The effects of Daphnia magna on harmful algae bloom Microcystis

Catherine Veseth Author

04/05/2021 Added

131 Plays

Description

The ability of Daphnia magna to control toxic Microcystis through their microbiome.

Searchable Transcript

Search:

[00:00:00.900]Hello everyone. My name is Catherine Veseth,
[00:00:02.820]and I'll be going over the effects of Daphnia Magna on harmful algae blooms.
[00:00:06.930]Microcysts harmful algal blooms are becoming a growing problem in
[00:00:11.820]lakes, ponds, and other water sources.
[00:00:13.890]These harmful algal blooms are the product of cyanobacteria,
[00:00:17.700]a common one being Microsystems.
[00:00:19.920]The main concern was cyanobacteria is its ability to produce toxins that lead to
[00:00:23.910]problems and the Hep pancreatic,
[00:00:25.920]digestive endocrine dermal and nervous system of animals.
[00:00:29.550]There is little agreement on the cause of these toxic effects and therefore
[00:00:32.910]there are many arguments on how to control cyanobacteria.
[00:00:36.120]Many researchers have suggested a biotic interactions.
[00:00:39.420]There have been theories of changing the temperature pH or nutrient availability
[00:00:43.320]of aquatic habitats to rid of the cyanobacteria changing.
[00:00:47.100]These factors could lead to their own challenges and consequences.
[00:00:50.310]There has also been the suggestion of biotic factors to combat cyanobacteria,
[00:00:55.050]multiple different types of aquatic.
[00:00:56.670]Grazing animals also show a strong indication of providing an effective and
[00:01:00.540]natural treatment to the cyanobacteria.
[00:01:02.850]One of these grazers is Daphnia Daphnia. Magna is an aquatic animal.
[00:01:07.290]Most commonly known as a waterfally.
[00:01:09.480]They are dominantly heart herbivores and are found in aquatic systems around the
[00:01:13.200]world.
[00:01:13.920]Daphne are known as an unimportant Keystone species or that the ecosystem is
[00:01:17.820]dependent on the function of the Daphnia Daphne Daphne,
[00:01:21.540]to create the common link in food webs between producers and secondary
[00:01:25.110]consumers.
[00:01:26.280]They reproduce asexually and have large number of offspring at once. Overall,
[00:01:30.930]this makes them a very promising organism for this study.
[00:01:34.230]Some reach search has suggested that the composition of the microbiome might
[00:01:37.920]play a role in allowing Daphnia to tolerate ingestion of cyanobacteria.
[00:01:42.840]The microbiome is defined as the community of bacteria living in and on
[00:01:46.680]everything. Daphnia, Magna has multiple genotypes,
[00:01:49.920]meaning each Daphnia has slight variances and their genetic makeup there for
[00:01:54.570]each type of genotype has a distinctive microbiome biome and can digest
[00:01:59.430]or not digest specific nutrients found in the environment.
[00:02:04.530]The overall objective of the experiment was to target toxic cyanobacteria
[00:02:08.610]through the use of Daphnia.
[00:02:10.350]The 20 2021 academic year provided the time to run trials on 11 different
[00:02:15.000]Daphnia Magna Chino types,
[00:02:16.530]in order to determine which had the best tolerance in the digestion of
[00:02:19.980]Microsystems through the preparation of this experiment,
[00:02:23.910]multiple hypotheses presented themselves for evaluation.
[00:02:27.450]The first hypothesis being that there is a variation in the microbiome per each
[00:02:31.470]genotype of Daphnia.
[00:02:33.180]This would be the reason that some Daphne genotypes are more naturally occurring
[00:02:36.720]than others. And in a variety of locations,
[00:02:39.300]the second hypothesis being that each genotype will have a variation and
[00:02:43.140]tolerance to Microsystems the variants and Microsystems can be contributed to
[00:02:47.370]different genotypes and microbiomes.
[00:02:49.710]The final hypothesis is that there is a cross-link between the tolerance of
[00:02:53.310]Microsystems and each genotypes microbiome.
[00:02:57.960]All three of these were tested and experiment that was conducted over four
[00:03:02.170]weeks.
[00:03:03.010]Each of the 11 Daphnia genotypes were collected and then separated an individual
[00:03:07.210]files. Initial photos were then taken of each Daphnia and their body length was
[00:03:11.560]measured. Two main groups were formed per each genotype.
[00:03:15.190]The first grade group was made of 50% Microsystems,
[00:03:18.310]which is the cyanobacteria and 50% ANCA distress, which is algae.
[00:03:22.540]That is their regular food.
[00:03:24.070]The second group was composed of 20% Microsystems and 75% ANCA destress.
[00:03:29.440]Each Daphnia was fed per their corresponding group every day.
[00:03:32.560]And their water was changed every other day. Numbers such as fatalities.
[00:03:36.700]Number of offspring and the dates of these events were recorded.
[00:03:39.940]The Daphnia were then photographed and measured for their final measurements.
[00:03:44.410]There were then sent to the third party for microbiome testing.
[00:03:48.670]It is important to note that this is an experiment.
[00:03:51.250]The Daphnia microbiome was analyzed under the presence of ANCA destress or good
[00:03:56.200]food conditions rather than pure cyanobacteria.
[00:04:01.270]These are pictures of Daphnia Magna under a microscope.
[00:04:04.180]Each Daphnia was measured from their eye to the stars with their tail on their
[00:04:07.810]back. These two photos are actually the same Daphnia.
[00:04:10.990]The one on the left is before starting the experiment and it was born from a
[00:04:14.440]healthy mother and a good food environment.
[00:04:17.530]The right photo is the same Daphnia after the treatment.
[00:04:20.710]The Daphne on the right is so much thinner because it's a lack of nutrients.
[00:04:24.310]They become even more translucent and fragile.
[00:04:27.250]She was able to establish some eggs that we can see on her back in the brood
[00:04:31.000]chamber through data analysis, overall trends can be seen in the data.
[00:04:36.580]This first graph is a comparison of each genotypes, cumulative reproduction,
[00:04:40.390]separated by their feeding group as expected and overall drop of fecundity
[00:04:44.740]happens when more Microsystems is used,
[00:04:47.650]this isn't the same for all genotypes genotype.
[00:04:50.260]AA has the highest fecundity average and the twenty-five seventy-five group.
[00:04:55.240]When compared its average in the 50 50 group, there is not much change.
[00:04:59.470]This shows that genotype eight a has a higher tolerance to Microsystems and
[00:05:04.030]higher cumulative reproduction in comparison with the other genotypes,
[00:05:08.320]other genotypes experience, unexpected drop like genotype 12,
[00:05:12.730]a and 32 K a large drop in their average for Kennedy happened when
[00:05:17.470]comparing the 25 to 75 group to the 50 50 group.
[00:05:21.490]These genotypes did not reproduce as much in the higher Microsystems
[00:05:24.970]concentrations showing that they had very low tolerance,
[00:05:28.540]genotype six a was like that of eight eight,
[00:05:31.470]because it had great tolerance when comparing our 50 50 to the 25
[00:05:35.800]75. The average reproduction is very similar showing it had great tolerance,
[00:05:41.050]six, eight just didn't have a large number of offspring in either group.
[00:05:46.780]This image shows a relative abundance of each genre of bacteria and the
[00:05:50.860]microbiome.
[00:05:52.060]We used analysis of bacterial DNA to determine that identity and relative
[00:05:56.200]abundance of different bacteria groups and the Daphnia Magna microbiome.
[00:06:00.410]We amplified a high variable region of bacterial DNA by comparing the amplified
[00:06:05.270]sequence to a database.
[00:06:06.860]We were able to determine the identities of the bacteria in the microbiome,
[00:06:11.180]by counting the total number of sequences assigned to each bacteria genus,
[00:06:14.630]we were able to determine relative abundances.
[00:06:17.780]The DNA was then organized by genre by the bacteria and everything present under
[00:06:22.160]less than five present was condensed together.
[00:06:25.040]We see this at the very top with a light blue color.
[00:06:28.760]This way only the bacteria that is heavily present can be reviewed between each
[00:06:32.270]genotype. Overall,
[00:06:33.920]we can see that each genotype had relatively the same type of bacteria in their
[00:06:37.790]microbiome.
[00:06:38.990]There's not a specific genotype that has a very different microbiome or
[00:06:42.260]presenting completely different bacteria. This being said,
[00:06:45.380]there are noticeable differences between the bacterial abundances per each
[00:06:48.800]genotype and genotypes [inaudible].
[00:06:52.340]There is a similar abundances of the same bacteria,
[00:06:55.610]especially the bacteria limbo habitats,
[00:06:58.070]which is that dark Navy blue color in the center.
[00:07:01.160]This could have possibly contributed to their higher tolerance to Microsystems.
[00:07:05.390]They also have smaller diversity of bacteria.
[00:07:07.670]This can be seen because not as many reads of bacteria, genus are represented,
[00:07:12.020]are present in their columns compared to other genotypes genotypes that did not
[00:07:16.910]do as well,
[00:07:17.540]or had a lower tolerance like 12 [inaudible] and 32 K showed that they have
[00:07:22.040]higher microbiome diversity because they have more genus of bacteria present in
[00:07:26.150]their microbiome. They also have a very different abundance in the bacteria,
[00:07:30.680]pseudomonas pseudomonas,
[00:07:32.600]which is that blue color on the very bottom and a flavor bacterium in
[00:07:37.460]that is that light orange color. At the very top.
[00:07:42.460]These can also be especially seen between genotypes AA and six.
[00:07:46.840]A there are large differences in each microbiome,
[00:07:49.630]makeup and abundance per each genotype.
[00:07:52.090]Overall trends can be studied more to show a possible correlation between a
[00:07:55.960]specific bacterium and cyanobacteria tolerance
[00:08:00.940]in conclusion. Yeah,
[00:08:01.630]it was found that each genotype did have a varying microbiome and each genotype
[00:08:05.530]responded differently and their tolerance to Microsystems connections can also
[00:08:09.790]be made of the cross-link between tolerance and Microsystems in each genotypes
[00:08:13.660]microbiome. These are very strong correlations,
[00:08:16.240]but more specific research must be done to con come to a conclusion.
[00:08:20.440]This research will continue to progress in the academic year of 2021 through
[00:08:24.370]2022,
[00:08:25.690]a more definitive answer to the possible cross-linking of the microbiome to
[00:08:29.290]Microsystems tolerance will be investigated along with the introduction of the
[00:08:33.520]cyanobacteria and Abena real-world application will then take place with a
[00:08:37.810]fluctuation of temperatures and they use a specific genotype of Daphnia to
[00:08:41.770]control the toxic cyanobacteria.
[00:08:45.820]I would like to offer a thank you to the undergraduate creative activity and
[00:08:49.840]research experience,
[00:08:50.950]or you care for providing the financial support to this experiment.
[00:08:54.430]Thank you also to my advisor, Dr.
[00:08:56.140]Kressler and to Riley Cooper for providing the guidance to conduct this
[00:08:59.590]experiment. Lastly,
[00:09:00.910]thank you to Kevin Rice for helping gather data and manage Daphnia.

The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!

You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.

Comments

0 Comments

The effects of Daphnia magna on harmful algae bloom Microcystis

Description

Searchable Transcript

Comments icon comment

Related Channels

Comments