GSL Beef Physiology Research Update
Dr. Rick Funston
Author
09/03/2020
Added
23
Plays
Description
Dr. Funston discusses new research out of his lab.
Feedback form
Feedback form
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:02.150]This is Rick Funston
- [00:00:03.140]with the University of Nebraska.
- [00:00:06.730]At the Annual Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory Open House,
- [00:00:11.320]in some different format
- [00:00:13.150]than I've experienced today
- [00:00:15.620]but nonetheless thank you all for getting online
- [00:00:21.390]and listening to the presentations this far.
- [00:00:25.660]You're all familiar
- [00:00:26.493]with the Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory.
- [00:00:28.340]We've a composite herd that's Red Angus Simmental.
- [00:00:32.250]And then for each resource that's upland range
- [00:00:35.700]or sub-irrigated meadow,
- [00:00:37.460]which really compliments grazing.
- [00:00:41.580]Because we have two different grass varieties
- [00:00:46.210]that have different growth patterns as shown in this slide
- [00:00:50.810]and different forage quality both in crude protein
- [00:00:55.110]and in energy.
- [00:00:57.450]This is years of data that Don Adams
- [00:00:59.870]was the instrumental in collecting
- [00:01:01.660]to put together some of these plant nutrient profiles
- [00:01:06.280]throughout the year.
- [00:01:07.630]And the questions become how do we both take advantage of
- [00:01:13.550]or deal with those changes in forage quality?
- [00:01:17.080]Especially if we want to remain profitable
- [00:01:20.270]and decrease feed cost,
- [00:01:22.810]which is the largest cost we have in beef production.
- [00:01:26.740]We ask ourselves, what are the implications
- [00:01:30.120]of grazing animals in a system that the forage quality
- [00:01:34.660]is below their requirements,
- [00:01:36.460]not only for the animal that's grazing
- [00:01:38.570]but in the animals that are subsequent progeny
- [00:01:42.010]in both the steers clear through the feedlot
- [00:01:44.960]in the heifer calves as measured in fertility and growth
- [00:01:48.560]and feed efficiency for example.
- [00:01:52.390]Well one of the biggest decisions a ranch has to make
- [00:01:55.990]is when they calve,
- [00:01:57.820]because it has far reaching implications
- [00:02:02.020]on the entire system.
- [00:02:05.720]And I wanna highlight one of our calving herds
- [00:02:09.640]in three studies that were conducted
- [00:02:11.860]in finishing up at Gudmundsen.
- [00:02:15.220]One of the things we must consider
- [00:02:18.410]when we change calving time,
- [00:02:20.310]how does it affect winter feed requirements?
- [00:02:22.460]That was some of the biggest impetus to calve later
- [00:02:26.020]when Don Adams research
- [00:02:28.010]was to decrease harvested forage needs.
- [00:02:32.230]And feed costs obviously are the number one cost
- [00:02:35.610]in any ranch operation.
- [00:02:38.860]And can we utilize range forage more
- [00:02:42.190]as we changed calving date?
- [00:02:44.680]But how does that affect both cow
- [00:02:46.700]and calf productivity at weaning and post weaning?
- [00:02:50.350]And do we need to consider
- [00:02:52.090]alternative post weaning strategies
- [00:02:55.160]for those calves born in later calving systems.
- [00:02:59.630]But the bottom line is it's not all about outputs.
- [00:03:03.230]Some of the early calving work shows
- [00:03:05.910]heavier weaning weights.
- [00:03:09.020]Different weights going into and out of the feed lot.
- [00:03:15.590]But what about overall profitability which
- [00:03:18.280]not just considers output but also inputs.
- [00:03:21.830]So, four main factors that we think about
- [00:03:26.990]as we change calving.
- [00:03:28.860]Harvested feed is lowest if we calve later.
- [00:03:31.970]Bad weather challenges are lowest as we calve later
- [00:03:36.150]but weaning weights are lower as we calve later.
- [00:03:38.950]And then labor it depends on the operation,
- [00:03:41.680]could be a conflict as we're calving later
- [00:03:44.030]if it interferes with other things on the ranch
- [00:03:48.140]that we need labor for.
- [00:03:49.930]But the two biggest factors I think that people consider
- [00:03:53.520]when they choose a calving season is weather
- [00:03:59.190]and then labor.
- [00:04:00.350]Because a lot of these ranches don't have facilities
- [00:04:03.680]to deal with storms
- [00:04:05.550]and one person that is calving a lot of animals
- [00:04:09.820]on some of these larger ranches.
- [00:04:13.360]We've always since I started work here
- [00:04:17.120]had more than one calving season.
- [00:04:19.700]We had a June and March when I began.
- [00:04:22.660]Through the years we've calved in,
- [00:04:25.070]always had a March herd
- [00:04:26.810]and then we had a March, June and August
- [00:04:28.880]and have some nice data published with that, comparisons
- [00:04:32.010]and different post weaning management strategies.
- [00:04:35.750]And then currently we have a May and a March calving herd.
- [00:04:39.970]So what are the opportunities?
- [00:04:41.520]Well, why would you calve later?
- [00:04:43.410]And we talked a little bit about it
- [00:04:45.070]but if we look at matching forage,
- [00:04:46.850]highest requirements of the cow
- [00:04:49.550]are early lactation.
- [00:04:51.570]And oftentimes we may not have very good quality forage
- [00:04:56.910]during early lactation
- [00:04:58.320]if we calve real early before the forage comes on.
- [00:05:01.850]So early lactation in this May calving system
- [00:05:06.310]has high protein and energy.
- [00:05:09.300]And we can potentially take advantage of that
- [00:05:12.680]and recover any body condition
- [00:05:14.730]or body weight changes over winter
- [00:05:17.930]due to not supplementing
- [00:05:20.840]and decrease our harvested feed needs.
- [00:05:24.660]Severe weather, as I mentioned before,
- [00:05:26.840]challenges are much less as we have later.
- [00:05:31.230]Breeding occurs during a period of the highest
- [00:05:34.470]or higher ambient temperatures.
- [00:05:37.500]From our work done with calving in March, June
- [00:05:40.440]and August with cows that have had multiple calves,
- [00:05:44.920]no difference in pregnancy rates.
- [00:05:47.120]So, a lot of people worry about the heat,
- [00:05:50.770]I think heat and humidity become the issue.
- [00:05:53.670]And generally at least in this area in Nebraska,
- [00:05:58.430]it cools off at night so they get relief from that heat
- [00:06:01.610]and I think the heat becomes a much bigger factor
- [00:06:05.420]as we go to the Southeast.
- [00:06:07.600]The one that is a challenge I believe
- [00:06:09.550]is this declining forage quality
- [00:06:11.400]during the breeding season
- [00:06:12.650]as we calve later and breed later.
- [00:06:16.040]And it's been implicated to increase embryonic loss
- [00:06:19.780]and decrease conception rates.
- [00:06:22.210]So from previous work in this first bullet
- [00:06:25.660]was the March, June, August,
- [00:06:27.730]we saw again no difference in preg rates
- [00:06:31.020]for cows that have had multiple calves,
- [00:06:34.230]regardless of when the breeding season was.
- [00:06:37.400]We did see though that heifer calves from a May calving herd
- [00:06:42.500]had lower pregnancy rates,
- [00:06:44.520]than from our March calving herd.
- [00:06:47.320]So what are potential management strategies
- [00:06:51.200]to overcome some of these challenges?
- [00:06:53.360]Well supplementation might be one,
- [00:06:55.770]although probably not the number one pick
- [00:06:59.050]to go supplementing cattle during the summertime.
- [00:07:01.610]But we looked at, did we have enough
- [00:07:04.730]to supplement cattle during the breeding season
- [00:07:08.330]in this May calving heifers and first calf heifers.
- [00:07:12.950]So we wanted to look at preg rates
- [00:07:14.550]and then body weight and body condition.
- [00:07:17.220]And what did it do to the weights of the calves
- [00:07:20.850]that were on the first calf heifers.
- [00:07:23.080]Well we had body weight increase in heifer calves
- [00:07:27.330]that received supplement as body condition followed
- [00:07:30.920]but no difference in puberty or pregnancy rates.
- [00:07:36.140]On the first calf heifers,
- [00:07:37.700]we saw a response in body weight
- [00:07:40.580]and body condition if we supplemented
- [00:07:43.350]but again no difference in pregnancy rates.
- [00:07:45.860]So no great benefit to supplement during the breeding season
- [00:07:50.500]on the outcome that we were trying to manage
- [00:07:54.010]which wasn't necessarily body weight
- [00:07:55.980]but it was pregnancy rate.
- [00:07:58.290]Calf body weight was increased in the first calf heifers
- [00:08:01.580]that received supplement
- [00:08:02.670]whether it was direct through milk
- [00:08:06.220]or eating the supplement or milk production
- [00:08:09.650]or a combination of both probably.
- [00:08:13.360]So supplementing this supplement that was high
- [00:08:15.940]in undergradable protein,
- [00:08:18.270]increased weight and body condition
- [00:08:21.140]but did not impact pregnancy rates
- [00:08:24.310]which was the outcome we were looking for.
- [00:08:28.410]Some other protein sources that are being looked at
- [00:08:31.500]involve more rumen degradable protein
- [00:08:34.860]and potentially this could elicit a different response
- [00:08:40.070]possibly than a high undergradable protein.
- [00:08:44.545]The other thing we have to manipulate
- [00:08:48.300]or utilize is different forage types in the Sandhills.
- [00:08:52.410]So can we take advantage of these to overcome
- [00:08:55.730]any potential detrimental effects
- [00:08:58.440]of these later breeding seasons?
- [00:09:01.290]So we had both heifers and first calf heifers again
- [00:09:04.740]but then we had multiparous cows
- [00:09:07.480]that have had multiple calves.
- [00:09:09.730]And then their treatments were either meadow or range
- [00:09:12.050]with or without supplements.
- [00:09:15.120]If we look at this one year of nutrient analysis
- [00:09:17.720]as agreed with the early slide,
- [00:09:20.710]protein is higher in the meadow
- [00:09:22.670]but interestingly energy was pretty similar
- [00:09:26.130]and followed a fairly similar pattern on the meadow
- [00:09:29.250]and the upland range.
- [00:09:31.440]If we look at body weight response,
- [00:09:35.280]we start with the top two lines
- [00:09:37.120]which are the multiparous cows.
- [00:09:40.320]We did get a response to supplementing
- [00:09:42.540]during breeding on body weight
- [00:09:44.740]in all three classes of animals.
- [00:09:46.860]The first calves in the middle
- [00:09:48.260]and then the heifer calves on the bottom.
- [00:09:52.210]But again, we did not see a benefit on pregnancy rates,
- [00:09:59.120]for any of the classes of animals
- [00:10:01.760]that were either grazing the two grazing systems
- [00:10:06.410]or supplemented or not within those systems.
- [00:10:13.970]The Calf-at-side we saw heavier calves
- [00:10:21.730]from the multiparous cows
- [00:10:25.520]and we also did see heavier calves
- [00:10:29.320]from the cows that were supplemented
- [00:10:31.280]as we saw in the previous study.
- [00:10:37.960]So, forage analysis we had higher protein,
- [00:10:42.030]similar energy,
- [00:10:45.060]we did increase body weight, by supplementing
- [00:10:48.890]and calf weaning weight
- [00:10:50.350]but we'd saw no difference in pregnancy rates again.
- [00:10:55.100]So the last of the studies
- [00:10:56.830]really builds on some more that we looked
- [00:11:01.460]at the need to supplement cattle in a March calving system
- [00:11:06.017]and during winter grazing
- [00:11:07.950]and how did that impact future productivity
- [00:11:12.950]of both the steer and heifer progeny?
- [00:11:15.940]Like I mentioned earlier,
- [00:11:18.090]the May calving system,
- [00:11:20.450]we have a much different nutrient environment
- [00:11:22.880]immediately before calving
- [00:11:24.660]for sure than we do in the March system.
- [00:11:28.800]So, we've seen negative effects
- [00:11:31.040]from not supplementing in the March calving system
- [00:11:36.400]during winter grazing.
- [00:11:38.580]The forage is different though in the May herd
- [00:11:41.300]as I mentioned, going to be different during late gestation.
- [00:11:49.090]So, we're hypothesizing that this difference in forage
- [00:11:54.680]in consequently nutritive value
- [00:11:57.490]will affect re-breed pregnancy rates
- [00:11:59.360]and alter progeny postnatal growth and performance,
- [00:12:03.110]perhaps in a different manner
- [00:12:05.200]than in our March calving system.
- [00:12:07.840]So we wanted to look at again a similar model,
- [00:12:11.310]two forage types with and without supplementing
- [00:12:14.520]in late gestation on our May calving dams.
- [00:12:18.170]On both their individual performance
- [00:12:21.257]and pregnancy rates
- [00:12:23.000]and then the progeny postnatal growth
- [00:12:26.390]and the heifer reproductive performance.
- [00:12:30.730]In this sphere it's clear to slaughter
- [00:12:32.680]fed out here at North Platte.
- [00:12:34.700]The dam results we saw
- [00:12:40.210]approaching significance negative effect in the range,
- [00:12:44.670]no supplement group.
- [00:12:47.490]So, a decrease in pregnancy rates
- [00:12:50.570]if we didn't supplement that cow grazing native range.
- [00:12:54.820]But if you look at the both meadow
- [00:12:57.300]and the range supplement are quite similar.
- [00:13:02.430]So body weight was lowest in the range.
- [00:13:04.840]No supplements,
- [00:13:05.770]the other treatments were similar,
- [00:13:07.300]conditions were followed.
- [00:13:12.830]The meadow grazing tended to increase pregnancy rates.
- [00:13:22.350]The steer progeny late gestation nutrition had no impact.
- [00:13:27.810]Heifer progeny, there was an interaction
- [00:13:32.040]between the pasture type and supplementation.
- [00:13:38.090]So, somewhat difficult to explain
- [00:13:42.010]but no difference in pregnancy rates
- [00:13:44.600]when she was bred as a yearling heifer.
- [00:13:50.810]With no differences in gain on the steers
- [00:13:54.250]but there are some reported differences in the heifers.
- [00:13:57.880]Why difference in steers and heifers,
- [00:14:00.880]while there's other species
- [00:14:02.440]that show some sex specific responses
- [00:14:06.480]and it's likely an interaction of hormones
- [00:14:12.160]and in gestational treatment,
- [00:14:14.610]which the females and males responded differently.
- [00:14:20.380]If we look at the heir
- [00:14:21.640]then re-breeding of the heifer after she had her first calf
- [00:14:26.390]interestingly, our preg rates were lower
- [00:14:30.290]in the two range systems.
- [00:14:33.140]So why this lag that we had no difference
- [00:14:37.940]in initial pregnancy rates
- [00:14:39.950]but in our first calvers
- [00:14:42.190]after they heard a calf preg rates were greater
- [00:14:46.060]in those that were on meadow,
- [00:14:48.800]that came from a cow that was on meadow during gestation.
- [00:14:55.850]So with that and that out of time,
- [00:14:58.290]if there are any questions
- [00:14:59.310]feel free to contact me
- [00:15:00.660]or type them in the chat box.
- [00:15:02.310]Thank you for attending.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/14354?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: GSL Beef Physiology Research Update" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments