11 - 2020 Soybean Management Field Days -
Nebraska Soybean Board & Nebraska Extension
Author
09/25/2020
Added
62
Plays
Description
Chris Proctor, Nebraska Weed Management Extension Educator looks at how to improve the understanding of the effects that soil management practices (conventional tillage, no-till, and no-till + cover crops) have on weed control, residual herbicide fate and crop productivity in a corn-soybean crop rotation.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:01.125](upbeat music)
- [00:00:07.010]Chris Proctor, I'm a weed extension educator,
- [00:00:09.950]University of Nebraska, we're talking about a topic,
- [00:00:14.470]just looking at the influence of soil practices
- [00:00:17.220]on how it controls weeds, kind of the effect of herbicides,
- [00:00:21.870]and ultimately crop productivity.
- [00:00:26.120]It's really the aim or the goal of the study
- [00:00:29.820]I'm gonna highlight was to try to understand
- [00:00:33.160]what effect is soil management practices?
- [00:00:34.900]How does tillage versus no-till versus use of cover crops,
- [00:00:37.840]how does that affect weed control?
- [00:00:40.040]What influence might that have on residual herbicides
- [00:00:43.270]that are applied in those systems?
- [00:00:45.170]And how productive are the crops in those systems?
- [00:00:50.280]And so thinking about it, you know, we kind of expected
- [00:00:54.980]that there would be a difference between soil management
- [00:00:57.430]practices on those different areas of crop production.
- [00:01:02.520]So the way this study was set up,
- [00:01:03.700]so this was a trial that was actually conducted
- [00:01:05.460]up in Wisconsin and we had six different soil management
- [00:01:11.930]practices and so that was a combination of tillage,
- [00:01:14.830]no-till and cover crops with different cover crop
- [00:01:19.090]termination timings, and so we had an early
- [00:01:21.240]termination timing that was about May 7th timing
- [00:01:27.880]that was right around the time of planting
- [00:01:29.920]and so in this instance, this was later in May,
- [00:01:33.160]around May 23rd and there's two terminations
- [00:01:36.500]at the app plant so there was a forage,
- [00:01:38.160]where the forage was harvested and collected,
- [00:01:41.130]and then it was also chemically terminated
- [00:01:43.290]and then a late termination timing around June six
- [00:01:46.080]which was chemically terminated.
- [00:01:47.740]And that was also, and then the other part of the study
- [00:01:50.480]was a comparison of a pre-merger beside versus
- [00:01:53.750]a no pre-merger herbicide to see what effect
- [00:01:56.180]that might have.
- [00:01:59.170]So looking at how these different components were set up
- [00:02:04.290]for the termination and burn down part of the study,
- [00:02:08.640]glyphosate was applied, for the pre-merge herbicide
- [00:02:12.730]you can see in the table there, we had
- [00:02:16.470]different pre-merger herbicides that were applied on
- [00:02:18.180]the corn and the soybean, and then there was a post-emerge
- [00:02:20.850]herbicide that was applied across the entire study,
- [00:02:23.750]so all the treatments received the post emergent herbicide.
- [00:02:31.100]Cover crops were planted with cereal rye,
- [00:02:33.970]and so we just use one cover crop for this study,
- [00:02:35.807]and it was about 60 pounds per acre tillage,
- [00:02:40.970]it was kind of a two pass tillage system,
- [00:02:42.570]so it was a fall chisel followed by a spring field
- [00:02:46.230]cultivator, and then the herbicides were applied
- [00:02:49.500]for the burn down at the termination of the cover crop
- [00:02:52.600]and the pre-merger beside those were applied
- [00:02:54.460]with a research backpack sprayer, but the post-merger
- [00:02:57.760]was sprayed over the top of everything with a tractor.
- [00:03:01.056]And then we evaluated weed control, so this was right
- [00:03:03.640]before the post-merger herbicide was applied,
- [00:03:06.430]weed control was evaluated and then yield
- [00:03:08.650]was collected at the end.
- [00:03:10.970]Another component of the study was to evaluate
- [00:03:12.780]herbicide persistence, so how long do those
- [00:03:14.540]pre-emerge herbicides remain in the soil?
- [00:03:18.090]How long were they there?
- [00:03:19.580]How long could we detect their presence?
- [00:03:20.980]And what influence did those have?
- [00:03:22.210]And so, soil samples were collected about 29 days
- [00:03:25.470]after application, and there were applied for the no-till
- [00:03:31.430]and that was kind of the control treatment,
- [00:03:34.750]and then you had a tillage plus pre-emerge,
- [00:03:37.210]no-till plus pre-emerge, and early termination
- [00:03:39.580]of the cover crop plus pre -emerge, and then an app plant
- [00:03:43.070]termination plus pre-emerge and then late terminatio
- [00:03:45.930]plus pre-merge.
- [00:03:46.763]So we kinda evaluated kind of the different parts
- [00:03:50.280]of the system to see how much of that herbicide
- [00:03:53.740]carried over, and then these were analyzed in a laboratory,
- [00:03:58.220]they were sent to South Dakota and analyzed there.
- [00:04:00.440]And so for corn, while there was a number of herbicides
- [00:04:03.690]that applied, the lab was able to detect S-metolachlor
- [00:04:09.430]was used and for kind of to evaluate the corn pre-merger
- [00:04:13.010]herbicide, and then for soybean, sulfentrazone
- [00:04:17.600]was the herbicide that was analyzed.
- [00:04:19.610]And so looking at the lab data, really all we saw
- [00:04:24.410]was the under tillage, there was higher concentration
- [00:04:29.541]of the soybean herbicide Sulfentrazone
- [00:04:32.550]compared to no-till and this was pretty similar for corn
- [00:04:35.800]but I'm just gonna highlight the soybean data today.
- [00:04:39.810]And so some of this is kinda gets into that question
- [00:04:43.410]when you start to have residue on the soil,
- [00:04:45.150]you have cover crops and residue from the cover crops,
- [00:04:48.120]is that begin to tie up some of the herbicide in the soil,
- [00:04:51.670]what effect does that have on the persistence
- [00:04:54.058]of those herbicides and whether or not
- [00:04:57.430]it affects weed control?
- [00:04:59.120]And so we did see differences in terms of the amount
- [00:05:01.770]that was there, to kind of verify what was being seen,
- [00:05:07.210]we use some of those soil samples we need a bioassay,
- [00:05:09.800]so we put that soil in pots in a greenhouse,
- [00:05:13.671]and then we test it both the use of cucumber
- [00:05:19.950]and Palmer amaranth to determine what effect
- [00:05:23.940]did the different soil treatments,
- [00:05:28.010]soil management treatments have on the persistence
- [00:05:30.910]of these herbicides?
- [00:05:32.360]And it didn't quite shake out the same as the laboratory
- [00:05:35.210]study and so being 29 days out from when we sampled,
- [00:05:40.550]I think a lot of the herbicides began to break down
- [00:05:43.870]at this point, and so we didn't see as clear
- [00:05:47.090]of delineation in terms of no-till having higher injury
- [00:05:50.540]on these plants compared to the other treatments.
- [00:05:54.030]If you look carefully at some of the polar plants,
- [00:05:55.800]you do see a little bit of injury,
- [00:05:57.040]but certainly the concentrations weren't high enough
- [00:06:00.660]to prevent emergence as we can see emergence all the
- [00:06:02.980]way across the board and there weren't strong differences
- [00:06:06.880]between the control.
- [00:06:09.390]So in this case, kinda given the soils
- [00:06:11.930]and the way that the study was conducted,
- [00:06:18.020]we didn't see a strong influence of the pre-emerge
- [00:06:22.720]herbicide kinda persistent or differences between
- [00:06:25.310]the soil treatments in terms of the persistence
- [00:06:27.060]of the herbicide.
- [00:06:29.110]And so really, I think we might've been too late
- [00:06:32.310]when we sampled, I think being a little bit closer
- [00:06:34.520]to when those were applied might've given us a little
- [00:06:36.090]better picture of what was going on and kinda
- [00:06:40.150]looking at that data, I think a combination of lab data
- [00:06:42.520]and some of these bioassay screens could give us
- [00:06:45.270]a pretty good idea, so this is kind of the first step
- [00:06:47.640]at trying to understand what's going on in these situations,
- [00:06:52.228]I'll just highlight just a little bit of the field data.
- [00:06:55.460]So this is looking at cover crop biomass,
- [00:06:57.700]and this is kind of what we would have expected
- [00:06:59.780]that the later you terminate, the more biomass
- [00:07:01.730]you accumulate, so that kind of followed what was expected.
- [00:07:05.030]In terms of weed control, we had one side with pretty low
- [00:07:08.080]weed control, the Arlington side on the left,
- [00:07:10.180]and so we really didn't see any difference
- [00:07:11.660]in percent weed control, compared to the other side
- [00:07:15.840]where there was a difference in the using
- [00:07:20.870]a pre-merger versus not using a pre-merger beside that side.
- [00:07:23.610]So under the tillage condition, including a pre had higher
- [00:07:29.060]weed control relative to without the pre-merger herbicide,
- [00:07:32.350]but for the other soil treatments
- [00:07:33.760]there really wasn't a difference,
- [00:07:34.950]which is kind of an interesting outcome.
- [00:07:37.870]And then, then looking at yield at the end of the day,
- [00:07:42.470]we just didn't see any, yield differences, either the side,
- [00:07:45.730]and so, despite I've seen a few differences
- [00:07:48.040]in terms of persistence of herbicides
- [00:07:51.970]that were detected in the laboratory study,
- [00:07:55.303]and some minor differences in weed control early on,
- [00:07:58.620]ultimately it didn't translate into any yield differences
- [00:08:01.140]in this particular study.
- [00:08:02.130]And so, I think kind of the take home is,
- [00:08:07.040]we need to pay attention, I think,
- [00:08:08.790]to these different systems and how they might affect
- [00:08:10.880]our herbicide persistence, because that'll affect
- [00:08:15.357]how well we control weeds in these systems,
- [00:08:20.900]but ultimately, I think under the soil conditions
- [00:08:24.300]tested in the kind of the environmental conditions
- [00:08:26.170]that we were looking at, we didn't see strong
- [00:08:27.700]differences here, so, that's encouraging in terms of the use
- [00:08:31.870]of no-till systems and cover crop systems
- [00:08:37.400]'cause of the benefits we can gain there.
- [00:08:40.250]So that's what I wanted to highlight related to that study.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/14522?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: 11 - 2020 Soybean Management Field Days -" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments