Nanocomposites for Phosphate Recovery: Investigating the Effects of Competing Contaminants and pH
Tobi Onasanya - Parallel I
Author
09/26/2024
Added
0
Plays
Description
Student’s name: Tobi Onasanya
Home Institution: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
NNCI Site: SHyNE @ Northwestern University
REU Principal Investigator: Professor Vinayak Dravid, Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University
REU Mentor: Kelly Matuszewski, Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University
Abstract: Nutrient pollution in natural water systems, such as nitrogen and phosphorus introduced into bodies of water primarily from agricultural runoff, can lead to harmful algal blooms, oxygen depletion, and severe impacts on aquatic ecosystems and water quality. Eutrophication, excessive nutrients, contribute to disruptions of the nitrogen and phosphorus cycles and the growth of algal bloom creating dead zones in aquatic environments. Current water treatment technologies are timely and lack versatility to remove different contaminants. Conversely, interest in the use of nanomaterials is increasing due to their availability and ability to be tailored to containments. Here we aim to investigate the remediation of phosphates and metals typically found in storm and wastewater using a nanocomposite that consists of iron oxide nanoparticles coated cellulose sponge. Previous studies have shown success, with high-performing adsorption rates of phosphorus in lower pH systems and subsequent recovery of the phosphorus occurs at a pH near 11. In exploring the impact of pH levels, we also investigate how much water is required for successful recovery of phosphorus off the nanocomposite, testing recovery in volumes of 15 mL, 100 mL, and 500 mL of pH 11 water. Kinetics trials were run to examine how the system's contents affect the capture and recovery rates by comparing phosphorus and multi-ion kinetics. Finally, a flow-through system was used to mimic real water systems and study how flow rate influences performance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is also used to observe how the nanoparticle coating is affected by these variables. This study will give more insight into how nanoparticle coatings can selectively remove pollution from flowing and stagnant water; creating a solution for large-scale pollution that is cost-effective and sustainable for the environment allowing us to recover and reuse these nutrients.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:00.800]Good morning everyone, my name is Tanya and this summer I spent my time in Northwestern
- [00:00:11.040]with my wonderful mentor Kelly studying Neuropathics for Phosphate Recovery.
- [00:00:16.080]Particularly, we look into investigating the effects of the same contaminants as diabetes.
- [00:00:29.840]Okay, so here we go. Many agricultural operations have seen significant impacts on our water system
- [00:00:38.320]and environment. Farm activities in particular lead to disruption of the soil and lead to runoff
- [00:00:45.120]which introduces herbicides, pesticides, and nutrients into our waterways.
- [00:00:50.320]And nutrient pollution from this runoff then leads to algal blooms which creates
- [00:00:55.360]the eutrophication of our environments, creating dead zones, essentially killing
- [00:00:59.760]any aquatic life underneath the algal blooms, and the disruption of the nitrogen and phosphorus.
- [00:01:06.080]So my project aims to use the nanoparticle coatings that can selectively remove nutrient
- [00:01:13.360]pollution probably in smaller water systems and sagging water systems. Specifically,
- [00:01:18.560]we're focusing on phosphates because current water treatment systems are tiny and lack
- [00:01:24.080]versatility to remove different types of contaminants while nanoparticles can be
- [00:01:29.040]tailored to different contaminants, which is way better. So first we looked into how
- [00:01:37.440]the constants of water impact removal and we did this first by synthesizing our iron oxide
- [00:01:43.520]sponges using a dip-coating technique where we cut off this big brick of cellular sponge,
- [00:01:48.960]it's the smallest sponges that you can see over there, and then we dipped it into the iron oxide
- [00:01:53.760]coating three times. We made it into a furnace overnight to dry and then we washed off any
- [00:01:58.320]excess earth. Then we created a 2 ppm solution of phosphorus and split that in half and added
- [00:02:05.040]additional ions, lead, zinc, and copper into the second system to introduce what we would normally
- [00:02:12.800]see in water lakes and stormwater so that we could then create kinetic curves to compare the
- [00:02:20.000]absorption over time using the different times that it was secured. And then after that we looked
- [00:02:27.600]at how pH and volume impact recovery. First, we already knew from prior research that using a pH
- [00:02:34.240]of 11 would allow us to decore the phosphorus from the sponge and collect it for reuse.
- [00:02:39.360]So most of our research focuses on using pH 11. And we started by soaking our iron oxide
- [00:02:46.400]sponges in a 2-ppl phosphorus solution, plus the additional ions for the multi-ion
- [00:02:50.640]channels for 24 hours, and it's going to have a max amount of hydrogen from the sponge. And then we
- [00:02:56.880]performed initial transducing volumes of 15, 100, and 500 milliliters of pH 11 DI water,
- [00:03:04.000]and compared that, compared the phosphorus and multi-ion data using the ICP-OES, which is the
- [00:03:10.560]inductively coupled plasma emission of optical emission spectroscopy, which allows us to quantify
- [00:03:16.560]how much of an element is inside of our samples. In this case, we're just looking at phosphorus
- [00:03:21.840]and from the multi-ion channels, the additional ions I mentioned earlier. And then we did a
- [00:03:26.720]more extensive volume trial using 15, 375, 625, 1000, and a control of just 1000 milliliters of
- [00:03:34.960]air water, which is straight water, no pH on it. And the reason why we're looking into volume and
- [00:03:40.480]how that impacts recovery is we want to be able to get a substantial amount of recovery without
- [00:03:46.400]having to use too much water, because then it starts to defeat the purpose of being sustainable
- [00:03:51.040]if we're creating water waste. So here now, we're definitely doing a
- [00:03:56.400]response to what the sponge looks like directly after iron oxide coating. As you can see, there's
- [00:04:01.600]a pretty good coating layer. Any areas that look a little sheer, it's most likely this where it's
- [00:04:07.120]been like cut off for the SEM, that's a certain size. But yes, the white particles are the iron
- [00:04:13.680]oxide, and they're very, very strong. And this is a pretty good baseline of what we hope to see
- [00:04:18.560]from the sponge after coating. So from our initial results, first, we saw that the
- [00:04:26.080]multi-ion trials seem to have a higher and faster rate of absorption compared to phosphorous-only
- [00:04:32.240]trials. And this initially led us to believe that having multiple ions in a system would
- [00:04:38.000]actually increase the rate of absorption. But after using the second-order kinetics absorption
- [00:04:46.000]model equation, we found the case can fall into the breakdown of the reaction.
- [00:04:51.120]And we saw that the phosphorous-only trial actually had a slightly
- [00:04:55.760]higher K2 value, which means that it actually absorbs phosphorus at a slightly faster rate
- [00:05:01.520]than the multi-ion trial. And this is most likely due to multiple ions competing to be soaked up by
- [00:05:07.360]the iron oxide, so the phosphorus, it takes more time for it to actually be soaked up. But it's not
- [00:05:13.120]a huge significant difference, which is good. And here's what the sponge looks like after
- [00:05:18.880]absorption. As you can see, it's still really well covered, really well coated, which is what we want to see. It's really
- [00:05:25.440]bad for moss coating midway. And so here's the data from our first volume dependency trial,
- [00:05:32.880]where we just see the three volumes. And in the phosphorus-only trial, we were able to
- [00:05:38.160]capture almost 40 percent of the phosphorus around the beginning 24-hour trials.
- [00:05:43.680]And from the 15, we saw 20%, 100%, 25%, and then from the 500, almost 30% was recovered.
- [00:05:51.090]So in total, from the phosphorus-only trial, in regards to the sponge, we got like 76% of the phosphorus that we captured originally.
- [00:05:58.810]And then from the multi-atom trial, we were able to capture about 65% of the phosphorus from the 24-hour trials using the sponges.
- [00:06:09.970]And then we only did 100 milliliters for the multi-atom trial because, once again, we're trying to find the happy medium where you don't have to use too much water to get back over 50%, about 50% of recovery.
- [00:06:23.570]And so from the phosphorus-only trial, we were able to do that.
- [00:06:28.270]So we figured we just want to look into 100 milliliters, how that would work.
- [00:06:31.570]And as you can see, from what we captured, we were able to get back 60.7%.
- [00:06:36.810]And here's what the sponge looks like.
- [00:06:39.810]This is like after the recovery trials.
- [00:06:41.810]As you can see, it's a little bare, and this could be because of sponge reuse.
- [00:06:46.510]It could just be a sponge that didn't get enough coating or some of the excess iron
- [00:06:51.230]oxide that didn't come off in the initial washes could have come off during the removal
- [00:06:56.250]process.
- [00:06:57.250]We're not sure.
- [00:06:58.250]The shining particles also could have coagulated with the bare particles, but this would take
- [00:07:04.430]more research and time to look into, but it's not a bad coating.
- [00:07:09.770]So, as you can see from both trials, we captured about 50% of the phosphorus from our 24-hour
- [00:07:20.510]trial.
- [00:07:21.510]And at 375 liters in both, we're able to get back about 50% of the phosphorus we captured,
- [00:07:28.070]which is good, because it shows that we don't need to use the highest amount of water to
- [00:07:32.730]get back a substantial amount of phosphorus, and especially in the multi-hour trial, you
- [00:07:36.530]can actually see as we go up to 1,000 liters, we captured about 50% of the phosphorus.
- [00:07:39.730]We captured less phosphorus than we did with 6.5, and still at 3.75, we were able to get
- [00:07:45.330]back 50%, so it's a pretty good standpoint to get.
- [00:07:50.450]In conclusion, we found that the multi-hour trial has a reduced rate of absorption due
- [00:08:00.410]to having multiple ions in the system, but it's not bad compared to what we have seen
- [00:08:09.690]in the phosphorus-only trial, and standard absorption was seen compared to previous work
- [00:08:15.450]that we have seen, but more work can be done to improve the recovery technique, which is
- [00:08:20.610]what we wanted to do, but, you know, we ran out of time.
- [00:08:24.070]And so in the future, we wanted to continue working to see how these sponges would work
- [00:08:29.250]in a flow-through system with columns and tubing, see how it would compare to a real
- [00:08:34.310]movement system, which is what we had planned to do, but again, ran out of time.
- [00:08:39.650]We wanted to see how a higher pH impacts recovery, because from previous works, I'm pretty sure
- [00:08:43.550]we got to pH 11 and it just stopped there, but we wanted to look at how pH 12 or pH 13
- [00:08:50.790]could impact recovery, potentially giving us more options.
- [00:08:55.490]And thank you to all these lovely people, and for the tears of Mike, you're all great.
- [00:09:09.610]Thanks for sharing your work this summer.
- [00:09:20.350]I was wondering if you could maybe share a little more insight on how scalable the production
- [00:09:25.350]of the membranes is, and if you're planning to use it for water recovery at scale, or
- [00:09:30.870]in a different scenario?
- [00:09:39.570]What types of water recovery are you planning to use it for, and if it's at scale, how scalable
- [00:09:48.650]is the production of the membranes?
- [00:09:50.410]So that's how scalable the production is, and what type of water recovery we're planning
- [00:09:56.250]to use it for.
- [00:09:57.250]Essentially, it's for water systems that have been polluted by different nutrients.
- [00:10:02.430]In this case, phosphate, but there's also, in different soils, there's also ones about
- [00:10:07.530]oil.
- [00:10:08.530]It's a similar situation.
- [00:10:09.530]It's a similar experiment.
- [00:10:10.530]The whole purpose of the sponge is to be reusable.
- [00:10:14.890]So we don't have to make huge batches, we make one big batch.
- [00:10:19.890]And it's pretty cost-efficient and time-efficient to make.
- [00:10:22.890]Making the big batch of sponges I made took about a week.
- [00:10:27.970]So it's not a crazy process, it takes too much time.
- [00:10:32.190]And so essentially how they work is we age them in a bag and apparently just toss them
- [00:10:39.490]in a water system, and then we can take it back, recover the phosphorus, and then repeat
- [00:10:44.410]the process.
- [00:10:45.670]So we don't have to continually make the sponges, we can just reuse.
- [00:10:50.790]Is there a reason why we use cellular sponges instead of some other high surface
- [00:10:56.950]area?
- [00:10:57.950]Yes.
- [00:10:58.950]Can you repeat the question?
- [00:11:01.950]Oh yes.
- [00:11:02.950]He asked why we're using cellular sponges instead of consecutive sponges, and that's
- [00:11:09.450]because I'm pretty sure cellulose actually has an affinity for the iron oxide particles,
- [00:11:13.470]so the particles don't just like fall off.
- [00:11:16.390]So with like a normal sponge, it's meant to like get rid of anything that's on it because
- [00:11:21.390]you have to like continually use the sponge to clean stuff, but this, the iron oxide particles
- [00:11:25.330]just stick to it.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/23116?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Nanocomposites for Phosphate Recovery: Investigating the Effects of Competing Contaminants and pH" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments