2021 Nebraska Cover Crop and Soil Health Conference - Kristen Veum
Deloris Pittman
Author
03/25/2021
Added
27
Plays
Description
Soil Sensing and Soil Health - Kristen Veum, Research Soil Scientist at USDA-ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit, University of Missouri-Columbia
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:00.060][music].
- [00:00:21.110]All right. So I'm Kristen Veum. I'm with the ARS in Columbia,
- [00:00:26.060]Missouri.
- [00:00:26.540]And today I'm going to talk about soil sensing applications in soil health,
- [00:00:32.090]and I think I'll be able to help make out some of this time too.
- [00:00:35.420]So I'm a research social scientist, and most of the time,
- [00:00:39.140]my research involves lab work and evaluating
- [00:00:43.820]soil properties. So methods, lab methods, and, you know,
- [00:00:48.080]things along those lines.
- [00:00:49.640]And so these are some pictures from my lab and the awesome staff that I have
- [00:00:53.870]that helped me do all of that, that work.
- [00:00:58.230]We all know, okay. You know, the soil health concept. Well,
- [00:01:02.990]we need some science to, have as the foundation of that.
- [00:01:07.580]So as a soil scientist, the way I contribute to that is through these,
- [00:01:12.530]chemical,
- [00:01:13.190]biological and physical soil measurements and evaluating
- [00:01:18.110]how they work. But as you probably know,
- [00:01:23.270]there are a lot of different soil properties that we can measure.
- [00:01:27.740]And in fact,
- [00:01:28.280]it's probably unlikely that you would ever be able to measure everything.
- [00:01:32.570]And we have to think about, well, what are we going to measure?
- [00:01:35.570]How are you going to choose different measurements?
- [00:01:38.300]And we like to lump these into three categories, right? Like chemical,
- [00:01:42.680]biological, and physical measurements. And so if you look at this list,
- [00:01:46.940]you may be familiar with some of these things.
- [00:01:49.040]Maybe you've measured some of these things on your own farm or in your own
- [00:01:53.030]experiments. and maybe you're not familiar with some of the others,
- [00:02:00.350]but with, within that research area,
- [00:02:03.380]one of my primary interests is working on assessments for producers.
- [00:02:08.450]And that's, that's a goal of mine.
- [00:02:09.860]But if we're going to measure soil health for producers,
- [00:02:13.580]we need measurements that are accessible so that they can actually get it
- [00:02:18.200]somewhere, right. Somebody has to offer it.
- [00:02:20.660]It has to be affordable and something that we can interpret.
- [00:02:26.150]There are a lot of challenges related to that.
- [00:02:29.000]And a lot of people have been working on that,
- [00:02:31.550]but today the soil sensing work really pertains more to that
- [00:02:36.290]affordability question.
- [00:02:39.680]So this is just the list of the cost of a lot of these different,
- [00:02:44.390]so health analyses.
- [00:02:46.220]And of course the cost varies depending on which lab you're talking about.
- [00:02:50.720]Ones that I circled here are more of the standard fertility analysis.
- [00:02:55.880]But if you look at these costs, you can tell that right away,
- [00:02:58.760]when you start adding different sole measurements together,
- [00:03:02.740]the costs on that get pretty high, pretty fast,
- [00:03:08.970]but this is what our fields look like, right? I mean, I, I don't know.
- [00:03:13.290]Maybe somebody out there has a really homogenous field where everything's all
- [00:03:17.190]the same, but at least here in Missouri,
- [00:03:19.830]we have a lot of variability in our fields. And some of that comes from
- [00:03:25.890]erosion. You movement of soil over time and deposition.
- [00:03:30.330]But if we're going to understand soil health,
- [00:03:34.530]now we're going to manage our fields at the field spiel.
- [00:03:37.830]We really want to get a grip on how the soil properties vary,
- [00:03:43.170]you know, within that single field. Right.
- [00:03:45.240]But when you combine that with the fact that these lab costs are really high,
- [00:03:50.040]we have a problem.
- [00:03:53.610]So.
- [00:03:53.880]So how are we going to reduce costs? Well, in the lab,
- [00:03:56.700]there are a lot of ways that we try to reduce costs for, you know,
- [00:04:00.210]for producer testing, right?
- [00:04:03.120]So we have combination testing where you can do,
- [00:04:05.220]there are some things that we can try to measure simultaneously.
- [00:04:09.750]We try to use cheaper supplies. We try to use fewer supplies.
- [00:04:14.700]We try to come up with methods that are shorter and faster,
- [00:04:18.720]and therefore a lab goods you'll make a better profit on that,
- [00:04:23.340]move it through more quickly, we try using smaller sample sizes.
- [00:04:27.480]So you don't need as much soil or reducing overall volume,
- [00:04:32.070]or we can use less sophisticated or less expensive instruments in the lab.
- [00:04:37.410]But even if we do all of this,
- [00:04:40.170]you still have to collect a sample and send it to the lab.
- [00:04:43.590]And your results only tell you about where that one sample came from.
- [00:04:50.550]So this.
- [00:04:50.880]Is where proximal soil sensing comes in. So Andrea was just talking about,
- [00:04:56.040]using remote sensing, right? So whether it's satellite data,
- [00:05:00.990]drone data feeds where you have sensors that are,
- [00:05:06.510]you know, up in the sky, somewhere up in the atmosphere and getting imagery.
- [00:05:10.530]We also have sensors that are directly in contact with the
- [00:05:15.510]soil, and that's what we call approximal soil sensors.
- [00:05:18.090]So they're either on or in the soil. And in comparison with some of the lab,
- [00:05:23.040]methods that we have,
- [00:05:25.230]the sensors are generally non-invasive and non-destructive, which is great.
- [00:05:30.810]Once you get past that capital equipment costs of actually buying the
- [00:05:35.460]sensor, which can be very expensive,
- [00:05:37.740]actually using it and getting the data in is inexpensive. And then with that,
- [00:05:42.480]you can get this high resolution data, right?
- [00:05:44.520]So you can cover and get a lot of information over space and over time,
- [00:05:48.570]we'll keep coming back with it.
- [00:05:50.670]And then you're not collecting more soil samples and sending them off to the lab
- [00:05:55.200]and they're pretty easy to operate. So they're low tech,
- [00:05:59.810]in the sense that if you have to train somebody to do it, it's a lot,
- [00:06:03.620]it's a lot easier for someone to operate this equipment than it is to be fully
- [00:06:07.820]trained on laboratory procedures.
- [00:06:13.220]So the techniques,
- [00:06:15.050]approximal techniques that we use the most in my unit and in our
- [00:06:19.430]research are these three.
- [00:06:21.410]So there's the visible near infrared spectroscopy.
- [00:06:25.040]And I'll just call that NIR and I are spectra on talking and it's
- [00:06:30.020]been used and pretty successful for estimating.
- [00:06:33.380]So organic carbon texture, clay mineralogy.
- [00:06:37.580]And in some cases, although it's in sort of rare,
- [00:06:41.240]aggregate stability and some nutrients,
- [00:06:45.920]electrical conductivity is another one we use a lot of,
- [00:06:49.490]and that's pretty good, pretty successful for soil texture, mineralogy,
- [00:06:54.050]CEC, and so moisture. And then the penetrometer,
- [00:06:58.760]you've probably all heard of that.
- [00:07:00.560]there are even handheld versions of a penetrometer,
- [00:07:03.950]but that relates more to those soil, physical attributes, like,
- [00:07:07.040]so I'll text her bulk density and compaction,
- [00:07:10.520]and I've got some pictures here of some of those pieces of equipment.
- [00:07:15.440]So Andrea already did this for me.
- [00:07:17.390]She talked about the electromagnetic spectrum.
- [00:07:20.450]So I don't need to go into much detail here, but each sensor,
- [00:07:24.950]if it's a spectroscopy sensor,
- [00:07:27.500]it's going to give you information from different parts of the spectr right?
- [00:07:31.790]So you can have sensors.
- [00:07:33.860]so we have these passive gamma detectors that tell us about gamma rays that are
- [00:07:37.850]coming out of the soil. And we have,
- [00:07:40.490]the ability to take soil and subjected to NMR and get specter for that.
- [00:07:45.770]But most of the things that we use out in the field are in that middle range,
- [00:07:49.760]they're the visible and near infrared range.
- [00:07:54.770]And.
- [00:07:54.890]This is what some of these spectrum will look like. in this case,
- [00:07:59.300]these were all essentially the same soil,
- [00:08:01.790]but they had been under different long-term management.
- [00:08:05.210]So there was a perennial Timothy system continuous till corn,
- [00:08:10.220]degraded oil that was, reconstructed into a Prairie system.
- [00:08:15.500]And then we have this native Prairie view at the bottom.
- [00:08:19.250]And on the left is one type of spectral data. And on the right,
- [00:08:23.690]it's a different type of spectral data,
- [00:08:26.270]but all I want to show you here is that if you look carefully,
- [00:08:30.240]and maybe you put on your glasses for this,
- [00:08:32.090]but there are slight differences in these spectra.
- [00:08:37.010]And so that's what we're trying to, to analyze. And you know,
- [00:08:41.120]why are the spectrum different from one sample to another? Well,
- [00:08:45.860]in spectroscopy usually relates to organic matter.
- [00:08:48.800]So you can have differences in the quantity and the quality of the organic
- [00:08:53.720]matter in the soil and then the inorganic fraction. So those minerals,
- [00:08:58.410]like the sand Sultan play contribute to those spectral features and
- [00:09:03.390]make the spectrum look different. And then Erin water also has an impact.
- [00:09:09.300]The main challenge with this type of sensor data is that it's subject to some
- [00:09:13.650]environmental effects, differences in temperature,
- [00:09:16.800]and particularly moisture can cause a lot of interference
- [00:09:21.630]in the spectrum. And then certain things just have a really weak signal.
- [00:09:25.860]And so we can't really pick it up very well
- [00:09:30.390]when it comes to soil electrical conductivity.
- [00:09:33.870]And this is the most widely useful sensing technology and precision agriculture.
- [00:09:39.450]I mean,
- [00:09:39.660]it's been used pretty extensively and there are several different commercial
- [00:09:43.140]sensors out there that you can,
- [00:09:45.300]you can use everything from a small handheld unit,
- [00:09:49.560]which is this orange thing in the middle.
- [00:09:51.000]You can just carry it in your hands instead of down and take a reading.
- [00:09:55.080]There are also some that you can pull behind an ATV with a wagon or a
- [00:09:59.850]sled, or you can even,
- [00:10:03.540]attach these to your equipment and pull them through the field with a tractor.
- [00:10:08.940]And potentially even when you're engaging in other field operations,
- [00:10:15.130]here's an example of where you see data was used to map soil texture.
- [00:10:19.300]It was a pivot field and they
- [00:10:24.390]took that ENC sensor and they rub it back and forth across this field.
- [00:10:29.280]Then they went in there and I'm going to set it all at the end is here maybe
- [00:10:34.410]20 locations.
- [00:10:35.430]They took samples and sent that off to the lab and got a
- [00:10:40.140]texture analysis.
- [00:10:41.520]And then they compared that UC readings to the sand content and there was a
- [00:10:45.900]pretty strong relationship there.
- [00:10:47.880]So then they translated this NC data into a texture map or
- [00:10:52.860]a sand present sand map. And you can,
- [00:10:56.970]you can imagine how this might be useful,
- [00:10:58.890]especially if you're doing something like, variable irrigation, for example.
- [00:11:06.420]And do you mind to ask this question, okay, this is supposed to be out,
- [00:11:09.390]so I'll help. Why is she talking about soil texture? And even though,
- [00:11:13.310]so I'll text her,
- [00:11:14.040]isn't considered necessarily a traditional soil health measurement or a
- [00:11:18.840]dynamic soil property it's is fundamental to,
- [00:11:23.820]the soil health characteristics, the potential for soil health.
- [00:11:29.130]so for example,
- [00:11:31.620]texture really controls how much water and how much carbon organic matter as
- [00:11:36.480]well can hold, right? So it really is important,
- [00:11:40.110]in the grand scheme of soil health that we understand so little texture and that
- [00:11:43.800]we'll take, take that into account.
- [00:11:46.680]So I'm gonna play a quick video for you. This is us in action, out in the field.
- [00:11:51.570]So here's a,
- [00:11:52.890]an NIR sensor it's being pulled across the field.
- [00:11:56.740]So you're getting a lateral map of, and I,
- [00:11:59.440]our spectra and following behind that is Scott with our sled with,
- [00:12:04.330]ECG sensor.
- [00:12:07.900]And so we'll get a map that has both of those sensor types.
- [00:12:12.760]And then that truck right there has our probe mounted on it.
- [00:12:19.690]And we're going to see that in action here in a moment. So in this case,
- [00:12:23.920]we're getting profile data. So the sensors are here at the end of this probe,
- [00:12:28.600]and it's going down into the soil.
- [00:12:30.160]We can get it's reading constantly as it moves,
- [00:12:32.830]and we're getting data down to a depth of about one meter.
- [00:12:36.340]And so we're getting that and I are spectroscopy electrical
- [00:12:40.570]conductivity,
- [00:12:42.880]and those penetrometer readings all at the same time.
- [00:12:46.900]So that window is a Sapphire window for the NIR.
- [00:12:49.750]And you can see the context there at the bottom for EDC.
- [00:13:03.480]So I'm going to give you a couple case studies where we've applied the sensor
- [00:13:07.860]data technique to try to estimate soil health indicators,
- [00:13:12.120]the soil properties.
- [00:13:13.710]And most of this work was done at our longterm agro ecosystem research site,
- [00:13:18.630]which is in central, Missouri, and out there, we have
- [00:13:24.270]12 different row crop systems and some CRP systems.
- [00:13:27.750]So we really have a pretty wide range of soil health values.
- [00:13:34.080]So the first thing we did was look at using NIR spectroscopy to estimate soil
- [00:13:38.820]carbon. And it worked really well,
- [00:13:41.430]but I'll say that was not really novel insight.
- [00:13:44.880]A lot of people have done work like that in the past.
- [00:13:47.790]And so we weren't really surprised, and it wasn't really new information,
- [00:13:53.580]but then we wanted to know, well,
- [00:13:55.200]can we use NIR to estimate all these other soil properties,
- [00:13:59.820]all this other soil health stuff that we were measuring in my lab
- [00:14:04.260]and lo and behold,
- [00:14:06.240]everything that was in the biological category did pretty well.
- [00:14:10.350]So the microbial biomeds, carbon beta glucose today's,
- [00:14:14.910]but all that stuff at the top,
- [00:14:16.470]which were the chemical and nutrient measurements performed pretty poorly.
- [00:14:21.210]And the physical measurements down here in bottled water,
- [00:14:24.000]stable aggregates and water-filled pore space did not do well.
- [00:14:27.600]That also is not very surprising.
- [00:14:30.060]And then you have to ask yourself the question,
- [00:14:33.270]we know that organic carbon bonds are producing these spectral signatures,
- [00:14:38.760]but in this case,
- [00:14:41.580]am I really able to capture the beta glucose a days or the microbial
- [00:14:46.440]biomass content, or is this just a result?
- [00:14:51.110]The fact that these measurements are highly correlated with each other.
- [00:14:55.520]So I'm really just estimating them by proxy.
- [00:14:59.030]And I think it's just the proxy measurement there, which is fine,
- [00:15:03.020]as long as you understand that.
- [00:15:05.450]So then we wanted to know what happens then if we stick the sensors together and
- [00:15:10.070]sort of do a mashup, right, we've got NIR, you know, it works for some things,
- [00:15:13.610]but not others. So how can we improve on that?
- [00:15:16.580]So then we tried to sensor data fusion. And in this case, again,
- [00:15:21.530]we're using NIR spectra,
- [00:15:23.840]but we collected that spectra in the lab because of the issue with,
- [00:15:28.360]with water content that I mentioned before.
- [00:15:30.950]And then we used infield NC data and penetrometer data.
- [00:15:35.570]And with those which you can see in the bottom,
- [00:15:37.340]we just carved off the data from that upper surface soil
- [00:15:43.220]and matched it up with our lab data.
- [00:15:46.310]And in this case,
- [00:15:48.560]we also calculated these soil health scores.
- [00:15:52.580]So I'm sure you've probably heard of the soil management assessment framework.
- [00:15:56.480]So in this case, we took all that lab data, we sport it.
- [00:15:59.960]And then we tried to estimate the lab values of the actual indicator value plus
- [00:16:05.990]these scores.
- [00:16:07.460]And what we found again was that,
- [00:16:12.230]what did the best with that biological category?
- [00:16:15.740]And we expected that because we already knew we could do that,
- [00:16:18.650]do that fairly well.
- [00:16:21.530]But we did see a bump in our performance on
- [00:16:26.510]the physical side.
- [00:16:27.620]So that added ISI information and the penetrometer was giving us a
- [00:16:32.540]little more information related to the soil, physical properties. Although,
- [00:16:36.650]you know, in this case, I would still say, that's not very good. I mean,
- [00:16:39.500]that's an R squared of just barely over 0.5. So it's an improvement,
- [00:16:43.970]but it's not really stellar. Now,
- [00:16:48.020]everything I've shown you so far was looking at surface oil properties.
- [00:16:51.650]So in the top, maybe 15 centimeters or six inches,
- [00:16:56.630]but what about the soil profile? Right? I mean,
- [00:16:58.400]we know that it's all profile is really important. Most,
- [00:17:02.180]most soil health assessments really focused on the surface soil,
- [00:17:05.750]but we know that the profile can control a lot of things,
- [00:17:09.950]including the movement of water. And, that relates a lot to,
- [00:17:15.200]crop productivity and everything else.
- [00:17:17.240]So how are we going to understand what's happening below the surface
- [00:17:22.490]without having to go out there and dig soil pits all the time.
- [00:17:26.630]And so that probe sensor that I showed you a few minutes ago, we took,
- [00:17:30.430]took that out and we collected easy data on penetrometer
- [00:17:35.270]data and added that back to that NIR
- [00:17:40.130]data, but we've chopped the soil up into horizons.
- [00:17:44.590]So we had this full profile information and we got pretty good
- [00:17:49.440]results, I would say for soil texture. So sand, silt, and clay,
- [00:17:53.790]and then also, well, density did better than I had expected there,
- [00:18:01.710]but the real test, this last, last thing that I'm going to show you here,
- [00:18:05.610]which was all right. Ultimately,
- [00:18:08.160]we want to get all of this data in the fields.
- [00:18:11.580]We want to collect everything in the field.
- [00:18:13.740]Maybe we have a couple of calibration samples that we send back to the lab,
- [00:18:17.400]but we want all these sensors to work in field conditions.
- [00:18:21.420]So they would have to work with more soil and we want that profile data.
- [00:18:27.420]So we went to 153 locations, 22 different fields.
- [00:18:31.110]In this theory in Indiana, we collected data down to one meter using that probe.
- [00:18:35.400]I just showed you.
- [00:18:37.050]And then we collected a sample and took it back to the lab and scanned it
- [00:18:41.850]there so that we could compare our results. And we use this lab,
- [00:18:46.800]lab measurement or lettuce mation as our, sort of our gold standard here.
- [00:18:53.220]And if you're curious, this is, this is what those are.
- [00:18:57.180]The data looks like when we plot it, after it comes off the P four thousands,
- [00:19:02.280]it's on the left, that's at sand and clay data from that's from the lab,
- [00:19:07.320]but then we, we can take out those spectr basically turn it into a heat map,
- [00:19:11.940]which this was not my ideas. And Scott Drummond's idea,
- [00:19:14.590]I thought was really cool.
- [00:19:16.020]So you can see the change in the spectrum keeps based on the color here.
- [00:19:21.450]And then we have easy data and then kind of traumas or data on yen.
- [00:19:25.110]And so the top of this thought is the surface of the soil.
- [00:19:28.380]And then it shows you the data as it goes down.
- [00:19:31.200]So this would be data from one location in the field.
- [00:19:36.270]What we do this all over the place and then put it together.
- [00:19:40.170]So this is a really ugly plot.
- [00:19:42.810]don't bother pulling out your reading glasses, just to look at it.
- [00:19:45.810]I'll tell you the important things here.
- [00:19:48.570]So on the left for carbon, there's a lot of scatter in that data.
- [00:19:52.320]It was a really messy plot. This is what happens when,
- [00:19:55.890]when moisture is in the soil and we're trying to use NIR
- [00:20:00.390]spectra,
- [00:20:01.740]but people have come up with some pretty fancy techniques now,
- [00:20:05.730]different transformations and statistical techniques essentially
- [00:20:10.410]remove the effect of moisture. And so on the right,
- [00:20:14.850]you can see the improvement that we have there. in fact,
- [00:20:18.630]that that improvement was a lot better than I thought it would be,
- [00:20:21.630]but I would still say there's room for improvement before we get to the point
- [00:20:26.220]where we can really say this is working well. And then for clay content, I mean,
- [00:20:30.900]that graph was really ugly before we applied the EPO transformation and
- [00:20:35.850]did some other shenanigans with the data. But,
- [00:20:39.120]so that's where that stands. Now.
- [00:20:42.360]The long term goal really is to put all these sensors together so that we can
- [00:20:46.650]conduct what I call the soil health assessment.
- [00:20:50.440]And it's just capturing these different aspects of soil properties,
- [00:20:54.790]and it puts high spatial and temporal resolution.
- [00:21:01.300]And if you look at the types of sensors that I showed you today,
- [00:21:04.570]plus other information from the literature, you know,
- [00:21:07.600]for the physical properties,
- [00:21:09.790]either conductivity or mechanical resistance sensors work fairly well,
- [00:21:14.530]but there's still room for improvement. The biological side,
- [00:21:17.680]the optical sensors are pretty good.
- [00:21:21.670]And then the chemical and nutrient categories where we need the most work,
- [00:21:26.770]this, fabulous table, it was put together by Dr.
- [00:21:29.950]Adam talk really summarizes where we are now with using soil sensors
- [00:21:34.870]to estimate so properties. Some,
- [00:21:38.170]we can do a fairly good job of right now. Most of them still need work.
- [00:21:42.670]And again, it's that nutrient.
- [00:21:45.730]And so all chemical property category where,
- [00:21:50.140]we can do a lot better and I know people are working on this.
- [00:21:53.440]So I'm hoping in the near future, we'll have a lot of progress in this area.
- [00:21:59.530]So that's it.
- [00:22:02.400]Thank you.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/16059?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: 2021 Nebraska Cover Crop and Soil Health Conference - Kristen Veum" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments