Comparing Stream Invertebrate Communities Along the Prairie Corridor
Laura Stalder
Author
04/06/2021
Added
15
Plays
Description
Comparing data from seven sites along the Prairie Corridor to determine species richness at each site.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:01.620]Comparing stream invertebrate communities along the Prairie corridor by Laura
- [00:00:06.420]Stalder. The Prairie corridor is a tall grass,
- [00:00:11.070]Prairie and trail that will connect to Lincoln,
- [00:00:13.830]Nebraska to the Spring Creek Prairie.
- [00:00:16.950]This will start at the Pioneer Park Nature Center and follow
- [00:00:21.810]along the streams through Denton to the Spring Creek Nature Center.
- [00:00:27.720]There'll also be a trail that branches off to connect to the
- [00:00:32.340]Conestoga Lake Recreational Area.
- [00:00:36.060]And this project will reconnect fragmented habitat.
- [00:00:39.930]So that includes the prairie, stream,
- [00:00:42.750]freshwater wetlands, and saline wetlands.
- [00:00:46.560]More information about this corridor can be
- [00:00:49.350]found @prairiecorridor.org
- [00:00:54.300]for the invertebrate communities. Uh,
- [00:00:58.380]we sampled at seven locations.
- [00:01:01.690]They're marked on this site on the slide as tacks
- [00:01:08.190]the orange tacks where the Spring Creek sites at
- [00:01:12.690]Denton and the East fork of Spring Creek.
- [00:01:16.230]The green tack is the Holmes Creek, uh,
- [00:01:20.550]below Conestoga Lake reservoir.
- [00:01:23.400]And the four blue tacks are along the Haines
- [00:01:27.720]Branch. The yellow
- [00:01:32.700]markers are landmarks of the Pioneers Park,
- [00:01:37.020]Conestoga Lake and Spring Creek Prairie to give a reference of
- [00:01:42.030]where this corridor will start and finish along that
- [00:01:46.650]stream.
- [00:01:50.190]The methods for this was during the summer,
- [00:01:53.790]we collected 11 samples per site that we combined to
- [00:01:58.500]be one sample per site. So to do this,
- [00:02:02.250]we sampled at 11 different transects
- [00:02:07.740]with a varying length,
- [00:02:10.320]depending on the width of the stream.
- [00:02:15.060]So if the width of the stream is less than four meters,
- [00:02:19.050]we sampled a reach of 150 meters.
- [00:02:23.940]But if the stream was more than four meters,
- [00:02:27.810]we did a 200 meter reach.
- [00:02:31.080]So for the 150 meter stream reach,
- [00:02:34.350]the transects were 15 meters.
- [00:02:37.440]And for the 200 meter stream reach,
- [00:02:41.610]our transects were 20 meters.
- [00:02:45.300]We sampled either the
- [00:02:49.950]left channel and bank, the center channel or the right channel and bank.
- [00:02:55.530]And so determine which portion we started on at transect
- [00:03:00.310]A, we used a random method that using time.
- [00:03:05.350]So if it was zero to three seconds,
- [00:03:08.410]then we sampled the left channel and bank, four to six seconds.
- [00:03:12.550]We sampled the center channel and seven to nine seconds.
- [00:03:16.360]We sampled the right channel and bank.
- [00:03:20.200]So use the time method to start at transect A,
- [00:03:24.430]if it was eight seconds,
- [00:03:25.990]we started on the right transect and right channel and bank.
- [00:03:31.140]And we sampled there for one minute disturbing the substrate with our
- [00:03:36.010]foot in front of our net in the upstream portion.
- [00:03:39.700]So with our net in the downstream portion,
- [00:03:43.120]so our disturbed area will flow into our net and be captured.
- [00:03:47.560]And that's how we captured the aquatic invertebrates.
- [00:03:52.270]And so we did that for one minute and then moved on to the next transect
- [00:03:57.070]at B. And so we started at the right bank.
- [00:04:02.020]Our next sample would be at the left bank and continue on in a pattern
- [00:04:07.030]of left center, right. And do that every transect.
- [00:04:11.680]We also use the NDEE rapid
- [00:04:16.120]bioassessment protocol and sample the substrate type,
- [00:04:20.890]the stream depth and width,
- [00:04:23.920]the flow of the stream and did a quick riparian habitat
- [00:04:28.630]assessment.
- [00:04:32.680]So during the semester we took the samples that were gathered at each site
- [00:04:37.930]that looked similar to the picture on the,
- [00:04:41.710]in the right side of this slide. Uh, those samples had leaves,
- [00:04:46.120]sticks, bark,
- [00:04:48.940]and parts of the substrates, still in it,
- [00:04:52.960]along with the aquatic invertebrates.
- [00:04:55.810]So we used a microscope to pick out
- [00:05:01.150]the invertebrates from all the detritus
- [00:05:05.980]and extra stuff like the leaves and sticks.
- [00:05:10.660]And the picture in the bottom left corner kind of shows some
- [00:05:15.460]different, uh, species and
- [00:05:21.720]species that we found in our samples. Uh,
- [00:05:26.200]and so we used those and counted out like with
- [00:05:30.640]likes and counted each individual found
- [00:05:36.730]in the sample.
- [00:05:39.460]We found highest species of richness in HCR,
- [00:05:43.180]and ESC with the lowest species of richness at Haines
- [00:05:48.030]Branch Denton.
- [00:05:49.930]We calculated the total abundance.
- [00:05:53.620]So that is the number of species total,
- [00:05:58.520]like every individual in that site.
- [00:06:01.700]And then we also did the taxonomic richness,
- [00:06:05.390]which is how many orders or species
- [00:06:10.370]are there. And then we also calculated diversity.
- [00:06:15.050]And so this told us not only how many species,
- [00:06:19.440]how many individuals were there, but also who they were and what portion of the
- [00:06:25.250]community they made up. Uh,
- [00:06:29.270]so in conclusion,
- [00:06:31.340]we found substantial differences in the macroinvertebrate communities,
- [00:06:35.900]along the Haines Branch stream network with the highest diversity
- [00:06:40.790]and species richness in the East fork of Spring Creek,
- [00:06:44.840]which was our expectation based on the level of the
- [00:06:49.790]low level of disturbances in that area and the good water quality
- [00:06:55.880]finding the relatively high diversity in Holmes Creek below Conestoga reservoir
- [00:07:00.950]and at East Pioneers Park was unexpected and maybe
- [00:07:05.780]driven by a very different factors.
- [00:07:09.140]It could be like flow regulation versus the salinity changes,
- [00:07:12.860]or also the width of the stream.
- [00:07:16.430]We are still working on the taxonomy of an additional site
- [00:07:21.500]at the West fork of Spring Creek
- [00:07:25.070]Our acknowledged, acknowledgements.
- [00:07:28.310]The photos were provided by Tu our funding was provided by the
- [00:07:33.050]Nebraska environmental trust. Uh,
- [00:07:35.630]we had many partners for this project and Ema Muslic and
- [00:07:40.250]Tu helped with the field work during the summer. Uh, that will be all.
- [00:07:44.600]Thank you.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/16499?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Comparing Stream Invertebrate Communities Along the Prairie Corridor" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments