Fate and Occurrence of Microplastics in Agricultural Runoff
Malayna Wingert
Author
07/30/2020
Added
23
Plays
Description
Discusses the mobilization of microplastics on field plots containing biosolids and manure as soil fertilizers.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:01.292]Hello everyone my name is Malayna Wingert
- [00:00:04.200]and I am majoring in Biological Systems Engineering
- [00:00:07.715]I am apart of the
- [00:00:09.175]Summer Nebraska Engineering Research Program
- [00:00:11.000]this summer and I am working with Dr. Shannon Bartelt Hunt
- [00:00:14.340]and her graduate student
- [00:00:16.220]The project we are working on this summer is
- [00:00:18.043]The Fate and Occurrence of Microplastics
- [00:00:20.543]in Agricultural Runoff
- [00:00:22.970]First let's talk about what microplastics are
- [00:00:26.460]Microplastics are plastic particles
- [00:00:28.382]less than 5 mm wide
- [00:00:30.557]There are two main types of microplastics
- [00:00:33.360]Primary and Secondary
- [00:00:34.816]We will be focusing mostly on secondary
- [00:00:37.203]in our experiment
- [00:00:39.821]These are specific examples of microplastic's dangers
- [00:00:45.712]Their small size
- [00:00:46.922]Ability to deplete the soil
- [00:00:48.604]contaminating additives
- [00:00:50.234]and ability to transport into the food web
- [00:00:52.686]are all reasons why microplastics
- [00:00:54.715]are a problem today
- [00:00:58.160]Some of the main sources of microplastics
- [00:01:00.429]include atmospheric deposition
- [00:01:02.269]and fertilizer application.
- [00:01:04.996]During atmospheric deposition
- [00:01:07.540]microplastics are deposited onto the land
- [00:01:09.474]from the atmosphere
- [00:01:10.928]They are able to do this
- [00:01:12.460]because of their small size
- [00:01:13.271]and the open layout of agricultural fields.
- [00:01:17.134]Biosolids are a fertilizer that comes from
- [00:01:19.452]Wastewater treatment plant's discharge or sludge
- [00:01:23.250]Wastewater treatment plants
- [00:01:24.592]can remove up to 99% of microplastics
- [00:01:26.925]from domestic wastewater
- [00:01:28.629]industry waste
- [00:01:29.471]and storm water runoff that enters the plant
- [00:01:32.169]These microplastics are then concentrated
- [00:01:34.369]into sludge and applied directly
- [00:01:36.226]onto agricultural fields.
- [00:01:38.209]The nutrients from these fertilizers
- [00:01:40.189]is used by crops but microplastics still remain
- [00:01:42.771]in the soil.
- [00:01:45.252]In our project biosolids and manure
- [00:01:47.532]were applied to our test plots
- [00:01:49.352]to study the quantity of microplastics
- [00:01:52.246]these fertilizers contribute to the soil
- [00:01:55.566]Motivations of our research include
- [00:01:58.606]the lack of research of microplastics
- [00:02:00.846]in agroecosystems.
- [00:02:03.154]We want to close the gap on this topic.
- [00:02:07.411]For this year's project our objectives are
- [00:02:10.506]How are microplastics mobilized in agricultural soils
- [00:02:13.986]What features of microplastics affect mobilization?
- [00:02:17.576]And what microplastic characteristics
- [00:02:19.806]are most common in runoff or horizontal movement?
- [00:02:25.234]In order to investigate these objectives
- [00:02:27.714]we set up 6 test plots at Roger's Memorial Farm
- [00:02:30.443]outside of Lincoln, Nebraska.
- [00:02:32.933]Of the 6 plots
- [00:02:34.630]2 were applied with biosolids
- [00:02:36.462]2 were applied with manure
- [00:02:38.193]and 2 were kept as controls
- [00:02:41.752]The plots that had fertilizer
- [00:02:43.642]had enough fertilizer to meet a
- [00:02:45.012]one year nitrogen requirement for corn
- [00:02:47.248]and this is about 177 kg
- [00:02:51.413]The test plots were constructed with metal buffers
- [00:02:54.122]around them to direct runoff from each plot
- [00:02:56.642]into the runoff pipe
- [00:02:57.982]and then into the collection tank
- [00:02:59.792]which allowed us to collect samples
- [00:03:01.442]after the storm event
- [00:03:05.052]Here is our test plot
- [00:03:06.508]The trough that we dug into the ground
- [00:03:08.918]our runoff pipe and the collection tank
- [00:03:12.568]For sampling,
- [00:03:13.559]I will be showing you the sampling dates
- [00:03:15.288]and results from last year
- [00:03:16.898]as these are the expected results for this year
- [00:03:19.278]We have sampled only once this year
- [00:03:21.173]and have not tested the results as of now
- [00:03:24.129]Six storm events were sampled last year
- [00:03:26.121]from July to October
- [00:03:28.301]This is in addition to 9 sampling dates
- [00:03:30.181]the summer previous
- [00:03:33.471]Samples were collected for storm events
- [00:03:35.018]when rainfall was greater than
- [00:03:36.219]3/4 of an inch
- [00:03:38.989]To sample, the collection tanks have
- [00:03:40.878]a metal bucket that collects water
- [00:03:43.048]These buckets are stirred to get particles
- [00:03:44.987]off of the bottom
- [00:03:46.417]Then a glass container is dipped into the water
- [00:03:49.167]and collects the sample
- [00:03:50.884]One sample is taken from each plot
- [00:03:53.694]The samples are then taken
- [00:03:54.944]into the lab to be analyzed
- [00:03:57.038]To analyze the runoff samples
- [00:03:58.751]there are a few steps
- [00:04:00.161]First the samples are covered with aluminum foil
- [00:04:02.361]and placed into an oven
- [00:04:03.561]to dry at 70 degrees Celcius
- [00:04:05.981]Here is the jar with aluminum foil
- [00:04:08.911]Then the samples go through a
- [00:04:10.511]density separation phase
- [00:04:12.881]A zinc bromide solution is prepared
- [00:04:14.436]and added to each jar
- [00:04:16.356]The jar are then sonicated for one hour
- [00:04:19.007]Sonication is using sound energy
- [00:04:21.345]to agitate particles
- [00:04:22.785]in this case it was to prevent clumping
- [00:04:24.836]or aggregation
- [00:04:27.287]To seperate by density the jars
- [00:04:29.177]were left to settle and seperate for 24 hours
- [00:04:32.667]the top layer was pipetted
- [00:04:34.397]and then filtered
- [00:04:35.657]When the filters are analyzed
- [00:04:37.619]the parameters recorded included
- [00:04:39.379]the total microplastic count
- [00:04:40.869]morphology and size
- [00:04:43.189]Samples are primarily analyzed under
- [00:04:44.989]UV light as it causes the polymer
- [00:04:46.969]particles to give off a blue color
- [00:04:49.113]as you can see in this photo
- [00:04:53.439]These are 3 of the 4 major morphologies
- [00:04:55.349]we are looking for
- [00:04:56.709]The other includes microbeads
- [00:05:05.560]These two bar graphs show the microplastic
- [00:05:07.454]concentration for liquid
- [00:05:09.412]on the top of the collection tank
- [00:05:11.745]and mixed or the bottom
- [00:05:14.777]Blue denoted an experimental plot
- [00:05:16.985]which is a plot that is applied with biosolids
- [00:05:19.775]And the gray denotes the control
- [00:05:21.933]As you can see the microplastic
- [00:05:23.623]concentrations vary anywhere from
- [00:05:25.223]20 to 160 microplastics per liter
- [00:05:29.134]At every sampling date for both types
- [00:05:31.284]of samples
- [00:05:32.083]the plots with applied biosolids
- [00:05:34.288]always had a higher microplastic concentration
- [00:05:37.876]Additionally, average concentration of
- [00:05:40.136]microplastics in the mixed samples
- [00:05:42.463]is often higher than the liquid samples
- [00:05:44.691]Showing that these microplastics
- [00:05:46.328]are more likely to settle into sediments
- [00:05:48.501]once the runoff velocity slows down
- [00:05:50.754]Also, due to this finding
- [00:05:52.160]this year we only be taking mixed samples
- [00:05:56.645]As you can see from the pie charts
- [00:05:58.193]morphology was fairly uniform
- [00:06:00.286]Showing that the shape of microplastics
- [00:06:02.426]primarily found in the agricultural environment
- [00:06:04.936]are either fibers or fragments
- [00:06:07.511]Of these fibers approximately
- [00:06:09.271]83% were shorter than 2 millimeters
- [00:06:11.626]And this shows a tendency for smaller
- [00:06:13.526]microplastics to be transported
- [00:06:15.835]This makes sense as they are smaller
- [00:06:17.638]and it takes less energy to transport them
- [00:06:19.648]away from their source area
- [00:06:21.918]Shown in the red and blue pie chart here
- [00:06:24.174]is a contribution of microplastics from biosolids
- [00:06:27.811]this is considered to be the difference
- [00:06:29.320]between the number of microplastics
- [00:06:30.767]in the experimental and control plots
- [00:06:34.531]By comparing this number
- [00:06:35.589]to the total microplastics in biosolids
- [00:06:38.858]We can look at the fate of microplastics
- [00:06:41.898]from biosolids which is shown in the pie chart
- [00:06:45.918]The red section denotes the percentage
- [00:06:48.888]of microplastics that were transferred
- [00:06:50.981]from biosolids into runoff
- [00:06:53.172]and this is approximately 17%
- [00:06:56.351]The rest denoted in blue represents
- [00:06:58.311]the percent of microplastics
- [00:07:00.004]that stayed in the biosolids
- [00:07:04.403]In conclusion
- [00:07:05.453]in the agricultural environment
- [00:07:07.063]biosolids do show to produce increased
- [00:07:09.679]levels of microplastics in runoff
- [00:07:12.653]Further the microplastics transported
- [00:07:15.306]are primarily smaller
- [00:07:16.606]fragment and fiber morphologies
- [00:07:18.826]that then settle with sediments
- [00:07:20.486]once runoff velocity decreases
- [00:07:23.402]In response to last year's results
- [00:07:24.962]we plan to further study
- [00:07:26.407]the background levels of microplastics
- [00:07:29.734]in controls
- [00:07:31.443]This year we have made a few changes
- [00:07:34.285]As I mentioned above
- [00:07:35.495]samples taken are going to be
- [00:07:37.305]all mixed samples
- [00:07:38.790]Also we added 2 more plots
- [00:07:40.610]where manure is the fertilizer for those two
- [00:07:45.705]Also this year our plots had crops in them
- [00:07:48.282]this may contribute differently to our samples
- [00:07:51.640]Because of this
- [00:07:52.580]we will be taking a stem from the milo
- [00:07:54.540]plants that reside there to see if any
- [00:07:56.700]microplastics have stuck to the outside
- [00:07:59.731]of them
- [00:08:00.860]I also want to mention that
- [00:08:02.005]support for this work
- [00:08:02.919]in part
- [00:08:03.359]was provided by the College of Engineering's
- [00:08:05.659]Dean's Office
- [00:08:06.859]and Engineering Graduate Programs
- [00:08:08.299]at the University of Nebraska Lincoln
- [00:08:10.379]through the Summer Nebraska Engineering
- [00:08:11.669]Research Program
- [00:08:14.564]Thank you!
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/13855?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Fate and Occurrence of Microplastics in Agricultural Runoff" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments