Impact of Rotorwash on Atmospheric Profiling

Ryan Martz Author

08/02/2021 Added

14 Plays

Description

This research focuses on using rotary wing UAVs for atmospheric profiling as a supplement to weather balloon soundings

Searchable Transcript

Search:

[00:00:01.710]Hello.
[00:00:02.070]My name is Ryan Martz and I am a junior meteorology major with minors in math,
[00:00:05.910]Spanish, computer science, and applied climatology.
[00:00:09.300]My UCARE project this summer was to investigate the usefulness of rotary wing
[00:00:12.480]Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,
[00:00:13.980]which will be referred to as UAVs for the rest of this video for taking vertical
[00:00:17.760]atmospheric profiles.
[00:00:19.230]Atmospheric profiles are measurements of how atmospheric properties like
[00:00:22.170]temperature and humidity change with height.
[00:00:26.100]The most prominent current method for atmospheric profiling is by many National
[00:00:29.670]Weather Service sites launching two weather balloons each day,
[00:00:32.400]12 hours apart, equipped with a measurement device called a radiosonde.
[00:00:36.090]The problem with this is that these measurements are spaced quite far apart by
[00:00:39.270]both distance and time. So it is hard to get a clear picture of the atmosphere.
[00:00:43.530]Additionally,
[00:00:44.100]weather balloons are not often retrieved, so they generate a lot of waste.
[00:00:47.460]For certain situations,
[00:00:48.630]a clear picture of the current state of the atmosphere is vital for accurate
[00:00:51.840]forecasts,
[00:00:52.680]with one such situation being short-term severe weather forecasting. UAVs could
[00:00:57.210]fill in the gaps because they can be launched often and be reused,
[00:01:00.000]so there are fewer cost and waste concerns,
[00:01:02.340]and since it requires less equipment to take a profile with a UAV,
[00:01:05.610]they could be launched from more locations when a severe weather event is taking
[00:01:08.640]place. However, a problem with UAV is,
[00:01:13.530]is that the spinning rotors pull air from above and push it out below.
[00:01:16.920]So the air that we are measuring on the UAV may be coming from a different
[00:01:19.890]height, and this has been shown by some experiments,
[00:01:21.960]but few have tried to quantify it with the focus of atmospheric measurements.
[00:01:25.830]One such experiment that did try to quantify this occurred in 2015,
[00:01:29.310]but it was conducted within about five meters of the ground.
[00:01:31.770]And as we can see from the figure on the right
[00:01:33.390]from a study conducted by Zheng et al in 2018,
[00:01:36.270]the wake still interacts with the ground at about five meters,
[00:01:39.180]so the ground pushing the air back up could have influenced their finding of an
[00:01:42.180]average of a two meter rotor wash.
[00:01:45.870]Based on previous research,
[00:01:47.250]I expected to find a rotor wash effect of about two to three meters,
[00:01:50.760]depending on several factors including wind speed, atmospheric stability,
[00:01:54.300]the size of the rotors, and the ascent and descent speeds of the drone during the
[00:01:57.600]profile. However,
[00:01:58.950]one important detail to analyze was whether any rotor wash that was found had a
[00:02:02.430]significant impact on the temperature recordings.
[00:02:04.920]That is to say what a rotor wash of two to three meters,
[00:02:07.260]if true, impact the observations of temperature more than just the natural
[00:02:11.100]margin of error of the temperature sensors, which was 0.3 degrees Celsius.
[00:02:15.060]During this experiment,
[00:02:18.660]hundreds of profiles were conducted over four days at the Southern Great Plains
[00:02:22.230]ARM research facility in Lamont, Oklahoma.
[00:02:25.260]My research focuses on the flights from March 31st and April 1st when the
[00:02:28.740]flights were conducted near a 60 meter tower with reference sensors at 25 meters
[00:02:32.730]and 60 meters.
[00:02:34.260]Each flight had two to six profiles and sometimes a several minute loader period
[00:02:37.920]at 60 meters.
[00:02:39.300]The flights varied in atmospheric conditions with wind speeds and atmospheric
[00:02:42.510]stability. And they also varied in terms of the M600 itself.
[00:02:46.710]The ascent speed was either one or three meters per second.
[00:02:49.170]And the sensor housings,
[00:02:50.610]the white trumpets in the image, were rotated so that they faced inward instead
[00:02:53.910]of outward for some flights. Lastly,
[00:02:56.280]the M600 itself was rotated so that different sensors were facing into or out
[00:03:00.880]of the wind on different flights. In addition to the 24 hour tower data,
[00:03:05.170]there were nine soundings each day and a ground reference called a Comet with
[00:03:08.440]continuous data for much of each day.
[00:03:12.640]There were several data sets that needed corrections. First,
[00:03:15.850]the XQ sensors that were attached to the M600,
[00:03:18.550]shown in the yellow boxes before, were allowed to record for several minutes at ground
[00:03:22.600]level
[00:03:22.930]at the same time as the Comet to allow for an inter comparison to identify
[00:03:26.320]biases.
[00:03:27.850]The tower temperature data were compared with contemporaneous soundings to
[00:03:31.090]determine biases in the tower data.
[00:03:33.970]Because the M600 data had unreliable altitude and the tower had no pressure
[00:03:38.080]observations,
[00:03:39.310]I needed to use the pressure readings from another drone called the meteodrone
[00:03:42.580]to estimate the pressure at 25 meters and 60 meters,
[00:03:45.670]so the tower and M600 data could be compared. Lastly,
[00:03:49.260]the M600 profiles needed a lag correction due to the fact that the
[00:03:52.750]sensors take time to record the temperatures after sensing them.
[00:03:59.110]All of my analysis, including the dividing of flights by atmospheric stability,
[00:04:02.770]was done using potential temperature as opposed to regular temperature.
[00:04:06.820]First I identified the difference in potential temperature from the low,
[00:04:09.910]from the tower to the M600,
[00:04:11.680]when the M600 reached the same pressure to see if the difference was within the
[00:04:15.280]XQ sensors' margin of error. Second, I identified the pressure.
[00:04:19.060]at which the XQ on the M600 reached the same potential temperature as the
[00:04:22.870]tower to calculate a rotor wash.
[00:04:25.330]The difference in pressure can be used to estimate a difference in meters
[00:04:28.210]because the change in pressure with respect to height is nearly linear
[00:04:31.230]nearly linear,
[00:04:32.560]so close to the surface. To analyze the loiter period I identified two points
[00:04:37.570]during the loiter to compare with the tower.
[00:04:40.180]I used the potential temperature difference in combination with the lapse rate
[00:04:43.450]around the loiter pressure to calculate a rotor wash. Lastly,
[00:04:47.140]I used two pressures, one, three hecta pascals lower than the first point,
[00:04:51.760]and one six hecta pascals lower than the first point of the ascent to
[00:04:55.330]calculate the difference between the ascent and descent in a similar manner to the
[00:04:58.750]tower. In this case, the ascent was the reference like the tower was,
[00:05:02.500]and the descent was the experimental observation, like the M600.
[00:05:05.710]was before.
[00:05:09.460]The results of this experiment were inconclusive for both the inversion flights
[00:05:13.060]and the superadiabatic flights.
[00:05:14.710]The difference in potential temperature at the same pressure on the tower,
[00:05:17.710]was within the margin of error of the sensors on most profiles.
[00:05:21.070]So any difference in temperature was not significant enough to be attributed
[00:05:24.250]to rotor wash. However, this does not mean that there is no rotor wash effect.
[00:05:28.630]One possibility is that the housing pictured previously was successful in
[00:05:31.870]sampling air from outside the rotor wash zone.
[00:05:35.260]Another possibility is that the inversions and superadiabatic layers were
[00:05:38.500]simply not strong enough for rotor wash to make a difference. With the lapse
[00:05:42.160]rates in the profiles for this experiment,
[00:05:43.960]the rotor wash effect would have needed to be larger much larger than two to
[00:05:47.020]three meters.
[00:05:48.160]It would've needed to be on the scale of 30 or more meters to get a significant
[00:05:51.610]potential temperature difference. There are times however, when
[00:05:56.530]an inversion could be strong enough to generate such steep lapse rates that
[00:05:59.720]rotor wash could have an impact.
[00:06:01.850]One strategy to identify this would be to fly early in the morning after the
[00:06:06.170]inversion has had an entire night to strengthen and also flying in the winter
[00:06:09.950]would give a better chance of a stronger inversion as well. Additionally,
[00:06:13.610]being able to fly the meteodrone or another drone without the sensor housing
[00:06:16.850]could be helpful to determine the impact of the sensor housing on mitigating the
[00:06:20.180]rotor wash. For this research.
[00:06:22.160]I am planning to continue a little bit farther to fine tune the tower
[00:06:25.460]temperature bias,
[00:06:26.750]as well as investigating the loiter periods of the flights to see if these
[00:06:29.690]periods show any rotor wash effect.
[00:06:32.030]I'm hoping to present my full results at the American meteorological society's
[00:06:35.600]annual meeting in January. Acknowledgments:
[00:06:40.280]Dr. Adam Houston,
[00:06:41.360]my advisor helped guide me through each step of the research process.
[00:06:45.350]Daniel Rico and Ashraful Islam helped us set up the experiments and Ashraful
[00:06:49.430]piloted the M600 drone. Dr.
[00:06:52.640]Carrick Detweiler also helped with experiments set up and took the pictures of
[00:06:56.540]the M600 used in this presentation and the ARM SGP site provided
[00:07:01.490]vital reference data through the tower onsite.
[00:07:04.160]And many of the radiosondes soundings that were taken. Thank you for your time.

The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!

You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.

Comments

0 Comments

Impact of Rotorwash on Atmospheric Profiling

Description

Searchable Transcript

Comments icon comment

Related Channels

Comments