Politicians Gone Wild: Moral Tolerance Judgements Against Political Candidates
Kelsey Wright
Author
04/02/2021
Added
17
Plays
Description
With this research I explore the relation between the moral tolerance of political candidates and friends.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:00.380]Hi, my name is Kelsey Wright
- [00:00:02.480]and I am a sophomore biochem major here at UNL
- [00:00:04.960]and I'm going to share with you my presentation today
- [00:00:07.640]entitled Politicians Gone Wild:
- [00:00:09.480]Moral Tolerance Judgements Against Political Candidates.
- [00:00:12.460]So my overall research question was
- [00:00:14.357]"To what extent are citizens willing to tolerate
- [00:00:17.150]bad behavior or immoral behavior from their
- [00:00:18.959]political candidates
- [00:00:20.680]versus the amount they're willing to tolerate
- [00:00:22.610]from their friends or colleagues?"
- [00:00:26.200]So far, I think it's pretty fair to say that
- [00:00:28.900]political scandals are pretty mainstream
- [00:00:31.170]in American politics.
- [00:00:32.980]A lot of different political science theorists have gone
- [00:00:35.890]and researched this, but there's no consensus yet
- [00:00:39.630]as to why some politicians are able to fully recover
- [00:00:43.060]from these scandals and rerun and win elections
- [00:00:46.858]while others are asked to resign
- [00:00:49.527]and aren't able to continue with their political career.
- [00:00:54.620]Some political science scholars have looked
- [00:00:56.820]into the nature of the scandals,
- [00:00:58.970]so whether it's relationship versus financial scandal
- [00:01:03.576]and have overall found
- [00:01:05.020]that financial scandals are a lot bigger deal
- [00:01:07.370]and a lot harder to recover from.
- [00:01:11.730]Others have looked into the timing of the scandal.
- [00:01:14.340]So during political candidates candidacy,
- [00:01:17.498]if it happens at the start of the campaign,
- [00:01:20.400]they're doing pretty good, they can probably recover
- [00:01:23.200]and win their election,
- [00:01:24.190]but if it happens at the end
- [00:01:25.310]it doesn't give them a lot of time to recover
- [00:01:27.230]and they're usually not able to win that election.
- [00:01:32.720]Other theorists have thought about the difference in
- [00:01:34.730]political party and have theorized that
- [00:01:40.320]wanting your party in power
- [00:01:42.150]is going to overpower any other feelings you have
- [00:01:44.730]about immoral behavior.
- [00:01:46.360]And so even
- [00:01:47.193]if your favorite politician has done something immoral
- [00:01:50.110]that you don't agree with
- [00:01:51.530]you're still likely going to vote for them
- [00:01:53.130]because you don't want the other political party in power.
- [00:01:57.440]So we pretty much just tried to figure
- [00:01:59.560]out exactly what type of immoral behavior will be tolerated
- [00:02:03.850]for politicians that wasn't tolerated
- [00:02:05.990]for friends or vice versa,
- [00:02:07.990]seeing if there was any statistical differences.
- [00:02:10.030]And then we did look
- [00:02:10.870]into partisan differences a little bit.
- [00:02:14.080]Overall, I hypothesized that individuals are going to
- [00:02:17.550]hold the politicians
- [00:02:21.150]to a higher moral standard
- [00:02:23.520]than they will their friends.
- [00:02:25.740]And I thought that Democrats are going to be more likely to
- [00:02:28.300]hold politicians to higher standards than Republicans.
- [00:02:33.320]For this experiment, we used a survey
- [00:02:35.476]and gathered data in the spring and fall semesters of 2020.
- [00:02:40.360]We had 708 individuals participate from UNL campus,
- [00:02:45.670]most of which received class credit for their participation.
- [00:02:51.230]Our sample was majority white
- [00:02:52.940]at 77% white and very religious.
- [00:02:57.410]And then the sample was more likely to identify
- [00:03:00.660]as Democrat at 58% while 41% as Republican.
- [00:03:04.680]And then we were about equal between male and female ratios.
- [00:03:09.650]In order to assess the moral tolerance,
- [00:03:12.580]we asked multiple moral questions
- [00:03:15.040]of politicians and friends.
- [00:03:17.412]For the most part, they were pretty similar when they could.
- [00:03:21.380]One was if they would abandon a special needs child.
- [00:03:25.330]And so we were able to ask that for both thinking
- [00:03:28.404]about your favorite politician and thinking about one
- [00:03:30.783]of your friends.
- [00:03:31.616]Some things just didn't quite go both ways.
- [00:03:35.540]One example was we asked about the politician,
- [00:03:40.410]what would you feel
- [00:03:41.243]if they use campaign funds for personal gain,
- [00:03:46.790]and then for the friend we had to ask
- [00:03:48.530]if they would use charity funds for their gain.
- [00:03:54.351]So that first graph there shows our results.
- [00:03:57.640]The red is the politicians and the black is the friend.
- [00:04:03.260]You can see that there are some statistical differences.
- [00:04:08.000]We found those differences in lying under oath,
- [00:04:11.110]cheating on taxes, illegal use of donated money,
- [00:04:14.290]being a heavy drinker
- [00:04:15.490]and failing to acknowledge an illegitimate child
- [00:04:19.340]as well as using public money to pay for personal travel.
- [00:04:22.840]With all of these, there was less moral tolerance
- [00:04:26.197]for the politicians than the friends,
- [00:04:28.850]except for
- [00:04:34.480]failing to acknowledge an illegitimate child
- [00:04:36.840]in which there was more tolerance.
- [00:04:40.460]So higher numbers on the scale means
- [00:04:42.620]that there is more tolerance for the behavior
- [00:04:44.690]and lower numbers means there's less tolerance
- [00:04:46.990]for the immoral behavior.
- [00:04:48.350]So when the friend is higher than the politician
- [00:04:51.010]that means that the politician has less tolerance.
- [00:04:55.130]And then below you can see there that first density
- [00:04:57.890]plot is showing the friend versus Democrat.
- [00:05:02.000]This illustrates really well that people
- [00:05:06.560]aren't going to tolerate really high levels
- [00:05:09.650]of immoral behavior from friends or politicians
- [00:05:12.310]which is why it slips off so steep.
- [00:05:14.690]And I realized that I'm mirrored the other way, that way.
- [00:05:17.790]And it also shows that red being all the way to the right,
- [00:05:23.692]hopefully your right maybe your left
- [00:05:27.140]shows that
- [00:05:33.032]they hold politicians to a higher standard.
- [00:05:37.520]And then below that are the two plots
- [00:05:41.193]for Democrat versus Republican.
- [00:05:43.215]So on the last that figure three is showing
- [00:05:45.665]the political questions.
- [00:05:51.065]So you can see that that blue is way over,
- [00:05:52.510]and so they expect a higher moral standard
- [00:05:55.530]than Republicans do.
- [00:05:57.030]And then that figure four is showing the friend
- [00:05:59.340]and you can see that's extremely similar
- [00:06:02.450]between Republican and Democrat.
- [00:06:03.740]So it doesn't really show a difference there.
- [00:06:07.570]Overall, we definitely found that people hold politicians
- [00:06:11.620]to a higher moral standard,
- [00:06:13.345]and that Democrats hold their politicians
- [00:06:15.930]to a higher moral standard.
- [00:06:17.210]I think this is really well illustrated
- [00:06:19.610]with the Me Too movement.
- [00:06:21.151]So with Democratic Senator Al Frankin was asked to resign
- [00:06:26.810]after a lot of comments that he sexually harassed people
- [00:06:31.523]and he did end up resigning.
- [00:06:34.370]And New York's current Democratic governor
- [00:06:38.220]is feeling very similar things right now
- [00:06:42.044]although very similar allegations have been made
- [00:06:45.080]been made against Republican Donald Trump.
- [00:06:47.700]And there's really been little waver in his following
- [00:06:51.060]and no one calling for his resignation for that reason,
- [00:06:55.120]especially from his own followers.
- [00:06:57.540]I think that our future research should really focus
- [00:07:01.230]on gender.
- [00:07:02.260]For this study we just asked for them
- [00:07:07.900]to imagine their favorite politician
- [00:07:10.540]instead of asking to imagine a female or a male politician.
- [00:07:14.910]And I think in the future
- [00:07:15.910]that these could show some very different moral standards
- [00:07:19.050]for the female and male politicians.
- [00:07:21.880]Otherwise, thank you so much for listening
- [00:07:23.720]to my presentation and a special thank you to
- [00:07:26.100]Dr. Kevin Smith and Clarisse Warren for helping me
- [00:07:28.820]so much with all of this research.
- [00:07:31.145]Thank you, bye-bye.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/16208?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Politicians Gone Wild: Moral Tolerance Judgements Against Political Candidates" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments