12 - 2020 Soybean Management Field Days - Influence of Soil and Residue Management on Herbicide Carryover and Subsequent Crop Development
Nebraska Soybean Board & Nebraska Extension
Author
09/25/2020
Added
41
Plays
Description
Chris Proctor, Nebraska Weed Management Extension Educator discusses the following: Carryover of residual herbicides can limit productivity of subsequent crops in a rotation. He also discusses persistence of residual herbicides is greatly influenced by soil properties such as texture, organic matter, water content, organic matter content and temperature regimes
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:01.118](upbeat music)
- [00:00:07.030]Chris Proctor, I'm a weed management extension educator
- [00:00:09.670]with the University of Nebraska.
- [00:00:11.340]I'm gonna highlight a study that was conducted
- [00:00:14.250]in both Wisconsin and Nebraska,
- [00:00:16.690]looking at how soil and residue management
- [00:00:21.310]might influence herbicides
- [00:00:23.010]that were applied to a previous crop,
- [00:00:25.510]and how they might carry over to the next season's crop
- [00:00:28.600]and how that might influence the development
- [00:00:32.610]and yields of those next crops.
- [00:00:35.780]So certainly, how herbicides persist in the soil,
- [00:00:39.790]and their ability
- [00:00:41.150]to maybe negatively influence the next crop in rotation
- [00:00:45.840]is something to pay attention to,
- [00:00:48.910]in terms of carryover in our systems.
- [00:00:52.210]And so, we wanted to look at,
- [00:00:54.100]particularly, how soil management might influence that.
- [00:00:56.820]So there's been a little bit of work
- [00:00:58.120]investigating just the idea of carryover
- [00:01:00.780]from one crop to another, but we wanted to maybe evaluate
- [00:01:06.740]if managing soil differently would influence that.
- [00:01:09.307]And so, as I mentioned, this was a study done
- [00:01:11.650]both in Wisconsin and in Nebraska
- [00:01:15.240]at a research farm outside of Lincoln, Nebraska.
- [00:01:19.120]We had a number of different soil textures.
- [00:01:21.750]So that kinda helps give a broad swath of how this might,
- [00:01:26.020]how soil texture might influence the study.
- [00:01:29.130]But ultimately looked
- [00:01:29.963]at three different soil management practices,
- [00:01:31.650]and then five different herbicide treatments.
- [00:01:34.607]And our soil management practices compared tillage
- [00:01:37.220]versus a no-till system, versus a no-till plus cover crop.
- [00:01:42.410]And our cover crop for this study was cereal rye grass.
- [00:01:49.270]And then we looked at two different herbicide,
- [00:01:52.390]sets of herbicides.
- [00:01:53.340]One was herbicides that would've been applied to corn.
- [00:01:57.550]And then we looked at how that would influence
- [00:02:00.710]the next year's soybean.
- [00:02:01.820]And so, we had two herbicides, Callisto and Stinger.
- [00:02:05.280]So, mesotrione and clopyralid.
- [00:02:07.280]And those were applied at two different rates.
- [00:02:08.730]So we had a quarter of the full-label rate,
- [00:02:11.090]as well as half the full-label rate.
- [00:02:12.970]And these were applied in the fall.
- [00:02:15.370]And so we were trying to mimic a full rate,
- [00:02:17.900]a spring application, that went through an entire season,
- [00:02:21.420]and then how much might be left the subsequent year
- [00:02:25.520]when the next crop was planted.
- [00:02:26.980]And so, a quarter rate and a half rate in the fall
- [00:02:30.100]was trying to represent maybe how much would be left
- [00:02:32.440]after the cropping season
- [00:02:33.980]that could potentially carry over the winter
- [00:02:35.620]to the next year.
- [00:02:36.453]And so that's how we designed the study.
- [00:02:38.950]And then we also evaluated a couple of soybean herbicides.
- [00:02:43.190]So, Reflex and Pursuit.
- [00:02:45.470]And those were, again, applied
- [00:02:46.810]at the quarter and half rate in the fall.
- [00:02:48.740]And then we evaluated how those soybean herbicides
- [00:02:50.870]might carry over
- [00:02:51.970]into the corn cropping system the next season.
- [00:02:57.370]We also selected a corn hybrid and a soybean cultivar
- [00:03:01.320]that were kinda known to have a sensitivity
- [00:03:03.960]to some of these herbicides.
- [00:03:05.030]So we were wanting to exaggerate some of the effect
- [00:03:08.260]if we could pick it up.
- [00:03:09.400]We wanted some corn and soybean plants
- [00:03:12.320]that might be more easy to detect some of these symptoms.
- [00:03:16.830]And then we also evaluated kinda the development
- [00:03:21.710]of the crop canopy at V3.
- [00:03:23.910]And then we also evaluated yields at the end of the year.
- [00:03:29.710]So I'll start highlighting some of the soybean results here.
- [00:03:34.530]We'll jump right into it.
- [00:03:35.363]And so this is looking at one of the sites in Wisconsin.
- [00:03:39.810]And what we saw is at V3,
- [00:03:41.850]we were able to detect a difference in canopy development
- [00:03:44.550]where tillage had a more developed canopy
- [00:03:48.100]relative to the no-till and the cover crop.
- [00:03:50.240]But when we got to the end of the year,
- [00:03:51.650]there was no difference
- [00:03:52.810]in terms of soybean yield at that site.
- [00:03:56.700]For our Lincoln, Nebraska location, it was very similar,
- [00:04:00.040]where we had earlier development of canopy under tillage
- [00:04:04.440]compared to the no-till and cover crop treatments,
- [00:04:08.070]but that didn't show up in the yield at the end of the year.
- [00:04:12.190]For the Lancaster location, the same story.
- [00:04:14.890]So, earlier development of canopy under tillage,
- [00:04:17.880]but no difference in yield at the end of the year.
- [00:04:21.730]And then for one of the locations, Arlington,
- [00:04:25.570]there was a small effect of the herbicide treatment.
- [00:04:29.560]So for the previous ones I showed,
- [00:04:30.830]there was really no effect of the herbicide.
- [00:04:32.260]There was only differences between soil management.
- [00:04:34.670]So, tillage, no-tillage, cover crop.
- [00:04:37.430]But for this location, there was.
- [00:04:38.780]There was a slight difference
- [00:04:40.160]in terms of canopy development,
- [00:04:43.330]where the half rate, the 50% rate of the mesotrione
- [00:04:47.770]did decrease the canopy development at Arlington at V3.
- [00:04:53.270]But then, by the end of the year,
- [00:04:55.149]that didn't translate into a yield reduction.
- [00:04:58.750]So this would just be an image
- [00:04:59.850]showing some of the mesotrione injury
- [00:05:02.450]that we saw at that V3 stage.
- [00:05:05.200]So we could detect a little bit of injury in the soybean,
- [00:05:09.660]but it ultimately didn't, we didn't see any effect
- [00:05:12.750]in terms of yield.
- [00:05:15.220]And so now I'm just gonna highlight
- [00:05:16.920]some of the soybean herbicide carryover into corn.
- [00:05:22.288]So I'll just highlight a few of the results
- [00:05:24.490]of our soybean herbicides,
- [00:05:27.230]and the influence they had on canopy development
- [00:05:30.920]and yield in corn.
- [00:05:31.867]And so looking at the first site, at Arlington,
- [00:05:36.860]we saw early canopy development in tillage was higher
- [00:05:40.050]than the no-till and the cover crop.
- [00:05:42.660]And we did see even a decrease in yield
- [00:05:45.050]under the cover crop plots here in corn.
- [00:05:49.000]For the Lincoln, Nebraska site, in this instance,
- [00:05:52.740]the no-till had a little bit slower canopy development
- [00:05:55.780]at V3, and it did translate
- [00:05:58.470]into a slight yield decrease for the no-till,
- [00:06:00.880]and the cover crop plots did have slightly lower yield,
- [00:06:04.350]relative to the tillage treatment.
- [00:06:07.620]And then for the Lancaster site,
- [00:06:10.720]again, canopy development was delayed
- [00:06:12.510]for the higher-residue treatments.
- [00:06:14.730]So the no-till and the cover crop
- [00:06:16.320]did have lower canopy development at V3.
- [00:06:19.510]And then also, that did translate across
- [00:06:22.110]into lower yields for that location.
- [00:06:26.440]And we did see a little bit of a difference
- [00:06:28.350]for our Lincoln, Nebraska site, in terms of difference
- [00:06:30.650]for the different herbicide treatments.
- [00:06:34.170]This was the only location
- [00:06:35.220]that had differences in herbicide treatment.
- [00:06:36.770]So you can see that the imazethapyr, for example,
- [00:06:41.640]at 50%, had a little bit lower canopy development
- [00:06:47.310]compared to some of the other herbicide treatments at V3.
- [00:06:51.720]And, ultimately though, that didn't translate
- [00:06:54.480]into any yield differences for that location,
- [00:06:57.690]relative to the herbicide treatments.
- [00:07:00.190]And this was just an example of some of the injury
- [00:07:03.390]that we did see in corn.
- [00:07:04.223]So we did see some early injury symptoms
- [00:07:07.760]in some of the corn.
- [00:07:08.920]It wasn't persistent, it wasn't widely persistent,
- [00:07:10.930]but we did see a little bit early on.
- [00:07:15.684]And so really, what we did see is,
- [00:07:18.600]under tillage conditions for soybean,
- [00:07:20.360]the canopy developed quicker than the no-till
- [00:07:23.940]and the cover crop treatments.
- [00:07:28.270]And, ultimately, it was the cover crop.
- [00:07:33.600]The cover crop treatments really had no effect
- [00:07:37.470]on soybean yield, ultimately, for, across the treatment.
- [00:07:41.790]So, while we did see some early differences,
- [00:07:43.630]it didn't translate into yield for the soybean.
- [00:07:46.530]However, in corn, it was a little different story.
- [00:07:48.500]So, ultimately, it was not a carryover effect
- [00:07:53.430]due to herbicides, but the cover crop treatments
- [00:07:56.310]across all of our study locations did have lower yields
- [00:07:58.760]relative to the no-till.
- [00:08:02.293]And so, soil treatment, if you will,
- [00:08:05.910]so, no-till versus tillage, versus cover crop,
- [00:08:09.090]that had a stronger influence on the next year's crop
- [00:08:11.980]than herbicide carryover did, in this instance.
- [00:08:14.950]And so, we think the level of rainfall
- [00:08:17.310]that we had during the study,
- [00:08:19.560]and kinda the soil conditions, the soil type,
- [00:08:21.940]probably had a stronger influence
- [00:08:23.870]on not seeing carryover for this particular year.
- [00:08:26.930]So, it's certainly possible,
- [00:08:28.420]but we didn't see a strong effect of that
- [00:08:31.610]for this particular study.
- [00:08:35.080]The comment being, in Nebraska,
- [00:08:37.310]we have a range of irrigated versus rain-fed environments,
- [00:08:40.710]and a whole range of soil types.
- [00:08:44.170]And so that can have a pretty strong influence
- [00:08:46.070]on how likely an herbicide is to carry over
- [00:08:48.730]from one year to the next.
- [00:08:50.120]Certainly the last number of years in Nebraska,
- [00:08:52.160]we've had pretty adequate rainfall, either fall or spring.
- [00:08:56.190]And so I think it's limited carryover,
- [00:08:58.950]or it's been pretty small pockets of the state
- [00:09:02.540]where conditions were just right to see it.
- [00:09:05.320]But we haven't seen widespread carryover
- [00:09:08.070]in Nebraska in recent years.
- [00:09:10.180]Yeah, so the question being that the yield decrease
- [00:09:12.460]that we saw in the corn
- [00:09:14.170]that was tied to the cover crop treatment,
- [00:09:17.370]is that something that just 'cause the cover crop,
- [00:09:19.170]it was kinda the part of that establishing cover crops
- [00:09:22.180]into a system, and it might decrease over time,
- [00:09:25.750]versus, is this just always gonna be an issue?
- [00:09:31.610]Yeah, I think tillage environments, in the short term,
- [00:09:36.520]are gonna favor corn yields, right?
- [00:09:39.460]It's just, it's an environment where corn tends to thrive.
- [00:09:43.050]But when you look at the big picture,
- [00:09:46.910]there's real advantage to the no-till and the cover crop.
- [00:09:49.130]And it does seem to regulate.
- [00:09:51.740]So if you look at the adoption of no-till over time,
- [00:09:54.900]there tends to be that yield lag
- [00:09:56.410]during the adoption of no-till.
- [00:09:58.220]They talk about the five-year adoption lag.
- [00:10:00.670]And so, those yields have tended to stabilize
- [00:10:03.010]and increase over time.
- [00:10:04.490]And I think we're starting to see
- [00:10:05.660]more and more cover crop data that would suggest the same,
- [00:10:07.970]that as those systems mature
- [00:10:09.850]and are utilized over the course of time,
- [00:10:15.530]those yields tend to stabilize as well.
- [00:10:17.160]And so, I think that's probably most likely to occur.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/14518?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: 12 - 2020 Soybean Management Field Days - Influence of Soil and Residue Management on Herbicide Carryover and Subsequent Crop Development" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments