Assessment of on-farm biochar production and performance as a peat substitute

Collin Eaton and Caleb Wehrbein Author

04/01/2021 Added

23 Plays

Description

Presentation of research relating to on-farm production of biochars using agricultural waste material and assessment of performance within chrysanthemum cutting and kale seed propagation as a viable peat substitute.

Searchable Transcript

Search:

[00:00:01.710]Hello,
[00:00:02.430]and welcome to the presentation of assessment of on-farm biochar production and
[00:00:07.380]performance as a peat substitute by Collin Eaton and Caleb Wehrbein.
[00:00:13.890]Sphagnum peat moss is a widely used growing mixed component used in the greenhouse
[00:00:17.910]industry. While Peat as a resource is renewable,
[00:00:21.690]it would take a far greater amount of time to regenerate the resource compared
[00:00:26.040]to the rate at which the greenhouse industry consumes it.
[00:00:29.730]Therefore, it is crucial for the industry to find sustainable substitutes for the
[00:00:34.290]peat resource that is easily affordable and widely available.
[00:00:39.780]Over the past couple of decades,
[00:00:41.580]biochar has been discussed as a potential source of long-term carbon
[00:00:45.390]sequestration that may have additional uses past carbon storage.
[00:00:50.400]Biochar is a pyrogenic carbonaceous material generated from slow
[00:00:54.750]pyrolysis of organic materials.
[00:00:58.290]These materials are often derived as agricultural waste products and can include
[00:01:03.180]materials such as rice hulls, manures, or woody materials.
[00:01:08.880]When discussing biochar,
[00:01:10.290]there are two different methods of production each with its own advantages and
[00:01:14.580]disadvantages while batch production, in comparison to
[00:01:18.900]continuous production of biochar, contributes to a low char yield,
[00:01:24.240]it represents an economical option to small farmers with minimal investment and
[00:01:28.680]equipment. Batch production of biochars also boasts the potential of
[00:01:33.210]on-site preparation of biochar with local waste materials contributing to
[00:01:38.600]the sustainability and improved economics of the farm operation.
[00:01:44.580]In this study,
[00:01:45.420]we are seeking to understand the performance of on-site production of biochar
[00:01:49.890]and incorporation into chrysanthemum cutting and kale seed propagation as a
[00:01:54.540]candidate for sphagnum peat replacement. In assessing performance in
[00:01:59.280]chrysanthemum cutting and kale seed production,
[00:02:02.280]we will then be able to determine whether a percentage of sphagnum peat can be
[00:02:06.960]replaced by biochar derived from batch production in these horticultural media
[00:02:11.850]mixes.
[00:02:15.410]For this study, untreated white oak wood stakes and locally sourced
[00:02:19.610]composted chicken manure were subjected to pyrolysis using a modified
[00:02:24.440]hybrid top lit updraft retort. Feed stocks placed in
[00:02:29.390]a 30-gallon drum were sealed and covered in fuel material within the
[00:02:33.830]55-gallon drum and lit. After pyrolysis, created
[00:02:38.570]biochars were wetted down until safe to handle, crushed, and sieved to a
[00:02:43.130]uniform size using a 4,000 micron sieve.
[00:02:47.720]During the chrysanthemum cutting part of the study,
[00:02:50.240]a custom Cornell seed starting mix was created with treatments of 20%
[00:02:55.460]and 50% sphagnum peat replacement with both the wooden stake and chicken
[00:03:00.460]manure biochars.
[00:03:02.500]Locally sourced, pre-bloom chrysanthemum material was used as the
[00:03:07.480]mother plant for propagule production.
[00:03:11.230]After four weeks sitting under mist, the cuttings were sampled for
[00:03:14.500]characteristics of root vigor by measuring properties such as root length and
[00:03:19.150]root number. To assess performance of kale seed production,
[00:03:24.250]a custom Cornell seed starting mix was created with treatments of 10%
[00:03:29.320]and 25% peat replacement with wooden stake and chicken manure
[00:03:34.030]biochars. Additional treatments of chars were created,
[00:03:38.830]with saturated cation exchange sites using ammonium
[00:03:43.660]sulfate and calcium nitrate fertilizers. Kale was then
[00:03:48.520]double seeded into plastic draining cells in a 16-pot treatment pattern
[00:03:53.440]and placed under greenhouse conditions.
[00:03:56.180]For the kale, we measured germination counts across the first few weeks,
[00:03:59.970]and then across the entire six weeks of growth, we also measured height,
[00:04:03.540]leaf counts, SPAD values. And then at the conclusion of the project,
[00:04:07.050]we recorded both the fresh and dry root and shoot biomass.
[00:04:13.060]We have a table outlining some of the results from the chrysanthemum trials.
[00:04:17.160]We have the number of root, total root length,
[00:04:20.010]and mean root length for both trial
[00:04:21.810]one and trial two. The values weren't significantly different from one another,
[00:04:26.430]but we did notice that at this chicken 20% rate,
[00:04:29.490]we did have a reduction in the number of roots and total length for both
[00:04:32.880]trials, but we think that might be due to some heterogeneity in the feedstock.
[00:04:37.380]So it contained both the composted chicken manure, as well as the wood bedding.
[00:04:43.890]And then here for the kale,
[00:04:45.210]we have a graph comparing the type of fertilizer that the
[00:04:49.980]char was soaked in versus the dry shoot biomass of the kale.
[00:04:54.510]So here we have AMS ammonium sulfate, CAN calcium nitrate,
[00:04:59.040]and then NON just means there was no fertilizer that it was soaked with.
[00:05:02.550]And we can see that those chars soaked with ammonium sulfate had a
[00:05:07.410]higher dry shoot biomass in both trials,
[00:05:12.000]while the calcium nitrate in that not soaking charred performed similar to one
[00:05:16.080]another.
[00:05:17.160]And we think that might be due to ammonia being released over time while the
[00:05:21.090]plants were growing. Then here,
[00:05:24.630]we've got another graph for the kale comparing the dry shoot biomass
[00:05:29.310]versus the feedstock and the percentage of incorporation.
[00:05:32.580]So you've got composted chicken manure incorporated at 10% and then 25%.
[00:05:37.500]And then wood biochar incorporated at 10% in 25% and then our control.
[00:05:43.020]So for trial one,
[00:05:43.890]we can see that most of the biochar makes it perform similar to control
[00:05:48.720]except for the wood 25%.
[00:05:50.970]And then for trial two chicken incorporated at the 10% level did perform
[00:05:55.710]slightly better than the medium mix.
[00:05:59.850]You think that maybe this chicken 10% perform a little bit better because it's
[00:06:03.560]the residual organic nitrogen left after pyrolysis,
[00:06:07.670]but across both trials, we can see that as a trend,
[00:06:10.550]as the amount of bio char went up in the mix,
[00:06:13.160]we did have a reduction in dry shoot biomass.
[00:06:18.260]So in conclusion,
[00:06:19.130]we determined that for cuttings, wood biochar could serve as a viable peat
[00:06:22.940]substitute up to 50%, but the composted chicken manure did show some variability.
[00:06:27.660]And again, that could have been due to the heterogeneity of the feedstock.
[00:06:31.380]And then for plug production,
[00:06:32.960]biochar mixes up to 10% could serve as viable peat substitute.
[00:06:37.520]But once we started to hit that 25%,
[00:06:39.530]we did have reduction in performance of the shoot.
[00:06:43.850]And then as a general trend from figure two,
[00:06:46.250]the increasing the amounts of biochar did slightly reduced plug performance.
[00:06:51.020]We also determined that the opportunity exists to improve biochar by soaking it
[00:06:55.280]with a fertilizer and saturating the CEC sites.
[00:06:58.700]And also that batch production of bio char is a feasible method of producing a
[00:07:02.780]usable product from agricultural waste.
[00:07:08.240]We would like to thank Dr. Wortman our UCARE advisor, Dr. Paparozzi
[00:07:12.830]for lending us some of the equipment that we use throughout the
[00:07:17.630]project. Zemua Baptista for donating some composted chicken manure,
[00:07:23.030]and then also the UCARE foundation for sponsoring the project.
[00:07:27.250]Thank you very much for watching.

The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!

You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.

Comments

0 Comments

Assessment of on-farm biochar production and performance as a peat substitute

Description

Searchable Transcript

Comments icon comment

Related Channels

Comments