Acceptability and Feasibility of a Mental Health Workshop for LGBTQ Youth and Young Adults

Christen Seyl Author

03/27/2021 Added

19 Plays

Description

This presentation reviews the methods, results, and implications of data derived from a mental health promotion workshop for LGBTQ+ youth and young adults.

Searchable Transcript

Search:

[00:00:00.920]Hello, my name is Christie Seyl,
[00:00:02.500]and today I will be presenting my study
[00:00:04.010]on the "Acceptability and Feasibility
[00:00:05.640]of a Mental Health Promotion Intervention
[00:00:07.350]for LGBTQ Youth and Young Adults."
[00:00:09.980]But first, here's some background.
[00:00:11.640]In general, there is a rise in mental health issues
[00:00:13.750]in people during adolescence and young adulthood.
[00:00:16.010]This risk increases when the individual identifies as LGBTQ,
[00:00:19.800]and that risk remains through their lifetime.
[00:00:21.910]Although there are many
[00:00:22.743]mental health prevention interventions that have been found
[00:00:24.970]to be effective in the general population,
[00:00:27.620]very few of these techniques
[00:00:28.760]have been studied in LGBTQ populations.
[00:00:31.220]My study further explored data from a parent study,
[00:00:34.970]a mental health intervention workshop
[00:00:36.360]aimed at LGBTQ youth and young adults.
[00:00:39.360]This study contributes to a gap in scholarship
[00:00:41.390]concerning LGBTQ-specific needs
[00:00:43.700]in mental health interventions.
[00:00:46.180]Given the field of psychology's history
[00:00:47.760]with this population,
[00:00:48.593]researchers working with it must be intentional
[00:00:50.590]about providing a positive experience for the participants.
[00:00:53.970]Due to society's continued stigmatization
[00:00:56.270]of both mental health and the LGBTQ identities,
[00:00:59.140]privacy and confidentiality are both critical
[00:01:01.220]while working with this population.
[00:01:03.440]My study sought to observe if the efficacy
[00:01:05.780]of a mental health prevention workshop
[00:01:07.160]was related to changes in various mental health measures.
[00:01:10.100]Additionally, it analyzed the participants likes and advice
[00:01:12.650]about the workshop to find any common themes.
[00:01:15.210]It was expected that those who rated the workshop higher
[00:01:17.370]on credibility and expectancy ratings
[00:01:19.060]would also experience a great or general reduction
[00:01:22.340]in reported mental health symptoms.
[00:01:24.900]For the qualitative responses,
[00:01:26.160]it was expected that participants
[00:01:27.690]would like the community the workshop provided
[00:01:29.370]and recommend more practice time.
[00:01:31.440]Participants were drawn
[00:01:32.510]from the local community of LGBTQ youth and young adults
[00:01:35.300]to participate in a mental health promotion intervention.
[00:01:38.150]The intervention workshop
[00:01:39.210]informed by focus groups with LGBTQ youth and young adults
[00:01:42.130]covered with techniques such as mindfulness
[00:01:43.760]and cognitive restructuring,
[00:01:44.860]as well as invited participants
[00:01:46.150]to share locations that they found affirming
[00:01:47.780]and activities that they found distracting.
[00:01:49.780]Before and after the workshop,
[00:01:51.020]participants filled out a survey
[00:01:52.280]that included various mental health measures.
[00:01:54.430]The ones included in this study
[00:01:55.720]were Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 measure
[00:01:58.600]which measured anxiety,
[00:01:59.940]the difficulties with emotion regulation scale
[00:02:02.600]which measured emotion regulation,
[00:02:04.440]the stress appraisal measure
[00:02:05.600]for adolescents threat appraisal subscale
[00:02:07.520]which measured participants' (indistinct) of stress.
[00:02:10.150]Finally, the internalized transphobia subscale
[00:02:12.120]from the gender minority stress and resilience measure
[00:02:14.440]was adapted to generalize to internalize stigma
[00:02:17.260]of participant's sexual and gender identity.
[00:02:19.790]After the workshop, participants rated the logic success
[00:02:22.370]and confidence in recommending the workshop
[00:02:24.140]on a self-report questionnaire,
[00:02:25.680]as well as answer these questions;
[00:02:28.180]What were helpful aspects of the workshop
[00:02:29.860]and what were aspects of the workshop
[00:02:31.350]that they would change?
[00:02:32.420]Their responses were thematically analyzed.
[00:02:35.110]The participants ranged in sexuality and gender identity,
[00:02:37.520]but all were aged between 17 and 26.
[00:02:40.000]All of the participants were part of a sexual minority,
[00:02:42.230]and 25% of the participants were part of a gender minority.
[00:02:47.250]The majority of the participants were white,
[00:02:49.240]with about 25 participants being a person of color.
[00:02:53.500]In general, the participants gave higher ratings
[00:02:56.110]of logic, success and confidence.
[00:02:57.710]However, the participants received the workshop in-person
[00:03:00.530]give slightly higher ratings of logic and success
[00:03:02.760]compared to those who received it virtually due to COVID-19.
[00:03:06.000]Partial correlations were run
[00:03:07.290]for change in each mental health measure
[00:03:09.070]across the three workshop ratings.
[00:03:10.910]For each measure of the pre-score was controlled for.
[00:03:13.560]None of these analyses yielded a significant correlation.
[00:03:17.330]Now, for that discussion of the qualitative data.
[00:03:19.390]From the written responses about what was liked
[00:03:21.540]and what could be improved on in the workshop,
[00:03:23.120]three themes emerged.
[00:03:24.860]Each of the following slides
[00:03:25.860]will have some de-identified quotes from the participants
[00:03:28.200]for examples of each associated theme.
[00:03:31.670]The first was the acceptability
[00:03:33.010]of empirically-supported therapeutic techniques.
[00:03:35.770]Many participants considered cognitive restructuring,
[00:03:38.110]generating the list of local resources,
[00:03:40.060]and distracting activities and mindfulness
[00:03:42.300]as helpful aspects of the workshop.
[00:03:44.810]Additionally, participants suggested spending more time
[00:03:47.250]to practice cognitive restructuring
[00:03:48.700]and including more examples of it in the workshop.
[00:03:51.340]Participants often mentioned
[00:03:52.660]several of the techniques in conjunction,
[00:03:54.640]and think that many segments of the workshop
[00:03:56.650]were useful to participants.
[00:03:58.860]There was also much overlap
[00:03:59.940]between participants who listed the list of local resources
[00:04:02.340]and the list of distracting activities
[00:04:03.780]with the second theme of community.
[00:04:05.640]Although it was not
[00:04:06.473]the in-primary intention of the workshop,
[00:04:07.930]many participants found that community
[00:04:09.390]was established and valued during it.
[00:04:11.170]While many participants to LGBTQ youth and young adults
[00:04:14.330]allowed for implicit community among participants
[00:04:16.390]that improved to comfort and indicated to participants
[00:04:18.700]that they were not alone in their experiences,
[00:04:21.140]participants suggested facilitating
[00:04:22.600]more discussions throughout the workshop,
[00:04:23.880]as well as adding more participants
[00:04:25.310]in order to increase diversity
[00:04:26.760]of individuals and perspectives.
[00:04:29.070]The final theme identified was that
[00:04:30.490]the structure and rationale of the workshop
[00:04:32.280]were logical to participants.
[00:04:34.060]Although the references to structure and rationale
[00:04:35.900]were less prevalent, they were no less important.
[00:04:38.730]The workshop followed a simple structure
[00:04:40.210]which lends to the feasibility of the intervention.
[00:04:43.150]Similarly, the necessity and applicability of the workshop
[00:04:46.210]were apparently dispensed.
[00:04:48.447]As discussed previously,
[00:04:49.770]there were no significant partial correlations
[00:04:51.640]between mental health outcomes and workshop rating.
[00:04:55.410]Because their ratings for the workshop were so high,
[00:04:58.070]there is a little variation in workshop rating.
[00:04:59.980]It's possible that this caused ceiling effect in the data.
[00:05:03.220]The themes identified indicates that this population
[00:05:05.560]doesn't accept empirically-supported therapeutic techniques
[00:05:08.160]as well as derive more meaningful community
[00:05:09.840]from the workshop.
[00:05:10.910]However, there were some differences
[00:05:12.480]between groups of participants.
[00:05:13.950]Participants who attended the workshop in-person
[00:05:15.970]rated it more logical and more successful
[00:05:17.850]at statistically significant levels compared to participants
[00:05:20.760]who attended the workshop virtually due to COVID-19.
[00:05:23.650]This could relate to the theme of community,
[00:05:24.890]as an in-person setting may more easily facilitate rapport
[00:05:27.810]than a virtual setting.
[00:05:29.520]The acceptance of empirically-supported
[00:05:31.200]emotion regulation techniques,
[00:05:33.120]the structure and the rationale,
[00:05:34.550]indicates that the content of the workshop
[00:05:36.160]was meaningful and useful to participants.
[00:05:39.820]There were a few limitations on this workshop
[00:05:41.520]that must be considered when viewing these results.
[00:05:43.820]One is the recruitment of the participants
[00:05:45.520]came from a largely white, educated population
[00:05:47.650]which limits generalizability.
[00:05:49.350]Additionally, because half of the participants
[00:05:51.010]received the workshop virtually,
[00:05:52.750]the in-person workshop
[00:05:53.760]lacked a large number of participants.
[00:05:56.860]To continue this research, they were structurally modified
[00:05:59.090]to include the participants' suggestions,
[00:06:00.710]such as spending more time on cognitive restructuring
[00:06:02.890]and including more participants of different backgrounds
[00:06:04.900]in each session.
[00:06:06.100]Preferably, the workshop also be conducted
[00:06:08.100]in an in-person setting,
[00:06:09.330]as this provided better logic and success ratings
[00:06:11.420]from the participants.
[00:06:13.250]A virtual format of the workshop
[00:06:14.650]which would help with dissemination requires more study,
[00:06:17.160]but our experience was encouraging
[00:06:18.680]that such an approach could be helpful.
[00:06:20.960]Finally, here's my Works Cited page
[00:06:22.720]as well as my Acknowledgements.
[00:06:23.810]I'm especially grateful to Natalie Holt and Debra Hope.
[00:06:26.360]And to my audience, thank you for listening.

The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!

You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.

Comments

0 Comments

Acceptability and Feasibility of a Mental Health Workshop for LGBTQ Youth and Young Adults

Description

Searchable Transcript

Comments icon comment

Related Channels

Comments