Nebraska Legislature - Special Committee - Climate Change Seminar - Overview
Don Wilhite
Author
06/08/2016
Added
312
Plays
Description
Seminar on Climate Change for the Climate Change Seminar for Elected Officials of the Nebraska Legislature - Overview
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:00.391]So, I wanna thank, first of all,
- [00:00:02.526]the sponsors at the University of Nebraska
- [00:00:05.894]for this particular session today.
- [00:00:10.794]The agricultural research division
- [00:00:12.974]of the Institute of Ag and Natural Resources,
- [00:00:15.042]one of the sponsors.
- [00:00:16.458]The Office of Research and Economic Development,
- [00:00:19.174]Graham Paul's office is sponsoring this,
- [00:00:21.822]the School of Natural Resources,
- [00:00:23.470]and also the Water for Food Institute,
- [00:00:25.814]so all four of them are sponsoring this session.
- [00:00:28.541]So, I'm always pleased when I go to these different groups
- [00:00:32.161]and I say, "We're putting on this session."
- [00:00:34.877]"Will you help sponsor this?"
- [00:00:36.821]There's never any hesitation.
- [00:00:38.541]They always say, "Yes, we'd love to do this."
- [00:00:41.977]So, I think it's a great opportunity to share information
- [00:00:46.761]between the various groups that are here,
- [00:00:49.221]to do some educating on this issue,
- [00:00:50.917]which is an important one,
- [00:00:52.571]and as you noticed on the agenda, following the break,
- [00:00:57.283]we're gonna have a report back on
- [00:00:59.443]from four of the eight roundtables that we had,
- [00:01:03.575]so we didn't have enough time to include
- [00:01:05.111]all eight in the discussion, but these are four
- [00:01:07.987]that are especially critical.
- [00:01:13.835]So, Ronnie's already mentioned the report and the authors,
- [00:01:17.827]so Clint Rowe is here as one of the main authors
- [00:01:20.871]that was associated with this report
- [00:01:25.745]that we did and published in September of 2014.
- [00:01:30.370]Deborah Bathke also, and also Bob Oglesby
- [00:01:34.038]were main authors of the report,
- [00:01:36.313]but there were a lot of other people
- [00:01:37.797]that provided input to this,
- [00:01:40.214]so I'll talk about in just a few minutes
- [00:01:42.557]the fact that we, as part of the report,
- [00:01:44.724]we focused on different sectors in the report
- [00:01:47.140]and I ask a number of people
- [00:01:48.641]that were experts in those sectors
- [00:01:50.760]to write commentaries that talk about
- [00:01:53.779]the implications of climate change
- [00:01:55.323]on those particular sectors and so, Scott Josiah's here.
- [00:02:00.360]He wrote about the forestry sector and so forth
- [00:02:03.264]and Nick, Nick Brozovic is here from the Water for Food.
- [00:02:07.676]He and some others wrote about
- [00:02:10.276]the agricultural sector, the water sector and so forth.
- [00:02:14.316]Then, we tried to flesh out more information
- [00:02:16.985]about those sectors in the roundtables
- [00:02:18.961]that were held in the fall of 2015.
- [00:02:22.697]So,
- [00:02:26.809]the remote's not working.
- [00:02:27.897]Is this not...
- [00:02:31.620]I can use the, I can use the...
- [00:02:37.124]Ah.
- [00:02:46.252]It was working earlier, wasn't it?
- [00:02:47.882]Let me just use the...
- [00:02:55.837]We'll edit this part out of the...
- [00:02:59.315]Let me just use, let me just use these.
- [00:03:05.893]Greg, this isn't working either.
- [00:03:11.025]Looks like it locked up.
- [00:03:15.529]Sorry about that.
- [00:03:18.462]While they're getting this to work,
- [00:03:19.993]I might just say that more and more people
- [00:03:25.170]are feeling comfortable talking about climate change
- [00:03:27.610]in this state and for those of you
- [00:03:29.374]who are not aware of this, the recent view
- [00:03:32.506]in the all rural poll showed that 61% of rural Nebraskans,
- [00:03:38.685]either agreed or strongly agreed
- [00:03:41.354]that the state needs to have a climate act plan,
- [00:03:45.210]so that's part of the reason for--
- [00:03:47.254]Okay.
- [00:03:49.093]Okay.
- [00:03:50.997]Nice filler, so (laughs) good job.
- [00:03:53.817]Okay, so this is the cover of the report
- [00:03:57.369]that we are talking about, the September 2014 report,
- [00:04:01.224]so the outline of my presentation is basically
- [00:04:03.520]going to follow the outline of the report
- [00:04:05.752]that we did in September of 2014.
- [00:04:09.372]If you want electronic copies of the report,
- [00:04:11.372]it's available at that particular URL at the university.
- [00:04:17.548]There's a lot of other information on that site as well,
- [00:04:20.100]including the roundtable reports,
- [00:04:22.332]so if you want to download that.
- [00:04:24.536]You're free to make copies,
- [00:04:25.860]distribute that as you need to and so forth.
- [00:04:30.480]So basically, I'm gonna go through some of
- [00:04:32.060]the observed changes that we've seen in climate,
- [00:04:36.076]global scale, national scale, Nebraska, and so on.
- [00:04:40.812]Look at climate change science,
- [00:04:43.228]what we know about climate change science,
- [00:04:45.296]what's driving these changes and so forth,
- [00:04:48.360]projections of future changes,
- [00:04:50.312]an understanding of these projections,
- [00:04:52.700]and some of the impacts.
- [00:04:57.072]What?
- [00:05:04.292]Is the microphone not working?
- [00:05:06.179]It's working?
- [00:05:08.547]Okay, all right.
- [00:05:15.279]Can you get rid of that, can you get rid of the box?
- [00:05:17.439]Or is it...
- [00:05:19.971]The box on the screen.
- [00:05:26.447]I thought that disappeared automatically.
- [00:05:31.327]Okay, all right.
- [00:05:34.194]So, as part of the 2014 report,
- [00:05:39.527]as I mentioned, we focused on a number of different sectors
- [00:05:42.339]that we thought were really critical
- [00:05:44.079]and we were building a lot off of
- [00:05:45.775]the National Climate Assessment report
- [00:05:47.979]that was issued in May of 2014,
- [00:05:51.627]and so, we pulled a lot of information
- [00:05:53.483]and then that report, there was talk about
- [00:05:55.943]changes on a regional scale, at a national scale
- [00:05:58.543]and there was also talk about changes
- [00:06:00.683]as they might affect different sectors
- [00:06:03.187]and so, we pulled off of those sectors
- [00:06:04.883]and included these commentaries
- [00:06:07.579]and then, as a follow on to that,
- [00:06:10.735]the roundtables were organized
- [00:06:12.455]as a mechanism to bring together
- [00:06:14.799]stakeholders within these various sectors
- [00:06:17.723]to actually talk about the implications
- [00:06:20.303]of the projected changes in climate
- [00:06:22.183]and the changes that we've seen already
- [00:06:24.551]on their particular sector and I think in total,
- [00:06:28.736]well, Kim worked with me on these.
- [00:06:31.386]In total, we had around 350 people
- [00:06:34.170]that attended these eight sector-based roundtables.
- [00:06:39.138]Ken kept popping up at most of these,
- [00:06:41.299]so he got counted many times, but 350 people,
- [00:06:46.035]so there was a really good exchange of ideas,
- [00:06:48.706]concerns, issues, and so on associated with climate change.
- [00:06:52.143]It's interesting because what we've done here in Nebraska,
- [00:06:55.323]in terms of the 2014 report and also the 2015 report,
- [00:07:00.527]is now considered to be a major success story
- [00:07:03.266]of the National Climate Assessment,
- [00:07:05.146]so the next National Climate Assessment,
- [00:07:07.351]which will occur in another three or four years,
- [00:07:10.302]is going to use Nebraska as an example of a case study,
- [00:07:14.734]a success associated with climate change
- [00:07:18.615]and what their expectation was
- [00:07:20.587]was that states would take the information
- [00:07:24.582]in the National Climate Assessment report
- [00:07:26.395]and do things like what we have done here,
- [00:07:29.135]so I think we're poised to take this to the next level
- [00:07:33.079]and then hopefully, this legislative resolution
- [00:07:35.287]will give us an opportunity to do that.
- [00:07:38.364]I'll start with, we brought to campus Tony Leiserowitz
- [00:07:43.960]in March of 2014, actually or 2015,
- [00:07:50.881]to talk about climate change.
- [00:07:54.364]He leads a climate change communication program
- [00:07:56.593]at Yale University, and so he came
- [00:07:58.800]and he gave an excellent talk.
- [00:08:00.888]He was one of the Heuermann Lecture speakers,
- [00:08:03.696]so I suggested to Ronnie that we bring him to campus
- [00:08:06.948]and he came to campus, when he began his presentation,
- [00:08:09.316]I mean, this is a very complex issue, climate change,
- [00:08:12.036]and so he said to a lot of audiences,
- [00:08:14.912]he tries to simplify this and he wanted to
- [00:08:17.649]simplify it in terms of 10 words.
- [00:08:21.428]So, those 10 words were, first of all, that it's real.
- [00:08:25.864]Secondly, that it's us.
- [00:08:28.624]Third, that it's bad.
- [00:08:31.714]Fourth, it's scientists agree
- [00:08:33.874]and finally, that there's hope,
- [00:08:36.706]so this message of hope is an important one
- [00:08:39.026]because when you look at climate change
- [00:08:41.210]and climate change projections,
- [00:08:42.790]it's easy to come away being very pessimistic
- [00:08:46.458]about our future and the future of this planet
- [00:08:49.154]in terms of how the environment's
- [00:08:50.802]going to change and so forth.
- [00:08:53.074]I gave a talk recently in Omaha
- [00:08:56.210]and when I put up this bullet that said scientists agree,
- [00:09:00.462]someone in the audience said, "No, they don't."
- [00:09:04.038]So, I'll talk to that in just a minute,
- [00:09:06.754]as to what we mean by that.
- [00:09:08.890]So, addressing climate change is really a moral issue
- [00:09:12.162]and this came out in the Pope's encyclical.
- [00:09:14.182]It was issued last year and so on
- [00:09:17.362]and it's not just for future generations,
- [00:09:20.082]but also now because we're already seeing these changes
- [00:09:22.682]and Ronnie was referring to those earlier,
- [00:09:25.606]but we need to do something about this.
- [00:09:27.954]We need to talk this out of the political perspective
- [00:09:30.366]and look at this from a scientific perspective
- [00:09:33.672]in what we know and what we don't know
- [00:09:35.703]and try to move forward with the conversation.
- [00:09:38.975]So, what is scientific consensus?
- [00:09:41.831]So I thought it was important maybe to
- [00:09:43.711]talk about that just a minute.
- [00:09:45.779]So the common statistics that's used
- [00:09:47.775]is that 97% of climate scientists agree
- [00:09:52.301]that not only the climate is changing,
- [00:09:54.161]but that humans are the driving factor here,
- [00:09:57.201]so we're talking about greenhouse gas changes
- [00:09:59.385]and concentrations and so on in the atmosphere.
- [00:10:02.429]So 97%, there's been more recent studies
- [00:10:04.841]that would put this closer to 100%.
- [00:10:07.441]So within the climate science community,
- [00:10:10.522]this is real and this is bad
- [00:10:13.829]and this is something that we need to do something about,
- [00:10:16.405]so scientific consensus, if you look at a definition of it
- [00:10:19.657]and there's a discussion of this in that 2014 report,
- [00:10:23.485]represents a collective position
- [00:10:25.161]of the community of scientists
- [00:10:26.621]in a specialized field of study,
- [00:10:29.269]so in this case, climate science.
- [00:10:32.473]It doesn't mean that every single climate scientist agrees
- [00:10:36.469]or may just disagree on certain aspects
- [00:10:40.389]of what some of the projections are
- [00:10:42.249]or some of the methodology and so forth.
- [00:10:45.593]Climate, or scientific consensus is achieved
- [00:10:48.217]through the process of peer review.
- [00:10:49.957]This is how science works,
- [00:10:51.745]is that we put information out there.
- [00:10:53.257]It's challenged by other scientists and so on
- [00:10:55.369]and we move forward.
- [00:10:58.573]It does not mean that all scientists
- [00:11:00.569]in a field of study agree,
- [00:11:03.077]so if you think about this
- [00:11:04.469]in terms of the health profession,
- [00:11:06.353]if you went for a diagnosis
- [00:11:08.117]and you went to five different physicians
- [00:11:10.957]and four of the five told you that
- [00:11:15.093]you needed to have surgery
- [00:11:16.437]and this is why you needed surgery,
- [00:11:17.902]but one disagreed with that,
- [00:11:20.043]I mean, you would take those
- [00:11:21.156]four out of five pretty seriously,
- [00:11:22.944]and so in this case, we're looking at
- [00:11:24.731]almost 10 out of 10 scientists
- [00:11:28.143]that are saying this is real, this is bad,
- [00:11:30.907]this is something we need to do about,
- [00:11:33.555]so there are some dissenting votes
- [00:11:35.623]and oftentimes, the ones you hear about
- [00:11:38.384]are actually not climate scientists,
- [00:11:40.731]but they're scientists in other fields of study,
- [00:11:43.027]sometimes completely removed from climate science
- [00:11:45.839]and they get a lot of publicity
- [00:11:47.106]and they get a lot of money from the
- [00:11:48.199]fossil fuel industry to say certain things.
- [00:11:52.585]So, our understanding of the magnitude
- [00:11:54.165]and the impacts of climate change continues to increase.
- [00:11:57.741]Improved computer models,
- [00:12:00.781]improved data, more data that we're collecting
- [00:12:05.239]from satellites and from other
- [00:12:06.863]ground observations and so on.
- [00:12:09.047]It's all improving our understanding of climate science,
- [00:12:11.695]so we continue to refine what we know,
- [00:12:14.295]modify what the projections are and so on as we go forward.
- [00:12:17.799]In the UN Climate Change Report,
- [00:12:21.052]we said in there, for more than a decade,
- [00:12:23.048]there's been a broad and overwhelming consensus
- [00:12:25.789]within the climate science community
- [00:12:27.716]that the human-induced effects of climate change
- [00:12:29.900]are both very real and very large
- [00:12:32.989]and so, this is the view within
- [00:12:34.496]the climate science community.
- [00:12:37.492]So finally, the global community came together in Paris
- [00:12:41.648]with the climate treaty of the conference of the parties
- [00:12:44.321]last December and signed an agreement
- [00:12:47.824]making pledges as to how they're going to reduce
- [00:12:50.540]greenhouse gas emissions and try to deal with this issue,
- [00:12:54.304]so we had, I think, 195 countries that signed this
- [00:12:57.924]and I think a lot of the success of this event
- [00:13:01.409]was to be attributed to the US, I think,
- [00:13:04.448]providing a lot of leadership for the first time
- [00:13:07.188]to address this issue and get countries
- [00:13:09.652]to come to this meeting, having already made a pledge
- [00:13:13.345]on what they were going to do
- [00:13:14.852]to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
- [00:13:17.904]So, I put this up there because
- [00:13:19.484]I could talk about this issue for a long time.
- [00:13:21.736]Clint could talk about it for a long time,
- [00:13:24.837]but there are time constraints, right?
- [00:13:27.181]So, I'm not gonna talk about this forever.
- [00:13:30.965]Introduction, background.
- [00:13:32.845]I wanna begin with this slide because
- [00:13:35.053]this is one that there's a lot of confusion
- [00:13:39.349]that results from, particularly in the public,
- [00:13:43.181]about the differentiation between weather and climate,
- [00:13:46.501]so weather is the condition of the atmosphere
- [00:13:48.429]at a particular place in time,
- [00:13:50.449]so it's highly variable from minute to minute,
- [00:13:52.605]hour to hour, day to day, week to week, and so on
- [00:13:55.997]and it's defined by sunshine, precipitation,
- [00:13:58.969]temperature, and all these variables, winds and so forth.
- [00:14:02.265]Climate, on the other hand, is the composite
- [00:14:04.145]or average of weather over a long period of time,
- [00:14:07.281]so with climate, we're looking at trends
- [00:14:12.297]in what we're seeing, whether it's temperature trends,
- [00:14:14.737]whether it's trends in terms of precipitation and so on.
- [00:14:17.729]We're looking at trends over a longer period of time.
- [00:14:21.005]We're also very concerned about
- [00:14:23.929]the frequency of extreme events
- [00:14:26.669]because these impose tremendous hardships
- [00:14:29.341]on society, on people and so on
- [00:14:31.733]on economic infrastructure and so forth
- [00:14:35.101]and so Mark Twain once said,
- [00:14:36.377]"Climate is what you expect and weather is what you get."
- [00:14:39.161]So, that's another way of sort of
- [00:14:40.765]defining the difference between weather and climate,
- [00:14:43.365]but people will, that live in a certain area,
- [00:14:46.477]maybe they're had a cold winter
- [00:14:49.401]will say things like, "Well,
- [00:14:51.029]"whatever happened to global warming?"
- [00:14:53.421]Well, again, climate is a regional phenomena.
- [00:14:58.715]Changes in climate are occurring over larger timescales,
- [00:15:03.939]so we're looking at trends,
- [00:15:05.587]but weather patterns obviously
- [00:15:06.935]are variable on the order of weeks, months, and so forth,
- [00:15:10.067]so yes, you're gonna have, if you look at
- [00:15:11.835]global mean temperature for a certain particular year,
- [00:15:15.411]you're gonna have some areas that were cooler than normal,
- [00:15:17.615]some areas that are warmer than normal.
- [00:15:19.635]What we've seen more recently is that
- [00:15:22.211]the warmer than normal are dominating.
- [00:15:25.651]So, why is climate important?
- [00:15:27.787]Well, climate is important because
- [00:15:29.783]it defines sort of the constrains of a lot of what we do,
- [00:15:33.891]so if you look at planting decisions by farmers,
- [00:15:36.167]what crops they grow where, when they plant,
- [00:15:38.839]and so, when they harvest and so on,
- [00:15:42.636]issues related to architecture
- [00:15:44.168]and how we design our buildings,
- [00:15:45.560]how we design dams, reservoirs, storm sewers, et cetera.
- [00:15:49.764]All of this is based upon climate
- [00:15:51.740]and historical climate information,
- [00:15:54.640]so we have these terms, stationarity
- [00:15:57.124]versus non-stationarity and,
- [00:16:00.840]so stationarity is assuming that we have,
- [00:16:03.720]while it's a variable, weather pattern over time,
- [00:16:07.180]that it's not changing, okay?
- [00:16:09.316]So, the climate is stationary,
- [00:16:12.264]whereas what we are seeing now
- [00:16:15.004]is that we moved to a situation
- [00:16:16.748]where we have non-stationarity of climate,
- [00:16:19.672]so we have trends, things that are going on,
- [00:16:22.228]so this raises all kinds of questions
- [00:16:24.432]about designs for the future, things that we're building,
- [00:16:27.916]whether it's utility facilities,
- [00:16:29.496]whether it's reservoirs or whatever,
- [00:16:32.652]how do we design those based on a climate that's changing
- [00:16:35.696]rather than one that's stable?
- [00:16:37.832]So, we'll talk about that more as we go forward,
- [00:16:40.456]so some of the observed changes in climate,
- [00:16:44.379]there are, could be, you could look at
- [00:16:46.182]10 key indicators of changes in climate.
- [00:16:51.074]If the climate is changing, we should see
- [00:16:53.862]a rise in air temperature over land, over water.
- [00:16:56.926]We should see an increase of ocean heat content,
- [00:17:01.130]sea surface temperatures should be increasing.
- [00:17:04.614]Water vapor should be increasing
- [00:17:06.214]within the atmosphere and so on.
- [00:17:08.534]Certain things should be decreasing as a result
- [00:17:10.694]of the higher temperatures and so on.
- [00:17:13.946]We should see a decrease in sea ice,
- [00:17:16.526]a decrease in glaciers and ice sheet,
- [00:17:18.314]a decrease in snow cover and so on,
- [00:17:20.542]so if you look at the data sets
- [00:17:21.958]for all of those 10 variables,
- [00:17:23.722]you'll see that they all confirm
- [00:17:25.602]that our climate is changing at a global scale,
- [00:17:28.878]at a regional scale for almost all places on earth
- [00:17:32.638]and so, we have sea level rise because of
- [00:17:34.938]the melting of glaciers and ice sheets.
- [00:17:37.838]We also have a warming of the ocean,
- [00:17:39.442]so you have a thermal expansion of the ocean and so forth.
- [00:17:42.148]The sea level is rising.
- [00:17:43.796]This is creating huge economic concerns
- [00:17:46.884]for coastal communities and so forth,
- [00:17:49.162]island nations and so on.
- [00:17:51.274]So, I wanted to show you this animation.
- [00:17:56.546]So, what this is showing before I start this,
- [00:17:59.470]is this is showing global temperature
- [00:18:03.326]on an annual basis from 1884 through 2012
- [00:18:08.014]and so, the areas that are in yellow
- [00:18:09.942]are the warmer than normal
- [00:18:14.238]and then, the areas that are in blue
- [00:18:16.190]are the cooler than average regions of the world
- [00:18:21.598]for that particular year.
- [00:18:28.982]So as we go through this animation,
- [00:18:30.562]you see the year down here
- [00:18:33.616]and so, you see how these patterns,
- [00:18:35.008]these changes in weather from year to year,
- [00:18:37.796]are affecting different regions of the world,
- [00:18:40.164]in terms of areas that are warm,
- [00:18:41.952]areas that are cool, and so forth.
- [00:18:44.320]You get into the 1930s drought
- [00:18:46.504]and you see the very warm area of the United States
- [00:18:49.776]that shows up quite dramatically.
- [00:18:52.376]You see that also during the 1950s,
- [00:18:54.860]which was a significant drought event
- [00:18:57.532]in large portions of the central part of the US,
- [00:19:00.620]southern, Southwest and so forth,
- [00:19:03.386]but look at visually what happens
- [00:19:05.451]when you get past about 1970, 1975
- [00:19:09.467]in terms of this warming that we're seeing.
- [00:19:13.483]So the warming is dominating,
- [00:19:16.411]so yes, there are some areas where maybe there are some,
- [00:19:19.162]in this particular map, 2012 was a very warm year.
- [00:19:24.593]You really don't see much in way of cooler areas,
- [00:19:26.686]but you can see how the warmth is dominating.
- [00:19:31.701]If we look at 2015, a similar map.
- [00:19:35.693]2015 was the warmest year on record.
- [00:19:39.201]2016 looks like we're gonna beat 2015.
- [00:19:42.937]You see one cooler than average pocket up there,
- [00:19:45.841]but the rest of the globe is showing this warming trend,
- [00:19:50.345]so this is very, very significant.
- [00:19:53.226]So, this again shows this pattern.
- [00:19:55.153]This is from 1880 up through current
- [00:19:59.865]and you see the global mean temperature
- [00:20:03.490]shown here in the blue line
- [00:20:05.301]and you see the dominance of the warming
- [00:20:08.853]in more recent, more recent decades
- [00:20:12.073]and so, some incredible statistics.
- [00:20:14.114]There's 15 of the 16 hottest years on record
- [00:20:17.157]have occurred this century.
- [00:20:19.457]We're not very far into this century.
- [00:20:21.637]388 consecutive months through April of 2016
- [00:20:25.909]with a global mean temperature
- [00:20:27.629]above the 20th century average,
- [00:20:30.046]so what's the probability that you're gonna have
- [00:20:33.017]388 consecutive months that keep beating
- [00:20:38.568]the warmest month part of that on record.
- [00:20:42.397]1988 was a significant drought year in the United States.
- [00:20:47.761]It was a record year when it occurred in '88.
- [00:20:50.501]It now ranks as the 23rd hottest year,
- [00:20:54.265]so again, it puts things in perspective,
- [00:20:55.981]that we keep beating these records
- [00:21:00.441]year after year, month after month and so on.
- [00:21:04.781]So if we look at the pattern
- [00:21:05.873]of temperature change across the US
- [00:21:07.810]and this comes from the National Climate Assessment report,
- [00:21:10.642]you can see the majority of the warming,
- [00:21:12.571]the greatest amount of warming has been
- [00:21:13.895]in the northern tier and in the Western United States.
- [00:21:16.775]Nebraska is kind of a mixed bag
- [00:21:18.979]with some areas having a little more warming than others.
- [00:21:21.511]None of the areas that are cooling.
- [00:21:23.231]You see a little bit during this period.
- [00:21:25.807]There's actually been a little bit of a cooling,
- [00:21:27.759]but again, this is related to local climate controls
- [00:21:32.239]and the climate controls for different regions
- [00:21:34.235]are gonna be different, whether it's wind,
- [00:21:36.255]whether it's mountain ranges,
- [00:21:37.743]proximity to the ocean and so forth,
- [00:21:40.702]but you can see this general pattern
- [00:21:42.722]and you can see for the Great Plains north region,
- [00:21:44.902]which is what, the Climate Assessment report
- [00:21:47.041]put us in the north region, what that's showing.
- [00:21:51.845]Ronnie kind of referred to this in his opening remarks.
- [00:21:56.909]Observed increases in the frost-free season.
- [00:21:59.973]For the Great Plains as a whole,
- [00:22:01.669]the frost-free season has increased by about 10 days.
- [00:22:05.013]For Nebraska, it varies between about five and 25 days
- [00:22:08.913]and this is going to continue to increase
- [00:22:10.816]and so, farmers are adapting to these changes
- [00:22:13.392]obviously, in terms of farming practices.
- [00:22:16.176]This is the map that Ronnie was referring to.
- [00:22:19.196]I saw some of you looking for it in the roundtable report.
- [00:22:21.868]It's not in the roundtable report.
- [00:22:23.376]It's in the 2014 report,
- [00:22:26.184]but this is the line he was talking about
- [00:22:28.600]that was kind of along the Platte River.
- [00:22:31.292]This is the differences between
- [00:22:32.872]zones four and five in 1990
- [00:22:36.378]and if you look at where this demarcation line is in 2012,
- [00:22:43.134]it's up on the South Dakota border,
- [00:22:45.110]so a dramatic change in a period of 22 years
- [00:22:49.502]and this is obviously continuing to change.
- [00:22:52.358]The amount of corn that's being grown
- [00:22:53.822]in South Dakota's increased dramatically
- [00:22:55.842]because of these changes and so forth.
- [00:22:58.346]Shifts from spring wheat in the northern states
- [00:23:01.250]to winter wheat in the northern states
- [00:23:03.714]is already occurring, so we're seeing
- [00:23:05.106]a lot of those kinds of shifts occurring.
- [00:23:07.822]Another way to look at this is to look at,
- [00:23:09.934]if you have a stationary climate,
- [00:23:11.722]so one that's not changing across time,
- [00:23:14.602]you would expect to break high temperature records
- [00:23:16.372]at the same rate that you're
- [00:23:17.659]breaking low temperature records
- [00:23:19.616]and you see that was pretty much the case back in the 1950s
- [00:23:24.749]and then you can see what has happened now,
- [00:23:26.584]so now, we're breaking two high temperature records
- [00:23:29.368]for every low temperature record,
- [00:23:31.088]so we've shifted that pattern,
- [00:23:34.336]that distribution significantly.
- [00:23:38.680]As far as precipitation goes,
- [00:23:41.559]observed precipitation changes,
- [00:23:43.835]you can see relatively, rather significant changes
- [00:23:47.435]across the northern tier, across some areas.
- [00:23:50.011]Here are the Great Plains.
- [00:23:51.939]Significant drying that's occurring in the Southwest,
- [00:23:54.358]so there's a lot of concerns about that
- [00:23:56.078]with regards to allocation of water
- [00:23:58.586]and the Colorado River and so forth
- [00:24:00.630]and all the states that are competing for that water.
- [00:24:03.786]Again, Nebraska's kind of a mixed, a mixed bag
- [00:24:06.946]in terms of precipitation and this is annual precipitation.
- [00:24:11.494]What's really important is the seasonal distribution
- [00:24:14.098]and how that seasonal distribution is gonna change
- [00:24:16.688]and how the distribution of
- [00:24:19.684]high intensity storms is gonna change,
- [00:24:22.144]which we're already seeing.
- [00:24:27.669]So, this observed changes in heavy precipitation events,
- [00:24:33.428]particularly for the Eastern United States,
- [00:24:36.216]so we may not, for some areas,
- [00:24:37.748]we're seeing an increase in precipitation,
- [00:24:39.676]which you would expect because there's more
- [00:24:41.348]water vapor in the atmosphere
- [00:24:42.740]because there's more evaporation.
- [00:24:44.572]There's more energy in the atmosphere,
- [00:24:46.616]but we're seeing a higher proportion of the rainfall
- [00:24:48.940]occurring in these extreme rainfall events.
- [00:24:53.048]I mean, think of Lincoln.
- [00:24:55.788]Since May of last year, we've had three 100-year rainfalls,
- [00:25:01.430]one last May, one last October,
- [00:25:03.161]and then one in May of this year,
- [00:25:05.229]so we're getting more rain
- [00:25:07.645]in these heavy, intense rainstorms.
- [00:25:11.661]This creates all kinds of design issues.
- [00:25:13.705]Storm sewers, et cetera, flooding and so forth,
- [00:25:17.745]so this is a significant issue too with the future
- [00:25:20.833]and you're seeing this, not just in the United States,
- [00:25:22.853]but in other areas as well.
- [00:25:25.037]Changes in the frequency of extreme events,
- [00:25:27.309]this is from Munich RE,
- [00:25:29.237]largest reinsurance firm in the world,
- [00:25:31.513]looking at loss events in the US
- [00:25:33.441]from 1980 through 2015
- [00:25:36.901]and they're divided into different categories,
- [00:25:38.989]geophysical, loss events, so tsunamis, earthquakes and so on
- [00:25:43.401]and you wouldn't expect, those are physical events.
- [00:25:46.373]You wouldn't expect a trend necessarily in those,
- [00:25:49.185]so highly variable from year to year.
- [00:25:51.485]Then you have meteorological events,
- [00:25:52.876]hydrological events, and then you have climate,
- [00:25:56.245]climatological vents, such as drought
- [00:25:58.129]and extreme temperature, heat waves and so on
- [00:26:00.981]and you see this tremendous increase
- [00:26:04.373]and so, one of the issues that we always have
- [00:26:07.577]as climate scientists is to what degree
- [00:26:10.409]was the 2012 drought the result
- [00:26:13.617]of normal climate variability
- [00:26:16.353]versus how did climate change play into this?
- [00:26:21.509]There have been studies that
- [00:26:22.901]have looked at things like that.
- [00:26:24.089]Super storm Sandy, for example.
- [00:26:25.781]To what extent do climate change
- [00:26:27.733]add to the impacts 'cause of higher surge levels,
- [00:26:30.889]in terms of the water and coming to shore and so forth
- [00:26:34.721]as a result of winds?
- [00:26:36.785]The California drought that's been
- [00:26:38.383]going on now for five, six years,
- [00:26:40.703]to what extent is climate change playing a role?
- [00:26:43.583]So it's hard to sort of figure out
- [00:26:45.047]how climate change is affecting that,
- [00:26:46.787]but they are showing for these extreme events
- [00:26:49.271]that climate change is making things worse,
- [00:26:51.871]so it's not that the 2012 drought
- [00:26:53.939]might not have occurred anyway,
- [00:26:55.447]but if you look at the highest
- [00:26:57.259]temperature stress days that we had,
- [00:26:59.675]this was probably exacerbated by the fact
- [00:27:03.179]that climate change is occurring
- [00:27:04.807]and you're having this increase in temperatures.
- [00:27:06.431]I'll talk about that a little bit more as we move forward.
- [00:27:10.427]So, what is the climate change science?
- [00:27:15.922]One of the things that deniers of climate change will say
- [00:27:18.825]is that, "Well, climates have always changed."
- [00:27:21.334]That's true, they do change.
- [00:27:23.446]They change over long timescales,
- [00:27:25.210]so we have ice ages, we have warm periods and so forth,
- [00:27:28.461]but these types of changes usually occur
- [00:27:30.642]over thousands of years
- [00:27:34.614]and they're due to things like
- [00:27:35.890]variations in the Earth's orbit,
- [00:27:37.578]variation in the energy from the sun.
- [00:27:41.248]Obviously, volcanic eruptions can put a lot of debris
- [00:27:43.988]and gases into the atmosphere
- [00:27:46.404]that have a cooling effect,
- [00:27:47.860]but these are the large-scale volcanic eruptions,
- [00:27:50.527]like Pinatubo and so forth in 1991.
- [00:27:54.894]Things like El Nino,
- [00:27:58.306]these things have an affect on climate,
- [00:28:00.259]in terms of the short-term,
- [00:28:01.882]but also in terms of longer-term changes,
- [00:28:04.414]so there are these natural forces
- [00:28:05.946]that have occurred in the past.
- [00:28:07.735]They're occurring today and they're gonna
- [00:28:09.174]continue to occur in the future.
- [00:28:11.798]What we're talking about are human-induced forces
- [00:28:16.875]or anthropogenic changes,
- [00:28:18.870]so as an example, one, some people will say,
- [00:28:22.098]deniers will say, "Well, we're getting less,
- [00:28:24.374]"are we getting more energy from the sun?
- [00:28:26.578]"That's why global temperatures are going up."
- [00:28:28.786]But if you look at fuller radiance
- [00:28:31.618]over this period from 1880 up to current,
- [00:28:34.914]you can see there's actually been a decline
- [00:28:36.726]in more recent years while temperatures continue to go up,
- [00:28:40.162]so changes in solar energy
- [00:28:42.462]and how much we're getting from the sun,
- [00:28:44.366]that's not an explanation for
- [00:28:46.338]the increase in global temperatures.
- [00:28:48.826]So these anthropogenic changes
- [00:28:50.774]are these changes in greenhouse gas
- [00:28:52.562]concentrations in the atmosphere.
- [00:28:54.094]We hear the most about carbon dioxide,
- [00:28:56.370]but there's methane and other gases as well.
- [00:28:59.550]Changes in aerosol particles in the atmosphere,
- [00:29:02.014]related to fire, smoke and so on,
- [00:29:04.590]that are occurring on a global scale
- [00:29:06.750]and then also on a global scale,
- [00:29:08.490]we have changes in land use,
- [00:29:10.162]dramatic changes in land use.
- [00:29:12.254]I mean, almost all areas of the earth
- [00:29:14.042]have been disturbed in one way or another by humans.
- [00:29:17.594]Here you see an extreme example
- [00:29:19.242]with center pivot systems and so on,
- [00:29:21.494]so this changes the albedo of the earth.
- [00:29:23.354]It changes the reflectivity of sunlight and so forth
- [00:29:26.326]and so, this has an impact on climate as well
- [00:29:29.970]at more of a micro-scale or at a meso-scale,
- [00:29:35.355]so I'll talk more about the
- [00:29:37.187]greenhouse gases here as we move forward.
- [00:29:39.603]So, just to refresh from your high school science class,
- [00:29:44.179]composition of the atmosphere is mostly nitrogen and oxygen,
- [00:29:48.499]so carbon dioxide and other trace gases
- [00:29:50.771]make up 1% or so of the gases in the atmosphere.
- [00:29:56.599]These are referred to as greenhouse gases and so on,
- [00:30:00.595]so we have carbon dioxide, we have methane,
- [00:30:02.847]nitrous oxide, water vapor and some others.
- [00:30:07.307]These are critical because these are the ones
- [00:30:10.163]that trap heat in the atmosphere
- [00:30:13.971]and allow earth, or allow life on earth
- [00:30:17.291]to exist as we know it today,
- [00:30:19.799]so without these greenhouse gases,
- [00:30:22.095]the earth's surface temperature would be about
- [00:30:23.767]57 degrees cooler than it is.
- [00:30:27.183]So these greenhouse gases are essential
- [00:30:30.595]for the climate that we have on the earth's surface,
- [00:30:33.684]so they are the heat regulators for the earth.
- [00:30:37.096]So if we increase the concentration
- [00:30:38.884]of these in the atmosphere,
- [00:30:40.348]we're increasing the capacity of the earth to retain heat
- [00:30:46.384]and so, that's the critical factor.
- [00:30:48.728]So, you see carbon dioxide increased.
- [00:30:51.608]This is just going from about the mid-1970s,
- [00:30:55.860]the increase in methane.
- [00:30:57.784]Gale Erickson's gonna be here this afternoon,
- [00:31:01.057]talk a little bit about methane, nitrous oxide and so forth,
- [00:31:04.585]so we said this increase in these
- [00:31:06.445]greenhouse gases within the atmosphere.
- [00:31:09.809]So basically, you hear about the greenhouse effect.
- [00:31:13.293]Well, if we have the same amount of energy
- [00:31:14.849]coming in from the sun that we have
- [00:31:16.265]going back out into space, then we have a stable climate,
- [00:31:21.073]variable, but stable,
- [00:31:23.465]but what happens with the change
- [00:31:25.833]in the concentration of greenhouse gases
- [00:31:27.877]in the atmosphere is we enable
- [00:31:29.921]the atmosphere to hold more heat.
- [00:31:32.057]It's like putting a blanket around the earth,
- [00:31:34.285]so this shortwave solar radiation
- [00:31:36.677]that comes in from the sun is,
- [00:31:40.765]essentially, the atmosphere is transparent to that
- [00:31:43.434]and so, it passes through the atmosphere.
- [00:31:45.570]Some of it's reflected by clouds back into space.
- [00:31:48.102]When it strikes the earth's surface,
- [00:31:49.866]it's absorbed and it's re-radiated as infrared radiation,
- [00:31:54.882]long-wave radiation, and when that energy
- [00:31:58.038]is re-radiated into the atmosphere,
- [00:32:01.474]the atmosphere is no longer transparent to it,
- [00:32:04.354]so it captures that heat and it
- [00:32:06.466]holds it for a period of time.
- [00:32:08.507]So, as we increase the concentration
- [00:32:11.155]of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere,
- [00:32:12.987]we increase the capacity of the atmosphere
- [00:32:14.871]to retain heat and that's why
- [00:32:16.660]we're seeing this increase in temperature.
- [00:32:20.371]So if you look over longer timescales,
- [00:32:23.507]and we can go back 800,000 years,
- [00:32:26.617]carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere
- [00:32:28.685]have generally been below about
- [00:32:30.029]280 to 300 parts per million, going back 800,000 years.
- [00:32:35.326]This graph those back 400,000 years.
- [00:32:39.204]At the beginning of the Industrial Revolution,
- [00:32:43.292]concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere
- [00:32:45.564]was about 280 parts per million
- [00:32:49.109]and you see what has happened
- [00:32:50.179]as a result of the burning of fossil fuels
- [00:32:52.708]is that we've increased this concentration dramatically.
- [00:32:57.398]If we focus in a little bit more
- [00:32:59.350]and this data comes from Mauna Loa
- [00:33:01.626]on the Big Island of Hawaii,
- [00:33:03.250]where they've been measuring CO2
- [00:33:06.246]levels in the atmosphere since 1958
- [00:33:09.890]and so you see this annual pattern
- [00:33:12.958]or inter-annual pattern here in terms of
- [00:33:15.906]carbon dioxide concentrations,
- [00:33:17.834]but in 2013, we hit 400 parts per million
- [00:33:21.338]and then since then, we've been continuing to go up,
- [00:33:25.146]so now we're at somewhere around, I think,
- [00:33:26.910]413 or something parts per million.
- [00:33:30.278]So this is continuing to increase
- [00:33:31.902]and will continue to increase to 500,
- [00:33:34.390]to 550, to 600, this is outside of
- [00:33:37.546]the range of anything that we've experienced in the past,
- [00:33:40.634]so the impact of this on climate and on people
- [00:33:44.490]that are dependent upon that climate is really dramatic,
- [00:33:47.716]so if you plot CO2 concentrations over time
- [00:33:50.528]going back to 1880 again,
- [00:33:53.196]along with global average temperature,
- [00:33:57.052]you can see the correlation between these
- [00:34:00.512]and correlation doesn't necessarily mean cause and effect,
- [00:34:03.368]but in this case, yes, it does.
- [00:34:05.876]So, this change in concentrations of
- [00:34:11.030]carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
- [00:34:12.586]is really, really important in terms of
- [00:34:14.302]explaining this change in global mean temperature.
- [00:34:18.786]So, separating human from natural causes,
- [00:34:22.594]so we use these computer models
- [00:34:25.658]and Clint is a computer modeler, climate modeler,
- [00:34:30.974]so he can speak more about this,
- [00:34:32.858]but what you have on this graph
- [00:34:34.666]is you have here global mean temperature in the black line
- [00:34:38.662]and if we run these computer models
- [00:34:40.286]and we hold CO2 constant in these models,
- [00:34:43.886]so we don't let that increase,
- [00:34:46.394]you get a pattern that's shown here by the green.
- [00:34:52.058]The only way we can essentially duplicate
- [00:34:57.538]the rising temperature that we've seen
- [00:35:00.002]is to run these models and put in the
- [00:35:03.554]carbon dioxide concentrations as they are changing
- [00:35:06.550]and then you see that the predictions in the model
- [00:35:11.053]tend to parallel what we see in terms of
- [00:35:13.769]actual observed temperatures.
- [00:35:18.203]So, projections for Nebraska.
- [00:35:20.295]Well, when we, when the modelers run these models,
- [00:35:25.287]the big unknown, I mean, they have
- [00:35:27.259]a pretty good understanding of climate science
- [00:35:29.119]and how things are working in the atmosphere,
- [00:35:31.227]physics of the atmosphere and so forth,
- [00:35:34.294]what we don't know and I'm not a climate modeler,
- [00:35:38.078]but what we don't know is what are going to be
- [00:35:39.910]the future concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere,
- [00:35:42.582]20 years from now, 40, 60, 100 years
- [00:35:45.762]because that depends upon what society
- [00:35:47.878]decides to do about this problem
- [00:35:51.450]and so, they run the models with different scenarios
- [00:35:55.470]of future carbon dioxide concentrations
- [00:36:00.182]and so, the red line here represents
- [00:36:02.178]essentially business as usual.
- [00:36:04.502]So, we just keep doing what we're doing
- [00:36:05.894]and we don't really make any changes,
- [00:36:07.798]but if we make some significant changes
- [00:36:09.610]where we actually try to reduce
- [00:36:11.654]this curve showing CO2 concentrations
- [00:36:16.970]or flatten it or even more,
- [00:36:20.826]then we're gonna have a different future
- [00:36:25.238]and so, one of the conclusions in our report
- [00:36:29.486]was the fact that the largest uncertainty
- [00:36:31.670]in projecting climate change into the future
- [00:36:35.198]is knowing what this level of CO2
- [00:36:39.562]and other greenhouse gas concentrations
- [00:36:41.582]are gonna be in the future.
- [00:36:42.790]We just don't know that,
- [00:36:44.786]so that's a huge uncertainty
- [00:36:47.226]and so, that's usually why,
- [00:36:48.734]if you've read some of the report,
- [00:36:50.454]they talk about temperature changes in ranges
- [00:36:53.059]and people will say, "Well, the reason they're
- [00:36:55.336]"giving a range is because the fact that
- [00:36:58.888]"the models are not very good."
- [00:37:00.860]The fact is they're giving a range
- [00:37:02.498]because we don't know what future
- [00:37:03.762]greenhouse gas concentrations
- [00:37:05.178]or carbon dioxide concentration are going to be
- [00:37:08.822]20, 30, 50, 60 years into the future,
- [00:37:11.726]so that's an important issue.
- [00:37:14.606]So, pulling information from the
- [00:37:16.950]National Climate Assessment report
- [00:37:18.622]and looking at what changes have
- [00:37:20.202]occurred in Nebraska already,
- [00:37:23.823]projections for Nebraska.
- [00:37:27.191]Projected increases range from
- [00:37:30.323]four to five degrees Fahrenheit
- [00:37:32.763]towards the last quarter of the century,
- [00:37:35.803]which we think of as being a long way out,
- [00:37:37.707]but I remember when there was a computer scare
- [00:37:39.611]and we were changing to the year 2000
- [00:37:42.075]and everybody was panicked
- [00:37:43.791]and it's hard to believe that was 16 years ago,
- [00:37:46.023]so time moves pretty quick.
- [00:37:48.019]So four to five degrees with a low emission scenario
- [00:37:53.055]and then, eight to nine degrees
- [00:37:54.799]with a high emission scenario.
- [00:37:57.215]So just think about Nebraska's climate
- [00:37:59.023]with an eight to nine degree increase
- [00:38:01.603]in our mean temperature.
- [00:38:05.663]So again, the range is largely associated with
- [00:38:07.916]uncertainties in terms of where future emissions
- [00:38:10.400]are gonna have us by the last quarter of this century.
- [00:38:16.068]One of the other big concerns for Nebraska,
- [00:38:18.388]being an agricultural state,
- [00:38:21.524]but also relates to questions of human health and so on,
- [00:38:24.772]is a projected high temperature increase
- [00:38:27.420]in the number of stress days,
- [00:38:29.256]so days over 100 degrees Fahrenheit.
- [00:38:32.018]So, the low emission scenarios
- [00:38:36.618]indicate a 13 to 16 additional days
- [00:38:40.214]and the higher emission scenario,
- [00:38:41.886]which is, that's what we are on,
- [00:38:43.838]is this business as usual scenario,
- [00:38:47.438]is looking at 22 to 25 additional days
- [00:38:51.570]over 100 degrees Fahrenheit during our growing season.
- [00:38:58.166]The number of warm nights increasing.
- [00:39:01.000]We're already seeing that, both in winter
- [00:39:03.324]as is in summer, and this has implications
- [00:39:05.948]for insects, over wintering of pests,
- [00:39:08.804]diseases, and all kinds of things,
- [00:39:11.660]as well as energy demand.
- [00:39:15.141]Then, the frost-free season continues to increase.
- [00:39:20.273]There's a seat up here in front and there's one over here.
- [00:39:25.937]So, frost-free season continues to increase
- [00:39:27.933]by an additional two weeks,
- [00:39:29.817]so we already talked about the fact
- [00:39:31.095]that the average for the Great Plains,
- [00:39:32.555]which were around 10 days for Nebraska,
- [00:39:35.112]five to 25 days, so an additional two weeks
- [00:39:39.175]lengthening of the growing season in Nebraska
- [00:39:41.635]and how we're going to take that into account
- [00:39:43.888]in terms of our agriculture, energy demand and so on.
- [00:39:48.856]So if you look at the low emission scenario,
- [00:39:51.572]versus the high emission scenario
- [00:39:53.359]in terms of temperature projections,
- [00:39:55.614]again, that one being the business as usual,
- [00:39:58.262]which is what we're on at the moment.
- [00:39:59.934]See, if we actually do something about
- [00:40:02.210]greenhouse gas emissions, so we actually are mitigating
- [00:40:05.320]some of the future warming, you see quite a difference
- [00:40:08.045]between these two maps, in terms of the amount of warming,
- [00:40:10.509]the four to five versus the eight to nine
- [00:40:13.457]degrees that I talked about previously.
- [00:40:16.453]If you remember the, just to give you an example,
- [00:40:19.285]if you remember the 2012 drought,
- [00:40:22.049]so we're only four years before the present,
- [00:40:28.853]Nebraska, of course, was in the bullseye
- [00:40:30.781]of this very, very severe drought
- [00:40:33.101]and this map is produced by the
- [00:40:34.613]National Drought Mitigation Center
- [00:40:36.122]here at the University of Nebraska
- [00:40:37.513]working with Noah and US Department of Agriculture.
- [00:40:40.929]So this map comes out weekly
- [00:40:43.109]and you see this huge drought area
- [00:40:46.941]and if you consider all the different
- [00:40:50.078]types of, or not types of drought,
- [00:40:51.818]but the severity levels for drought,
- [00:40:54.490]really, two thirds of the United States
- [00:40:56.302]was in drought in 2012.
- [00:41:00.434]So one of the characteristics of drought,
- [00:41:02.570]people think about drought as being a dry situation,
- [00:41:05.706]but another characteristic of drought
- [00:41:07.306]is higher temperatures, partially because of the fact
- [00:41:10.162]you have less rainfall, you have more sunshine and so on.
- [00:41:13.250]You have warmer temperatures and so on.
- [00:41:16.106]So if you look at a map of the number of days
- [00:41:19.334]over 100 degrees in 2012 across the United States
- [00:41:24.118]and you look at Nebraska, I pulled out a few of these.
- [00:41:26.626]McCook had 37 degrees over 100 degrees.
- [00:41:30.178]Lincoln had 17 days over 100 degrees
- [00:41:33.382]and Lincoln averages about five per year, they had 17.
- [00:41:38.446]McCook averages about 11, they had 37.
- [00:41:41.772]So, if you think about the projections
- [00:41:44.271]in terms of high temperature stress days into the future,
- [00:41:48.448]the bottom line is by the last quarter of this century,
- [00:41:53.532]2012 could be a relatively average year
- [00:41:57.900]and that's a pretty scary, scary picture
- [00:42:00.128]for all the sectors, not just agriculture.
- [00:42:04.305]So, this is a picture I put in.
- [00:42:06.441]Ken, we were talking about wind energy earlier,
- [00:42:08.997]so I happened to run across this slide the other day
- [00:42:11.061]and I thought, well, okay,
- [00:42:12.549]it doesn't apply to Nebraska
- [00:42:13.757]'cause we don't have many of these,
- [00:42:15.149]but Iowa does, Kansas does, and so on.
- [00:42:18.261]So one of the other things, you know,
- [00:42:20.087]when you talk to farmers, they'll say,
- [00:42:21.410]"Well, I irrigate, so if we have more droughts,
- [00:42:25.146]"we have higher temperatures, I'm just gonna irrigate more."
- [00:42:27.934]But then there's the issue about
- [00:42:29.005]the availability of groundwater.
- [00:42:31.878]There's gonna be less recharge
- [00:42:33.318]because of more evaporation,
- [00:42:35.758]more erratic rainfall patterns and so forth
- [00:42:39.866]and if there's more demand on the aquifer,
- [00:42:42.094]it's gonna cause declining groundwater levels,
- [00:42:45.553]so this is a map showing the groundwater changes
- [00:42:48.689]in Nebraska from the spring of 2012
- [00:42:51.265]to the spring of 2013, so this is after one year of drought
- [00:42:55.957]where you've had a decline in the water table
- [00:42:57.885]of anywhere from five to 20 or more feet in one year.
- [00:43:03.273]Now, the groundwater levels in Nebraska have recovered,
- [00:43:06.173]but this was a one year drought.
- [00:43:09.705]If we had a two, three, four year drought
- [00:43:12.769]like California's been going through,
- [00:43:14.765]the Southwest, the South Central US,
- [00:43:17.321]multiple years of drought
- [00:43:18.805]and that's certainly is characteristic
- [00:43:20.081]of the climate of this area.
- [00:43:21.637]There's no reason why another Dust Bowl-type drought
- [00:43:24.422]or '50s-type drought wouldn't,
- [00:43:26.421]will not occur again in the future
- [00:43:28.087]and this is actually being projected.
- [00:43:30.387]This is a huge, huge issue.
- [00:43:32.267]Consecutive years of drought
- [00:43:33.615]and what that's gonna do to groundwater
- [00:43:35.075]and therefore, the potential for irrigation.
- [00:43:38.488]Precipitation, the trend for precipitation,
- [00:43:41.127]we've seen and I've shown you maps earlier,
- [00:43:43.031]this trend will continue with maybe more precipitation
- [00:43:46.211]in the Northern Plains.
- [00:43:47.883]Decrease in the Southern Plains.
- [00:43:50.320]Little change in winter and spring
- [00:43:52.271]precipitation in Nebraska.
- [00:43:54.339]Small projected changes in summer and fall in Nebraska.
- [00:44:00.259]In general, the models are showing,
- [00:44:01.768]maybe a drying trend for the Central Great Plain states
- [00:44:06.459]and there are projections of mega-droughts
- [00:44:09.685]in the near future in the Great Plains region,
- [00:44:13.401]so a mega-drought is like a drought of 10 years or more.
- [00:44:17.953]This increase in heavy precipitation that we've seen,
- [00:44:20.413]this trend's going to continue
- [00:44:22.529]and so again, that raises issues for urban areas
- [00:44:25.521]and flooding and all kinds of issues.
- [00:44:30.094]So we don't know, it's much harder to predict
- [00:44:32.210]what's going to happen with regards to precipitation
- [00:44:34.834]and the distribution and how that
- [00:44:36.178]may change from season to season,
- [00:44:39.360]but when you consider the increase in temperature,
- [00:44:41.916]even if we have a slight increase in precipitation,
- [00:44:44.748]it's going to be ineffective because the temperature's
- [00:44:46.860]gonna overwhelm that and so,
- [00:44:48.856]we're gonna be losing more of
- [00:44:50.620]that moisture to the atmosphere.
- [00:44:51.986]Soil moisture expected to decrease.
- [00:44:54.287]Flood magnitudes, we've already seen
- [00:44:56.354]an increase in flood magnitudes
- [00:44:58.050]along the Eastern Great Plains
- [00:44:59.858]associated with these high-intensity rainfall events.
- [00:45:04.690]This is expected to continue into the future.
- [00:45:07.939]Snow cover is a huge issue.
- [00:45:09.518]There's a lot of variability in snow cover,
- [00:45:11.562]but generally what we've seen is snow cover
- [00:45:14.234]decreasing in the Western United States,
- [00:45:16.486]decreasing in those areas that feed the Platte,
- [00:45:19.178]the Missouri River and so forth.
- [00:45:20.687]This year's an exception, but this reduced snow pack's
- [00:45:24.146]gonna mean less surface water flow across the state
- [00:45:27.910]and therefore, you know, the users of that water,
- [00:45:31.718]whether it's urban areas or agriculture,
- [00:45:33.994]this is going to have an impact as well.
- [00:45:36.711]If you look at some of the model output
- [00:45:39.499]predicting this sort of drying trend
- [00:45:42.655]for the Western United States and the Great Plains,
- [00:45:44.907]you can see a dramatic change here
- [00:45:49.111]across that particular region,
- [00:45:51.271]if you project it out towards the end of the century.
- [00:45:55.079]So, takeaway points.
- [00:45:58.796]Assessing the implications, or the impact
- [00:46:01.932]of these projected changes in Nebraska,
- [00:46:05.276]obviously the consequences depend upon
- [00:46:07.204]the sensitivity of key sectors.
- [00:46:09.456]So, the sensitivity of one sector versus another
- [00:46:13.288]is going to be variable and so,
- [00:46:15.680]some can adapt more readily than others
- [00:46:18.788]and so, we need to understand that.
- [00:46:22.968]How proactive these sectors are in adapting to changes.
- [00:46:26.404]Ronnie mentioned that farmers are already adapting
- [00:46:29.795]to the changes in climate that they see.
- [00:46:33.115]They will continue to adapt,
- [00:46:35.439]but one of the outcomes and one of the conclusions
- [00:46:37.575]of the National Climate Assessment report
- [00:46:39.687]is the changes that are projected for the future
- [00:46:42.383]are outside of the range that have anything
- [00:46:44.423]they've had to adapt to in the past
- [00:46:46.931]and so, dealing with these gradual changes
- [00:46:49.603]that we've been seeing is going to be
- [00:46:52.111]much more difficult and is gonna require
- [00:46:54.035]new innovations and technology and so forth.
- [00:46:59.306]Availability of groundwater to respond
- [00:47:01.166]to this increased demand that I just mentioned
- [00:47:04.322]and also mitigation.
- [00:47:06.250]What are we going to do to lessen the amount
- [00:47:08.062]of warming that is being projected to occur
- [00:47:11.058]through the reduced reliance on fossil fuels
- [00:47:13.426]and also the development of alternative energy sources?
- [00:47:17.766]Again, emphasizing this point that
- [00:47:20.622]even with, you know, we don't exactly know
- [00:47:22.714]what's gonna happen to precipitation.
- [00:47:24.710]It'll be a slight increase, maybe a slight decrease.
- [00:47:27.079]There's gonna be a change in terms of
- [00:47:29.050]distribution between the different seasons,
- [00:47:30.910]but it's gonna be overwhelmed by these
- [00:47:32.838]increasing temperatures and increasing
- [00:47:35.206]high temperature stress days
- [00:47:37.850]and finally, that it's really important,
- [00:47:40.962]while individuals can do a lot of things,
- [00:47:42.842]governments need to provide leadership on this issue
- [00:47:46.100]and that, I think, is what the
- [00:47:47.394]climate change action plan is about,
- [00:47:49.876]is the government needs, both the federal government
- [00:47:52.476]and the national government needs to set a tone,
- [00:47:55.612]need to say that these are our goals.
- [00:47:57.375]These are things we need to achieve
- [00:47:59.327]and then, work within the different agencies
- [00:48:03.948]and with the private sector to implement this.
- [00:48:08.475]Obviously, universities have tremendous research capacity,
- [00:48:12.027]tremendous capacity in terms of outreach,
- [00:48:14.419]building public awareness, which is important,
- [00:48:17.507]so where do we go from here?
- [00:48:18.783]Obviously, the University of Nebraska
- [00:48:20.387]and other institutions within the state
- [00:48:23.220]can help a lot in preparing for and adapting to changes.
- [00:48:27.331]Many grassroots organizations have been
- [00:48:29.303]very actively engaged thus far
- [00:48:31.787]in this process of trying to build awareness, interest.
- [00:48:36.663]Come in, Chuck.
- [00:48:38.582]There's a chair up here if you don't mind
- [00:48:39.958]sitting in the front row.
- [00:48:41.105]Sit up front?
- [00:48:42.226]You get to sit by me (laughs).
- [00:48:45.169]Okay, Chuck was in here earlier.
- [00:48:47.237]Chuck is the Dean of Extension,
- [00:48:49.189]so we all introduced ourselves,
- [00:48:50.976]so now they know who you are, okay.
- [00:48:54.761]So, grassroots organizations have really taken up this cause
- [00:48:57.685]and are trying to build awareness,
- [00:48:59.265]educate the public about this and do various things.
- [00:49:03.561]State agencies, NRDs, communities,
- [00:49:06.601]obviously need to do a lot more
- [00:49:08.645]in terms of engaging in this process,
- [00:49:11.129]working within their jurisdiction and so on.
- [00:49:14.545]Working together across state agencies
- [00:49:16.936]is critically important.
- [00:49:19.213]NRDs, which are tasked with the job
- [00:49:21.233]of managing our groundwater resources in the future,
- [00:49:24.875]today and in the future and so far, critically important.
- [00:49:29.823]So, a Nebraska action, climate action plan
- [00:49:32.679]is an important step to mobilize,
- [00:49:35.023]I think, a lot of these resources that are out there,
- [00:49:37.739]the university resources, but the resources
- [00:49:40.155]of state agencies, grassroots organizations,
- [00:49:42.823]all of these stakeholders that participated
- [00:49:45.055]in our roundtables and even more than those that,
- [00:49:49.489]and we can, you know, I mentioned earlier
- [00:49:51.441]that Nebraska's really considered to be a leader
- [00:49:54.225]and so, people in D.C. want to use Nebraska
- [00:49:56.825]as an example of how you can build,
- [00:50:00.913]sort of awareness and expertise
- [00:50:03.465]to move this issue forward, in terms of discussion,
- [00:50:06.765]but we can learn an awful lot from other states
- [00:50:09.245]that have gone through the development
- [00:50:10.536]of climate action plans and also, other municipalities.
- [00:50:14.907]There are many of these that we can draw from
- [00:50:16.879]and I know Ken Winston's been looking at some of
- [00:50:18.763]these plans from other states.
- [00:50:22.359]Kind of a final sentence in our 2014 report
- [00:50:26.539]was that action now is more preferable
- [00:50:28.491]and cost-effective than reaction later.
- [00:50:31.255]So, the quicker we get onto this,
- [00:50:32.927]the much better we are going to be able
- [00:50:34.319]to deal with the issue as we move forward,
- [00:50:37.407]but this action requires both adapting to changes
- [00:50:40.886]as well as mitigating as much of the
- [00:50:45.073]future warming as possible through
- [00:50:46.981]reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and so forth.
- [00:50:51.089]So, with that, I will stop.
- [00:50:54.713]I think I'm right on time, so we break in 15 minutes,
- [00:50:58.033]so if people have questions, I'd be glad to
- [00:51:00.841]try to answer your questions.
- [00:51:02.445]Thanks for your attention.
- [00:51:03.905]Okay.
- [00:51:04.738]This is one that my staff and I were
- [00:51:06.636]sitting and talking one day.
- [00:51:08.407]It was right after the big storm
- [00:51:11.171]in Lincoln a week or two ago
- [00:51:13.679]and there was hail, you know, huge chunks of hail.
- [00:51:20.319]Well, when I was 17, which is almost 60 years ago,
- [00:51:24.987]55 years ago, we had a a hailstorm in Lincoln
- [00:51:28.936]and I walked out in the street
- [00:51:30.724]and there were hailstones this big
- [00:51:35.088]and that was 50 years ago.
- [00:51:37.852]So, can we say that the storm a week ago in Lincoln
- [00:51:44.492]was caused by climate change?
- [00:51:46.396]'Cause I saw the same thing 50 years ago.
- [00:51:49.300]Well, no, we can't.
- [00:51:51.296]So the question is, did climate change
- [00:51:53.340]in any way exacerbate that particular storm?
- [00:51:57.172]Clint, do you want to...
- [00:51:59.096]We don't know for a single event like that.
- [00:52:01.304]We're gonna have thunderstorms and we had thunderstorms,
- [00:52:03.323]you know, hundreds of years ago.
- [00:52:05.739]We're gonna have thunderstorms
- [00:52:07.131]hundreds of years in the future
- [00:52:09.455]and we're gonna have hail in some of those thunderstorms.
- [00:52:12.703]Sometimes, it's gonna be big
- [00:52:14.119]and sometimes it's not gonna be big.
- [00:52:15.771]You know, it's just part of, that's weather.
- [00:52:18.603]We're gonna have weather no matter how the climate changes.
- [00:52:22.223]In this part of the country, part of that weather
- [00:52:24.687]for the foreseeable past and the foreseeable future
- [00:52:28.215]is going to include thunderstorms with hail.
- [00:52:32.255]So as I mentioned, it's the frequency of these things
- [00:52:35.807]that we're trying to get a handle on.
- [00:52:38.223]If these things are occurring much more frequently,
- [00:52:41.335]then you have to kind of take a look at that
- [00:52:43.515]and is that being driven by something
- [00:52:45.955]in the atmosphere, some of the changes that we're seeing
- [00:52:48.487]related to climate change?
- [00:52:50.483]By the way, we've been joined by Senator Pansing Brooks.
- [00:52:54.771]Hi.
- [00:52:55.955]You're one of those that snuck in as well.
- [00:52:58.207](laughs)
- [00:52:59.279]Yeah, John has a question.
- [00:53:00.555]Along the lines of when we were young,
- [00:53:03.270]I grew up in the city of Pittsburgh
- [00:53:06.358]and there were days where the streetlights never went off,
- [00:53:09.678]that we had 110 consecutive miles
- [00:53:11.998]of steel mills billowing up smoke.
- [00:53:14.670]That's all gone.
- [00:53:16.458]I remember buses that used to
- [00:53:18.386]spew a whole bunch of Diesel fuel-smelling stuff.
- [00:53:22.890]We don't have that anymore,
- [00:53:24.746]so looks like we're making improvements and improvements
- [00:53:27.733]and then I look at this chart and it's going straight up.
- [00:53:30.361]As far as greenhouse gases, where are they comin' from?
- [00:53:35.261]Well, they're coming from all--
- [00:53:36.537]But it's hard for me to reconcile
- [00:53:37.836]what, that the accomplishes, the accomplishments
- [00:53:41.410]that we've made as far as cleaning up,
- [00:53:44.660]the rivers in Pittsburgh used to catch on fire.
- [00:53:47.608]They're now catching trout and walleye
- [00:53:51.440]at The Point in Pittsburgh.
- [00:53:52.963]Are they eating each other?
- [00:53:54.175]That's what I was gonna ask (laughs).
- [00:53:56.268](everyone laughs)
- [00:53:59.032]But, I mean, I look at so much improvement
- [00:54:02.004]we have made in the environment
- [00:54:04.000]and we've really concentrated on cleaning air up,
- [00:54:07.996]water up, and all the rest of that stuff
- [00:54:10.016]and all of a sudden, wow, we've got this big crisis,
- [00:54:13.128]so I'm thinking, where is this coming from?
- [00:54:16.102]And obviously, once we figure out where it's coming from,
- [00:54:19.634]maybe we can do something about it.
- [00:54:21.698]I just look at us getting better and better.
- [00:54:24.162]We got scrubbers on.
- [00:54:26.086]I go buy the, what is it, (mumbles)
- [00:54:30.870]the PowerPoint, yeah.
- [00:54:32.614]There's nothing coming out of that.
- [00:54:34.286]I mean, I can't see anything
- [00:54:35.910]where I used to when I was a kid, would see
- [00:54:37.678]billowing smoke and soot
- [00:54:39.977]and all that kind of stuff going out.
- [00:54:41.837]I'm breathing out CO2 now
- [00:54:43.601]and you don't see it either.
- [00:54:44.925]Well, maybe that's where I need to be.
- [00:54:49.453]I think, you know, a lot of this is invisible
- [00:54:51.544]to the public in the sense that,
- [00:54:53.999]you know, CO2 and so on, but all the sectors,
- [00:54:56.845]transportation, energy, in all of these sectors,
- [00:55:00.052]agriculture, are contributing to
- [00:55:02.572]this greenhouse gas increase that
- [00:55:04.264]we're seeing in the atmosphere.
- [00:55:05.728]What we cleaned up is a lot of the pollution
- [00:55:07.748]and the air quality, water quality has really improved.
- [00:55:11.164]You know, it's really scary, not to get too political,
- [00:55:13.600]but really scary when Ted Cruz, for example,
- [00:55:16.119]in his campaign is saying,
- [00:55:17.723]"Well, if I'm elected President,
- [00:55:18.927]"I'm gonna do away with EPA."
- [00:55:21.092]Well, those are the regulations that
- [00:55:23.252]are cleaning up our air, cleaning up our water.
- [00:55:25.572]Do we wanna go back to rivers catching on fire?
- [00:55:28.568]I mean, that's really what we're talking about
- [00:55:30.776]and so that's a huge concern,
- [00:55:33.816]so there are a lot of sources that,
- [00:55:35.604]Clint, did you wanna--
- [00:55:36.744]Yeah, can I?
- [00:55:37.812]If you look back at one of the maps that Don showed,
- [00:55:41.038]which had the trends in temperature
- [00:55:43.058]over the United States and different regions,
- [00:55:45.218]if you look carefully, you'll notice that in the Southeast
- [00:55:48.286]and especially over the Tennessee Valley,
- [00:55:52.483]it's still showing a slight cooling trend,
- [00:55:55.779]but it's coming out of that now
- [00:55:57.659]and part of the reason for that we feel
- [00:55:59.563]is that during the, up until the Clean Air Act
- [00:56:03.767]and then a little after
- [00:56:04.879]'cause it was grandfathering tin,
- [00:56:07.649]they were burning coal that had a lot of sulfur
- [00:56:10.806]and a lot of sulfur particulates in the atmosphere
- [00:56:13.917]that created basically, sulfur clouds
- [00:56:17.170]and massive ray problems, from what I remember
- [00:56:19.397]from way back then and those types of
- [00:56:23.464]particles coming out actually end up
- [00:56:26.252]collecting sunlight, I mean, causing heat in the air,
- [00:56:30.456]so it's not till recently, that they cleaned up those
- [00:56:33.782]and now it's coming out of that flume
- [00:56:35.826]and showing the warming that we're seeing now in that area.
- [00:56:40.330]So there are, you know, the aerosols
- [00:56:44.046]that make up the smoke you see
- [00:56:47.342]and the stuff coming out of power plants,
- [00:56:49.434]they have different impacts than the CO2,
- [00:56:52.894]which mixes in and stays in the atmosphere
- [00:56:55.006]a lot longer than the aerosols.
- [00:56:56.794]The aerosols and the big particulates that cause
- [00:57:00.048]clouds that warm and drain out
- [00:57:02.116]and get washed out relatively quickly.
- [00:57:05.460]Helen, you next.
- [00:57:06.760]Yeah, I was just wondering.
- [00:57:07.944]Do you have ideas on
- [00:57:12.103]mitigation approaches that, that
- [00:57:18.023]would resonate in Nebraska?
- [00:57:22.643]Well, I think, you know, a big one obviously is wind power
- [00:57:26.407]and solar, I mean, both of those.
- [00:57:28.891]We have tremendous resource, in terms of,
- [00:57:30.935]I think we're third in the nation,
- [00:57:32.167]in terms of wind potential.
- [00:57:35.047]Solar, I think we're pretty,
- [00:57:36.675]I mean, we get a lot of sunshine days and so on,
- [00:57:39.531]so there are tremendous opportunities,
- [00:57:42.527]but one of the things we find
- [00:57:44.127]is you're battling against
- [00:57:45.731]the coal industry on those things
- [00:57:47.679]and these public power districts and so on
- [00:57:49.700]that wanna stay with coal and so on,
- [00:57:52.373]which is not a good thing
- [00:57:53.856]in terms of greenhouse gas emissions
- [00:57:55.833]and so, I mean, that's a huge solution
- [00:57:58.385]and one that, I think, Nebraska's gonna start
- [00:58:02.496]hopefully moving forward with more wind energy development,
- [00:58:05.796]but it's just staggering.
- [00:58:06.932]When I drive across Kansas, when I drive across Oklahoma,
- [00:58:10.931]those states, and you see the wind farms that exist
- [00:58:14.667]and then you get to the border of Nebraska
- [00:58:16.667]and you just don't see anything
- [00:58:18.591]and we probably have more wind potential here
- [00:58:20.683]than they have in Oklahoma.
- [00:58:23.143]I think some are in Washington.
- [00:58:24.539]Yeah.
- [00:58:26.349]And not to put you in a sticky spot,
- [00:58:29.253]the legislature, we've done it right on the minute.
- [00:58:31.713](laughs) No, no, it's your comment that,
- [00:58:35.497]are you referencing you think that coal power
- [00:58:37.681]has actually held us back in terms of energy development
- [00:58:40.537]because of what their supposed stated goals are?
- [00:58:45.821]There's a tricky, yeah, thank you.
- [00:58:47.025](everyone laughs)
- [00:58:50.389]The short answer is yes.
- [00:58:51.669]I don't disagree with you.
- [00:58:53.317]No, they, I mean, I,
- [00:58:56.357]several of them attended our
- [00:58:57.473]roundtable that we had on energy
- [00:58:59.914]and so, they were pretty engaged,
- [00:59:01.606]I think, in the conversation,
- [00:59:03.374]but when you keep getting this feedback
- [00:59:08.086]that says we have to stick with what we've done in the past,
- [00:59:12.265]well, we really need to be looking at
- [00:59:14.541]new paradigms for the future
- [00:59:16.145]in wind energy and solar,
- [00:59:18.770]I mean, I think back when the federal government
- [00:59:21.402]was subsidizing solar research and so on
- [00:59:24.534]back in the '70s and then the fossil fuel industry
- [00:59:27.395]got the federal government to pull out the subsidies,
- [00:59:30.439]so that that research wouldn't move forward.
- [00:59:32.271]You think about, well, where would we be today
- [00:59:34.455]in terms of solar, if in fact the federal government
- [00:59:37.611]had been continuing to put resources into that?
- [00:59:41.399]So, we've got a lot of catching up to do.
- [00:59:43.299]Oh, it's trended.
- [00:59:44.507]I think it's a conversation that,
- [00:59:46.507]no, I've had with a number of colleagues
- [00:59:49.223]and just the issues I have with public power,
- [00:59:52.567]the concept of public power.
- [00:59:54.027]Clint?
- [00:59:54.860]Yeah, if you look at,
- [00:59:56.051]Don mentioned, you come across the border,
- [00:59:57.407]you don't see anymore turbine things.
- [00:59:59.291]That's not quite, you come across the border,
- [01:00:00.775]you do see a few along the border, why?
- [01:00:03.051]Because they get in Nebraska and get the electricity out
- [01:00:06.139]to the markets in other states, you know,
- [01:00:08.971]so they're being done by private companies
- [01:00:12.223]to benefit other places using our wind.
- [01:00:14.939]My district has probably more wind,
- [01:00:17.843]actually, towers built than any other, so I'm familiar.
- [01:00:21.418]So, the fact that public power
- [01:00:23.301]has to provide low cost energy is a bit problematic,
- [01:00:29.266]but, you know, I think, one thing that can be done
- [01:00:32.518]is promote commercial ventures.
- [01:00:35.258]If they can get a long-term contract
- [01:00:36.906]in the public power district,
- [01:00:38.206]they could probably build wind energy sites in Nebraska,
- [01:00:43.299]so there are ways to think outside the box a little bit.
- [01:00:48.384]It becomes difficult too because,
- [01:00:52.480]you know, with our technology,
- [01:00:54.080]we build coal-powered plants that last for 40 years
- [01:00:58.236]and so, it's hard to look at closing them
- [01:01:03.682]or re-purposing them because they've been huge investments
- [01:01:07.535]and so, it gets to be a sticky problem.
- [01:01:10.067]I'd just like to respond quickly to John.
- [01:01:12.319]The other point is that we all share
- [01:01:17.103]the same atmosphere on this planet
- [01:01:19.819]and while I think in the United States,
- [01:01:22.139]there's been some success in cutting the amount of CO2,
- [01:01:27.899]in other, in the developing countries,
- [01:01:29.943]China and India and so on,
- [01:01:33.055]there has been just dramatic increases in CO2 production
- [01:01:37.794]and so that's one of the reasons that I think Paris was,
- [01:01:41.114]at least encouraging is those big developing countries
- [01:01:46.062]are now talking about reducing their CO2 as well.
- [01:01:50.078]So, we have to do our part, but the whole world
- [01:01:53.190]is producing more CO2 and that's the problem.
- [01:01:56.284]Well, the other piece of it is that
- [01:01:59.116]they've dramatically decreased the amount of
- [01:02:01.696]other kinds of pollution, but at this point,
- [01:02:04.132]carbon capture from fossil fuel emissions
- [01:02:07.896]is not really, it's not really happening at this point,
- [01:02:12.260]so and I'd be glad to give you some more information.
- [01:02:16.184]We don't have anything to talk about
- [01:02:19.064]to reinforce rain forest depletion,
- [01:02:21.500]the things that are happening
- [01:02:23.592]around the globe with the rain forest.
- [01:02:26.748]Isn't that a part of this--
- [01:02:28.304]That is definitely a part of it.
- [01:02:29.836]I mean, the rain forest, obviously,
- [01:02:32.068]will pull carbon out of the atmosphere
- [01:02:35.640]and then you're destroying huge numbers of these
- [01:02:38.128]and then the only time you burn the trees,
- [01:02:40.404]which then releases the carbon into the atmosphere,
- [01:02:43.608]so you get a double whammy.
- [01:02:45.140]We've got Scott Josiah here from the Forest Service.
- [01:02:49.248]You wanna make a comment related to that?
- [01:02:51.848]Right, I mean, rain forests are great
- [01:02:55.216]cyclers of carbon and so,
- [01:02:58.744]and there's been enormous amounts of deforestation,
- [01:03:01.116]not just in the Amazon, but across Southeast Asia
- [01:03:05.807]and that continues to convert to agriculture in the pasture
- [01:03:09.209]and those new systems of agriculture in pastures
- [01:03:12.805]don't absorb and retain as much carbon,
- [01:03:15.221]so once that carbon gets in the atmosphere,
- [01:03:17.193]it's not being absorbed by trees growing back.
- [01:03:20.165]It's gone, it's up there now.
- [01:03:22.489]So, it's a big concern.
- [01:03:25.794]The bottom line is whether you're going back
- [01:03:28.254]to Dr. Roader's question, what can we do in Nebraska?
- [01:03:31.318]I mean, plant trees.
- [01:03:33.526]From a forester.
- [01:03:34.778](everyone laughs)
- [01:03:35.822]Are you surprised by that answer?
- [01:03:37.078](everyone laughs) We need to plant more trees.
- [01:03:38.363]Yeah, and we, well, I don't know
- [01:03:40.945]whether you're gonna show a slide,
- [01:03:42.549]but yeah, and he's gonna give a talk in a little while,
- [01:03:46.145]and so, the decline in forest in Nebraska
- [01:03:50.400]has really been dramatic.
- [01:03:54.485]Yes, Julie?
- [01:03:56.529]Do you think that
- [01:03:57.925]increasing the amount of grazing land
- [01:04:00.182]or native prairie in the state
- [01:04:04.266]can do the same thing as planting more trees,
- [01:04:07.402]is the question, as much pardon?
- [01:04:10.563]Yeah, but somebody else, maybe, that we have--
- [01:04:15.068]Well, I might make a comment.
- [01:04:16.647]You know, we've looked at some of these,
- [01:04:18.484]I work for NRCS and USDA and we have,
- [01:04:21.383]I'll talk about it later, a building block to,
- [01:04:24.080]within NRCS, they're doing studies,
- [01:04:26.239]looking at, you know, the impact of how many
- [01:04:29.395]and how much carbon is sequestered
- [01:04:31.626]by different practices and it seems,
- [01:04:34.482]you know, if you have cover crops or pasture management,
- [01:04:38.614]all this really does increase the carbon content,
- [01:04:41.654]but when you start planting trees,
- [01:04:43.978]there's a huge gain, so anything,
- [01:04:46.440]you know, repairing areas, windbreaks,
- [01:04:50.507]carefully manage the wood locks, you know.
- [01:04:54.175]If we can promote those, there is a real benefit.
- [01:05:01.110]Is it about break time or you have a question?
- [01:05:03.128]So, no, go 'head and then that'll be
- [01:05:06.057]the last question before we break.
- [01:05:08.609]Well, we've seen a major increase in fracking
- [01:05:12.137]and oil production, particularly in Northern Great Plains
- [01:05:15.877]and as a result, there's been a,
- [01:05:18.429]I think, a lot of burn off of natural gas
- [01:05:21.121]because it was not economically viable to capture that gas.
- [01:05:25.977]As we
- [01:05:31.061]try to transition away from coal,
- [01:05:33.174]are these rational step downs to oil and the natural gas
- [01:05:37.958]and so on instead of assuming that we're
- [01:05:40.558]gonna be able to get to high levels
- [01:05:42.041]of production of wind and solar in the next five, 10 years?
- [01:05:45.689]Or is it really just kind of spitting wind,
- [01:05:49.753]so to speak, no pun intended,
- [01:05:52.909]if we don't immediately try to transition more quickly
- [01:05:55.649]to the truly renewable, the truly carbon neutral methods?
- [01:06:02.777]Well, I think it's rational
- [01:06:06.169]and I know this has been a huge point
- [01:06:09.673]of the Obama administration and moving to more natural gas,
- [01:06:13.205]but natural gas is causing a tremendous increase
- [01:06:15.853]in methane in the atmosphere as well,
- [01:06:18.173]so there's a side effect of that
- [01:06:20.937]and we don't hear as much about that.
- [01:06:23.561]We tend to hear more about carbon dioxide,
- [01:06:25.625]but methane is much more powerful
- [01:06:27.857]greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide
- [01:06:31.849]and with concerns about the permafrost,
- [01:06:34.565]thawing the permafrost and natural gas,
- [01:06:38.190]methane relieves from that and that's a huge issue,
- [01:06:40.930]so it's, I think we've taken a step forward
- [01:06:44.482]in the US by moving away from coal,
- [01:06:47.990]but natural gas is kind of creating
- [01:06:50.242]another series of issues that we're gonna
- [01:06:52.470]have to address as well.
- [01:06:54.398]I don't know, anyone else have comments about--
- [01:06:57.414]That's like switching to (mumbles).
- [01:06:59.782](everyone laughs)
- [01:07:01.686]It's probably better, but it's still not good.
- [01:07:05.973]Depending on who's President,
- [01:07:07.100]we may be building a pipeline,
- [01:07:09.723]which some of them are talking about that, you know?
- [01:07:12.183]Yeah, Kim?
- [01:07:13.640]Bill Kevin had an article
- [01:07:15.016]that came out a couple of months ago.
- [01:07:16.432]I forget which magazine it was in,
- [01:07:17.688]but it was a big, long comprehensive piece
- [01:07:19.800]and his argument was that all this time
- [01:07:21.680]we've been battling CO2, we may have been
- [01:07:23.956]missing the biggest things of all,
- [01:07:25.812]which is all the methane released
- [01:07:27.716]that has come from the fracking move
- [01:07:29.786]and since methane is tens of times more potent than CO2,
- [01:07:34.918]it really is a problem, so it may be
- [01:07:37.494]sort of a sleeping giant that we're not really aware of
- [01:07:41.582]as much as we should be yet
- [01:07:43.370]and so, I think that makes that
- [01:07:44.878]kind of stare down approach that
- [01:07:46.772]the Obama administration has taken is kind of problematic.
- [01:07:52.843]Okay, wow.
- [01:07:54.167]I'll let you say very kind words.
- [01:07:56.003]Okay, we'll be back.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;">
<iframe
style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;"
src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/5800?format=iframe&autoplay=0"
title="Video Player: Nebraska Legislature - Special Committee - Climate Change Seminar - Overview"
allowfullscreen
></iframe>
</div>
Comments
0 Comments