Assessing Antioxidant Nanoparticle Efficacy Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice
Aria Tarudji
Author
04/01/2021
Added
27
Plays
Description
Assessing antioxidant nanoparticle efficacy following traumatic brain injury in mice. Utilizing controlled cortical impact to induce brain injury, and look for the reduction in oxidative stress with nanoparticle treatment.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:00.870]Hi everyone. My name is Aria Tarudji.
- [00:00:03.030]I am a PhD student in the Kievit lab at the biological system engineering
- [00:00:06.660]department. And today I want to talk about my research in assessing antioxidant
- [00:00:10.740]nanoparticle efficacy following traumatic brain injury in mice.
- [00:00:15.880]A little bit of background of the traumatic brain injury.
- [00:00:18.090]Traumatic brain injury is the main cause of death and disability of people below
- [00:00:21.750]45 years old.
- [00:00:23.280]And has 69 million new cases worldwide annually. It was estimated to costs over
- [00:00:28.130]60 billion dollar a year in the U.S. alone.
- [00:00:31.590]And the problem is that after primary injury,
- [00:00:33.900]from the damage to the head or the brain, it doesn't stop there. However,
- [00:00:38.380]there is the progression that induce more degeneration
- [00:00:43.260]of the brain, it's called the secondary injury.
- [00:00:47.820]So after the primary injury that causing cell death,
- [00:00:52.440]releasing oxidative stress, which induces more oxidative stress.
- [00:00:56.640]And this oxidative stress inducing cell death.
- [00:01:00.030]Therefore the cycles continue, and this is called the secondary injury of TBI.
- [00:01:05.940]And this cascade can continue more than 18 years after the injury.
- [00:01:09.840]And it was hypothesized,
- [00:01:11.340]It is hypothesized to increase the chance of Alzheimer's disease.
- [00:01:16.210]However, currently, there is no treatment that can reduce the secondary injury in TBI.
- [00:01:22.110]We think the failure is partly because it's using the small molecule drugs.
- [00:01:26.640]Small molecule drugs,
- [00:01:28.800]have small accumulation and small retention time in the brain injury.
- [00:01:32.910]Moreover, the small molecule drugs has fairly small therapeutic window in
- [00:01:37.830]which the drugs can be administered to the patient of TBI.
- [00:01:42.540]And with these limitations we think that the smaller molecule drugs
- [00:01:47.580]cannot be used in the traumatic brain injury to reduce the effect of
- [00:01:52.500]secondary injury.
- [00:01:55.980]And therefore I would like to propose the use of antioxidant nanoparticle.
- [00:02:00.180]Nanoparticle is a very small molecule, according to us,
- [00:02:03.120]but it's quite high in molecular weight compared to small molecule drug,
- [00:02:07.470]and usually the shape is sphere.
- [00:02:09.360]However, there is multiple shapes of the nanoparticles that people use.
- [00:02:15.600]We found that nanoparticles,
- [00:02:17.400]regardless of the size and the type of the nanoparticle's able to accumulate
- [00:02:22.350]more than the gadolinium DTPA, which is a small molecule resembling
- [00:02:27.150]the small molecule drugs.
- [00:02:29.850]And, we also found that the small molecule have
- [00:02:34.740]lower retention rate in the brain injury,
- [00:02:38.160]as well as lower blood circulation
- [00:02:41.640]half-life compared to the nanoparticles.
- [00:02:44.370]And the evidence is not only found by our group, but also by other groups.
- [00:02:51.450]And with this higher accumulation and higher retention in the brain injury,
- [00:02:54.930]we hope the nanoparticle is able to have more time to react with
- [00:02:59.830]the oxidative stress.
- [00:03:02.050]Therefore, reducing the secondary injury cascade.
- [00:03:06.880]And by that we used the antioxidant nanoparticle,
- [00:03:10.300]the nanoparticle has a thioether bond and free thiol group,
- [00:03:14.740]both of them is able to react with the oxidative stress.
- [00:03:17.440]Therefore, inhibiting the oxidative stress to damage the cells nearby.
- [00:03:22.870]And because it's reducing the oxidative stress level,
- [00:03:27.130]that's why it's called the antioxidant nanoparticle.
- [00:03:31.180]And what we want is that the nanoparticle will be able to react with the oxidative
- [00:03:35.500]stress, therefore inhibiting the propagation of the oxidative stress,
- [00:03:40.390]therefore inhibiting the cell death, and inhibiting the
- [00:03:44.920]secondary injury of TBI. The test, this hypothesis,
- [00:03:48.940]we use the controlled cortical impact as the primary injury in the
- [00:03:53.740]mice model of TBI.
- [00:03:56.560]We use controlled cortical impact or CCI because it's very repeatable
- [00:04:01.900]and it can induce severe injury in the mice.
- [00:04:07.120]So we can know how efficacy,
- [00:04:11.080]how effective is the nanoparticle in reducing the oxidative stress,
- [00:04:15.220]even in the very severe TBI.
- [00:04:18.670]And we induce it on the left side of the brain
- [00:04:23.830]and also the good thing with the CCI, even though it's very severe,
- [00:04:27.580]it's very high survivability rate.
- [00:04:31.060]So almost no mice died from this surgery.
- [00:04:35.710]So, we put the mice in the stereotaxic to keep the head level and hit the
- [00:04:39.760]brain with the
- [00:04:41.450]piston.
- [00:04:44.610]And to test the oxidative stress level.
- [00:04:48.060]We use the DHE assay. DHE is a chemical that readily oxidized
- [00:04:53.070]with the oxidative stress and become fluorescence.
- [00:04:56.700]And the fluorescence level is able to be correlated with the
- [00:05:02.070]level of the oxidative stress in the brain injury.
- [00:05:06.600]Therefore we did the CCI and the nanoparticle or MnTMPyP
- [00:05:11.040]injection right after the injury.
- [00:05:13.680]MnTMPyP is a small molecule that also act as the antioxidant and
- [00:05:18.300]currently in the clinical trials.
- [00:05:20.520]So we use them as the positive control against the nanoparticle. And then we,
- [00:05:25.410]at three hours time point, we inject the DHE and at four hours,
- [00:05:30.210]we collect the brain for a confocal microscope. In the confocal
- [00:05:34.650]microscope, we can
- [00:05:37.500]quantify the florescence in the injured area compared to the uninjured
- [00:05:42.360]area.
- [00:05:43.410]And we found that there's huge reduction in the ROS
- [00:05:48.420]with the MnTMPyP and nanoparticle treatment.
- [00:05:51.420]And there are more reduction in nanoparticle compared to the MnTMPyP.
- [00:05:57.920]We also test the alpha spectrin degradation product.
- [00:06:02.900]So alpha spectrin is the cytoskeleton of the cells. And when the cells died,
- [00:06:07.730]either by the necrosis or apoptosis,
- [00:06:10.160]it degraded differently. With the necrosis,
- [00:06:12.710]it'll be degraded by calpain pathway and therefore producing 145
- [00:06:17.210]kilodalton, while on the apoptosis,
- [00:06:20.180]it will be dominated by caspase-3 pathway,
- [00:06:22.640]therefore it will be inducing the 120 kilodalton.
- [00:06:27.470]And because this is more downstream compared to the oxidative stress,
- [00:06:30.770]we compare it at the three days after the injury, collect the brains for the
- [00:06:35.210]Western blot. And with the Western blot,
- [00:06:37.640]we found the significant reduction in the 150
- [00:06:42.050]kilodalton in that area of the brain,
- [00:06:45.950]the left and the right brains. And,
- [00:06:50.180]we also found significant reduction in the 145 kilodalton
- [00:06:54.950]of the injured side of the brain, compared to the untreated CCI mice.
- [00:06:59.960]As a conclusion,
- [00:07:00.920]antioxidant nanoparticle's able to reduce the ROS in the acute phase of TBI,
- [00:07:04.880]and also reducing cell death in the subacute phase of TBI. And the next,
- [00:07:09.920]we want to look for nanoparticle therapeutic window,
- [00:07:13.520]which is the nanoparticle concentration that give the
- [00:07:18.470]highest efficacy in reducing the oxidative stress, and also the treatment
- [00:07:23.330]window, which is the
- [00:07:25.460]how long after the injury that we can still administer nanoparticle,
- [00:07:29.030]and still give accumulation as well as reducing the secondary injury.
- [00:07:33.650]And by that, I would like to acknowledge Dr. Forrest Kievit, my primary advisor,
- [00:07:38.030]Dr. Greg Bashford, Dr. Rebecca Wachs, and Dr. Aaron Mohs as my committee members,
- [00:07:42.970]Connor Gee and Brandon McDonald as helping me in handling the mice.
- [00:07:48.470]And you to listening to my presentation. Thank you very much.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/16176?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Assessing Antioxidant Nanoparticle Efficacy Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments