Antibacterial Activity of Polymeric Membranes Against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

Kai Shen Choong Author

07/31/2020 Added

10 Plays

Description

Studying the Antibacterial Activity of Polymeric Membranes against Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria Kai Shen Choong This project is to study the introduction of sulfonated polysulfone membranes to ampicillin-resistant E. Coli.

Searchable Transcript

Search:

[00:00:01.224]Hello everyone, my name is Kai.
[00:00:03.488]I’m from the College of Engineering,
[00:00:05.769]Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
[00:00:09.680]and today I’m going to talk about
[00:00:11.850]my UCARE project with the title of
[00:00:14.181]Studying the Antibacterial Activity of Polymeric Membranes
[00:00:18.246]against Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria.
[00:00:21.840]Let’s get started.
[00:00:23.076]Bacteria had existed for ages
[00:00:25.521]and gave us human beings problem.
[00:00:27.897]We solved that by creating antibiotics for the bacteria.
[00:00:31.612]Over time, as we are trying to protect ourselves,
[00:00:34.402]we overuse and misuse antibiotics.
[00:00:37.467]This is why there are so many antibiotic-resistant bacteria today
[00:00:44.634]because the bacteria itself
[00:00:46.224]mutate and evolve to protect themselves.
[00:00:49.553]From some studies, it has been shown that
[00:00:53.394]multi-block sulfonated polymers could inactivate more than 99%
[00:00:57.964]of Gram-positive and negative bacterial strains within five minutes.
[00:01:02.730]So, the aim of this project is
[00:01:04.592]to study the antibacterial activity of sulfonated polymers,
[00:01:09.462]mainly polysulfone and sulfonated lignin,
[00:01:14.036]against ampicillin-resistant E. coli.
[00:01:18.426]So, I formed the membranes
[00:01:20.590]using solution casting method
[00:01:22.835]and the materials used were
[00:01:25.805]polysulfone (PS),
[00:01:28.085]sulfonated polysulfone (SPS),
[00:01:31.983]PS and lignin sulfonate (LS)
[00:01:34.331]in a ten to one ratio
[00:01:36.516]as well as SPS with LS in a ten to one mass ratio.
[00:01:42.607]The casted membranes were then
[00:01:44.751]cut into 1 cm by 1 cm pieces.
[00:01:47.591]Then, the bacteria are cultured using
[00:01:52.460]ampicillin-resistant E. coli (pSSBIO2)
[00:01:57.144]grown following the standard protocol.
[00:02:00.538]It was cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) media
[00:02:04.760]and incubated at 37 degree Celsius overnight.
[00:02:09.080]A single colony was then transferred
[00:02:11.390]into new LB media and
[00:02:14.179]incubated for 37 degree Celsius overnight.
[00:02:18.649]So, it’s time to test the membranes.
[00:02:21.525]The membranes were added to the bacteria cells
[00:02:24.457]and incubated for four hours
[00:02:27.913]then the treated bacteria were
[00:02:29.793]transferred into LB media to grow for 3 hours.
[00:02:34.537]Finally, the absorbance at 600 nanometers
[00:02:38.833]was measured and the antibacterial activities of the membranes were calculated using Equation 1,
[00:02:49.612]shown at the bottom of the materials and methods section.
[00:02:54.772]After those experiments, this is what I got.
[00:02:58.152]Figure 1 shows the chemical structures
[00:03:00.702]of the polymer that I used
[00:03:02.960]which were SPS and LS,
[00:03:05.432]if it is a PS then the sulfonate group in SPS is just a hydrogen.
[00:03:13.648]The image shown in the middle of Figure 1
[00:03:16.650]is an example of a casted membrane
[00:03:20.404]this one here is a SPS membrane in 1 cm by 1 cm dimension.
[00:03:25.811]Keep in mind that
[00:03:27.130]all the membranes were about
[00:03:29.341]60 micrometers thick.
[00:03:32.536]The table next to it shows the membrane
[00:03:36.353]and its ion-exchange capacity.
[00:03:39.524]Figure 2 here shows a
[00:03:41.954]schematic of the methods used.
[00:03:44.034]As mentioned before, the bacteria were
[00:03:46.528]treated with the membranes for four hours.
[00:03:50.938]And then, 50 microliters of the treated cells
[00:03:55.568]were added to LB media for 3 hours at 37 degree C.
[00:04:01.321]Figure 3 shows the colony forming units (CFUs) for each trial.
[00:04:09.941]In A, it is the untreated one,
[00:04:14.119]which looks like a hot mess.
[00:04:16.337]And in B, this is the one which was treated with PS.
[00:04:22.217]In C, it is treated with PS with LS.
[00:04:26.057]In D, it is treated with SPS and
[00:04:29.377]finally in E, it is the one treated with SPS with LS.
[00:04:35.437]Here we can see that the hot messes
[00:04:38.419]were reduced after being treated by the membranes.
[00:04:42.689]The samples that were treated with PS and PS with LS membranes
[00:04:51.113]did not cause much or any reduction in bacterial colonies
[00:04:56.466]as the plates were not clear.
[00:04:59.059]However, the samples that were treated with SPS and SPS with LS membranes
[00:05:06.067]showed great reduction in bacterial colonies
[00:05:09.117]as the plates were almost clear.
[00:05:11.650]The absorbances of untreated sample and treated sample
[00:05:15.812]of each trial were also measured and used
[00:05:20.236]in equation 1 to calculate the growth inhibition.
[00:05:23.768]Figure 4 shows the results for it.
[00:05:27.575]PS and PS with LS did not possess much growth inhibition,
[00:05:34.205]they were about 0% and 3%
[00:05:37.479]but, SPS and SPS with LS showed about 98% and 100% growth inhibition.
[00:05:48.570]This agrees in the previous part,
[00:05:50.460]which was the CFU reduction.
[00:05:53.450]So, SPS and SPS with LS membranes are effective
[00:06:00.388]against antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
[00:06:04.400]If we take a closer look into
[00:06:06.542]the table on the left column of results section
[00:06:10.040]and the graph on the right column of results section,
[00:06:14.235]we can corelate its ion-exchange capacity to the growth inhibition
[00:06:20.463]as the trend looks similar.
[00:06:23.109]This is helpful as more trials with
[00:06:25.589]different ratios of SPS and LS or PS with LS,
[00:06:32.003]in which produces membranes with varying ion-exchange capacity,
[00:06:40.149]are needed to be done
[00:06:43.485]to complete the function in the future
[00:06:45.937]to further understand the relationship between
[00:06:49.211]ion-exchange capacity and its antibacterial activity
[00:06:53.047]using polysulfone membranes.
[00:06:57.625]In conclusion, the membranes with
[00:07:01.061]60 micrometers thick were casted successfully
[00:07:04.511]using solution casting methods.
[00:07:07.111]Sulfonated membranes showed
[00:07:10.011]antibacterial activity against antibiotic-resistant E. coli.
[00:07:15.791]Antibacterial activity of membranes
[00:07:19.361]was a function of ion-exchange capacity,
[00:07:23.245]like the membranes with higher
[00:07:26.230]ion-exchange capacity showed
[00:07:28.459]higher antibacterial activity
[00:07:30.966]against ampicillin-resistant E. coli.
[00:07:35.778]The final point that I want to point out is that
[00:07:39.716]SPS and SPS with LS membranes inhibited
[00:07:46.692]growth rate of bacteria cells around 100%.
[00:07:51.972]I’d like to end this off with some acknowledgments.
[00:07:54.662]I’d like to thank Doctor Dishari for her encouragement
[00:07:57.921]in order to complete the work.
[00:08:00.110]I would also like to thank the two graduate students from Dr. Dishari’s group;
[00:08:04.320]they are Ehsan Zamani and Seefat Farzin
[00:08:08.248]for their support and guidance throughout the experiments.
[00:08:11.396]Without them, this project wouldn’t be a success.
[00:08:14.442]With that said, I’d like to end this presentation.
[00:08:18.068]Thank you all for listening!

The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!

You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.

Comments

0 Comments

Antibacterial Activity of Polymeric Membranes Against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

Description

Searchable Transcript

Comments icon comment

Related Channels

Comments