Nebraska Virtual Space Law Week - Spectrum and Space: Future Challenges and Opportunities
jredwine2
Author
10/12/2021
Added
14
Plays
Description
Day 3 of Nebraska Space Law Week is on Spectrum and Space activities. Join panelists Jennifer Manner and Jennifer Warren as they discuss Spectrum, its future opportunities and challenges.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:01.810]Good afternoon, everybody.
- [00:00:02.840]Welcome to the 14th annual
- [00:00:05.140]University of Nebraska College of Law Washington, DC
- [00:00:07.860]Space Law Conference.
- [00:00:09.120]And as you can tell, we're not all in Washington, DC.
- [00:00:12.090]We're not all even in the United States.
- [00:00:15.330]So we were just lamenting the fact we can't be in person.
- [00:00:17.410]Hope to be back in person next year.
- [00:00:20.480]But this year, like last year,
- [00:00:21.760]it is an online Space Law Week,
- [00:00:23.610]one session per day.
- [00:00:26.910]We started out with commercial space on Monday,
- [00:00:31.270]and then we are moving today
- [00:00:35.470]into spectrum management issues.
- [00:00:39.810]We're honored to be joined by Jennifer Manner,
- [00:00:44.090]Senior Vice President for Regulatory Affairs
- [00:00:46.290]at EchoStar Corporation.
- [00:00:47.640]Jennifer has previously served in a variety of roles
- [00:00:49.840]at the Federal Communications Commission
- [00:00:52.150]and serves also as an adjunct professor of law
- [00:00:55.610]at the Georgetown Law Center.
- [00:00:57.790]And also by Jennifer Warren,
- [00:01:00.070]Vice President of Technology Policy and Regulation
- [00:01:02.740]at Lockheed Martin.
- [00:01:04.690]Jennifer Warren has also previously served
- [00:01:07.040]in the Federal Communications Commission
- [00:01:09.270]as a senior advisor.
- [00:01:11.320]So both Jennifers bring a wealth of experience.
- [00:01:14.460]We look forward to hearing from them again
- [00:01:16.890]on spectrum management issues.
- [00:01:19.320]This year I'm joined by my co-moderator Endeliza Hampton.
- [00:01:24.830]She's a third year student here
- [00:01:26.350]at the University of Nebraska College of Law,
- [00:01:29.040]focusing on cyber telecommunications and satellite law.
- [00:01:32.933]Endeliza has done research for a preeminent spectrum
- [00:01:39.210]scholar on a spectrum management book,
- [00:01:42.230]and has also worked in corporate compliance.
- [00:01:45.580]We're delighted to be joined by Endeliza here today
- [00:01:48.510]as well to help co-moderate.
- [00:01:51.540]Wanted to also mention that this week,
- [00:01:54.180]our Space Law Week, our 14th annual conference
- [00:01:56.710]is co-sponsored by
- [00:01:58.030]the American Society of International Law
- [00:02:00.290]Space Law Interest Group,
- [00:02:01.640]and the American Branch of International Law Association
- [00:02:04.220]Space Law Committee.
- [00:02:06.820]And with that, I'm gonna turn it over to Endeliza
- [00:02:08.980]to begin the questions for the Jennifers.
- [00:02:14.080]Well, thank you very much, Professor Schaefer.
- [00:02:16.480]So I'm gonna start, and it's an honor to be on this panel
- [00:02:19.789]as I said earlier with everybody here,
- [00:02:23.290]but to Ms. Manner and Ms. Warren,
- [00:02:25.370]so you both recently served on an advisory committee
- [00:02:28.180]that recommended and laid out possible reforms
- [00:02:30.780]for spectrum management in the United States.
- [00:02:33.540]What reforms would you personally like to see
- [00:02:36.660]in the United States regarding spectrum management?
- [00:02:45.220]Jen, do you want me to go first,
- [00:02:46.658]or do you want to go first?
- [00:02:48.140]Okay, I'll go first.
- [00:02:49.420]Do you wanna?
- [00:02:50.750]No, you go first.
- [00:02:51.583]Okay.
- [00:02:54.930]So Jennifer was,
- [00:02:55.910]and I should mention Jennifer and I
- [00:02:57.210]were actually co-professors at Georgetown together.
- [00:03:01.650]Jennifer was actually the chair
- [00:03:03.110]of the Commerce Spectrum Management Advisory Committee,
- [00:03:05.690]and I was the working group chair on this issue.
- [00:03:08.200]So we've worked very closely on this as well
- [00:03:11.100]as we have throughout our whole career.
- [00:03:12.500]So this is a great question,
- [00:03:14.290]and I think probably one of the most important
- [00:03:19.400]for me personally was revising
- [00:03:21.800]the memorandum of understanding that exists
- [00:03:24.050]between the FCC and NTIA today
- [00:03:26.610]was really one of our early recommendations,
- [00:03:29.930]but we actually expanded on that in the second half
- [00:03:33.610]of our reports.
- [00:03:35.370]And there's an existing MOU since the mid 2000s
- [00:03:38.940]between the FCC and NTIA on coordination.
- [00:03:42.800]And when we took a look at it, it was fairly,
- [00:03:47.150]I mean, it was a good first stab.
- [00:03:48.440]It was fairly high level.
- [00:03:50.490]It didn't take into account a lot of the changes
- [00:03:52.360]that we're seeing, things like spectrum sharing,
- [00:03:54.670]really putting in place time limits,
- [00:03:57.830]and maybe even greater cooperation among the agencies
- [00:04:01.850]and greater, more touches between the agencies.
- [00:04:05.170]One of the things we think is maybe a problem
- [00:04:07.510]is that people don't spend enough time together
- [00:04:11.030]being able to talk through issues.
- [00:04:12.730]So we made a whole bunch of recommendations
- [00:04:15.930]that we believe could be implemented without legislation.
- [00:04:18.890]So that was something else.
- [00:04:20.050]We looked at a number of different changes in our report.
- [00:04:23.910]Some of them required funding.
- [00:04:25.340]Some of them required legislative changes.
- [00:04:27.910]This was something that could be done today
- [00:04:31.470]by the agencies if they chose.
- [00:04:33.270]And we're still very hopeful that there will be a change.
- [00:04:36.770]I think this is critical to get in place.
- [00:04:39.290]And if you take a look,
- [00:04:40.450]we've made some kind of subsidiary recommendations too
- [00:04:43.730]to try and increase the coordination
- [00:04:45.690]between the FCC and NTIA,
- [00:04:47.640]including possibly having shared offices,
- [00:04:50.520]having details among the agencies.
- [00:04:53.300]We really do believe increasing the communication
- [00:04:56.020]can only help things.
- [00:04:58.130]The other piece I just want to touch on
- [00:04:59.563]that I thought was very important,
- [00:05:01.190]and I am seeing implemented
- [00:05:03.270]was the idea of more research being done.
- [00:05:05.350]And National Science Foundation has started that actually
- [00:05:09.910]with creating a center for-
- [00:05:14.003]They had a grant proposal center
- [00:05:16.320]for more testing and working together
- [00:05:18.290]on sharing and so forth.
- [00:05:19.990]Programs like that I was very happy to see.
- [00:05:23.030]I think more programs like that in the government
- [00:05:25.660]is gonna be important and where the private sector
- [00:05:27.790]and academia can participate.
- [00:05:29.780]So for me personally, those are the top things
- [00:05:31.960]and I will turn my floor over to my colleague, Jennifer.
- [00:05:36.490]So thank you very much.
- [00:05:37.460]So I agree with Jennifer that
- [00:05:43.720]an updated MOU is a good interim step,
- [00:05:47.880]but I view it as an interim step.
- [00:05:50.650]I don't believe it will be sufficient,
- [00:05:54.170]and let me spend a moment on why.
- [00:05:57.580]When the MOU and was first conceived,
- [00:06:00.750]spectrum sharing really wasn't an issue.
- [00:06:04.500]Spectrum sharing now is talked about
- [00:06:07.720]not just because it's trendy to talk about it,
- [00:06:10.350]but because it's almost impossible
- [00:06:13.650]to look at the bands that are being targeted
- [00:06:17.870]for use by other sectors
- [00:06:20.800]and not see spectrum sharing as the question.
- [00:06:26.770]It can be satellite.
- [00:06:28.080]It can be commercial Satcom,
- [00:06:31.060]can be weather, can be federal uses, climate,
- [00:06:35.380]all sorts of different types of uses, space and otherwise.
- [00:06:40.690]And our spectrum governance model doesn't account for
- [00:06:45.390]executive branch national priorities, which may include 5G.
- [00:06:49.180]So let me step back on that.
- [00:06:51.110]So today, spectrum sharing has to be thought of.
- [00:06:54.890]When these things begin,
- [00:06:57.070]you had very stove-piped approaches.
- [00:06:59.440]Everybody had their own spectrum.
- [00:07:01.540]So we have to sit back and say is a system where,
- [00:07:08.460]that has worked well up until now,
- [00:07:10.310]is it proper going forward
- [00:07:12.790]where one agency and an agency that is actually outside
- [00:07:16.840]of the executive branch
- [00:07:18.550]has unilateral decision-making authority
- [00:07:21.320]over the use of spectrum?
- [00:07:22.970]Cooperation is great as long as you arrive at consensus
- [00:07:26.580]that's often driven more by personality
- [00:07:28.670]than technical studies.
- [00:07:30.490]And if we want to get to where the United States
- [00:07:36.140]can prioritize its national priorities,
- [00:07:42.060]there needs to be.
- [00:07:43.390]The MOU cannot do that,
- [00:07:46.070]because the MOU does not require legislation
- [00:07:49.150]and it would require legislation
- [00:07:52.040]to make that change so that
- [00:07:54.290]decision-making authority is legally shared.
- [00:07:57.200]So that would be personally
- [00:07:59.770]something that I think would be significant
- [00:08:01.610]as we continue to move forward in a shared world.
- [00:08:04.170]Thank you.
- [00:08:08.550]Well, great.
- [00:08:09.610]It's interesting to hear those developments on the MOU
- [00:08:13.610]and then possible next steps.
- [00:08:15.880]So the Biden administration has been in office
- [00:08:18.320]roughly eight months now,
- [00:08:20.290]and just wondering if we could get your views
- [00:08:23.670]on where they're headed on spectrum management issues,
- [00:08:28.340]if it's become clear yet
- [00:08:29.730]or where you think they might head
- [00:08:31.130]if it's not yet quite clear where they're going on it,
- [00:08:34.320]and maybe we can start with Jennifer Warren this time
- [00:08:36.550]and then turn to Jennifer Manner.
- [00:08:39.890]Sure.
- [00:08:40.723]So the Biden administration has yet to appoint
- [00:08:46.560]or nominate a head of the National Telecommunications
- [00:08:50.029]and Information Administration,
- [00:08:55.560]which is, as I think most of your audience may know,
- [00:08:58.460]the regulator of federal users of spectrum.
- [00:09:01.460]And it remains unclear when they may move forward
- [00:09:07.040]with a permanent chair
- [00:09:09.310]of the Federal Communications Commission,
- [00:09:11.320]although acting chairwoman Rosenworcel
- [00:09:13.910]is doing a phenomenal job
- [00:09:16.856]and is certainly positioned
- [00:09:21.050]should they choose to be the permanent chair.
- [00:09:25.730]The question is though, have things stopped
- [00:09:30.340]because of those permanent appointments or appointments?
- [00:09:33.510]And I would say no.
- [00:09:34.620]I mean, the NTIA has had its spectrum summit,
- [00:09:38.830]is certainly working forward-
- [00:09:42.320]Working on its national spectrum strategy,
- [00:09:45.550]is leaning into a lot of dialogues on spectrum sharing.
- [00:09:50.400]The FCC under chairwoman Rosenworcel's leadership
- [00:09:54.570]is certainly, again, moving forward,
- [00:09:56.080]making mid-band spectrum available,
- [00:09:58.420]trying to come up with sharing
- [00:10:00.400]that works for impacted users.
- [00:10:03.910]So I think everybody is moving forward
- [00:10:08.570]as far as they can.
- [00:10:09.950]I think where we're going to see
- [00:10:12.660]some challenges is as we look ahead
- [00:10:15.170]and we're in the preparations
- [00:10:17.110]for the World Radio Conference.
- [00:10:18.690]And I'm sure, I was gonna say Professor Manner,
- [00:10:20.610]but Jennifer can speak to that as well.
- [00:10:24.610]That's where we're really going to need to see
- [00:10:28.110]leadership that we know will take us
- [00:10:29.800]all the way through that,
- [00:10:30.910]both in the FCC and at NTIA as well as at the state.
- [00:10:36.960]But I think we're good for the moment,
- [00:10:44.270]but we've got a precipice ahead.
- [00:10:46.510]A precipice may not be the right word,
- [00:10:47.770]but we've got to a point where we really need to have
- [00:10:50.120]leadership there.
- [00:10:52.960]So I agree with Jennifer's assessment.
- [00:10:56.910]There's one piece that I think is getting interesting,
- [00:11:00.780]which is they've appointed their PCAST,
- [00:11:03.050]which is the presidential advisory group
- [00:11:05.550]on science and technology.
- [00:11:07.600]And during the Biden administration,
- [00:11:09.770]this was an instrumental group in spectrum sharing,
- [00:11:13.060]and for those of you who are aware of what we call CBRS,
- [00:11:16.460]which was a novel spectrum sharing approach
- [00:11:20.050]that involves satellite terrestrial and government spectrum,
- [00:11:23.110]that was recommended by the PCAST
- [00:11:24.970]that was done under the Obama administration.
- [00:11:28.310]I anticipate that the PCAST
- [00:11:31.754]will be used in a similar manner again
- [00:11:34.690]to look at spectrum sharing.
- [00:11:36.040]So I think that that's one thing that I'd say is different.
- [00:11:39.000]The other, just to build on what Jennifer said,
- [00:11:41.240]is I see more of a commitment
- [00:11:43.780]by the National Science Foundation
- [00:11:46.570]on the research side and the idea that they're creating
- [00:11:50.101]what I would call basically an incubator
- [00:11:52.340]or test sites and things.
- [00:11:54.120]I think that's something that we haven't seen before,
- [00:11:58.250]and I think Colt's promise at least
- [00:12:00.260]for some real life testing and analysis,
- [00:12:03.050]which I think is critical.
- [00:12:04.410]If you don't have fact-based decisions,
- [00:12:07.420]you're gonna end up with bad decisions.
- [00:12:09.170]So that's something that I think
- [00:12:11.400]hopefully will be included in
- [00:12:14.400]to anything that happens as the FCC and NTIA
- [00:12:17.890]working with state determine our international,
- [00:12:19.920]but as well as our domestic positions,
- [00:12:21.970]'cause a lot of what Jennifer's talked about
- [00:12:23.550]is really moving forward on things
- [00:12:25.473]where the ground has been laid in the past
- [00:12:29.130]and are exciting and good policies,
- [00:12:31.470]but there needs to be something after that.
- [00:12:34.730]And and there definitely needs to be
- [00:12:36.510]the national spectrum strategy as Jennifer remarked.
- [00:12:47.610]So that actually leads us to another question,
- [00:12:50.000]and one of you mentioned it earlier
- [00:12:52.210]in regards to terrestrial 5G.
- [00:12:54.280]So there is some belief that there is a bias
- [00:12:56.780]towards terrestrial 5G against satellite
- [00:12:59.680]when it comes to spectrum allocations.
- [00:13:02.480]Of course, 5G is part of the infrastructure,
- [00:13:06.910]but can you speak to what creates that bias
- [00:13:09.530]and what can satellite do to best respond to that?
- [00:13:16.087]I guess it's my turn.
- [00:13:17.034]So let's start with the fact that
- [00:13:19.550]probably everyone has in their hands
- [00:13:21.800]or near them right now who's watching this webinar,
- [00:13:24.260]at least one communications device if not two.
- [00:13:28.370]You have probably your computer and a hat.
- [00:13:30.960]So when you think about spectrum, you go,
- [00:13:33.607]"Oh, I need it for my cell phone.
- [00:13:35.630]Oh, I need it for my computer."
- [00:13:38.020]And you may not even think that your-
- [00:13:39.540]My computer's actually linked up via satellite,
- [00:13:42.640]because I'm at the office and we're a satellite company.
- [00:13:46.619]So you don't really think about how do I,
- [00:13:48.640]I mean, unless you're paying for it,
- [00:13:49.750]you probably don't really pay attention to
- [00:13:51.300]who's your provider, right?
- [00:13:54.350]But the fact of the matter is everyone has a cell phone.
- [00:13:56.630]Everyone thinks it's important.
- [00:13:57.900]It's certainly a critical economic driver
- [00:14:00.020]for the United States and the globe
- [00:14:03.200]and satellite is fairly the unsung hero.
- [00:14:07.840]And there was a great-
- [00:14:09.670]If you ever get time and you're interested,
- [00:14:11.260]I think it was the Society of Satellite Professionals
- [00:14:13.720]did a great video years ago,
- [00:14:15.657]"A Day in the Life Without Satellite".
- [00:14:17.880]And you really saw everything
- [00:14:19.780]and things that you don't think of.
- [00:14:22.090]When you go to the gas station,
- [00:14:24.180]my company, for instance,
- [00:14:26.140]provide satellite service to 85% of the gas stations
- [00:14:29.060]in the United States to do credit card transactions, right?
- [00:14:32.970]There is something you would never think,
- [00:14:34.820]much less your programming that comes,
- [00:14:38.440]is transmitted via satellite,
- [00:14:40.500]et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
- [00:14:41.980]Some people get home broadband.
- [00:14:44.870]But at the end of the day, everyone thinks satellite.
- [00:14:47.410]I mean, everyone thinks terrestrial
- [00:14:49.040]and there was a big economic,
- [00:14:52.890]plus there's a race for 5G.
- [00:14:55.100]And this is one area where I actually think
- [00:14:56.750]there is a mistake.
- [00:14:58.560]At 3GPP, which is the standards body
- [00:15:01.140]that's developing 5G standards,
- [00:15:04.390]in March of this year, they're actually gonna release
- [00:15:07.160]an update to the standards that include satellites.
- [00:15:09.590]So satellite is part of 5G, will be part of 5G,
- [00:15:12.690]so that kind of makes it more official,
- [00:15:14.350]even though I would argue it's been part of 5G
- [00:15:17.520]and it's for a number of different use cases.
- [00:15:20.930]The ITU is considering how to work
- [00:15:23.640]satellite into its 5G standards.
- [00:15:26.020]So satellite is a part,
- [00:15:27.570]so I'm somewhat careful when I say 5G versus satellite,
- [00:15:30.950]because satellite is part of 5G
- [00:15:33.460]as you know, Endeliza, from our discussions.
- [00:15:36.280]But I think the bias is mistaken.
- [00:15:41.300]We have a smaller economic portion of the country
- [00:15:44.900]who uses satellite, so DOD thinks a lot about it.
- [00:15:47.940]Rural users think a lot about it.
- [00:15:50.370]But at the end of the day, it's just not top of mind.
- [00:15:55.220]And in terms of getting it more important,
- [00:15:57.400]continued education,
- [00:15:58.600]it's something Jennifer and I spend
- [00:15:59.910]a fair amount of our time meeting with people
- [00:16:02.420]to try and explain
- [00:16:04.780]and getting important allies I consider is important.
- [00:16:08.040]For instance, we work closely
- [00:16:09.390]with certain government agencies
- [00:16:10.780]who may have certain interests, certain industrial sectors.
- [00:16:14.020]You may have seen this.
- [00:16:16.870]In the three gigahertz band,
- [00:16:18.740]there's been a long time satellite band,
- [00:16:22.160]satellite user operators have joined
- [00:16:24.770]with the broadcast industry, for instance,
- [00:16:26.720]who relies on that band and relies on the product
- [00:16:29.180]from satellite operators
- [00:16:30.850]to bring programming to consumers and so forth.
- [00:16:34.080]So banding together with the right allies is important,
- [00:16:37.840]but it's a hard sell.
- [00:16:39.680]I have to say we work every day on this issue
- [00:16:43.200]trying to bring home the importance of satellite.
- [00:16:45.340]I'm sure Jennifer can add to that.
- [00:16:48.860]Yeah, I'll add some
- [00:16:51.170]and maybe I'll be a little bit of a realist
- [00:16:54.640]as potential other reason.
- [00:16:57.080]So building on what Jennifer said,
- [00:16:59.190]I mean, I'm looking at my phone, right?
- [00:17:00.570]And I'm thinking, I wonder how many people
- [00:17:02.440]even stopped to ask
- [00:17:04.340]what satellite-based applications are there on here?
- [00:17:08.146]Or what applications that run because
- [00:17:11.797]of satellite-generated information?
- [00:17:16.790]Satellite-provided information?
- [00:17:18.333]Weather ultimately comes from satellites.
- [00:17:23.250]So there's so many things
- [00:17:24.630]that the average user of this phone
- [00:17:26.460]and the value that this device provides
- [00:17:29.400]doesn't even stop to think, nor should they,
- [00:17:31.610]about where does it come?
- [00:17:32.930]That is part of our job.
- [00:17:34.050]That's why the video that Jennifer talked about
- [00:17:35.910]is really important,
- [00:17:37.160]and if we could get much more prominence of that,
- [00:17:38.633]that would be awesome.
- [00:17:39.770]I'd love to have that for every incoming class
- [00:17:41.430]in colleges around America.
- [00:17:43.530]But in addition to that,
- [00:17:46.100]I mean, there's a fundamental regulatory structure
- [00:17:51.720]that creates a bias in favor of 5G auctions
- [00:17:56.266]to assign spectrum to wireless users,
- [00:18:02.360]or at least licensed wireless users
- [00:18:05.000]that is viewed as a revenue raiser, a pay for,
- [00:18:10.050]and in congressional terms,
- [00:18:13.560]it creates, I don't know if it's a bias,
- [00:18:16.910]but a predisposition, that might be a nicer word than bias,
- [00:18:19.870]a predisposition to,
- [00:18:21.327]"Ooh, we ought to auction it."
- [00:18:23.120]Satellite spectrum as an auction
- [00:18:25.270]in part because we don't need exclusive license.
- [00:18:28.380]We don't argue for exclusive license.
- [00:18:31.200]The wireless community, always,
- [00:18:34.200]on a panel I was on yesterday
- [00:18:40.010]continues.
- [00:18:41.210]Satellite's never been that way.
- [00:18:42.930]So we haven't ever needed auctions.
- [00:18:46.160]The only exception to that was kind of a forced construct
- [00:18:50.390]with the DARS, the direct radio satellite service,
- [00:18:55.940]Sirius XM.
- [00:18:57.610]But other than that, there really hasn't been.
- [00:19:00.130]And in part because Congress realized
- [00:19:02.770]that would be a bad idea,
- [00:19:04.090]because satellites are inherently international
- [00:19:06.200]and we serve more than one market, a GEO satellite.
- [00:19:09.370]One satellite serves more than the United States, right?
- [00:19:12.320]So getting that where
- [00:19:16.440]satellites would have to pay in multiple markets
- [00:19:19.290]was an economic disaster,
- [00:19:20.670]so Congress recognized that and banned auctions
- [00:19:23.120]for international satellites.
- [00:19:24.970]That's ultimately been the right policy.
- [00:19:26.900]Has that hurt us in terms of policy?
- [00:19:31.890]Probably.
- [00:19:37.530]Can I just bring up one other thing?
- [00:19:39.970]Jennifer brought up auctions.
- [00:19:41.250]There's been only one country that I know of
- [00:19:44.130]that's had auctions and that's Brazil,
- [00:19:46.610]and they are actually stopping that
- [00:19:48.170]because they found it to be not as successful model
- [00:19:51.840]in a country that really relies on satellite
- [00:19:54.550]because of the rural nature of Brazil.
- [00:19:57.770]I just want to bring it up.
- [00:19:58.650]So it's not something-
- [00:20:00.830]Every few years, every time there's a new president,
- [00:20:04.620]the budget proposes satellite auctions
- [00:20:06.940]and every four years, thankfully,
- [00:20:10.780]that doesn't happen,
- [00:20:11.670]but I don't think it would be successful.
- [00:20:13.870]I don't think it would get where they want to go
- [00:20:16.230]if they had the auctions.
- [00:20:20.340]Great.
- [00:20:21.173]Well, next topic we wanted to get your views on
- [00:20:24.690]is the Internet of Things.
- [00:20:27.730]So obviously, some things are
- [00:20:30.470]in places that are remote, right?
- [00:20:34.070]Ships drilling and in the Arctic
- [00:20:38.390]and other places like that.
- [00:20:40.850]But obviously, there's also connected devices
- [00:20:43.860]within Walmart, the refrigeration systems, et cetera.
- [00:20:47.400]And just want you to elaborate a little bit
- [00:20:49.770]on the role of satellite, the Internet of Things,
- [00:20:51.503]because this is really an exploding marketplace
- [00:20:55.510]and tying on your other other comments,
- [00:21:00.330]how satellites play this important role
- [00:21:02.640]that many don't realize.
- [00:21:07.380]And we could start with Jennifer Warren on this one
- [00:21:09.520]and then go to Jennifer.
- [00:21:11.433]It's not enough to say Jennifer anymore.
- [00:21:14.840]So yeah, so IoT.
- [00:21:21.130]There's a couple of roles satellite can play.
- [00:21:22.870]Obviously it is back haul for connected homes
- [00:21:28.620]around, particularly in rural areas, remote areas.
- [00:21:34.130]It certainly can do that.
- [00:21:35.970]It also has the opportunity, I'm gonna highlight IoMT,
- [00:21:39.240]the Internet of Military Things.
- [00:21:41.200]And it also has application there
- [00:21:44.917]for many of the same rural and remote reasons as well.
- [00:21:48.980]But whether it's commercial logistics, military logistics,
- [00:21:53.037]that narrow band IoT is very valuable.
- [00:21:58.790]And in fact, I don't remember the agenda item
- [00:22:05.160]that will address narrowband IoT as well, some spectrum.
- [00:22:11.070]So we are watching that with great interest as well.
- [00:22:15.920]So the satellite has a role in that.
- [00:22:18.410]I'm gonna let Jennifer speak to some more specifics,
- [00:22:21.290]but it is kind of something that I think
- [00:22:24.150]will serve multiple markets.
- [00:22:27.510]No, thank you.
- [00:22:28.343]It's agenda item 118, 'cause I chaired the agenda item,
- [00:22:30.600]so I know that.
- [00:22:31.950]I knew you would know that.
- [00:22:34.187]So, but I wanted to hold up,
- [00:22:35.717]the FCC is considering tomorrow a notice of inquiry
- [00:22:40.340]on spectrum for IoT.
- [00:22:42.530]This was required by the National Defense Authorization Act.
- [00:22:46.450]And in it, they do ask specific questions
- [00:22:49.300]about the need for spectrum for satellite IoT.
- [00:22:53.640]One thing I'd like to just say
- [00:22:55.680]personally and professionally,
- [00:22:57.140]I don't believe in is the identification
- [00:23:00.090]or assignment of spectrum specifically for IoT use.
- [00:23:04.200]I have vast concerns about spectrum being made
- [00:23:07.180]for specific applications,
- [00:23:09.200]because applications change
- [00:23:11.540]and you don't want to leave any resource stranded.
- [00:23:13.780]And this is one of the questions actually
- [00:23:16.140]in agenda item 118,
- [00:23:17.500]which is an agenda item for consideration at WRC-2023
- [00:23:21.060]to make a five megahertz of spectrum available
- [00:23:24.470]for narrowband MSS for IoT purposes.
- [00:23:27.970]And so this kind of goes against that purpose.
- [00:23:32.080]And the reason the agenda item came
- [00:23:33.830]was there were some new entrants
- [00:23:36.040]who wanted to get some access to spectrum,
- [00:23:38.550]and so they decided they needed a new agenda item,
- [00:23:41.620]and it's a very controversial agenda item.
- [00:23:43.920]I could tell because I'm up at 6:00 AM for weeks on end
- [00:23:47.430]talking about this with lots of different views
- [00:23:50.550]and some of the bands being considered
- [00:23:52.300]have important other uses.
- [00:23:54.160]And so, but I think no matter what you say,
- [00:23:58.310]satellite has-
- [00:24:00.160]And satellite, I should say,
- [00:24:01.560]I'm of the view that we do need more spectrum.
- [00:24:04.100]I think we're spectrum-constrained.
- [00:24:06.380]I think, especially in the future,
- [00:24:07.910]where so many bands that we've been planning to use
- [00:24:10.970]or are being also used for terrestrial
- [00:24:13.250]more and more and opening, it's a bigger concern.
- [00:24:15.650]One of the things that satellite brings to IoT
- [00:24:18.290]is its wide area coverage and its resiliency.
- [00:24:21.810]And so even in a situation, so I look at-
- [00:24:26.050]Professor Schaefer, you brought up maritime,
- [00:24:29.320]whatever, Arctic.
- [00:24:30.740]I think about everything.
- [00:24:32.160]I look out my window
- [00:24:33.880]and I've got utility poles
- [00:24:37.930]and they're everywhere.
- [00:24:38.980]So having a satellite network be able to connect utilities
- [00:24:42.080]or not just connect, but be able to monitor.
- [00:24:44.960]And some places you may need backup
- [00:24:47.600]because the main facility may be so important.
- [00:24:49.900]So it may be terrestrial and satellite.
- [00:24:53.117]And then because of the wide area coverage,
- [00:24:57.760]I talked about the gas stations earlier.
- [00:25:00.730]We connect gas stations in urban areas
- [00:25:03.870]as well as rural areas,
- [00:25:05.010]because you can connect with a single network
- [00:25:08.210]and there's certain efficiencies with that.
- [00:25:10.600]So I think you'll see satellite's IoT role
- [00:25:14.010]be multiple, whether it's being on cars,
- [00:25:18.760]whether it's on utility poles,
- [00:25:20.160]whether it's on military vehicles.
- [00:25:23.079]And satellite brings a certain reliability
- [00:25:26.070]that isn't available.
- [00:25:27.880]The other item the FCC has opened is,
- [00:25:30.610]is considering tomorrow's item on resiliency.
- [00:25:33.460]And one of the things they're proposing is
- [00:25:35.010]to extend their disaster,
- [00:25:38.800]when you have outages during disaster response.
- [00:25:41.810]But the truth is, it's kind of a funny one,
- [00:25:43.930]they're saying, "Well, should we extend this to satellite?"
- [00:25:45.760]But satellite really doesn't have the same sort of outages
- [00:25:48.820]during bad weather events than terrestrial networks.
- [00:25:51.240]So I don't expect necessarily that there's gonna be
- [00:25:54.300]this huge influx, even if they change it in for IoT
- [00:25:57.450]where a lot of these are critical functions,
- [00:25:59.610]like monitoring, reporting and so forth.
- [00:26:02.810]Satellite is a really nice compliment.
- [00:26:04.720]So thank you.
- [00:26:11.026]So that leads us to the next question.
- [00:26:12.210]You both actually mentioned the ITU
- [00:26:15.630]and upcoming agenda items.
- [00:26:17.520]So I'm gonna start with Jennifer Manner.
- [00:26:20.520]If you could tell us what you see as the biggest issues
- [00:26:24.070]that will be addressed at the WRC-23
- [00:26:26.700]and then Jennifer Warren, if you could continue.
- [00:26:29.420]And I think we'll be a good compliment
- [00:26:30.920]because Jennifer understands the-
- [00:26:33.140]I'm sorry, Jen.
- [00:26:36.830]I said don't list them all.
- [00:26:39.030]No, I'm not.
- [00:26:39.863]I was gonna say you can do all the government ones
- [00:26:42.230]because I don't know those.
- [00:26:43.563]So I'll start with some of the-
- [00:26:47.110]So we talked about agenda item 118,
- [00:26:49.090]but just going down from that is,
- [00:26:53.550]and maybe I can give a brief overview of some of them
- [00:26:56.150]and then we can delve into them.
- [00:26:57.680]But 116, which is one which is gonna make
- [00:27:00.383]digital spectrum for NGSOs available
- [00:27:02.850]for earth stations in motion.
- [00:27:05.100]That's important.
- [00:27:06.350]I'm gonna focus on the next one,
- [00:27:07.870]'cause this one I find very, very interesting,
- [00:27:10.080]and that is agenda item 117 on inter-satellite links.
- [00:27:15.530]And the idea is that,
- [00:27:18.680]this was actually a proposal by the United States
- [00:27:21.600]at the last conference.
- [00:27:23.230]And the idea is to be able to reuse Ku and Ka band,
- [00:27:27.610]which are two workhorse frequency bands for satellite,
- [00:27:31.510]for inter-satellite links between LEOs, MEOs, and GEOs.
- [00:27:36.530]And so the question is how do you do that
- [00:27:38.660]in a way that works
- [00:27:40.160]and how do you still protect the existing operations?
- [00:27:43.210]And so we're a geostationary operator in this band,
- [00:27:46.310]and we want to make sure that if you've got,
- [00:27:48.910]if you think about it,
- [00:27:49.743]if you've got links between all the different systems,
- [00:27:51.860]you don't want them to interfere with existing systems.
- [00:27:54.930]But it's an efficient use of spectrum
- [00:27:56.850]if you can get it to work.
- [00:27:59.040]The other ones, I think I'm gonna leave some for Jennifer.
- [00:28:01.620]I don't know which one she wants to cover,
- [00:28:02.850]so I'm gonna guess,
- [00:28:04.430]but a big portion of this has to do with,
- [00:28:08.120]some things are not even work-related.
- [00:28:10.270]We're looking at an issue on software changes
- [00:28:13.150]and there needs to be certain changes to the ITU software.
- [00:28:17.360]And how does that impact protection between GEOs
- [00:28:20.360]and non-GEO satellite systems?
- [00:28:23.680]That's actually a huge issue,
- [00:28:25.130]and I'd say one that's taking up
- [00:28:26.510]a significant amount of time.
- [00:28:28.760]I'm gonna bring up one other
- [00:28:30.530]and then turn it over to Jennifer
- [00:28:31.780]so I make sure not to go through all of them,
- [00:28:33.990]but this is an important one.
- [00:28:35.280]As I talked about, more spectrum is always good.
- [00:28:38.160]And so besides for the additional spectrum for MSS IoT,
- [00:28:41.480]there's an item for additional spectrum for FSS,
- [00:28:43.960]or fixed satellite service, in the 17 gigahertz band.
- [00:28:47.710]That's a band that today is used
- [00:28:48.980]by the broadcast satellite service.
- [00:28:51.160]And the GEOs and non-GEOs probably can share for gateways,
- [00:28:55.690]which are larger stations.
- [00:28:58.050]That's the only in region two,
- [00:29:00.590]but it would give access to some more spectrum
- [00:29:02.740]that I can say from a commercial operator's perspective
- [00:29:05.960]is much needed, especially as we're offering
- [00:29:07.900]broadband throughout the Americas.
- [00:29:09.220]So Jennifer I'll turn it over to you
- [00:29:10.420]to make sure I don't cover everything.
- [00:29:13.920]Well, I was just gonna pick one
- [00:29:15.570]and then kind of take a little liberty.
- [00:29:17.270]But the first one, the real one that I was gonna focus on
- [00:29:21.360]has to do an unmanned aerial systems,
- [00:29:23.200]and you'll think what's that got to do with satellite?
- [00:29:25.330]Well, it's command and control of unmanned aerial systems
- [00:29:28.450]by satellites, right?
- [00:29:30.000]And so if you think of cargo transport,
- [00:29:34.490]be it maritime or aeronautical,
- [00:29:38.380]really important commercial application
- [00:29:42.330]of command and control for that type
- [00:29:44.700]of autonomous transport.
- [00:29:48.562]And you would think this was not something
- [00:29:52.200]that was a big deal, but it has been
- [00:29:56.370]an agenda item for the last two conferences,
- [00:29:59.470]has been one of the ones that has kept us up
- [00:30:01.330]till five, six in the morning in the full plenaries.
- [00:30:04.950]It is a challenge.
- [00:30:08.390]Some of it, you can understand the discussion,
- [00:30:10.950]because folks needed to understand
- [00:30:12.630]how can you use satellite spectrum
- [00:30:15.070]for command and control capabilities
- [00:30:17.210]without having it be a safety band,
- [00:30:19.620]a band that's designated with special requirements
- [00:30:22.400]for safety?
- [00:30:23.233]And so a lot of time has been spent with iKO,
- [00:30:29.417]because obviously they care about aviation safety
- [00:30:32.160]as we all do.
- [00:30:33.490]And so it's been really working a lot of technical effort
- [00:30:36.750]in educating and gaining confidence
- [00:30:39.420]in the models that are being proposed
- [00:30:41.180]and the approaches that are being proposed.
- [00:30:42.810]But it also has some, oh, regional issues
- [00:30:47.030]and it's become quite a contentious issue
- [00:30:51.340]in the working groups that are meeting on this topic
- [00:30:54.370]over the last year virtually,
- [00:30:56.520]and it's much more difficult as Jennifer knows
- [00:30:59.270]to deal with contentious issues virtually.
- [00:31:06.120]The benefit of being in person is
- [00:31:08.750]and in sit-downs where you don't
- [00:31:09.770]have to have a microphone on you
- [00:31:14.040]and just really talk to the person that has issues.
- [00:31:16.960]In this context, one can't do that.
- [00:31:19.030]So until we really resume,
- [00:31:20.930]it's been harder to make the progress we hope.
- [00:31:23.450]But unmanned systems for command and control by satellite,
- [00:31:26.820]I'd say is one of the more prominent ones.
- [00:31:31.030]And then it's not for this WRC,
- [00:31:33.430]but I'm gonna put it out there as something that
- [00:31:36.200]might be of interest to the audience,
- [00:31:38.350]which is the jurisdiction of the IDU
- [00:31:42.190]with respect to non-earth-centric communications.
- [00:31:48.420]And obviously space and satellites
- [00:31:51.690]play an important role in that,
- [00:31:54.670]a critical role.
- [00:31:55.730]And when you look at the ITU constitution and convention,
- [00:32:00.310]it is very earth-centric.
- [00:32:02.400]So the question is, if you want to get to
- [00:32:04.440]robotic communications on the moon,
- [00:32:06.990]you want to get to inter habitat communications.
- [00:32:11.000]You want to focus on that next planet
- [00:32:15.720]and not just bringing in
- [00:32:17.550]or not just sending comms up to the astronauts.
- [00:32:24.950]Is there a region of the world for the ITU
- [00:32:31.490]to allocate spectrum?
- [00:32:33.010]Well, what's the approach?
- [00:32:34.080]And this is not theoretical.
- [00:32:35.600]There are actually ITU filings to deal
- [00:32:38.140]with communications on the moon.
- [00:32:40.660]And we haven't had this policy,
- [00:32:42.283]it's not even policy, this discussion
- [00:32:45.290]yet at the ITU formally,
- [00:32:48.290]but it's gonna be a really interesting topic
- [00:32:50.260]over the next year or two.
- [00:32:51.590]So not on the WRC, but it is ITU, Endeliza.
- [00:33:01.200]Thank you for that great rundown of WRC-23.
- [00:33:05.910]Moving onto a topic that came up a little bit there,
- [00:33:08.240]but just a three-part question.
- [00:33:10.300]The lower earth orbit satellite communication systems
- [00:33:13.550]are obviously coming on online,
- [00:33:15.530]the LEO systems are coming online.
- [00:33:17.960]And so the three questions are,
- [00:33:19.320]do you think that the WRC-19 got it right
- [00:33:22.360]in terms of the bring into use requirements,
- [00:33:24.620]10% within two years, 50% within five years
- [00:33:27.827]and 100% within seven years?
- [00:33:30.920]Do you think there's ultimately gonna have to be
- [00:33:33.000]consolidation of the LEO systems?
- [00:33:35.510]That second quick question.
- [00:33:37.380]And the third question is
- [00:33:39.360]what do you see in terms of potential future
- [00:33:44.210]conflicts between LEO and GEO systems?
- [00:33:47.010]We mentioned it a little bit in the last question.
- [00:33:49.520]So I guess we'll start with Jennifer Warren on that one
- [00:33:52.720]and go to Jennifer Manner.
- [00:33:56.210]I was afraid I was gonna get this one first.
- [00:33:58.772](laughs)
- [00:34:00.760]So.
- [00:34:03.740]Yes, this is a very hard question.
- [00:34:06.100]I'm not gonna speculate on consolidation.
- [00:34:15.260]It is just unclear to me
- [00:34:18.918]how that would work.
- [00:34:20.790]What would the antitrust authorities think?
- [00:34:24.250]What would be, because there are different flags-
- [00:34:32.036]I just don't know.
- [00:34:34.025]Now we've been in this situation before,
- [00:34:38.330]but not with the technology as advanced as it is today.
- [00:34:41.740]Jennifer knows well the days of Teledesic.
- [00:34:44.520]We had SkyBridge from the French,
- [00:34:46.740]we had Celeste straight from the United States.
- [00:34:52.242]I'm forgetting a few others.
- [00:34:57.400]I think there's an inevitability to deployment.
- [00:35:00.340]I mean, obviously, some are already being deployed.
- [00:35:03.400]Time will tell.
- [00:35:04.233]I'm just gonna hedge on that one.
- [00:35:06.010]I really can't feel that one.
- [00:35:10.770]I know there are a lot of skeptics,
- [00:35:12.670]so I'm gonna stay out of the skeptics camp.
- [00:35:16.800]In terms of the actual results of WRC-19,
- [00:35:20.380]it was a very reasonable choice
- [00:35:25.380]that was made in terms of the milestones.
- [00:35:28.040]Could they have gone a different way?
- [00:35:29.530]For sure.
- [00:35:32.310]Was it unreasonable, was it irrational?
- [00:35:34.970]Not at all.
- [00:35:37.310]I think it's too soon to second guess it.
- [00:35:40.260]I think we need to see practical implementation.
- [00:35:45.210]but it certainly, I think it was a reasonable approach.
- [00:35:50.070]Not the only one, but reasonable.
- [00:35:51.750]Jennifer?
- [00:35:54.200]So I agree with Jennifer starting with the-
- [00:35:59.110]I think the most important thing was
- [00:36:00.730]there needed to be something to guard against
- [00:36:02.430]some sort of speculation
- [00:36:03.770]and there needed to be some sort of build out requirement,
- [00:36:06.140]which was broader than what was in effect,
- [00:36:08.160]which was you just have to bring
- [00:36:09.280]a single satellite into use.
- [00:36:11.610]You have a lot of spectrum
- [00:36:13.220]and you don't want to lay it fallow
- [00:36:14.750]just like we've been talking about with any spectrum.
- [00:36:17.040]So I agree with Jennifer.
- [00:36:19.000]On the consolidation, my personal belief
- [00:36:22.130]is there probably will be some consolidation,
- [00:36:24.240]but I agree with Jennifer that there's
- [00:36:26.210]so many issues with it and what it looks like
- [00:36:28.760]and how that goes,
- [00:36:29.830]and if it happens at all is anyone's guess.
- [00:36:33.770]I think maybe the other thing besides the technology,
- [00:36:36.957]the cost has come down.
- [00:36:38.350]In some ways, the space technology's always been there.
- [00:36:41.090]Or it has been there since I was working for Teledesic
- [00:36:44.140]years and years ago.
- [00:36:45.720]But what wasn't there was the grant equipment
- [00:36:48.900]and you've seen Elon Musk with SpaceX
- [00:36:50.800]deploy a very attractive user terminal
- [00:36:53.460]that, while still expensive,
- [00:36:54.900]it is much more reasonably priced,
- [00:36:56.690]especially in today's world
- [00:36:58.270]where you've got, I don't know, $1,000 iPhones.
- [00:37:02.820]So I think we're in a better place for success.
- [00:37:05.726]I've been waiting since 1995 for an NGSO broadband system.
- [00:37:10.510]We used to call it high-speed data then,
- [00:37:12.040]we didn't call it broadband.
- [00:37:14.426]So we'll say, but I did want to touch a little on
- [00:37:16.410]Endeliza's question on the issues created
- [00:37:20.880]between LEO and GEO.
- [00:37:23.290]And this is a complex issue.
- [00:37:26.600]So just for background, when I worked for Teledesic,
- [00:37:30.380]we entered the world where every single frequency band
- [00:37:33.960]or almost every signal frequency band
- [00:37:35.780]had a de facto priority for geostationary orbit systems.
- [00:37:40.700]And so what Teledesic tried to do was get rid of-
- [00:37:43.610]It was radio regulation 2613,
- [00:37:47.520]in certain frequency bands so that they could deploy
- [00:37:50.440]a non-GEO that was protected,
- [00:37:52.220]that didn't have to protect GEOs
- [00:37:54.270]and had the required protection.
- [00:37:56.540]They were successful at WRC-95 and 97 to do that.
- [00:38:00.300]Ultimately that got withdrawn by the ITU
- [00:38:04.420]because there was no real deployment in those bands.
- [00:38:07.810]So we're in a world now where
- [00:38:10.690]there needed to be some protection.
- [00:38:12.160]We've moved from this exclusive bands,
- [00:38:15.230]once again, towards greater technology,
- [00:38:17.440]increased ability to share,
- [00:38:19.090]to have what we call EPFD limits,
- [00:38:21.150]so essentially power limits to protect GEOs.
- [00:38:25.607]The LEOs and one company in particular, OneWeb,
- [00:38:28.980]who's actually a partner with my company
- [00:38:31.010]and who were building out their network,
- [00:38:32.610]have come out and said,
- [00:38:33.450]we'd like to do away with the EPFD limits.
- [00:38:35.500]We don't think we should have to protect GEOs anymore.
- [00:38:38.980]And this is the fight,
- [00:38:40.350]what I talked about earlier with the software piece,
- [00:38:42.940]which is what protection do LEOs have to give GEOs,
- [00:38:47.710]and perhaps, maybe, I'm not an engineer,
- [00:38:50.410]so I'm not going to opine
- [00:38:52.170]on what the interference environment looks like
- [00:38:54.140]between GEOs and LEOs,
- [00:38:56.020]but what does that protection regime look like?
- [00:38:58.420]And I think that is both a competitive
- [00:39:01.210]as well as a technical fight going on right now.
- [00:39:04.700]So I think that's something to watch
- [00:39:06.680]and something that will really develop.
- [00:39:09.390]For instance, there's a UK consultation
- [00:39:12.290]that comments were due on, I want to say on Monday,
- [00:39:15.770]on this very issue,
- [00:39:17.100]and it's actually on the issue of NGSO to NGSO.
- [00:39:21.690]And then some of the GEOs have come in and said,
- [00:39:24.417]"Wait, you can't figure till you also
- [00:39:26.380]figure out how to protect me."
- [00:39:28.910]So this is gonna have to be addressed at some point.
- [00:39:32.330]And I don't think it's really teed up appropriately
- [00:39:36.010]at this conference,
- [00:39:38.520]but domestic regulators are addressing it
- [00:39:40.532]while there's a void,
- [00:39:42.545]and I think it's gonna come to a head
- [00:39:45.080]in the next couple of years.
- [00:39:48.720]Well, Endeliza and I are switching up the order
- [00:39:50.660]for the last two questions here
- [00:39:51.890]so that she gets the last question.
- [00:39:55.240]The second to last one is concerning orbital debris.
- [00:39:58.900]And that's been getting a lot of attention
- [00:40:01.300]with the FCC looking at the issue.
- [00:40:03.860]Obviously there's provisions in the Artemis Accords
- [00:40:06.920]on orbital debris,
- [00:40:09.610]and just wanted to get both of your views on that.
- [00:40:13.080]what needs to happen or should happen
- [00:40:15.190]here domestically within the United States,
- [00:40:17.870]and then also at the international level
- [00:40:21.860]on this issue of orbital debris?
- [00:40:23.740]And we'll start with Jennifer Manner on this one
- [00:40:25.590]and then go to Jennifer Warren.
- [00:40:27.940]So actually Jennifer and I have had conversations-
- [00:40:30.330]We actually co-chair the Space Sustainability Working Group
- [00:40:33.880]for the Satellite Industry Association,
- [00:40:35.710]and we had a very good meeting this week
- [00:40:38.220]with some folks on the government on this.
- [00:40:41.520]I think the first thing that's important
- [00:40:43.180]is that the satellite industry does believe
- [00:40:45.210]there needs to be some action taken
- [00:40:48.090]both domestically and internationally in this,
- [00:40:50.620]and does want to be responsible,
- [00:40:53.710]does believe the future of our company's business,
- [00:40:57.230]all of ours, is on a safe space environment.
- [00:41:00.170]So let me start with that.
- [00:41:02.650]I think what we're disappointed in
- [00:41:04.950]is that the United States has not taken
- [00:41:07.120]more of a leadership role here.
- [00:41:09.730]And when we say the United States,
- [00:41:11.760]we're not talking about the FCC.
- [00:41:14.240]What we'd like to see is a government agency
- [00:41:17.810]that's assigned with the task
- [00:41:19.720]for creating the framework for the US.
- [00:41:21.590]So for instance, you would have an expert agency.
- [00:41:26.020]I'm partial to the Office of Space Commerce,
- [00:41:29.620]at the Department of Commerce, for instance,
- [00:41:31.370]would be the lead agency, and then they would create,
- [00:41:34.050]they would do the work, create the standards
- [00:41:35.940]that the agencies with subject matter jurisdiction,
- [00:41:38.420]for instance, the FCC would impose on licensees.
- [00:41:42.230]So we'd have a lead agency.
- [00:41:44.190]They would work with the Department of State
- [00:41:45.820]and other agencies to come up with things internationally
- [00:41:49.450]and really become a leader internationally.
- [00:41:51.960]My big concern as a US company and as a US citizen
- [00:41:55.660]is I want the US to be the leader in this area,
- [00:41:58.730]working with our allies and developing a regime
- [00:42:01.310]and getting a regime that everyone can buy into globally.
- [00:42:05.230]And so since we haven't done that domestically,
- [00:42:07.750]it's hard to go out and say,
- [00:42:08.897]"This is the right way internationally."
- [00:42:11.290]The other thing is, I'm not against regulations,
- [00:42:15.280]but the regulations have to be flexible
- [00:42:18.150]and allow companies to innovate to meet the requirements.
- [00:42:21.470]And I always go back to a good example
- [00:42:24.460]when I was at the FCC years ago, the commission,
- [00:42:28.970]and this goes back to Jennifer's original statement
- [00:42:32.450]about what satellite equipment-
- [00:42:35.390]What do you use your cell phone?
- [00:42:36.450]Is that satellite-dependent?
- [00:42:37.730]And GPS.
- [00:42:39.540]So the FCC was putting location accuracy rules
- [00:42:42.100]for 911 calling so that you could
- [00:42:43.990]find people in an emergency, right?
- [00:42:45.610]Because you might have a cell phone,
- [00:42:47.500]but if you're unable to-
- [00:42:48.910]If they can't find you and you don't know where you are,
- [00:42:52.640]it's a problem.
- [00:42:53.473]So the FCC could have chosen a technology,
- [00:42:56.490]and there were several technologies being considered,
- [00:42:59.160]including GPS,
- [00:43:00.660]but the FCC didn't want to make that call
- [00:43:02.980]and rightfully said we'll allow
- [00:43:05.640]the cell phone operators, manufacturers
- [00:43:07.680]to determine what the best technology is.
- [00:43:09.840]And I'd say a big reason we have Uber Eats and Uber cabs
- [00:43:14.490]and everything else we have
- [00:43:16.620]is because the FCC had this requirement,
- [00:43:18.840]but they also didn't dictate technology.
- [00:43:21.090]So here, again, as we're looking at regulations
- [00:43:24.960]or a framework, a regulatory framework for orbital debris,
- [00:43:28.870]who knows what people are gonna think
- [00:43:31.390]of as a way to meet certain requirements?
- [00:43:33.660]So giving the industry the flexibility to respond to that
- [00:43:36.700]and develop the best approaches
- [00:43:39.000]that that meet the requirements is my preferred choice.
- [00:43:42.910]So with that, I'll turn over to Jennifer.
- [00:43:46.310]Not surprising since we co-chair
- [00:43:49.160]the Sustainability Working Group,
- [00:43:50.930]we're pretty aligned on this,
- [00:43:52.320]so I'll just add some dimensions to this.
- [00:43:56.110]I mean, orbital debris is part of the larger dialogue
- [00:43:59.280]on space sustainability, right?
- [00:44:01.720]And I agree with Jennifer,
- [00:44:03.902]there's abundant opportunity here to lead by both example,
- [00:44:17.939]and I'll call it advocacy.
- [00:44:20.470]So a couple of different points here.
- [00:44:22.160]So industry doesn't necessarily need regulation
- [00:44:26.790]to try and take steps that are,
- [00:44:29.370]and further on sustainability, I mean,
- [00:44:31.586]SIA is subscribed to certain sustainability principles,
- [00:44:37.620]a multinational group of operators and governments
- [00:44:42.470]and academia work with the World Economic Forum
- [00:44:45.840]to develop the Space Sustainability Rating System,
- [00:44:51.550]which is gonna be coming online,
- [00:44:53.360]and companies are gonna be submitting their satellites
- [00:44:56.800]to that rating review voluntary, right?
- [00:44:59.580]But getting a good housekeeping seal of approval
- [00:45:02.300]of your satellite,
- [00:45:04.180]getting into orbit in the most sustainable fashion
- [00:45:09.570]from manufacturer to delivery on orbit,
- [00:45:12.570]that's important, right?
- [00:45:15.721]And that's without mandates.
- [00:45:17.990]It's with understanding one's corporate role
- [00:45:21.730]and responsibility.
- [00:45:23.240]However, at the same time,
- [00:45:26.840]there are so many different players
- [00:45:28.700]that are participating in space,
- [00:45:31.130]industry, academia, scientists,
- [00:45:34.020]or I should say universities, right?
- [00:45:36.020]There's so many folks that are launching, governments.
- [00:45:39.340]And there are no lanes in space.
- [00:45:42.030]And so we have to share this common area.
- [00:45:44.430]And it just doesn't seem as if
- [00:45:47.455]we can do this without some framework
- [00:45:52.640]that, and I'll come back to Jennifer's point
- [00:45:55.530]on flexibility because that is important,
- [00:45:59.520]but some framework, but not multiple frameworks,
- [00:46:03.330]let alone multiple frameworks within a single country.
- [00:46:07.430]So I really admire all the federal agencies
- [00:46:11.650]that are showing an interest in regulating
- [00:46:15.410]or looking at this space.
- [00:46:16.740]We have the FCC proceeding,
- [00:46:17.960]we have the FAA going to launch an NPRM on orbital debris.
- [00:46:22.200]We have NASA with its own standards.
- [00:46:25.650]It's kind of like, okay,
- [00:46:26.720]how do we get to whole of government?
- [00:46:28.230]Because none of us are stove-piped in our own lanes.
- [00:46:31.230]We have ride shares, hosted payloads
- [00:46:35.760]and OSA being launched with GEO rides.
- [00:46:40.350]I mean, there's just so much going on
- [00:46:44.600]and that's just the satellites that have to worry about it.
- [00:46:47.000]But there's other things that will be in space
- [00:46:48.740]that are gonna have to worry about orbital debris,
- [00:46:50.240]not just satellites.
- [00:46:51.340]If we, again, are looking to the future of a space economy.
- [00:46:55.690]So getting a whole of government approach,
- [00:46:57.930]which I think is certainly something that has some traction,
- [00:47:02.870]but we're a long way from it, will be important.
- [00:47:05.310]And then when we have that,
- [00:47:07.300]how do we export what we've agreed on?
- [00:47:13.985]And it can't be so agreed upon
- [00:47:16.240]that we can't negotiate a little bit, right?
- [00:47:18.340]Because you can't just expect people
- [00:47:19.750]to agree to what one country has thought through.
- [00:47:23.680]But we have to also work really hard on the principle
- [00:47:27.910]that Jennifer talked about,
- [00:47:28.980]which is flexibility and contract land, right?
- [00:47:31.440]I would call it performance requirements
- [00:47:34.180]rather than design requirements.
- [00:47:37.360]So we need to have established as frameworks,
- [00:47:39.320]what are the objectives that need to be achieved?
- [00:47:44.770]Leave it to the folks who are launching into space
- [00:47:48.630]and getting authorized to do that
- [00:47:50.510]to demonstrate how they're going to achieve that.
- [00:47:53.940]So there's constantly incentives to find better ways
- [00:47:56.390]that perhaps will be cheaper, more green, more efficient,
- [00:48:00.013]but you've got the performance objective.
- [00:48:02.390]And then you've got the technology that can keep innovating
- [00:48:04.695]and hopefully become a competitive market
- [00:48:07.780]in which the US will lead offering that
- [00:48:09.520]to others around the world.
- [00:48:11.780]So there's a lot of components
- [00:48:13.820]to what I just kind of laid out there,
- [00:48:15.630]but I think it's a real opportunity.
- [00:48:18.110]And this feeds into something
- [00:48:19.480]Jennifer and I were talking about earlier this week,
- [00:48:21.560]which is, it's just been agreed as I understand it,
- [00:48:25.108]that there's gonna be a summit of the future
- [00:48:26.770]in 2023 by the UN.
- [00:48:29.360]A large component of that summit of the future
- [00:48:31.780]will deal with the space economy
- [00:48:35.220]and will deal with space traffic management.
- [00:48:37.870]And by definition, I would imagine
- [00:48:39.610]some orbital debris in there.
- [00:48:41.695]We've got a timeline ahead of us that we can work towards.
- [00:48:45.430]Those are some of my thoughts on that.
- [00:48:52.240]Thank you, and that actually leads us
- [00:48:54.050]to the last question before we take any questions
- [00:48:57.228]from the audience.
- [00:49:00.370]We've talked a lot about the Internet of Things,
- [00:49:02.560]GPS, cell phones, satellite radio, and spectrum,
- [00:49:06.860]and its proper management is actually so crucial
- [00:49:10.495]and critical to our daily lives.
- [00:49:13.268]Is there anything that you think would be helpful
- [00:49:18.520]ways to get the populace to better really understand
- [00:49:21.680]and engage in these issues
- [00:49:23.010]so they could actually demand reform from our government?
- [00:49:30.180]And you're letting me go first, huh?
- [00:49:32.510]So-
- [00:49:33.969](laughs)
- [00:49:37.730]So I thought about this question a lot, actually.
- [00:49:41.750]And I think the best thing we can do realistically
- [00:49:51.160]is educate our downstream users as best we can
- [00:49:56.790]so that it's not only when they go into
- [00:50:00.000]the T-Mobile store that they think about
- [00:50:03.020]a use of spectrum, right?
- [00:50:08.270]And brand things a little better.
- [00:50:09.930]Brought to you by satellite.
- [00:50:12.510]We don't do that as a community.
- [00:50:14.260]We don't do that in our advertising.
- [00:50:17.360]It might say brought by EchoStar II.
- [00:50:20.260]It might say brought by Lockheed Martin.
- [00:50:24.300]That'd be on an operator in that sense though,
- [00:50:26.270]but still it doesn't say brought to you by satellite
- [00:50:29.730]and not everybody knows the names of companies
- [00:50:32.490]and what they do and what that means.
- [00:50:34.660]And so is there that way?
- [00:50:36.750]And then building coalitions again.
- [00:50:39.140]Working across the coalition so that
- [00:50:41.910]the policymakers understand.
- [00:50:44.366]That's where we really have to ensure-
- [00:50:48.380]Staff changeover's huge,
- [00:50:50.927]and we have to stay on top of that and make sure
- [00:50:54.840]that they all appreciate, even if they don't agree,
- [00:50:58.790]but appreciate the role of satellite
- [00:51:02.490]because you can argue with informed decision-making,
- [00:51:05.510]but if it's informed, at least that's one less
- [00:51:08.366]personal worry I have as a citizen.
- [00:51:11.527]It's when it's uninformed that it really troubles me.
- [00:51:17.210]So needless to say, I agree with Jennifer.
- [00:51:19.970]A couple other points, maybe on some other areas.
- [00:51:23.180]First, I've thought about this in a different way,
- [00:51:28.120]which is, is it important for people to understand
- [00:51:31.870]how things work or why they work that way
- [00:51:34.120]so they're not as frustrated with their services?
- [00:51:36.950]And so at one point I was talking to someone
- [00:51:40.460]in one of the scientific agencies
- [00:51:43.320]about whether there was funding available
- [00:51:45.290]to start to teach children in schools
- [00:51:47.670]like, how does my cell phone work?
- [00:51:49.600]How does my satellite TV work?
- [00:51:51.500]How do these things work?
- [00:51:54.760]You hear a lot of people say,
- [00:51:55.827]"Well, I'm getting,
- [00:51:57.210]I have problems with getting X."
- [00:52:00.150]But some of it's just because,
- [00:52:01.690]it is because there's physics involved.
- [00:52:04.570]And so one thing I actually think would be good
- [00:52:07.440]since communications is so important in our lives
- [00:52:10.870]is if somehow it ended up incorporated into a curriculum,
- [00:52:14.390]whether that's a science curriculum, whatever,
- [00:52:16.840]at an early age, so that these are important,
- [00:52:20.621]more and more an important device.
- [00:52:22.440]So that's one thing.
- [00:52:24.100]The other thing I think is civil society.
- [00:52:28.570]And Jennifer and I just talked about this in class.
- [00:52:32.710]Getting civil society to understand
- [00:52:34.840]not how Spectrum's allocated from the technical side,
- [00:52:38.940]but understanding the importance
- [00:52:41.040]of why having satellite, for instance,
- [00:52:43.740]is important to ensure that you're addressing
- [00:52:45.910]the digital divide in developing countries.
- [00:52:50.460]So it goes back to Jennifer's coalition-building.
- [00:52:52.901]I think there needs to be outreach to more and more
- [00:52:58.850]outside of our normal-
- [00:53:01.860]I live very much in the telecommunications world
- [00:53:04.030]outside of who I might think,
- [00:53:05.197]"Oh, there's public knowledge,
- [00:53:06.670]or there's tech freedom."
- [00:53:08.750]But actually, to give you an example,
- [00:53:12.496]one group that's a very good advocate for satellite
- [00:53:15.860]is Doctors Without Borders, Doctors Without Frontiers.
- [00:53:19.340]They rely on satellite when they're in the field
- [00:53:22.410]and they'll speak up.
- [00:53:24.120]So I think is a role for them in terms of an advocate,
- [00:53:27.910]but in terms of having people at the ITU
- [00:53:30.340]or participating in FCC rulemakings
- [00:53:32.980]on the very technical issues,
- [00:53:35.240]I mean, everyone's welcome,
- [00:53:36.560]but I don't know if that will be effective at all,
- [00:53:41.050]but much less whether it's something
- [00:53:42.730]that people want to get involved with.
- [00:53:44.100]But I think understanding why things work the way they work
- [00:53:46.730]for consumers is incredibly important.
- [00:53:49.960]And then having the groups that maybe aren't always aware
- [00:53:54.030]understand how things work and why they work that way
- [00:53:57.410]as a way to start a broader conversation,
- [00:53:59.850]especially we have a big development conference
- [00:54:02.810]coming up at the ITU next year,
- [00:54:05.660]the World Telecommunications Development Conference.
- [00:54:08.820]And certainly that's an important part of it
- [00:54:11.190]is the digital divide.
- [00:54:13.420]And I would like to just bring up one thing.
- [00:54:16.600]We're very excited today because we have
- [00:54:18.810]a US candidate for secretary-general of the ITU
- [00:54:23.110]who was announced today, Doreen Bogdan-Martin,
- [00:54:26.290]and so she was just announced today,
- [00:54:28.390]and we are, I think Jennifer and I can both say
- [00:54:33.400]we're ecstatic to have a really competent US candidate
- [00:54:38.110]who's ready to take the ITU into the future.
- [00:54:40.810]So I did want to share that.
- [00:54:42.140]Jennifer, you may want to say something on that as well.
- [00:54:46.880]I just echo that she currently serves
- [00:54:49.690]as the director of the development sector,
- [00:54:53.980]and for those who may follow the ITU,
- [00:54:58.090]she won that role by election two years ago
- [00:55:04.550]in a bureau of that role,
- [00:55:07.230]which has always been held by a developing country,
- [00:55:10.310]and she won it in the first round.
- [00:55:13.800]So she did not have to go through multiple rounds.
- [00:55:16.140]So it was tremendous
- [00:55:21.620]support from governments all around the world,
- [00:55:24.760]reflecting the quality of the individual.
- [00:55:27.565]And so we're very excited and hope
- [00:55:30.005]that that will be the same result.
- [00:55:32.379]She has a few people that have announced
- [00:55:35.140]that are running again,
- [00:55:37.720]one Russian internet person and candidate.
- [00:55:42.840]And I can't remember the other person,
- [00:55:44.500]so we may edit this part out,
- [00:55:46.711]but it's very exciting.
- [00:55:51.583]Anyway, I'll turn it back,
- [00:55:52.790]'cause I know we have some questions in the chat box.
- [00:55:56.070]Yeah, thank you so much.
- [00:55:57.830]To turn maybe to audience Q&A
- [00:56:00.650]and a few other hot button issues.
- [00:56:04.260]So one question is on the issue of
- [00:56:06.901]cybersecurity for satellites or hacking of satellites.
- [00:56:11.180]And does there need to be a stronger
- [00:56:13.820]regulatory framework for that?
- [00:56:15.860]I think the Satellite Industry Association
- [00:56:17.690]has done some work on that issue as well,
- [00:56:20.180]but get your comments on that.
- [00:56:21.680]And to put one more out there,
- [00:56:24.940]another questioner was wondering
- [00:56:26.880]or thought that the International Standards Organization,
- [00:56:30.510]the ISO, was getting involved in
- [00:56:33.272]space debris mitigation standards.
- [00:56:37.300]And so if you had any thoughts on whether
- [00:56:40.040]ISO might play a useful role.
- [00:56:46.810]I can address the cyber.
- [00:56:47.910]I don't know about ISO, so sorry about that.
- [00:56:51.150]I don't know if Jennifer does.
- [00:56:53.300]On cyber, I just came off a call.
- [00:56:56.830]I'm part of the SISA Space Infrastructure Working Group.
- [00:57:02.410]In terms of hacking,
- [00:57:07.440]I mean, personally,
- [00:57:08.273]I don't know how much of a concern that is,
- [00:57:10.640]but I will tell you that the NIST Cybersecurity Framework
- [00:57:13.600]of course include satellite.
- [00:57:15.620]And when I talked to our cyber people in the company,
- [00:57:19.120]I think a lot of what we do for cyber to protect against it,
- [00:57:23.760]attacks and so forth are the same thing
- [00:57:25.500]terrestrial folks do.
- [00:57:27.520]But SISA and DHS are very active right now
- [00:57:31.280]at looking what special things have to be done
- [00:57:33.510]for satellite, so I do expect something.
- [00:57:35.760]There's actually a NIST report out for comment
- [00:57:39.000]that's due, I want to say on the 13th,
- [00:57:42.040]on satellite and cybersecurity.
- [00:57:43.670]They did a report, and of course,
- [00:57:46.430]you have the space policy directives
- [00:57:49.120]that call for cybersecurity work.
- [00:57:51.010]So I think it's ongoing work.
- [00:57:53.290]I do think that companies, I can say personally,
- [00:57:56.990]are very focused on this and very concerned
- [00:57:59.360]and are very keyed into this
- [00:58:01.570]and look forward to working with the government
- [00:58:03.320]on taking any other actions.
- [00:58:04.810]So Jennifer, I'll turn it over to you
- [00:58:06.080]for anything else on that or ISO.
- [00:58:08.760]Yeah, on the ISO, I appreciate the participant
- [00:58:12.380]putting the link in there.
- [00:58:14.850]I'm not as familiar with that.
- [00:58:18.280]I do know that in some recent policymaker conversation,
- [00:58:26.380]there's been a question about whether or not
- [00:58:28.850]a standards body ought to be
- [00:58:31.270]the defacto kind of center for
- [00:58:34.690]developing a standard that would then be
- [00:58:37.170]pushed out to the, shall we say,
- [00:58:38.820]implemented to the ISO.
- [00:58:40.160]I actually thought it was a NIST
- [00:58:45.010]issue that they were raising,
- [00:58:46.000]but I'm gonna take a look at that.
- [00:58:47.840]So thank you very much.
- [00:58:48.840]Unaware of that one.
- [00:58:53.070]Great, and I think we touched on
- [00:58:56.730]all the audience questions except one
- [00:58:58.600]for spectrum for moon, but Jennifer,
- [00:59:00.380]you had sort of mentioned that in the context of ITU,
- [00:59:03.330]whether ITU was purely for
- [00:59:05.690]earthly-based communications or not,
- [00:59:09.150]and I think they were just wondering
- [00:59:10.650]if you had a prediction for that or not,
- [00:59:13.560]how the ITU would address it.
- [00:59:15.237]And if you want to give a prediction, that's fine.
- [00:59:18.500]Otherwise we can wrap up.
- [00:59:21.910]I've never known an institution
- [00:59:23.620]that doesn't accept new responsibilities.
- [00:59:25.930]So I would anticipate that through some process or another,
- [00:59:30.130]the ITU will end up with such jurisdiction.
- [00:59:34.580]Great.
- [00:59:35.440]Well, Jennifer Manner, thank you so much.
- [00:59:38.440]Jennifer Warren, thank you so much.
- [00:59:40.400]This is once again just an incredibly rich discussion.
- [00:59:43.330]And I know I always learn just a ton
- [00:59:45.481]hearing from you on these issues,
- [00:59:48.540]and I know the audience did as well
- [00:59:50.220]and Endeliza as well.
- [00:59:51.900]So thank you, thank you once again.
- [00:59:54.970]For those of you attending,
- [00:59:56.940]we will have an Artemis Accord session on Thursday
- [00:59:59.890]and then a National Security Space session
- [01:00:02.201]on Friday to conclude the week.
- [01:00:04.130]And of course, yesterday's ASIL
- [01:00:06.430]World Speaks Space Africa session was terrific too.
- [01:00:09.850]So thank you to everybody.
- [01:00:11.970]Thank you, Endeliza, thank you, Jennifer Manner,
- [01:00:14.310]thank you, Jennifer Warren.
- [01:00:15.340]Really appreciate it.
- [01:00:16.260]Have a great rest of the night or day,
- [01:00:18.420]depending on where you're at.
- [01:00:20.192]Thank you.
- [01:00:21.181]Thank you, bye.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/18052?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Nebraska Virtual Space Law Week - Spectrum and Space: Future Challenges and Opportunities" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments