The Poor People’s Petition: Four Uses of Habeas Corpus Among the Poor in Washington and Missouri in the 19th Century

Jacquelyne Leon-Flores Author

07/27/2021 Added

27 Plays

Description

Four examples of how the poor used Habeas Corpus Petitions to challenge unlawful arrest, confinement and custody disputes.

Searchable Transcript

Search:

[00:00:00.750]Hello, my name is Jacquelyne Leon-Flores.
[00:00:03.300]I am a Sociology and Social & Criminal Justice major at Coe college.
[00:00:07.530]Thank you for taking the time to watch my presentation today.
[00:00:10.500]The Poor People's Petition: Four Uses of Habeas Corpus Among the Poor in Washington
[00:00:15.270]and Missouri in the 19th century. This summer I was able to work with Dr.
[00:00:19.590]Katrina Jagodinsky and the Center for Digital Research in the Humanities
[00:00:23.700]transcribing and encoding hundreds of Habeas Corpus petitions from 1812
[00:00:28.530]to 1924 in the American West. Habeas Corpus petitions
[00:00:33.630]are used to challenge an unlawful arrest or detainment. Reading
[00:00:37.410]these allows for us to see how those who were at a disadvantage due to their
[00:00:41.370]socioeconomic status,
[00:00:43.200]managed to use the law to petition for their rights and freedom.
[00:00:48.300]For my presentation,
[00:00:49.440]I decided to focus on the four ways in which the poor used the law to their
[00:00:53.280]advantage to either petition for their freedom against
[00:00:57.120]One- slavery, two-
[00:00:59.940]in custody disputes,
[00:01:01.320]three-against Vagrancy Laws and four-from poor defense.
[00:01:08.190]The first example I will talk about is Dolly v. Young. Dolly,
[00:01:12.240]a woman restrained of her liberty by John Young,
[00:01:15.810]who forcibly took her, a free person, and forced her into slavery under his
[00:01:20.130]supervision for six months.
[00:01:22.290]This was until she was able to petition to the court, where she had to ask for
[00:01:26.010]permission to sue as a "poor person" through the
[00:01:29.460]1818 Missouri Freedom Statute,
[00:01:31.710]which granted her permission to sue. Her
[00:01:34.530]writ was granted by the court and she was able to proceed with her case.
[00:01:40.170]Thinking about this case in today's world,
[00:01:42.180]Dolly would be provided with proper legal aid to help her through the process to
[00:01:46.980]sue Young, rather than to have to petition
[00:01:50.760]to sue as a "poor person" first.
[00:01:55.590]Alice McKay V John and Della
[00:01:57.780]Kevan is an example of a custody dispute in which the mother used
[00:02:02.490]habeas against a couple,
[00:02:04.860]the Kevans, who unlawfully had custody of her daughter, Mary McKay.
[00:02:10.110]Alice McKay had petitioned for custody of her daughter before,
[00:02:13.740]but was seen as too poor to care for her by the court.
[00:02:18.270]She states that there is no legal adoption from this couple,
[00:02:22.230]that she is a fit and capable person to be granted custody of her daughter.
[00:02:26.790]During this case,
[00:02:27.960]she is often questioned about her economic status during testimonies,
[00:02:31.710]and is portrayed as poor by the defendants in order to discredit her and
[00:02:35.970]her ability to be a fit.
[00:02:37.230]parent. We see,
[00:02:39.630]not only in this case,
[00:02:40.800]but in many other custody disputes that mothers are often portrayed as too poor
[00:02:44.910]to try to discredit them
[00:02:46.710]as parental poverty is something that comes up a lot during these.
[00:02:51.480]disputes. Since time,
[00:02:53.970]there has been the creation of programs and social services and ensure that
[00:02:57.930]poverty is not the main reason in which a parent loses custody of their
[00:03:02.470]child,
[00:03:03.430]along with reform to help these parents be able to provide for their children.
[00:03:08.860]The next example is Washington v. Mary O'Neill. O'Neill was charged with
[00:03:13.630]vagrancy and is restrained of her liberty,
[00:03:17.350]but has not confessed to any crime at the time.
[00:03:21.250]She was given the option of paying a fine of a hundred dollars or serving three
[00:03:25.300]months in the county jail. After filing a Habeas petition,
[00:03:29.140]she was granted release by the court for this particular case,
[00:03:33.040]but we read later on that Mary was arrested multiple times for the same crime of
[00:03:37.720]Vagrancy, where instead of petitioning
[00:03:42.250]for a writ, she
[00:03:44.230]confesses to the crime and serves the time.
[00:03:47.530]We see in the Washington statute, that Vagrancy did not only mean homeless,
[00:03:52.030]rather, it had
[00:03:53.260]a pretty large range of people who officers were granted
[00:03:58.090]permission to arrest and bring them before the court, where they either had to
[00:04:02.290]pay in which most cases, people could not afford,
[00:04:08.080]or serve the sentence
[00:04:09.970]which was usually around three months.
[00:04:12.640]These laws increased
[00:04:14.110]the policing and incarceration of poor people who then use habeas to petition the
[00:04:18.130]accusations made by
[00:04:19.300]the court. Today, this
[00:04:21.520]is not a crime that one can be charged with,
[00:04:23.980]but these Vagrant laws were around until the 1960s,
[00:04:27.790]which targeted poor people in the streets until then.
[00:04:32.200]William Warden v. Butterfield is an example of an indigent petitioner
[00:04:37.570]with poor defense.
[00:04:39.820]Warden was restrain of his liberty without a warrant or process of the law,
[00:04:43.660]where he states in his petition
[00:04:45.010]that he was a poor man who does not have any means of being able to pay for
[00:04:49.540]fines, court fees, or such legal aid,
[00:04:53.830]like an attorney.
[00:04:55.780]He has no property or any other means to afford these fees.
[00:05:00.160]After spending time in jail, without being convicted of a crime,
[00:05:04.330]his writ was granted, where he is released and does not have to pay any fees.
[00:05:10.270]For those whose writ is not granted,
[00:05:12.160]they must pay the fees that come with petitioning.
[00:05:15.940]Today, although
[00:05:17.200]not nearly a perfect system,
[00:05:18.910]there is the creation of public defenders for indigent people.
[00:05:22.750]The Supreme court case of Gideon v. Wainwright was a movement that required
[00:05:26.320]states to provide public defense attorneys for those who cannot afford one.
[00:05:31.540]This would prevent those, who are in similar situations as a Warden,
[00:05:35.920]who are held in custody, but are not convicted of a crime.
[00:05:42.160]Significance and Conclusion. Looking at these cases gives us a better insight as
[00:05:46.810]to how the poor, despite facing many obstacles,
[00:05:50.230]use the mechanisms of the law to find their way to freedom or custody.
[00:05:55.420]Individually encoding and using digital research methods allows for
[00:05:59.990]researchers to analyze thousands of petitions for evidence of the poor people's
[00:06:04.880]use of the law. This could suggest
[00:06:06.960]new insights regarding the nature and origin of legal reform movements
[00:06:12.530]that help address the concerns and obstacles poor people face.
[00:06:17.780]We know that these changes did not happen overnight,
[00:06:20.210]but a lot comes from the constant push of these petitioners,
[00:06:23.600]some being poor, to
[00:06:26.120]push for social change through the use of the law.
[00:06:32.380]I want to thank you again for taking the time to listen to my presentation and
[00:06:36.370]another, thank you to Dr. Katrina Jagodinsky,
[00:06:39.130]the CDRH and the GSEF program. Thank you.

The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!

You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.

Comments

0 Comments

The Poor People’s Petition: Four Uses of Habeas Corpus Among the Poor in Washington and Missouri in the 19th Century

Description

Searchable Transcript

Comments icon comment

Related Channels

Comments