Optimization of Single-Walled Carbon Nantube Sensor Platform for the Quantification of Extracellular Analytes
Wali Sohail
Author
07/30/2021
Added
18
Plays
Description
Single Walled Carbon Nanotube sensor platform used to detect varying quantities of Nitric Oxide is optimized to have a more time efficient development process.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:02.580]Hello, and welcome to our presentation. My name is Wally Sohail.
- [00:00:05.910]And this summer I've worked with the Iris and lab for the time-based
- [00:00:09.030]optimization of a single wall, carbon ENA tube,
- [00:00:12.090]otherwise known as Swintt platform that will be used for the quantification of
- [00:00:16.140]cellular analytes. Before I get into this,
- [00:00:18.510]some relevant background information is necessary. The nitric oxide,
- [00:00:22.350]and this is involved in many aspects of cell health,
- [00:00:24.540]from maintenance of normal tissue homeostasis to repair of tissue injury.
- [00:00:29.100]It is known that nitric oxide is essential in cell signaling,
- [00:00:32.190]but it's concentration in mechanisms during healthy and disease states is
- [00:00:35.580]largely unknown.
- [00:00:37.830]A nanoscale real-time sensor that can quantify concentrations of extracellular
- [00:00:42.300]nitric oxide in a spatial temporal fashion would allow researchers to determine
- [00:00:46.710]the levels of this reactive species that is associated with specific cell types
- [00:00:51.540]and functions. This would be beneficial to many areas of science,
- [00:00:55.110]including understanding the basic mechanisms of cell signaling,
- [00:00:58.410]determining the likelihood for increased cell flutter fibrillation and migration
- [00:01:01.890]rates, and to knowing a patient's precise level of nitric oxide at the time of
- [00:01:06.030]treatment, allowing for personalized drug slash dosage determination.
- [00:01:11.340]Unfortunately,
- [00:01:12.120]commercially available sensors cannot provide the precise spatial temporal
- [00:01:15.960]quantification necessary to understand the role of nitric oxide Institute carbon
- [00:01:20.910]nanotube sensors. However,
- [00:01:22.140]can provide spatial temporal information about biological samples over long time
- [00:01:26.760]periods due to their fluorescent recovery lack of flow photo bleaching and
- [00:01:30.780]biocompatibility,
- [00:01:33.300]but is there a platform with the large concentration of evenly distributed Swin
- [00:01:37.050]sensors needs to be created to carry out these experiments,
- [00:01:40.710]the Iris and lab previously developed this type of platform,
- [00:01:43.800]but this one-time use platform takes five days to build resulting in a lot of
- [00:01:47.910]wasted time between experimental planning and performance.
- [00:01:51.900]This research I'll do the platform building protocol by decreasing the time for
- [00:01:55.950]development while maintaining the concentration and distribution of Swin sensors
- [00:02:00.420]on the platform resulting in decreased experimental downtime and increase lab
- [00:02:05.190]efficiency.
- [00:02:06.900]So to start off is important to understand the original method of constructing
- [00:02:11.850]the Swin sensor platform, which involves five main reactions. These are the, uh,
- [00:02:16.560]immersion in Pronto solution to form hydroxyl groups. Uh,
- [00:02:20.490]it is then the immersion in a proxy silent or silent, silent,
- [00:02:24.720]silent Istation to form a proxy groups. Uh,
- [00:02:28.320]the oven curing phase for the glass slides. Uh,
- [00:02:32.370]the addition of Avidan onto the surface,
- [00:02:35.850]and finally the addition of biotech related swims with, uh,
- [00:02:39.840]incubation period for laser analysis.
- [00:02:43.650]It is sort of these core reactions,
- [00:02:45.180]specifically these ones right here that the Pranam more specifically
- [00:02:50.130]the Parata immersion salinization and oven curing that alternative
- [00:02:54.630]alternative methods were made.
- [00:02:57.120]This is because prior studies provide more evidence for the modification of the
- [00:03:01.150]first three steps rather than the latter two,
- [00:03:05.290]three individual experiments were conducted over the course of three weeks. Uh,
- [00:03:10.120]one for the modification of each step, they are also consisted of three groups,
- [00:03:14.800]each, uh, one control group, a and two alternative groups,
- [00:03:18.520]B and C the control group consisted of the original
- [00:03:23.140]protocol times,
- [00:03:25.030]whereas the alternative groups consisted of different experimental times.
- [00:03:29.200]And it's also important to note that while each of these experiments are going
- [00:03:33.640]on, the rest of the protocol remained unchanged for the week.
- [00:03:36.760]So only that specific step was modified for its individual experiment
- [00:03:42.160]for week one, the modification, uh,
- [00:03:45.430]frequent modification of the glass platform,
- [00:03:47.770]immersion times in Parana solution was conducted the control group,
- [00:03:52.060]a immersed the glass slides in for 14 hours. Uh,
- [00:03:55.870]the control group B immerse the slides in for 45 minutes, uh,
- [00:04:00.520]after pre-cleaning and NaOH and HCL,
- [00:04:03.430]and the other group C immerse the slides in for one hour
- [00:04:08.500]for week two, uh, the modification of the immersion times and, uh,
- [00:04:13.090]of toxi silent was conducted. And then this week,
- [00:04:16.390]the control group bay immersed, uh, the, uh, slides in 1%, uh,
- [00:04:21.400]3g PTMS ethanol based solution for 24 hours. Uh,
- [00:04:25.750]the other group be immersed, uh,
- [00:04:29.080]the slides and in Tallinn based silent solution for 30 minutes.
- [00:04:34.210]And the group C immersed the slides in a 10%
- [00:04:38.920]cyclopentane OnBase solution for 20 minutes. Now,
- [00:04:43.360]again for week three, uh,
- [00:04:45.030]of in times we're testing and the control group bay, uh,
- [00:04:49.090]set the slides in the oven for three hours at 150 degrees Celsius, uh,
- [00:04:53.920]whereas control group or sorry, uh,
- [00:04:55.830]experimental group B set the sides in the oven for one hour at 100 degrees
- [00:05:00.070]Celsius a group.
- [00:05:01.870]See there set the sides in the oven for one hour at 150 degrees Celsius.
- [00:05:08.560]Now images were taken, uh,
- [00:05:10.780]on three different points of the platform in order to accurately measure
- [00:05:13.750]fluorescent spatial distribution, uh, across the glass slides.
- [00:05:18.100]This was done at the end of the platform making process on the Iverson labs near
- [00:05:22.510]infrared microscope that emits a laser onto the substrate in order to display
- [00:05:26.800]swings, using his fluorescent properties.
- [00:05:29.920]Now for image analysis prior to going into the results, um,
- [00:05:34.180]the images were processed into matrices using MATLAB and then converted into
- [00:05:38.440]colorized heatmaps shown right here to display and compare the mean spatial
- [00:05:42.670]distribution of Swink derived fluorescent emission maps for computed by
- [00:05:47.350]subtracting the average,
- [00:05:48.700]some matrix of the control group bay from each individual matrix done for all
- [00:05:53.330]groups in order to quantify both the fluorescent yield and spatial the
- [00:05:57.830]fluorescence intensity and mean deviation RA or calculated mean
- [00:06:02.570]deviation RA is given by the sum of the average
- [00:06:07.010]intensity of each, uh, the entire image,
- [00:06:09.920]Y subtracted from the intensity of each pixel,
- [00:06:13.370]sun divided by the total number of pixels.
- [00:06:17.570]Now for our results,
- [00:06:19.220]all three groups came back not significantly different,
- [00:06:24.680]and you could see the heat maps right here showing for each individual group
- [00:06:29.780]and the mean, um, fluorescent intensity, as well as the, uh,
- [00:06:34.000]fluorescent distribution shown, uh,
- [00:06:38.900]the heat maps show, uh,
- [00:06:41.450]even spatial distribution and the accurately depict, uh, each, um,
- [00:06:47.060]uh, group.
- [00:06:49.160]So for the discussion of increase in the promise solution, immersion step one,
- [00:06:53.420]sanitation and the oven curing time do not significantly alter the platforms for
- [00:06:58.280]us and intensity or distribution. This was analyzed with a one-way.
- [00:07:01.730]I know who tests with a two key post-talk analysis for the platform.
- [00:07:06.260]Immersion time for step one,
- [00:07:08.120]group C is a viable alternative to the current immersion time of brute bay and
- [00:07:11.990]maybe use moving forward for the silent ization process,
- [00:07:16.550]the immersion in a Tallinn based a GP TMS solution for 30
- [00:07:21.410]minutes, maybe using the protocol moving forward,
- [00:07:23.750]as it shows the highest overall fluorescent intensity and distribution,
- [00:07:29.180]the oven curing times, uh,
- [00:07:30.770]there is no significant difference in fluorescent intensity and mean
- [00:07:34.460]distribution. However, the P values between groups a and B,
- [00:07:39.380]um,
- [00:07:40.460]are higher than the p-value between groups a and C for the, uh,
- [00:07:45.320]sorry, S an intensity,
- [00:07:47.000]therefore option B will be used for future work
- [00:07:52.910]with these three modifications.
- [00:07:54.440]We decreased the time required for the construction of the wind sensor platform.
- [00:07:58.490]By two days,
- [00:07:59.600]making the process 40% more efficient without significantly altering the swing
- [00:08:04.160]fluorescence, intensity or distribution, uh, when attached to the platform,
- [00:08:08.990]this will allow for a decreased time bill spending the wind sensor platform. Uh,
- [00:08:13.190]this can be visualized in these tunes here in the beginning of original protocol
- [00:08:17.390]timeline. Uh, it lasted five days approximately to make these platforms,
- [00:08:22.100]and now we have reduced it to around three days.
- [00:08:27.260]Um, for acknowledgements,
- [00:08:28.520]I'd like to thank the Iris and lab members for their support on the study.
- [00:08:31.730]And this work is also supported by the national science foundation and the
- [00:08:35.390]national Institute of health.
- [00:08:37.250]Thank you very much for listening to my presentation and have a nice day.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/17516?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Optimization of Single-Walled Carbon Nantube Sensor Platform for the Quantification of Extracellular Analytes" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments