest benefit,
- [00:54:52.948]both personally at that farm scale to the owner and farmer,
- [00:54:58.450]in addition to all of these societal benefits,
- [00:55:01.534]then that will probably be attractive to you.
- [00:55:15.244]Lisa, I wanted to draw together
- [00:55:16.792]a couple of concepts that people have asked
- [00:55:19.106]about in their questions.
- [00:55:20.239]I guess my question's about, like, normalizing the idea
- [00:55:23.450]of having a prairie strip in your field.
- [00:55:25.347]So, Mark asked about, you know, how do we,
- [00:55:28.214]basically, how do we get these into every field,
- [00:55:30.742]like, you know, watershed wide
- [00:55:33.731]and thinking about the idea
- [00:55:37.300]of maybe maximizing this soil carbon savings,
- [00:55:42.191]and you've talked to a lot of people in the project.
- [00:55:46.737]Do you have thoughts about, I'm just thinking
- [00:55:50.100]in a wheat fallow system, you know,
- [00:55:52.160]that's normal to have a--
- [00:55:53.305]Right.
- [00:55:54.327]Fallow, wheat fallow stripped
- [00:55:56.061]or rotations wheat fallow.
- [00:55:57.710]It's normal in Wisconsin to have alfalfa, soybean,
- [00:56:00.199]corn strips and rotate, so
- [00:56:03.087](sighing)
- [00:56:04.982]do you have thoughts about normalizing this
- [00:56:07.484]to Iowa and Nebraska farmers so that it's just normal
- [00:56:12.682]to have a strip like this in your field
- [00:56:15.057]as part of the way you do business?
- [00:56:20.083]Yeah, certainly one of the things
- [00:56:22.272]that I'm really excited about in the project is, you know,
- [00:56:27.008]truth in presentation, I'm coming at this
- [00:56:29.183]from an ecologist's perspective
- [00:56:31.509]and I'm lucky enough to work with, you know, hydrologists
- [00:56:34.112]and entomologists and economists and sociologists.
- [00:56:39.021]You know, it certainly coming at this as an ecologist,
- [00:56:41.933]the opportunity to teach people a little bit of ecology
- [00:56:45.692]by putting prairie on their farms is really exciting to me
- [00:56:50.010]and I see that all the time
- [00:56:51.607]in the farmers that we're working with.
- [00:56:54.121]For example, the Wright Country farm that I showed you,
- [00:56:57.002]that particular farmer is very much into water quality.
- [00:57:02.541]He's got just about every single water quality practice
- [00:57:06.057]one can have on his farm and his reason is
- [00:57:10.234]that, you know, he's in the Boone River,
- [00:57:12.274]Eagle Creek, Boone River watershed,
- [00:57:14.036]which is a part of the Des Moines River watershed.
- [00:57:16.224]His daughter lives in Des Moines and he doesn't want
- [00:57:18.496]to be, you know, the farmer that is causing the decline
- [00:57:21.307]in drinking water (laughing)
- [00:57:23.682]that his daughter needs to pay for,
- [00:57:25.362]right down in Des Moines, so he's really into water quality
- [00:57:28.589]but, you know, he put the prairie strips out there
- [00:57:31.815]because he saw the nitrogen benefits, basically.
- [00:57:35.275]But now going out with him,
- [00:57:37.894]he actually has some great species on his farm.
- [00:57:43.363]He has Upland Sandpipers that are making use of cover crop
- [00:57:46.082]and that's pretty much the prairie strip.
- [00:57:48.113]He has Prairie Skinks which is another species
- [00:57:51.372]of greatest conservation need on his farm.
- [00:57:53.710]Going out there now, he's like sending me pictures
- [00:57:57.168]of Monarch butterflies and the Upland Sandpipers
- [00:58:00.420]and tells me about when he turns over the cover board
- [00:58:03.396]and what he sees out there.
- [00:58:05.795]He was not at all interested in bio,
- [00:58:08.458](laughing)
- [00:58:09.703]biodiversity but now as a result of, you know,
- [00:58:12.440]seeing the prairie strips and being out there
- [00:58:15.590]and seeing the data that we're collecting,
- [00:58:17.241]all the sudden he's becoming a biodiversity guy
- [00:58:19.947]in addition to a water quality guy.
- [00:58:22.406]You know, and now he's telling his neighbors about that too.
- [00:58:24.999]So I'm really excited about this aspect of
- [00:58:27.886]sort of reembracing our prairie roots from this.
- [00:58:33.697]You know, the entry point is a very functional one,
- [00:58:36.770]but building on that functional, you know,
- [00:58:40.763]building soil quality, you know, keeping my nutrients,
- [00:58:44.528]improving the image of farmers
- [00:58:48.183]from a water quality standpoint,
- [00:58:50.373]to thinking about appreciating Monarch butterflies
- [00:58:53.585]and getting excited about Upland Sandpipers.
- [00:58:56.800]To me that's a really beautiful transition
- [00:58:59.357]and I hope it's one that we can expand
- [00:59:01.984]across the entire Cornbelt.
- [00:59:04.670]If I could have one wish for the future,
- [00:59:07.626]that's what it'd be.
- [00:59:08.716](laughing)
- [00:59:15.438][Male Audience Member] So, it was
- [00:59:18.402]a very interesting presentation and Larkin's question,
- [00:59:21.663]I think is related to something that I was thinking
- [00:59:25.701]about asking you but I think it could be really interesting
- [00:59:28.471]to look at, sort of, the social community
- [00:59:31.409]or social networks that exist in farming communities
- [00:59:33.784]and whether those networks themselves promote the adoption
- [00:59:37.016]of your, of these strips.
- [00:59:39.751]In the communities, that I think from, you may have people
- [00:59:43.841]in the sociology or economics realm
- [00:59:45.508]that are already interested in looking at those things.
- [00:59:47.755]But I think that that could be something
- [00:59:49.347]that would be interesting to look at.
- [00:59:50.688]Yeah.
- [00:59:51.663][Male Audience Member] So, anyway,
- [00:59:53.744]just a thought there.
- [00:59:55.582]I don't really know that I have anything
- [00:59:57.039]for you to respond to.
- [00:59:58.040]Right.
- [00:59:59.107][Male Audience Member] But I was also gonna ask
- [01:00:00.645]if you could expound a little bit on the,
- [01:00:02.433]when you talk about targeting socioeconomic benefits,
- [01:00:05.266]particularly in lower profitable,
- [01:00:08.027]areas of lower profitability.
- [01:00:10.657]if you could explain a little bit more
- [01:00:12.681]what that the thought is there.
- [01:00:16.082]Yeah, well, first of all, with your first comment,
- [01:00:18.667]so we're working across, you know,
- [01:00:21.775]a very wide geographic area which is very challenging to do
- [01:00:28.393]but one of our motivations in attempting to do it
- [01:00:31.170]is because we know, basically, the adoption diffusion model
- [01:00:35.113]works really well within agricultural
- [01:00:38.700](laughing) locations, right?
- [01:00:42.846]The way that farmers tend to learn about practices
- [01:00:46.783]is, you know, you have the innovator, early adopter
- [01:00:50.391]that adopts them and all their neighbors watch them
- [01:00:52.773]and see if they're successful with it
- [01:00:54.536]and if their neighbor is successful,
- [01:00:56.823]they might think about, you know,
- [01:00:58.487]the majority might think about putting it on their farm.
- [01:01:01.484]And so we think about these sites as, you know, lighthouses
- [01:01:03.744]basically for the prairie strips practice.
- [01:01:07.049]And certainly at this point we are working
- [01:01:10.131]with the innovators and early adopters.
- [01:01:12.231]There's, you know, I would say very clearly
- [01:01:16.279]that's the population that we're working with.
- [01:01:20.114]So that's one aspect and we're okay with that,
- [01:01:23.418](laughing)
- [01:01:25.058]because we still feel like we're in beta testing mode
- [01:01:28.435]and so it's better to beta test something
- [01:01:30.631]with someone that's a little bit more willing
- [01:01:33.330]to well one, work with a bunch of academics
- [01:01:38.534]that might have some crazy ideas sometimes
- [01:01:41.777]and then also just take the risks associated
- [01:01:45.800]with a new practice so we're fine with that at this point.
- [01:01:49.030]In terms of your second question,
- [01:01:51.043]the profitability piece.
- [01:01:53.631]Certainly that idea of trying
- [01:01:58.192]to improve farm level profitability
- [01:02:00.902]is very exciting within Iowa now.
- [01:02:05.633]You're not only hearing farmers sort of beginning
- [01:02:10.413]to resonate with the idea, but also lots of folks
- [01:02:13.917]that are working in the agri-business sector
- [01:02:16.639]are employing companies to help with data management
- [01:02:22.472]to look at, you know, what are the areas of your farm
- [01:02:25.990]where it's worth investing in that particular seed trait
- [01:02:29.154]or it's worth putting on more nitrogen and lime.
- [01:02:33.613]Maybe the whole field doesn't need lime,
- [01:02:35.475]maybe it's just this part and so, I mean,
- [01:02:39.757]that's one way it's kind of thinking
- [01:02:41.560]about raising the bottom, right,
- [01:02:43.205]the lowest performing anchors that way,
- [01:02:46.446]but another way to think about it is, well,
- [01:02:48.807]in some areas, if you're pouring on extra nutrients
- [01:02:51.963]they just might not stick.
- [01:02:54.045]The soil quality is already so poor, you know,
- [01:02:56.424]that bald nob or whatever, that you can pour on, you know,
- [01:03:00.378]more fertilizers but you're still gonna be, you know,
- [01:03:03.352]losing them so from a profitability standpoint,
- [01:03:05.792]maybe it does make sense to put
- [01:03:07.830]in a perennial vegetation type,
- [01:03:09.885]maybe that could be prairie and build that soil quality
- [01:03:13.319]for some period of time at some point
- [01:03:15.885]and then you'll put it back into production
- [01:03:18.514]and it might make it, at that point,
- [01:03:20.262]worth farming that ground.
- [01:03:22.569]It takes a lot of sophisticated modeling
- [01:03:25.321]to figure this out on how to do it,
- [01:03:28.692]so I'm excited working with,
- [01:03:31.369]especially there's a group called Agfelver out of Aimes
- [01:03:36.108]that has the capacity to run the really huge computer
- [01:03:42.911]simulation models that were required to develop
- [01:03:46.014]those graphics that I shared with you on that piece.
- [01:03:54.234]Alright, well, thank you everybody for coming
- [01:03:55.703]and thank you so much, Lisa, for a wonderful presentation.
- [01:03:57.937]Yeah, thanks so much for having me.
- [01:03:59.218]Great questions. (audience applauding)
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/6361?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Prairie STRIPS: From research to action" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments