Analysis of a Length-Structured Model for Fish
Geigh Zollicoffer
Author
08/05/2020
Added
100
Plays
Description
A mathematical study of the invasive white perch fish using a length-structured model.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [0:03] Hello my name is Geigh Zollicoffer,
- [0:04] And my UCARE Project was
- [0:06] Analysis of a length-Stuctured
- [0:07] Model for fish
- [0:10] I was supervised by
- [0:11] Dr. Richard Rebarber
- [0:13] As some of you who fish may know
- [0:15] the White Perch fish are not
- [0:16] native to Nebraska
- [0:18] and are actually also invasive
- [0:21] The population accomplishes this by
- [0:22] exhibiting stunting, or by dominating the
- [0:25] overall population despite being the
- [0:27] smaller fish
- [0:29] In order to measure this
- [0:30] we can observe the convergence
- [0:32] of the total population,
- [0:33] using a length based model.
- [0:37] Our length based model that
- [0:38] we used was proposed because
- [0:39] it was:
- [0:40] Easier to collect length data
- [0:42] than age data.
- [0:43] We thought that most anglers would
- [0:45] be more interested in the size
- [0:46] distribution rather than the age
- [0:49] We also decided that length
- [0:50] would be more applicable due to
- [0:51] the life history parameters being
- [0:53] more relatable
- [0:55] to a length based model
- [0:56] rather than an age based model
- [0:59] Lastly, it was more tractable
- [1:01] to mathematical analysis.
- [1:06] One of the core elements of the length
- [1:07] structured model is the
- [1:09] population vector.
- [1:11] The population vector shows the state
- [1:13] of the population
- [1:14] The vector uses a time
- [1:16] step, which is a constant
- [1:18] and is determined by the behavior
- [1:19] of species or by data collection
- [1:22] Each element is determined by length
- [1:25] so P_0 would be new born fish
- [1:27] and P_n would be the population
- [1:30] of the largest fish possible
- [1:32] Each time step a fish can either
- [1:34] stay in it’s length class or
- [1:36] grow into the next length class.
- [1:41] In order to calculate P_t at a
- [1:43] given time step, there
- [1:44] are a few more parameters
- [1:46] that we use.
- [1:48] L_i which is the average
- [1:49] length of fish at a specific ith stage
- [1:52] S_i which is the survivability
- [1:53] of a fish at a specific ith stage
- [1:56] F_i which is the fecundity
- [1:57] of a fish at a specific ith stage
- [2:00] And lastly, p_t which is the
- [2:03] probability that if ith fish survives
- [2:05] it grows into the next stage
- [2:10] Using these parameters, we
- [2:12] were are able to use a model of the
- [2:14] form P_(t+1), Which
- [2:16] helps us traverse through
- [2:17] time steps.
- [2:18] As you can see the f_i’s are
- [2:20] stored at the top
- [2:21] and the diagonals are calculated using
- [2:23] the determined survival rates
- [2:24] and probabilities.
- [2:26] This is similar to an age based
- [2:28] model, however it is
- [2:29] based on the length
- [2:30] of the fish
- [2:32] Concerning bio mass of a fish,
- [2:34] the mass of the fish was computed
- [2:35] using the length classes, and
- [2:37] a coefficient alpha
- [2:39] Therefore the total population biomass
- [2:41] at a time step t is
- [2:43] the total sum of the computed
- [2:44] mass of a fish in class i,
- [2:46] which is multiplied by the
- [2:48] total population of fish in the same class
- [2:52] There is also a Nonlinear system
- [2:54] in place that is strictly
- [2:55] decreasing and is continuous
- [2:56] in order to calculate the probability
- [2:58] of a fish growing larger.
- [3:01] Looking at the dynamical system,
- [3:03] we use a function g(B(t)) to calculate
- [3:07] the probability.
- [3:12] Therefore our model creates
- [3:14] a system that:
- [3:15] if there is low biomass, the probability
- [3:18] that a fish gets larger is
- [3:19] close to one, and concurrently
- [3:20] if there is high biomass, the probability
- [3:23] that a fish gets large in a time step
- [3:26] is close to zero.
- [3:28] These two implementations, help
- [3:29] the model penalize crowding.
- [3:33] This can be better shown by
- [3:34] observing the nonlinearity of the system,
- [3:38] where we are using a Beverton-Holt
- [3:40] response function which gives
- [3:41] the expected number of density
- [3:42] in timestep t + 1 as a function
- [3:45] of the density in the
- [3:47] previous generation.
- [3:49] We determine convergence in this
- [3:51] model if vector P is
- [3:53] globally asymptotically attracting
- [3:55] for every nonzero, nonnegative P(0)
- [3:59] Also known as the spectral radius
- [4:01] we also use the largest eigenvalue of A
- [4:04] which is denoted as p(A)
- [4:06] to determine the asymptotic
- [4:08] behavior of solutions after
- [4:10] a certain number of time steps.
- [4:16] Assume S_i and F_i are
- [4:18] nondecreasing,
- [4:19] Using p(A) and previous studies
- [4:21] we can determine two
- [4:22] outcomes of the population:
- [4:24] if the zero population vector is
- [4:26] asymptotically attracting,
- [4:27] and if the system has
- [4:28] a unique non zero equilibrium.
- [4:31] However, the condition of s_i
- [4:33] is often not satisfied,
- [4:36] so we study if this theorem
- [4:37] is true despite failing the nondecreasing
- [4:39] condition.
- [4:45] We do this by altering the
- [4:46] survival rates to a non
- [4:47] decreasing state
- [4:48] This allows us to take a
- [4:49] different approach to the main
- [4:51] theorem and allows
- [4:52] us to explore the results
- [4:57] Each simulation was done with
- [4:59] a different initial population
- [5:01] than before and the
- [5:03] limiting population is shown
- [5:04] below.
- [5:05] The first 15 trials are
- [5:06] shown; however all
- [5:07] tests had the same results
- [5:09] in each example:
- [5:11] This first type of survival rates
- [5:13] simulated were sequential
- [5:14] patterns
- [5:15] giving convergence to zero.
- [5:22] The second type of of survival rates
- [5:23] simulated were a monotone
- [5:25] like non decreasing pattern
- [5:27] which showed convergence, this
- [5:29] example shows convergence
- [5:32] to a unique limiting population
- [5:38] The third type of survival rates simulated
- [5:39] were steep non decreasing
- [5:40] patterns, that dropped
- [5:41] down significantly as length class
- [5:43] increased, this example
- [5:45] shows convergence to a
- [5:46] unique limiting pattern
- [5:53] The final type of survival rates simulated
- [5:55] were gentle non decreasing
- [5:56] patterns, that
- [5:57] dropped down a small
- [5:58] amount over multiple length
- [5:59] classes. This example
- [6:00] converged to zero.
- [6:09] After a number of simulations
- [6:10] starting from different
- [6:11] initial populations,
- [6:12] testing the following statements
- [6:13] from previous studies appear
- [6:15] to be true, despite
- [6:17] not following the non decreasing
- [6:18] condition.
- [6:22] Future work
- [6:23] Since smaller fish are less
- [6:24] desirable than larger fish
- [6:26] we would like to identify survivals (si)
- [6:28] that lead to limiting populations
- [6:30] which are not dominated by small fish
- [6:33] This might lead to management
- [6:35] recommendations in the form
- [6:35] of fishing regulations.
- [6:40] This presentation was possible due
- [6:42] to funding from the UCARE program
- [6:46] thank you for
- [6:47] your time.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Comments
0 Comments