Talking Out of School: Academic Freedom and Extramural Speech
College of Arts and Sciences
Author
04/01/2019
Added
128
Plays
Description
The lecture “Talking Out of School: Academic Freedom and Extramural Speech” by Michael Bérubé, Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Literature at Penn State. March 29, 2019. Union auditorium.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:04.360]Welcome.
- [00:00:05.899]I am thrilled to have you all here.
- [00:00:08.560]And on behalf of the College of Arts and Sciences,
- [00:00:11.700]we are so pleased that you could join us this afternoon
- [00:00:14.950]to hear, what I am sure is going to be,
- [00:00:18.290]an enlightening and informative talk
- [00:00:20.690]on the topic of academic freedom and extramural speech.
- [00:00:24.730]It is obviously a hot topic on campuses
- [00:00:27.920]around the whole United States,
- [00:00:29.840]and we're just thrilled today to have our guest speaker.
- [00:00:33.640]I am Interim Dean Elizabeth Theiss-Morse,
- [00:00:37.737]and I picked the lucky straw
- [00:00:41.100]to be able to introduce our speaker for today.
- [00:00:44.380]Dr. Michael (laughing).
- [00:00:46.820]I was just talking to him about it...
- [00:00:48.867]Michael is fine.
- [00:00:49.700]No, no, no. (audience laughing)
- [00:00:51.680]Michael Berube is the Edwin Erle Sparks
- [00:00:56.060]Professor of Literature,
- [00:00:57.750]and Chair of the University Faculty Senate
- [00:01:00.140]at Pennsylvania State University.
- [00:01:03.993]He is an accomplished scholar and public intellectual.
- [00:01:06.698]He is the author of 10 books.
- [00:01:08.560]10 books, that's a lot of books to write.
- [00:01:10.590]He's the author of 10 books,
- [00:01:12.340]including such works as,
- [00:01:15.080]Life as We Know it: A Father, a Family,
- [00:01:17.850]and an Exceptional Child,
- [00:01:20.120]The Humanities, Higher Education,
- [00:01:22.320]and Academic Freedom: Three Necessary Arguments,
- [00:01:25.230]co-authored with Jennifer Ruth,
- [00:01:27.560]The Left at War,
- [00:01:29.550]and What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?
- [00:01:32.370]Classroom Politics and Bias in Higher Education.
- [00:01:37.590]He has written for Harper's Magazine,
- [00:01:40.040]the New Yorker, the Nation, and the New York Times,
- [00:01:43.230]and he has been a contributor
- [00:01:45.460]to the Chronicle of Higher Education.
- [00:01:48.187]In his spare time (chuckling),
- [00:01:50.590]however much there is after all of that,
- [00:01:53.220]in his spare time he is also a very active person
- [00:01:59.860]in terms of service to higher education
- [00:02:03.360]and service to his profession.
- [00:02:05.430]He has been on such things
- [00:02:08.040]as the American Association of University Professor's
- [00:02:12.050]Committee A, on academic freedom and tenure.
- [00:02:15.460]He has been on the International Advisory Board
- [00:02:18.480]of the Consortium of Humanity Centers and Institutes,
- [00:02:22.050]and he has been the President
- [00:02:23.820]of the Modern Language Association.
- [00:02:26.070]All of these are very, very highly renowned positions.
- [00:02:30.550]So please help me welcome Dr. Berube to the stage.
- [00:02:35.413](Elizabeth applauding) (audience applauding)
- [00:02:41.728]Thank you so much.
- [00:02:42.561]Thanks Beth.
- [00:02:43.394]And thank you to, really, all of you,
- [00:02:45.950]for coming out on a really crappy day.
- [00:02:49.090]Especially to the students.
- [00:02:50.510]I'm seeing a good number of students here,
- [00:02:52.590]which is great.
- [00:02:53.423]A lot of my lectures these days are to faculty,
- [00:02:56.350]to my colleagues.
- [00:02:57.650]And since these issues clearly also affect students,
- [00:03:01.060]I'm really gratified that you took the time.
- [00:03:03.970]Especially, honestly, on a really rainy, nasty, cold Friday,
- [00:03:07.890]I would go see the movie Us,
- [00:03:09.670]and I'm glad you came here instead.
- [00:03:12.880]But you can still see it,
- [00:03:13.870]I'm sure it's showing tonight.
- [00:03:16.010]So, two words of introduction (clearing throat).
- [00:03:19.450]One, is that I've put up
- [00:03:21.810]the American Association of University Professors
- [00:03:25.310]1940 statement on academic freedom and tenure.
- [00:03:28.060]And I will have occasion to refer to it.
- [00:03:33.647]It would help if I turned on a mic.
- [00:03:36.530]I was a drummer.
- [00:03:38.191]I do know how to do a sound check.
- [00:03:41.420]So, is that better?
- [00:03:42.649]Yeah.
- [00:03:43.820]Thanks.
- [00:03:45.825]I'll have occasion to refer to this throughout the talk.
- [00:03:49.530]Mainly I'm focusing on thing three,
- [00:03:52.080]speech as citizens.
- [00:03:53.990]But I noticed,
- [00:03:54.980]and I was telling people I should have done this weeks ago,
- [00:03:57.640]and I'm doing it just now,
- [00:03:59.210]I want to check your own bylaws, your own faculty handbook,
- [00:04:04.580]and we'll get to this, I hope, in the Q&A,
- [00:04:06.380]but you all gotta fix this.
- [00:04:08.099]This is leaving some holes open
- [00:04:09.900]that I think some day,
- [00:04:11.870]somebody's gonna drive a truck through.
- [00:04:13.950]That's one thing.
- [00:04:15.850]So I hadn't prepared that part, this is all ad lib.
- [00:04:18.490]The other is a little announcement I have to make,
- [00:04:20.175]I think for the first time in my 30 years
- [00:04:23.060]of being a professor.
- [00:04:24.640]I don't know how many people in the room this pertains to,
- [00:04:27.190]but I know that some people here received an email
- [00:04:29.770]from a person calling him or herself Danic Carson,
- [00:04:32.830]and accusing me of pretty serious racist and sexist
- [00:04:36.170]and other bad things.
- [00:04:38.020]The good news is that these charges are not true,
- [00:04:39.990]the bad news is that someone is making them,
- [00:04:42.041]and I do, in fact,
- [00:04:44.303]I have known about this cyber stalker for about five years;
- [00:04:47.550]this is the first time they have tried anything like this.
- [00:04:50.840]Actually, looking up people at Nebraska,
- [00:04:53.200]and targeting them with this email.
- [00:04:55.060]Again, I don't know how widespread it was,
- [00:04:56.500]or whether people forwarded it.
- [00:04:58.610]Again, if you Google the name Danic Carson,
- [00:05:00.530]you'll come up empty, it's not a name.
- [00:05:02.550]And the email itself is a dummy address,
- [00:05:05.810]so if you try to reply to it,
- [00:05:07.471]it'll go into the ether.
- [00:05:10.100]But weirdly enough,
- [00:05:10.933]this is actually kind of relevant to the talk,
- [00:05:14.300]because we are talking about extramural speech.
- [00:05:16.700]How many people are even familiar with the term?
- [00:05:20.620]Okay, not a subset of all the people in the room.
- [00:05:23.540]Basically, whoops, let me go back to the AAUP.
- [00:05:29.252]Ah!
- [00:05:33.810]Okay.
- [00:05:34.643]I'll quote this later,
- [00:05:35.770]but it's the third thing.
- [00:05:39.320]So, about the first two,
- [00:05:41.220]I'm gonna say very, very little,
- [00:05:42.480]because especially number one,
- [00:05:44.880]is not terribly controversial.
- [00:05:47.270]You very rarely find
- [00:05:48.990]abrogations of academic freedom in publishing.
- [00:05:53.340]I have an example,
- [00:05:54.820]it happened about three, four years ago,
- [00:05:57.080]where a journal,
- [00:05:58.720]it wasn't even an academic journal,
- [00:05:59.930]it was a quasi-academic journal,
- [00:06:01.480]it was kind of a popular journal,
- [00:06:02.590]it was more like a magazine,
- [00:06:04.010]published by Northwestern University,
- [00:06:09.759]it was a special issued called Bad Girls,
- [00:06:10.940]and in it, a man who has since become paraplegic
- [00:06:14.580]narrated the story of when he became ill,
- [00:06:18.070]and became paraplegic.
- [00:06:20.594]And in the course of this,
- [00:06:21.970]a nurse performed oral sex to remind him
- [00:06:26.500]that his sex life was not over.
- [00:06:29.020]Northwestern insisted they pull the essay,
- [00:06:32.340]because it was not consistent with the brand
- [00:06:35.150]of Northwestern University's College of Medicine;
- [00:06:38.720]unclear on the concept.
- [00:06:40.120]Again, dicey subject, you know,
- [00:06:42.140]you don't just throw that out in casual conversation,
- [00:06:45.780]or in mixed company,
- [00:06:46.840]but the idea that you could publish it in a magazine,
- [00:06:49.650]and in fact, the person publishing it
- [00:06:50.830]was the person to whom this happened.
- [00:06:55.120]So the editor, Alice Dreger, resigned;
- [00:06:57.830]good for her.
- [00:06:58.870]You can Google her,
- [00:07:01.419]she's whip-smart and a very, very interesting person.
- [00:07:02.980]That's the only example I can think of,
- [00:07:04.900]in an academic freedom issue
- [00:07:08.530]involving research and publication.
- [00:07:11.300]More difficult are the cases where, let's say,
- [00:07:15.880]you get a grant from Monsanto to do a study,
- [00:07:19.630]and the study you come up with
- [00:07:22.490]does not please Monsanto in the least,
- [00:07:24.730]and they want you not to publish it.
- [00:07:26.280]That happens.
- [00:07:28.740]And that's, the AAUP has a 300 page book
- [00:07:33.040]on academic industry partnerships
- [00:07:34.680]that covers this sort of thing.
- [00:07:36.410]But it almost never happens in the humanities.
- [00:07:38.560]Most of the cases, including your own here from last year,
- [00:07:41.050]from Courtney Lawton,
- [00:07:42.220]most of them tend to involve the humanities,
- [00:07:45.580]sometimes my own home discipline, English,
- [00:07:47.630]we lead with the chin.
- [00:07:50.190]But also, think of the fields in Women's Studies,
- [00:07:53.010]or Gender and Sexuality Studies, African-American Studies,
- [00:07:55.680]Ethnic Studies, Middle Eastern Studies,
- [00:07:57.590]these are flash points (fingers snapping)
- [00:07:58.910]these days,
- [00:08:00.475]and have been for quite some time.
- [00:08:01.690]So I like to say, like I say,
- [00:08:03.710]one is not terribly controversial.
- [00:08:06.230]Now, not everybody believes in academic freedom,
- [00:08:08.410]and not everyone, like in every State legislature,
- [00:08:11.230]believes in it.
- [00:08:12.520]I like to say that if you understand
- [00:08:14.270]why academic freedom is important for things one and two,
- [00:08:17.220]you probably own more than one NPR tote bag.
- [00:08:20.483](audience laughing)
- [00:08:21.484]Right?
- [00:08:22.483]It's that constituency.
- [00:08:23.316]It's like the ACLU folks, yeah.
- [00:08:24.727]And I am actually a card-carrying member of the ACLU.
- [00:08:28.710]Two is a little more tricky
- [00:08:30.570]because you get into the situation
- [00:08:32.850]where a professor might be so opinionated
- [00:08:35.650]and so passionate about a thing
- [00:08:37.320]that they seem like they brook no disagreement about,
- [00:08:40.870]say, gay marriage, or about immigration,
- [00:08:43.920]or about head scarves, whatever, right?
- [00:08:47.840]And so, that's the principle of the AAUP,
- [00:08:55.163]you have freedom in class from discussing your subject,
- [00:08:58.021]but don't introduce controversial matter
- [00:08:59.685]which has no relation to their subject.
- [00:09:00.560]Then there's this other clause
- [00:09:02.651]which is not relevant to Nebraska or to Penn State,
- [00:09:04.020]or any secular institution,
- [00:09:06.450]limits of academic freedom because of religious
- [00:09:07.950]or other aims of the institution
- [00:09:09.838]should be clearly stated in writing
- [00:09:10.671]at the time of the appointment,
- [00:09:11.580]which basically is our way of saying,
- [00:09:13.407]"Yeah, Brigham Young gets to impose
- [00:09:15.107]"whatever the Mormons want to impose on you."
- [00:09:17.970]And this is a really tricky problem
- [00:09:19.810]for any of you who might be pluralists.
- [00:09:22.350]I hope there are some pluralists in the room.
- [00:09:24.200]Because the pluralists always have to deal with,
- [00:09:25.710]what do we do with the people who aren't pluralists,
- [00:09:27.220]and kind of hate pluralists.
- [00:09:29.560]They get a seat too.
- [00:09:30.700]They get the anti-pluralist seat
- [00:09:32.330]at the pluralist table,
- [00:09:34.160]and that's the way the AAUP accommodates them.
- [00:09:35.370]If you're a religious institution
- [00:09:37.100]for whom obedience to either a sacred text
- [00:09:41.300]or a sacred body of elders supersedes academic freedom,
- [00:09:46.350]you get to do that.
- [00:09:47.637]And one last thing about thing two,
- [00:09:51.150]if I get this mouse to work,
- [00:09:52.160]I'm gonna click on the footnote.
- [00:09:55.290]Okay.
- [00:09:57.120]I have been trying to get this
- [00:09:58.930]into our own statement at Penn State,
- [00:10:00.540]I'll show you what we have at Penn State,
- [00:10:02.640]it's very, very, very good.
- [00:10:04.660]I'm gonna suggest you just copy and paste it
- [00:10:07.054]into your policies.
- [00:10:09.550]Seriously, and I'll get to what the holes,
- [00:10:11.594]and the truck you can drive through the holes through,
- [00:10:14.070]I'll get to that too.
- [00:10:16.037]But (sharply exhaling),
- [00:10:19.560]up top.
- [00:10:20.773]And look at these dates, 1970.
- [00:10:23.430]What had just been going on?
- [00:10:25.424]A nation actually, probably even more at war with itself
- [00:10:28.810]than it is now, right?
- [00:10:30.740]Campus riots everywhere.
- [00:10:32.870]And so they went back,
- [00:10:34.190]and revisited this and said,
- [00:10:35.247]"Look, the intent of the statement
- [00:10:36.457]"is not to discourage what is controversial."
- [00:10:38.970]All right, introducing controversial material
- [00:10:40.380]that has no relation to the classroom.
- [00:10:42.440]Controversy is at the heart of the free academic inquiry,
- [00:10:44.420]which the entire statement is designed to foster.
- [00:10:46.370]The passage serves to underscore the need for teachers
- [00:10:48.480]to avoid persistently intruding material
- [00:10:52.720]which has no relation to their subject.
- [00:10:55.456]We don't have the word persistently in ours.
- [00:10:58.520]And that means,
- [00:11:00.060]that let's say on November 10, 2016
- [00:11:04.000]I come into class and I just go WTF.
- [00:11:07.430]As some people did, and students did to.
- [00:11:09.580]Or, they were like, some students were like,
- [00:11:11.580]yeah, MAGA.
- [00:11:14.170]But it was actually an event.
- [00:11:15.480]Or let's say you come into school after an earthquake,
- [00:11:18.680]a tsunami, massive flooding throughout your State,
- [00:11:21.220]and you're just like,
- [00:11:22.437]"I'm gonna suspend things for a while,
- [00:11:23.537]"we just gotta talk about climate change,"
- [00:11:24.970]or whatever, right?
- [00:11:27.520]This edit says, basically, you're allowed a one-off.
- [00:11:30.630]You know, if there's a cataclysm of some kind.
- [00:11:33.450]Especially, now, if you students are in bits,
- [00:11:36.830]as the Irish say, and they want to talk about stuff,
- [00:11:39.190]they can bring it up;
- [00:11:40.630]they can bring up anything they want in a classroom.
- [00:11:43.210]But this is the question of the professor intruding it.
- [00:11:46.341]So we have, in our clause,
- [00:11:48.710]that you can't introduce irrelevant material.
- [00:11:51.750]And a lot of people had this question after the election.
- [00:11:54.640]Was it okay for me to stop and do a class,
- [00:11:57.440]or just a section, on whatever,
- [00:11:59.973]any aspect of the election?
- [00:12:02.430]And my answer is, yeah, it is.
- [00:12:04.386]Don't keep doing it,
- [00:12:06.200]unless your class is somehow related to the subject matter.
- [00:12:09.570]So, you have to get back to calculus pretty quickly.
- [00:12:13.530]But what does persistent mean?
- [00:12:14.880]So when I brought this up to my own Provost,
- [00:12:16.480]my own Chief Academic Officer,
- [00:12:18.310]he was like, "Okay, define persistently."
- [00:12:21.660]I said, "Sure, I'll take a stab.
- [00:12:23.977]"Let's use the rule of Freud in folk tales.
- [00:12:26.517]"Three is a pattern, all right?"
- [00:12:30.180]He says, "Well why don't you write that in?"
- [00:12:31.380]I said, "I'm not gonna write in 'three.'"
- [00:12:33.460](audience chuckling)
- [00:12:34.840]He was kind of goading me.
- [00:12:36.620]But, I mean, it raises the question, right?
- [00:12:38.050]What constitutes a persistent intrusion
- [00:12:39.860]that really does derail the class altogether?
- [00:12:42.140]So that's the one part of the second principle
- [00:12:45.170]that is potentially problematic.
- [00:12:52.553]I just can't.
- [00:12:53.573]Let's see, I think we go back.
- [00:12:55.710]And then we'll get to thing three,
- [00:12:58.630]which is the subject of the talk.
- [00:13:01.256](papers hitting table)
- [00:13:02.260]Most of these things,
- [00:13:04.159]if you've been to them before,
- [00:13:05.695]usually run close to an hour.
- [00:13:06.847]I know we have 'til 3:30.
- [00:13:07.871]I deliberately kept this short,
- [00:13:08.704]because I assumed there were going to be questions.
- [00:13:11.071]So please think of them,
- [00:13:13.500]or bring them already pre-formed,
- [00:13:15.820]and I'll do my best to answer everything.
- [00:13:18.130]So this is the written part.
- [00:13:20.910]It will have escaped no one's notice
- [00:13:23.170]that the vast majority of controversies
- [00:13:24.930]over academic freedom and professorial speech
- [00:13:27.700]over the past decade have involved extramural speech,
- [00:13:30.640]rather than research or teaching.
- [00:13:32.740]Doubtless this is because social media,
- [00:13:35.060]now purveyed practically every aspect of human interaction,
- [00:13:38.330]such that we are only belatedly beginning to realize
- [00:13:40.540]that Facebook and Twitter are exceptionally useful devices
- [00:13:43.340]for stirring up primal antagonisms
- [00:13:45.030]and generating instantaneous mass festivals of outrage.
- [00:13:48.770]And again, I wrote this
- [00:13:49.603]before I knew of cyber stalker writing to Nebraska,
- [00:13:53.780]but that's the way this happened;
- [00:13:55.844]that's how five years ago
- [00:13:57.172]people attacked my Wikipedia page,
- [00:13:58.324]which I thought was the weirdest thing
- [00:13:59.838]I'd ever seen (coughing).
- [00:14:01.140]I can't even go into the mindset
- [00:14:03.640]of people who want to deface a Wikipedia page,
- [00:14:06.920]but it taught me a lot about Wikipedia.
- [00:14:09.750]Moreover, recent years have seen
- [00:14:12.220]renewed right-wing initiatives to harass and intimidate
- [00:14:14.890]controversial left-leaning faculty members,
- [00:14:17.110]usually with the object
- [00:14:18.050]of pressuring university administrators to fire them.
- [00:14:20.425]It is therefore urgently necessary
- [00:14:22.910]to understand how the principles of academic freedom
- [00:14:25.350]apply to extramural expression,
- [00:14:27.600]not least to disentangle academic freedom
- [00:14:30.610]from first amendment rights to freedom of expression
- [00:14:32.760]in the United States.
- [00:14:33.750]That's one of the things I mainly came to say,
- [00:14:37.300]that I think a lot of the controversy
- [00:14:39.810]about Courtney Lawton and all these similar cases
- [00:14:43.100]tend to speak generally about freedom of speech.
- [00:14:46.200]And I'm sure you must have had some forums
- [00:14:47.870]and whatever debates about free speech;
- [00:14:50.600]academic freedom's not the same thing.
- [00:14:52.670]I'll get into that now.
- [00:14:54.810]Because the relation between academic freedom
- [00:14:56.950]and extramural speech is really not well understood,
- [00:15:00.080]I'll start by trying to clear up some possible confusion.
- [00:15:03.510]Last year in May 2018,
- [00:15:05.360]the Chronicle of Higher Education
- [00:15:06.660]published an essay by Judith Butler.
- [00:15:09.280]Renowned scholar it the humanities,
- [00:15:10.950]the author of Gender Trouble,
- [00:15:12.070]really one of the most important intellectuals
- [00:15:13.790]in the English speaking world,
- [00:15:15.100]and her talk was called The Criminalization of Knowledge:
- [00:15:17.750]Why the Struggle for Academic Freedom
- [00:15:20.201]is the Struggle for Democracy.
- [00:15:22.050]It is an eloquent essay,
- [00:15:23.450]the original context,
- [00:15:24.360]it was excepted from her keynote address
- [00:15:25.920]at the 2018 Scholars at Risk Global Congress in Berlin,
- [00:15:29.910]which was the ideal occasion for her argument.
- [00:15:32.600]And its subtitle is exactly right,
- [00:15:34.030]but it's also a very curious essay,
- [00:15:36.880]because its passionate defense of academic freedom,
- [00:15:39.380]and freedom of expression,
- [00:15:41.050]runs directly counter to American traditions
- [00:15:44.580]of academic freedom,
- [00:15:45.810]as enunciated and elaborated by the AAUP.
- [00:15:49.407]Now, Butler was not purporting to speak
- [00:15:51.760]on behalf of the AAUP,
- [00:15:53.120]so it's not like the misstated anything,
- [00:15:54.930]and, in fact, that essay got published
- [00:15:57.780]just as I was at my last meeting of Committee A
- [00:16:01.080]on Academic Freedom and Tenure with the AAUP.
- [00:16:03.250]I served on that body for nine years,
- [00:16:05.090]and in fact, this talk is just saturated
- [00:16:07.400]with my service on that committee.
- [00:16:09.731]Not only that debate last June,
- [00:16:13.060]but in the meeting before that,
- [00:16:14.880]the previous November 2017,
- [00:16:16.720]we just had a free-for-all for two hours
- [00:16:18.390]about extramural speech,
- [00:16:19.420]and you'll see why,
- [00:16:20.460]the contours of it are, I hope, pretty interesting.
- [00:16:24.960]And, in fact, one of the people around the table,
- [00:16:28.142]I'm about to mention her, Joan Scott,
- [00:16:31.810]said that I shouldn't reply to Butler's argument
- [00:16:34.830]in the Chronicle of Higher Ed,
- [00:16:36.110]because she wasn't speaking for the AAUP,
- [00:16:37.730]she was just forwarding her own opinion of academic freedom.
- [00:16:40.540]So I said, "Okay,"
- [00:16:41.470]so I wrote this instead.
- [00:16:44.610]Again, she wasn't misstating anything,
- [00:16:46.190]she was offering her own interpretation
- [00:16:48.140]of the relation between academic freedom
- [00:16:50.244]and extramural professorial speech.
- [00:16:51.950]Spoiler alert!
- [00:16:52.783]Short version, there is no relation for Butler;
- [00:16:55.740]two things are completely separate.
- [00:16:57.560]Her defenses of both are robust and necessary,
- [00:17:00.050]but her absolute distinction between the two is problematic,
- [00:17:02.450]and I'm gonna try to show you.
- [00:17:04.320]So she was drawing on the work of Joan Wallach Scott,
- [00:17:07.170]who's book on this just came out, like, two months ago,
- [00:17:10.350]and I'm the lead blurb on it,
- [00:17:12.440]so I'm kind of implicated here,
- [00:17:15.360]because I love Joan Scott's argument.
- [00:17:18.030]So she's drawing on Scott's work,
- [00:17:19.808]and Butler distinguishes academic freedom
- [00:17:21.750]from freedom of expression,
- [00:17:24.014]which is an entirely necessary move,
- [00:17:25.200]made more urgent by recent debates over free speech.
- [00:17:28.942]And by the reemergence of the white nationalist right,
- [00:17:31.480]and it's campus acolytes.
- [00:17:33.557]"Academic freedom," writes Butler,
- [00:17:35.172]"belongs to faculty members within universities
- [00:17:37.817]"who have been appointed for the purpose
- [00:17:40.036]"of teaching and pursuing knowledge.
- [00:17:41.157]"Political expression is the right of citizens
- [00:17:43.027]"to expound on political viewpoints as they please."
- [00:17:45.630]That's the distinction she's drawing.
- [00:17:47.407]"They converge when academics who speak extramurally
- [00:17:49.828]"suffer retaliation or punishment within the university,
- [00:17:52.987]"or are threatened with the loss of their positions.
- [00:17:55.487]"Thus, the rights of academic freedom
- [00:17:57.107]"and extramural political expression
- [00:17:59.397]"require institutional structures and support
- [00:18:01.427]"within the university,
- [00:18:02.817]"and they require an explicit and enduring commitment
- [00:18:04.897]"from universities.
- [00:18:06.187]"Indeed, the task of the university is undermined
- [00:18:08.207]"when either of those freedoms is in peril."
- [00:18:10.530]Okay, I have nothing to quibble with there.
- [00:18:12.430]Like, every single letter is right.
- [00:18:15.000]But later in the essay,
- [00:18:15.910]the rigidity of this distinction becomes more troublesome,
- [00:18:19.353]as Butler takes Scott's distinction and runs with it.
- [00:18:22.787]"Academic freedom and freedom of expression
- [00:18:24.237]"are not the same."
- [00:18:25.623]Again, true.
- [00:18:27.457]"The professional activities
- [00:18:28.697]"pertaining to one's academic position
- [00:18:30.468]"should be protected by academic freedom.
- [00:18:33.017]"The extramural utterances any of us make
- [00:18:35.127]"about the world we inhabit,
- [00:18:36.827]"the institutions in which we work,
- [00:18:38.537]"or any matter of public concern,
- [00:18:40.157]"should be protected by rights of free expression."
- [00:18:42.732]Okay, two different things, all right?
- [00:18:46.360]So Butler derives from Scott's distinction
- [00:18:48.610]between academic freedom and freedom of expression
- [00:18:50.734]the conclusion that the former, academic freedom,
- [00:18:53.670]pertains only to activities
- [00:18:55.030]within the scope of one's academic position,
- [00:18:57.580]and, presumably, to one's academic expertise.
- [00:18:59.972]And that is a really thorny question that I'll return to,
- [00:19:03.340]it's gonna be like the bulk of the talk.
- [00:19:05.270]Whereas the latter, freedom of expression,
- [00:19:07.410]should be protected by the State,
- [00:19:09.480]by which I mean the government,
- [00:19:10.740]as it is the US by the first amendment.
- [00:19:13.160]Okay, now,
- [00:19:15.000]this is a reasonable account of academic freedom,
- [00:19:16.750]and it's one that would be recognizable in many countries,
- [00:19:19.172]including, notably, the countries to which Butler
- [00:19:21.560]is implicitly, and sometimes explicitly talking,
- [00:19:23.840]as when she names in her talk, Turkey, Brazil, and Iran.
- [00:19:28.448]Where, basically, both academic freedom
- [00:19:31.440]and freedom of expression are deeply imperiled,
- [00:19:34.790]countries that do not have form,
- [00:19:36.540]strong protections, for freedom of expression.
- [00:19:39.360]But her account is at odds with the American elaboration
- [00:19:41.670]of academic freedom,
- [00:19:42.980]which, since 1940, has included extramural speech,
- [00:19:46.390]as an aspect of academic freedom specifically,
- [00:19:49.300]quite apart from any first amendment considerations, right?
- [00:19:52.950]So (clearing throat) it's,
- [00:19:54.650]and so in some cases you would think,
- [00:19:56.340]well what does it matter.
- [00:19:57.610]In a case like Courtney Lawton's,
- [00:19:59.070]does it matter whether she's protected by academic freedom,
- [00:20:01.030]or by the first amendment,
- [00:20:02.770]as long as any umbrella will do, right,
- [00:20:06.710]is a thing for today.
- [00:20:09.500]Well, it does actually matter.
- [00:20:11.360]Stay with me on that.
- [00:20:13.120]So here's the actual clause,
- [00:20:15.450]now I get to number three. (hands clapping together)
- [00:20:16.970]College and university teachers are citizens,
- [00:20:18.840]members of a learned profession,
- [00:20:20.530]and officers of a educational institution.
- [00:20:22.840]When they speak or write as citizens,
- [00:20:24.160]they should be free
- [00:20:25.938]from institutional censorship or discipline,
- [00:20:26.771]but their special position in the community
- [00:20:28.660]imposes special obligations;
- [00:20:30.010]hold onto that.
- [00:20:31.350]As scholars and educational officers,
- [00:20:32.890]they should remember
- [00:20:34.407]that the public may judge their profession
- [00:20:35.240]and their institution by their utterances.
- [00:20:36.980]Hence, they should at all times be accurate,
- [00:20:38.940]should exercise appropriate restraint,
- [00:20:40.573]should show respect for the opinions of others,
- [00:20:42.920]and should make every effort to indicate
- [00:20:44.830]that they're not speaking for the institution.
- [00:20:46.870]Okay.
- [00:20:48.000]There's some problematic language in there,
- [00:20:49.490]I'll return to it.
- [00:20:50.830]But the general point is clear.
- [00:20:52.190]Extramural speech is one of three aspects
- [00:20:54.620]of academic freedom.
- [00:20:56.270]The other two pertain to research and teaching,
- [00:20:57.790]and I like to say,
- [00:20:58.860]it's like the holy spirit in the Christian trinity,
- [00:21:00.830]extramural speech is the most mysterious
- [00:21:02.650]and the most illusive of the three.
- [00:21:04.658]Now, one reason it is worth trying to clear up
- [00:21:09.050]this potential confusion about extramural speech,
- [00:21:11.830]is that the AAUP did and does lay claim to academic freedom
- [00:21:16.250]for utterances that Butler would leave
- [00:21:18.200]to protection from the State.
- [00:21:20.220]Another reason is that the AAUP definition
- [00:21:22.290]of academic freedom
- [00:21:23.470]has profound implications for what it means
- [00:21:26.730]when someone is or isn't speaking from a position
- [00:21:29.710]of credentialed, intellectual expertise.
- [00:21:33.040]And that's Scott's distinction, Joan Scott,
- [00:21:35.940]between academic freedom and freedom of expression.
- [00:21:37.700]It rests on the claim that the former,
- [00:21:39.950]academic freedom, is tied to some form
- [00:21:42.540]of credentialed, scholarly expertise.
- [00:21:47.110]A PhD in something.
- [00:21:49.800]A degree in something.
- [00:21:51.250]Not just staying at Holiday Inn Express last night.
- [00:21:54.250]In this, she is aligned with theorists such as Robert Post,
- [00:21:57.020]who argues that academic freedom and tenure
- [00:21:58.690]are based on a social contract,
- [00:22:00.600]whereby the legitimation of free scholarly inquiry
- [00:22:03.090]by specialists in a discipline
- [00:22:04.670]ultimately serves the common good in an open society.
- [00:22:08.426]And some of you might say,
- [00:22:09.640]okay, well, sure,
- [00:22:11.060]you want the researcher who's doing a thing on Monsanto
- [00:22:14.050]to be able to speak freely about agribusiness, right?
- [00:22:17.560]That's ultimately good in an open society.
- [00:22:20.560]Why does it matter that the French medievalist
- [00:22:22.780]have academic freedom and tenure?
- [00:22:24.190]And the answer to it is, we don't know.
- [00:22:26.050]We'll work it out.
- [00:22:27.070]Eventually where knowledge goes,
- [00:22:29.330]and how it goes,
- [00:22:30.210]whether it's a person playing the trumpet,
- [00:22:31.830]or a person studying Yvain, which is French medieval text,
- [00:22:35.450]we just leave that to itself,
- [00:22:37.160]and we hope and expect that the accumulation of knowledge,
- [00:22:41.150]and the exchange of knowledge,
- [00:22:42.890]will not only be good in itself,
- [00:22:44.570]it will be part of a hallmark of civilization
- [00:22:46.590]in the open society,
- [00:22:47.630]but it actually will, ultimately,
- [00:22:49.850]benefit society as a whole.
- [00:22:52.906]Okay (coughing).
- [00:22:54.700]Excuse me.
- [00:22:55.533]Scott's reliance on the idea
- [00:22:57.150]of interdisciplinary specialty and expertise
- [00:22:59.390]is complex.
- [00:23:01.000]Again, I hope some of you are already thinking,
- [00:23:03.100]does this mean that Berube
- [00:23:04.080]only gets to talk about literature?
- [00:23:05.950]That's what my expertise is in, right?
- [00:23:10.100]I got news for you,
- [00:23:10.940]literature is also about a lot of other things.
- [00:23:13.500]So if it were just about literature, yeah,
- [00:23:16.000]but also in the course of learning about literature,
- [00:23:18.420]I also had to learn a great deal about history,
- [00:23:20.920]psychology, sociology, et cetera,
- [00:23:23.065]wherever this literature leads me.
- [00:23:26.480]But then also, well,
- [00:23:28.510]I'll get to it in a moment.
- [00:23:30.260]Scott takes a very generous approach
- [00:23:32.090]to scholars who challenge disciplinary norms,
- [00:23:34.740]and that's really key.
- [00:23:36.120]So in this book she just published,
- [00:23:37.730]she cites a 1986 Committee A statement,
- [00:23:40.450]that suggests, quote,
- [00:23:42.007]"In many instances,
- [00:23:43.317]"a show of disrespect for a discipline
- [00:23:45.637]"is at the very same time an expression of descent
- [00:23:48.607]"from the prevailing doctrines of that discipline."
- [00:23:51.770]Got me on that?
- [00:23:53.622]In other words,
- [00:23:54.855]you don't have to just follow what your discipline says.
- [00:23:57.110]If you challenge it's parameters,
- [00:23:58.934]that to might be valuable,
- [00:24:02.600]it might change the shape of the discipline.
- [00:24:04.250]And I have to say,
- [00:24:06.030]Scott quoting this is a little bit coy.
- [00:24:07.530]I think she wrote those words 30 years ago.
- [00:24:10.060]She was on Committee A then.
- [00:24:11.710]And those of you who don't know Joan Wallach Scott
- [00:24:13.700]or her career,
- [00:24:15.821]well, I'm about to allude to something.
- [00:24:19.478](coughing) (clearing throat)
- [00:24:22.410]Excuse me.
- [00:24:23.410]I'll explain in a moment.
- [00:24:25.557]"Too reverent a conception of disciplinary expertise,
- [00:24:27.957]"according to this statement,
- [00:24:29.467]"may end by barring those most likely
- [00:24:31.887]"to have remade their field."
- [00:24:33.620]Close quote.
- [00:24:35.370]So the immediate context for this statement
- [00:24:37.020]had to do with critical legal studies,
- [00:24:38.840]which got a lot of shit at the time,
- [00:24:40.170]I know that's a technical term.
- [00:24:42.090]But it was a branch of legal studies that said,
- [00:24:44.620]actually, law favors the powerful,
- [00:24:46.360]it is inevitably tied to notions of white supremacy
- [00:24:51.510]and racial and gender hierarchies,
- [00:24:53.780]and a lot of legal scholars said this is nonsense,
- [00:24:56.870]this is politics.
- [00:24:59.410]30 years later,
- [00:25:00.438]it's looking pretty good, actually.
- [00:25:02.630]Those arguments are holding up pretty well.
- [00:25:04.760]And, in fact, one of those arguments
- [00:25:06.320]was articulated by a woman named Kimberle Crenshaw,
- [00:25:08.590]who coined the term intersectionality,
- [00:25:10.657]which now, basically, defines the world we live in.
- [00:25:15.630]So, like I said, there's a lot to like about this statement.
- [00:25:19.979](clearing throat)
- [00:25:21.620]So it was about critical legal studies,
- [00:25:23.734]but anyone familiar with Scott's career
- [00:25:26.260]knows such a principle would resonate for someone
- [00:25:28.470]who had to argue forcefully for many years
- [00:25:31.200]against disciplinary norms in history,
- [00:25:33.163]in which gender was not generally regarded
- [00:25:35.740]as a useful category of historical analysis.
- [00:25:40.040]Here's what I'm alluding to. (clearing throat)
- [00:25:43.080]About 30 or so years ago,
- [00:25:45.160]Joan Scott wrote an essay called,
- [00:25:46.920]Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.
- [00:25:49.450]And you would think, why?
- [00:25:51.770]Why is that even necessary,
- [00:25:52.900]of course gender is a part of history, right?
- [00:25:55.680]It should go without saying.
- [00:25:56.930]Well, I'm here to say I am old enough now to know,
- [00:26:00.100]and to remember,
- [00:26:01.280]a case at the University of Illinois,
- [00:26:04.150]where the history department was considering hiring a woman,
- [00:26:07.315]and some of the people in the history department
- [00:26:09.950]didn't think her work was really history.
- [00:26:12.410]Her work was on the history of abortion.
- [00:26:14.920]I am not making this up, all right?
- [00:26:18.030]And one of the people who was most skeptical of her
- [00:26:22.300]was a guy who's history was on the history of dredging.
- [00:26:25.430]Also important, especially if you're flooded.
- [00:26:27.905]Certainly important to the history of Amsterdam,
- [00:26:30.380]and to much of Europe,
- [00:26:31.840]but c'mon man!
- [00:26:33.210]Why is dredging okay history,
- [00:26:34.980]and abortion is not?
- [00:26:36.870]Now, the story ends mostly well.
- [00:26:39.400]They did hire her at Illinois.
- [00:26:41.110]You can look her up.
- [00:26:41.943]Her name is Leslie Reagan.
- [00:26:43.435]Her book was called When Abortion Was a Crime,
- [00:26:45.800]and it won two awards.
- [00:26:48.240]She barely got tenure.
- [00:26:49.410]She still had to make that fight all the way through.
- [00:26:51.960]Again, it ends well,
- [00:26:52.950]but I do remember a day when the old boys,
- [00:26:55.810]and they were old, and they were boys,
- [00:26:58.317]had that litmus test.
- [00:27:00.971]I don't know if this gender history
- [00:27:01.804]is really history, right?
- [00:27:04.390]So yeah,
- [00:27:05.473]here's someone challenging a disciplinary norm,
- [00:27:08.600]and saying, "No, the history of abortion
- [00:27:09.977]"actually is a history."
- [00:27:11.620]And if you have two narrow a conception
- [00:27:14.070]of disciplinary expertise,
- [00:27:15.280]she is not covered by academic freedom.
- [00:27:17.360]Joan Scott helped to change that.
- [00:27:19.460]So, you can see the relation between disciplinary expertise
- [00:27:22.497]and academic freedom is therefore unstable.
- [00:27:25.540]In my own life,
- [00:27:26.610]I mentioned, okay, I do literature.
- [00:27:28.796]I got my PhD in literature.
- [00:27:29.927]You know what I do now, mostly?
- [00:27:30.760]A thing called disability studies.
- [00:27:32.710]If you do take a look at one of the books outside,
- [00:27:35.900]the book Life As We Know It:
- [00:27:37.060]A Father, a Family, and an Exceptional Child,
- [00:27:38.800]that was published in 1996.
- [00:27:40.710]I didn't know I was contributing
- [00:27:41.930]to something called disability studies in the humanities,
- [00:27:43.860]'cause it didn't kind of really exist yet,
- [00:27:45.510]it was very, very new.
- [00:27:47.950]And now, you can actually minor in it in some places,
- [00:27:50.552]there are disability studies programs,
- [00:27:53.180]and more and more people are understanding
- [00:27:55.280]the history of disability, philosophy behind disability,
- [00:27:57.987]social policy and disability,
- [00:28:00.370]and this was not a field 30 years ago.
- [00:28:01.890]Now, I don't have my degree in disability studies,
- [00:28:04.130]'cause there wasn't a degree back then.
- [00:28:06.270]Nevertheless, my area of expertise changed,
- [00:28:08.390]and grew, and expanded, as I went on.
- [00:28:11.710]And that, too, should be accommodated by academic freedom.
- [00:28:15.790]In other words, if you tie it to disciplinary expertise,
- [00:28:18.460]which you should,
- [00:28:20.124]because a person is credentialed to be an expert in,
- [00:28:21.860]say, climate change,
- [00:28:23.490]and they get to speak with authority on their work.
- [00:28:28.060]But that's not the only thing, right?
- [00:28:29.850]If their work also takes them also, then,
- [00:28:32.711]into other aspects of (coughing),
- [00:28:34.950]environmental history,
- [00:28:36.610]then that, too, is covered by academic freedom,
- [00:28:39.660]and that too becomes an area of their expertise.
- [00:28:42.720]But matters are rendered still more complex
- [00:28:45.800]by the fact that the meaning of extramural speech
- [00:28:48.760]and the AAUP's understanding
- [00:28:51.350]of the relationship between extramural speech
- [00:28:53.450]and disciplinary expertise
- [00:28:55.030]has changed considerably over time.
- [00:28:57.021]I'm gonna stop here for a moment,
- [00:28:57.854]because now I got a couple balls, or chainsaws,
- [00:28:59.670]juggling in the air at one time, all right?
- [00:29:01.700]Freedom of speech is one thing,
- [00:29:02.900]academic freedom is another.
- [00:29:04.100]Academic freedom is different,
- [00:29:05.080]because it's based on scholarly expertise,
- [00:29:06.720]but as scholarly expertise can change over time as well,
- [00:29:08.810]and they all have an interesting relation
- [00:29:10.930]to extramural speech.
- [00:29:14.670]To simplify the issue somewhat,
- [00:29:15.900]over the years
- [00:29:17.544]the AAUP has tended to de-emphasize the notion
- [00:29:19.420]that a professor should exercise appropriate restraint
- [00:29:23.600]and show respect for the opinions of others
- [00:29:26.100]in his or her public remarks,
- [00:29:28.110]on the grounds that those norms come dangerously close
- [00:29:31.080]to upholding a standard of civility
- [00:29:33.550]that the AAUP otherwise rejects
- [00:29:35.500]as a precondition for academic freedom.
- [00:29:38.130]So one of the complaints about that stuff
- [00:29:39.910]is that, again, in 1940,
- [00:29:41.070]this is very gentlemanly stuff;
- [00:29:42.420]and I do mean that in the gendered sense.
- [00:29:44.190]Like, well yes, of course,
- [00:29:46.493]we should exercise appropriate restraint,
- [00:29:48.320]and show our respect for the opinions of others,
- [00:29:49.910]and some people come out and said, basically,
- [00:29:52.125]eff that, right?
- [00:29:54.450]I'm not showing respect for the opinions of racists.
- [00:29:56.940]I'm not showing respect
- [00:29:57.950]for the opinion of climate change deniers.
- [00:29:59.700]I'm not showing respect for the claims of Holocaust deniers,
- [00:30:03.610]genocide deniers;
- [00:30:04.910]they can all just go take a jump.
- [00:30:08.730]As for every effort to indicate
- [00:30:10.070]they're not speaking for the institution,
- [00:30:11.430]that too is tricky.
- [00:30:13.608]Feel free to ask me more about that,
- [00:30:15.530]but I'll leave it for now.
- [00:30:17.510]Furthermore, as John Wilson argued
- [00:30:19.500]in the AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom,
- [00:30:22.080]the 1960 Leo Cooke Case at the University of Illinois,
- [00:30:25.150]represented a turning point
- [00:30:26.400]in the AAUP's understanding of extramural speech.
- [00:30:29.120]Now, when I wrote this,
- [00:30:30.140]I wasn't sure whether anyone would have heard of this case,
- [00:30:32.440]so I left a little note to myself,
- [00:30:33.853]do a brief (speaking in foreign language).
- [00:30:35.600]It's a good one.
- [00:30:38.205]Leo Cooke was a scientist at the University of Illinois.
- [00:30:42.080]He was on the tenure track.
- [00:30:43.270]He was an assistant professor, but he was not tenured.
- [00:30:46.020]One day,
- [00:30:47.485]well, he became increasingly incensed at what he regarded
- [00:30:51.440]as the hypocritical sexual morays of the day;
- [00:30:53.610]again, 1960.
- [00:30:55.310]And he was especially incensed
- [00:30:58.322]by things like single sex dorms, curfews,
- [00:31:00.500]and other restrictions
- [00:31:01.710]on the free movement of undergraduates.
- [00:31:03.510]Am I taking you back?
- [00:31:05.576]I don't think this would be even remotely recognizable
- [00:31:07.320]on any campus other than that of like Brigham Young,
- [00:31:09.440]or Liberty, or what have you.
- [00:31:11.390]And so he wrote, perhaps unwisely,
- [00:31:14.960]a really long letter to the school paper,
- [00:31:17.290]the Daily Illini.
- [00:31:18.210]I mean, by really long, 2,500 words.
- [00:31:21.170]It's like, 10 pages.
- [00:31:23.370]Arguing, basically,
- [00:31:24.600]for free love and sexual experimentation.
- [00:31:28.540]I see a few people going hmm.
- [00:31:30.330]You know, if he'd waited eight years,
- [00:31:31.570]no one would have given a shit, right?
- [00:31:33.965]But 1960, he was fired the next day.
- [00:31:37.260]The next day.
- [00:31:40.732]And the administration argued
- [00:31:42.205]that his words carried extra weight,
- [00:31:45.780]this is the expertise issue,
- [00:31:47.453]because he was a scientist, all right.
- [00:31:49.394]He was a scientist saying people come,
- [00:31:51.320]they leave their parents' homes,
- [00:31:52.370]they come to campus,
- [00:31:53.680]they should experiment sexually.
- [00:31:55.180]If a scientist says that, you know.
- [00:31:56.710]And, in fact, he was a biologist on top of everything.
- [00:32:00.210]Wait for it.
- [00:32:01.981]You know what his specialty actually was?
- [00:32:03.340]Moss. (audience laughing)
- [00:32:05.770]You can't make this up.
- [00:32:07.890]That story does not end well.
- [00:32:08.850]He never got his position back,
- [00:32:10.230]he never taught again.
- [00:32:11.640]But, it precipitated this crisis, right?
- [00:32:15.186]Why is this not protected speech?
- [00:32:17.890]Regardless of whether, you know,
- [00:32:19.430]he's talking about moss, or people doing it like mammals,
- [00:32:21.640]you know, right?
- [00:32:23.101]So, the AAUP went back and said,
- [00:32:26.740]and this is now the really crucial statement,
- [00:32:29.270]and this also applies to the Courtney Lawton case.
- [00:32:31.880]So in 1964, the AAUP decided
- [00:32:33.650]that a faculty member's expression of opinion as a citizen
- [00:32:36.670]cannot constitute grounds for dismissal
- [00:32:39.350]unless it clearly demonstrates
- [00:32:40.980]the faculty member's unfitness to serve.
- [00:32:43.602]All right.
- [00:32:45.620]It has to be open and shut.
- [00:32:47.330]The thing this person said
- [00:32:48.920]means that they are obviously unfit to be a professor.
- [00:32:53.290]And believing that late adolescence,
- [00:32:55.357]and people in their early 20s should experiment sexually
- [00:32:57.800]hardly counts as anything terribly demonstrative
- [00:33:01.170]of someone's unfitness to serve.
- [00:33:02.490]Again, you can question his judgment at the time,
- [00:33:04.910]but not the actual argument.
- [00:33:07.350]So this principle, in turn,
- [00:33:08.730]was challenged by a former AAUP President, Cary Nelson,
- [00:33:11.750]in the Steven Salaita case,
- [00:33:13.110]which also, weirdly, involved the University of Illinois.
- [00:33:15.270]And again, I'm not sure how many people remember this,
- [00:33:17.570]but in 2014,
- [00:33:20.060]Israel, let's just say, made an incursion into Gaza;
- [00:33:23.230]it was ugly, there were deaths,
- [00:33:25.050]there were (clearing throat),
- [00:33:26.674]mistreatments of all kinds of Palestinians.
- [00:33:29.970]Salaita is Palestinian.
- [00:33:31.200]He's Palestinian-American,
- [00:33:33.074]and he tweeted up a firestorm over that summer,
- [00:33:35.630]just clearly in agony.
- [00:33:36.810]I mean, he was furious and he was grieving,
- [00:33:39.010]and he said some really regrettable things,
- [00:33:41.330]like a bit about Benjamin Netanyahu
- [00:33:44.060]appearing with the teeth of Palestinian children
- [00:33:47.120]around his neck,
- [00:33:48.636]which kind of evoked antisemitic blood libel
- [00:33:52.240]kind of suggestions.
- [00:33:53.390]And then the one really way-over tweet
- [00:33:56.120]that a lot of people objected to.
- [00:33:58.930]I'm going to have to use a bad work,
- [00:34:00.230]'cause it was crucial to the tweet (clearing throat).
- [00:34:02.300]You may remember that, at some point,
- [00:34:04.400]one of the reasons for the incursion was that
- [00:34:06.760]somebody had abducted three West Bank settlers,
- [00:34:10.130]and killed them;
- [00:34:10.963]they had gone missing.
- [00:34:13.404]And Salaita's response to that was,
- [00:34:16.692]"You may be too refined to say it, but I'm not."
- [00:34:19.970]That was part of the tweet.
- [00:34:20.857]"I wish all the West Bank settlers
- [00:34:22.247]"would go fucking missing.
- [00:34:23.957]"Would fucking go missing."
- [00:34:26.860]And I found this really fascinating.
- [00:34:28.950]First of all, again,
- [00:34:30.520]it's deliberately offensive, right?
- [00:34:33.020]And he acknowledges it.
- [00:34:34.547]"You may be too refined to say it, but I'm not."
- [00:34:36.306]It's almost as if he's invoking that standard, right,
- [00:34:39.040]to show appropriate restraint.
- [00:34:41.160]Like, you may show appropriate restraint, but I'm not gonna.
- [00:34:43.140]I wish they would all go missing.
- [00:34:45.050]And, you know, I might say my own opinion on the matter is,
- [00:34:48.146]"I wish they were negotiated through State settlement."
- [00:34:53.496]That's not gonna get me in too much trouble,
- [00:34:54.580]but something like that would.
- [00:34:56.290]So what happened to Salaita was a very strange thing,
- [00:34:58.350]it's the only times this has happened
- [00:34:59.710]in the history of American academia;
- [00:35:01.020]he was de-hired.
- [00:35:02.910]He had already moved to Champaign;
- [00:35:04.500]he had moved his family,
- [00:35:06.126]they had assigned him classes for the fall,
- [00:35:07.704]and then they un-hired him.
- [00:35:11.883]Yeah.
- [00:35:12.730]And so it was Cary Nelson who teaches at Illinois,
- [00:35:16.900]who was actually in favor of his de-hiring.
- [00:35:19.990]There are people, including myself,
- [00:35:22.310]Cary was one of my closest friends
- [00:35:24.120]and associates in academia,
- [00:35:25.590]and we haven't spoken in five years because of this.
- [00:35:28.224]He argued that Salaita's tweets
- [00:35:31.450]about Israel's incursion into Gaza
- [00:35:34.080]did demonstrate his unfitness to serve,
- [00:35:36.300]precisely because they were related to his area
- [00:35:38.270]of scholarly expertise.
- [00:35:40.230]See?
- [00:35:41.250]He's a Palestinian-American,
- [00:35:42.800]working on Israel/Palestine issues in the Middle East
- [00:35:44.920]and so forth,
- [00:35:45.753]he was hired to teach that stuff
- [00:35:47.590]as well as Native American stuff about settler colonialism,
- [00:35:51.040]therefore his tweets are not extramural speech;
- [00:35:54.628]they are related to his scholarship.
- [00:35:57.020]Okay.
- [00:35:59.440]There's actually a little more
- [00:36:00.273]to the Cary Nelson story and me,
- [00:36:01.640]but that's tangential,
- [00:36:02.680]but that was the real argument,
- [00:36:04.340]but that's what the argument was about.
- [00:36:06.640]Now, Nelson's essay on Salaita
- [00:36:08.610]was published in the same issue
- [00:36:09.920]of the AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom
- [00:36:12.000]as Wilson's essay about Salaita and Leo Cooke.
- [00:36:16.100]And Nelson's essay opens with this essay
- [00:36:18.180]from Matthew Finken and Robert Post's book,
- [00:36:19.945]For the Common Good: Principles of Academic Freedom.
- [00:36:24.490]This is a quote.
- [00:36:26.307]"The most theoretically problematic aspect
- [00:36:28.047]"of academic freedom is extramural expression.
- [00:36:30.687]"This dimension of academic freedom
- [00:36:32.057]"does not concern communications
- [00:36:33.517]"that are connected to faculty expertise,
- [00:36:35.577]"for such expression is encompassed
- [00:36:36.997]"within freedom of research,
- [00:36:38.797]"a principle that includes both the freedom to inquire,
- [00:36:40.827]"and the freedom to disseminate the results of inquiry.
- [00:36:43.597]"Nor does extramural expression concern communications
- [00:36:45.594]"made by faculty in their role as officers
- [00:36:48.497]"of institutions of higher education.
- [00:36:50.394]"Freedom of extramural expression refers instead
- [00:36:52.967]"to speech made by a faculty in their capacity as citizens
- [00:36:55.867]"speech that is typically about matters of public concern,
- [00:36:58.127]"and that is unrelated to either scholarly expertise,
- [00:37:01.577]"or institutional affiliation."
- [00:37:03.322]So for Nelson, Salaita's comments,
- [00:37:05.450]even though they were made on Twitter,
- [00:37:06.950]did not really constitute extramural speech,
- [00:37:09.700]and therefore had implications for his scholarly work,
- [00:37:11.910]and his fitness to serve.
- [00:37:13.670]Now, that's a different claim.
- [00:37:15.110]Other people said that Salaita's tweets
- [00:37:17.613]would have a chilling effect on Jewish students
- [00:37:20.770]who might enroll in his classes.
- [00:37:22.880]There was no evidence, when he moved from Virginia Tech,
- [00:37:25.090]all of his evaluations at Virginia Tech were good;
- [00:37:27.240]there was no record of him
- [00:37:29.135]ever badgering a student in a class, right?
- [00:37:30.810]So they couldn't say that.
- [00:37:32.090]They couldn't say,
- [00:37:33.743]"Well, he's been just demonstrated
- [00:37:35.471]"to be unfit to serve in the past,
- [00:37:36.304]"'cause the guy just goes off in the classroom
- [00:37:37.647]"about Israel."
- [00:37:39.162]Instead they made the claim
- [00:37:42.127]that now that these tweets are public,
- [00:37:42.960]Jewish students would feel a chilly environment
- [00:37:45.220]in his classes.
- [00:37:47.060]So Nelson's argument was different.
- [00:37:48.630]Nelson's argument is that Salaita's tweets
- [00:37:50.490]deserved less protection
- [00:37:52.350]under principles of academic freedom,
- [00:37:54.080]than, say, a series of tweets
- [00:37:55.570]suggesting that the Apollo moon landings never happened,
- [00:37:59.030]because that would concern a subject
- [00:38:01.230]about which Salaita had also written and taught
- [00:38:04.540]as a disciplinary expert, all right?
- [00:38:06.870]Now, it just so happens that I edited that issue
- [00:38:09.850]of the AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom (chuckling),
- [00:38:12.198]and Nelson's and Wilson's essays both appeared.
- [00:38:15.560]And in my introduction,
- [00:38:17.090]I noted that although this debate about extramural speech
- [00:38:19.700]was legitimate and necessary,
- [00:38:20.960]there was something disturbing in Nelson's argument.
- [00:38:23.860]I acknowledged
- [00:38:25.391]that it was unquestionably a plausible argument, right,
- [00:38:26.850]'cause Salaita was tweeting about Israel.
- [00:38:29.757]"And yet," I said,
- [00:38:31.366]"it has a nasty corollary,
- [00:38:32.199]"as we have discovered in the wake
- [00:38:34.349]"of Garcetti versus Ceballos."
- [00:38:36.208]I'll explain in a moment.
- [00:38:38.187]"In Pickering versus Board of Education, 1968,
- [00:38:40.957]"and again in Connick versus Myers, 1983,
- [00:38:43.787]"the US Supreme Court held
- [00:38:45.318]"that if an employees public speech
- [00:38:47.347]"were a matter of personal grievance
- [00:38:48.857]"rather than public concern
- [00:38:50.237]"related to his or her employment,
- [00:38:51.817]"then that speech is protected by the first amendment."
- [00:38:54.270]Stay with me on that, this is a crucial one.
- [00:38:55.942]"The Pickering-Connick test therefore turns largely
- [00:38:59.927]"on whether an employee is talking about matters
- [00:39:02.851]"about which he or she is well informed, and paradoxically,
- [00:39:06.136]"affords employees less protection from retaliation
- [00:39:10.517]"for statements in their area of expertise
- [00:39:12.624]"than for statements about matters unrelated to their work.
- [00:39:16.487]"For this reason I call the Pickering-Connick test
- [00:39:18.367]"a crank protection plan,
- [00:39:20.417]"insofar as an employee who mouths off about matters
- [00:39:22.967]"in which he has no credibility
- [00:39:24.927]"is granted more of a hearing in the public square
- [00:39:28.337]"than an employee who actually knows
- [00:39:29.827]"what she is talking about.
- [00:39:31.777]"That logic underlies the courts finding in Garcetti,
- [00:39:33.897]"and it underlies Nelson's argument here."
- [00:39:36.270]See where I'm going with this?
- [00:39:37.520]If Salaita had only had the good sense
- [00:39:39.080]to say that we never landed on the moon,
- [00:39:41.275]he's good, right?
- [00:39:42.980]But, he tweets about Israel,
- [00:39:44.350]that's too related to his subject matter,
- [00:39:46.620]and therefore he's not protected for that.
- [00:39:49.020]So yeah, the potential applications of this are troubling.
- [00:39:52.930]They establish an inverse relation between academic freedom
- [00:39:55.970]and scholarly expertise,
- [00:39:57.570]and redefine certain forms of extramural speech
- [00:40:01.417]and intramural.
- [00:40:04.780]That's not true of the first two, right?
- [00:40:06.480]In the first two, the more expertise you have,
- [00:40:08.280]the more academic freedom;
- [00:40:09.690]it's based on that.
- [00:40:10.780]The third one?
- [00:40:12.320]The more expertise you have,
- [00:40:13.520]the less protection you have.
- [00:40:16.330]So, here's the argument in another form.
- [00:40:19.906]It is arguably more damaging to one's intellectual
- [00:40:22.650]and professional legitimacy
- [00:40:24.190]for a historian to deny the Holocaust,
- [00:40:26.820]than for a professor of electrical engineering to do so.
- [00:40:29.910]And there I'm referring to Arthur Butz
- [00:40:31.400]of Northwestern University,
- [00:40:32.690]who is a professor of electrical engineering,
- [00:40:34.790]emeritus now, I think he's in his mid-70s,
- [00:40:36.205]and who totally denies the Holocaust.
- [00:40:39.170]Because one expects
- [00:40:40.280]that the disciplinary protocols of history departments
- [00:40:42.454]would militate far more strenuously against Holocaust denial
- [00:40:45.912]than the disciplinary protocols of electrical engineering.
- [00:40:50.610]I mean, if you're denying the Holocaust,
- [00:40:51.810]that would seem to be
- [00:40:53.717](speaking in foreign language) evidence
- [00:40:55.000]that you are unfit to be a professional historian.
- [00:40:56.850]So by that token,
- [00:40:57.850]a series of tweets from Salaita about moon landings
- [00:41:00.190]wouldn't be taken as evidence of professional unfitness,
- [00:41:02.670]it would merely be evidence
- [00:41:03.650]that Salaita subscribed to a belief
- [00:41:05.260]associated with a fringe of conspiracy theorists.
- [00:41:08.020]And yet, the form of his statements
- [00:41:10.250]was undeniably extramural,
- [00:41:11.540]because the statements were tweets,
- [00:41:13.360]and there are really chilling consequences
- [00:41:15.130]to the argument that the more informed
- [00:41:16.810]a professor's tweets may be,
- [00:41:18.440]the more they involve an area
- [00:41:20.020]of his or her scholarly expertise,
- [00:41:22.240]the less protection they deserve
- [00:41:23.810]as a matter of academic freedom.
- [00:41:26.410]Okay, that's mostly what I came to say,
- [00:41:27.980]but I have a little bit more.
- [00:41:30.310]The relation between scholarly expertise
- [00:41:31.900]and extramural speech
- [00:41:32.733]was also an issue in a less celebrated
- [00:41:34.270]but equally challenging example
- [00:41:35.670]from the University of Wisconsin, Madison,
- [00:41:37.581]where in 2017 the Assistant Professor, Damon Sajnani,
- [00:41:40.930]offered a course called The Problem of Whiteness,
- [00:41:43.810]drawing the ire of Republican State legislators,
- [00:41:46.850]who demanded his firing.
- [00:41:48.890]The course should never have been controversial,
- [00:41:51.310]and would not have been,
- [00:41:52.350]if not for the fact that the phrase,
- [00:41:53.860]the problem of whiteness,
- [00:41:55.250]is a problem for some very fragile white people.
- [00:41:59.165]Sajnani's webpage for the course.
- [00:42:00.480]Actually, I should call that up, if you give me a moment.
- [00:42:02.093]Oh, I can't even see this.
- [00:42:04.660]I should have had this up.
- [00:42:05.800]It's more (keyboard clicking)
- [00:42:12.630]demonstrative that way.
- [00:42:26.584]♪ Do do do ♪
- [00:42:27.417]And there it goes!
- [00:42:30.020]Okay, so now the course actually has coverage of the course.
- [00:42:34.710]Sort of a, one of the good things
- [00:42:36.802]that comes from being the object of a right-wing swarming.
- [00:42:42.530]But, here's what I want.
- [00:42:45.440]When I first heard of this case.
- [00:42:47.720]And, in fact, it had to so with something called
- [00:42:50.050]the Academic Leadership Program,
- [00:42:51.210]which is actually a Big 10 consortium,
- [00:42:55.180]that's trying to diversify upper-level administration;
- [00:42:57.960]the higher up you go in the administration in academia,
- [00:43:00.010]as in the corporate world,
- [00:43:01.762]the whiter and maler it tends to get.
- [00:43:03.690]And one of the questions we dealt with was,
- [00:43:05.493]what do you do about this case?
- [00:43:07.440]Right, this had just happened at Wisconsin.
- [00:43:09.800]And there were some people in the room saying,
- [00:43:11.967]"Well, maybe he should have cleared the name of the course
- [00:43:14.517]"with his Dean."
- [00:43:15.970]And I'm like, "No, no!
- [00:43:17.897]"Can I just push back on that?
- [00:43:19.938]"There is no problem with the title of this course.
- [00:43:22.577]"It is a reference to Du Bois' line,
- [00:43:24.797]"from The Souls of Black Folk,
- [00:43:26.737]"How Does it Feel to be a Problem."
- [00:43:28.390]It is also a reference to Richard Wright.
- [00:43:30.130]There is no negro problem in the United States,
- [00:43:32.160]there is only a white problem.
- [00:43:33.100]Now, I think Sajnani added these things later,
- [00:43:35.554]but it doesn't matter, they already existed.
- [00:43:37.880]We're talking about a century of black critical thought,
- [00:43:41.240]that basically says
- [00:43:42.954]there's no such thing as a negro problem.
- [00:43:44.100]I don't think there are probably too many people in the room
- [00:43:46.260]old enough to remember when that was the going term,
- [00:43:48.570]the negro problem in the US.
- [00:43:50.030]And they're saying, basically no,
- [00:43:50.960]there is no negro problem,
- [00:43:52.260]there's a white supremacy problem is what it is.
- [00:43:54.710]Totally legitimate, right?
- [00:43:56.160]And anyone, I said,
- [00:43:57.912]the problem of whiteness is not a problem,
- [00:44:00.130]the people who think the problem of whiteness is a problem,
- [00:44:02.460]they're the problem.
- [00:44:03.840]So, the University defended the course,
- [00:44:07.500]as well it should have (coughing).
- [00:44:11.390]And one could argue,
- [00:44:12.223]as did one intrepid white student,
- [00:44:14.110]writing for the student paper,
- [00:44:15.868]the Badger Herald,
- [00:44:16.870]that the backlash against the course
- [00:44:17.703]demonstrated nicely why the course was necessary.
- [00:44:21.500](audience tittering)
- [00:44:23.270]But there was a complicating factor.
- [00:44:24.380]The Wisconsin State Representative, Dave Murphy,
- [00:44:25.300]who led the campaign against Sajnani,
- [00:44:27.340]cited a pair of Sajnani's tweets.
- [00:44:29.470]It's always tweets, right?
- [00:44:31.720]That's another thing I came to say.
- [00:44:32.810]Just don't. (audience laughing)
- [00:44:35.290]I do have a Twitter account, but yeah.
- [00:44:41.440]These were a couple of tweets from July 2016,
- [00:44:43.720]when five Dallas police officers were killed by a sniper.
- [00:44:47.093]One of his tweets consisted of a photo of CNNs coverage
- [00:44:51.160]of the shootings,
- [00:44:52.806]accompanied by the remark,
- [00:44:53.639]is the uprising finally starting?
- [00:44:55.020]Is this style of protest gonna go viral?
- [00:44:58.340]The other read, watching CNN,
- [00:44:59.960]this is the song I am currently enjoying in my head,
- [00:45:03.040]and linked to the song Officer Down
- [00:45:04.810]by UNO The Prophet.
- [00:45:07.670]Now, is he cheering it on?
- [00:45:10.901]Arguably, right?
- [00:45:14.510]But it could be remarked.
- [00:45:15.610]I just said, this is a century of black critical thought
- [00:45:17.650]about the so-called negro problem,
- [00:45:19.530]there is also a long history in popular culture
- [00:45:22.390]of black critical thought
- [00:45:23.520]on protests against police brutality,
- [00:45:25.820]from Ice-T's Cop Killer and NWA's Fuck the Police,
- [00:45:28.520]all the way back to this revolutionary West Indian figure
- [00:45:30.720]who admitted that he shot the sheriff,
- [00:45:33.030]although in self defense,
- [00:45:34.710]and did not, in fact, shoot the deputy.
- [00:45:37.034](audience laughing)
- [00:45:37.867]And yet, there is,
- [00:45:38.850]I know, seriously, this is a thing.
- [00:45:41.230]You can't go into black popular culture
- [00:45:43.180]and not know that there's a tradition of this, right?
- [00:45:46.630]And yet there's something arguably discomforting
- [00:45:48.300]about the spectacle of a college professor
- [00:45:51.840]apparently cheering on the murder of police officers.
- [00:45:53.320]Now, all the more so,
- [00:45:54.870]when the statements he makes have a non-trivial relation
- [00:45:57.190]to his work as a scholar and a teacher.
- [00:45:59.120]So again, the course is not a problem.
- [00:46:02.557]The people who tried to make it a problem were the problem.
- [00:46:04.770]But the tweets are problematic,
- [00:46:06.970]and they might deserve, say,
- [00:46:08.500]a formal reprimand by administration,
- [00:46:10.760]though certainly not firing or suspension.
- [00:46:13.010]This is, again, one of those one-offs,
- [00:46:14.180]just don't do this again, right?
- [00:46:16.930]And this also, I mean,
- [00:46:18.717]I could say something.
- [00:46:20.330]Feel free to ask me about Twitter,
- [00:46:21.360]that's a whole thing unto itself.
- [00:46:22.640]But it sometimes happens that people behave on Twitter
- [00:46:25.090]as if they're just talking to a friend or two,
- [00:46:26.830]you know, across the table,
- [00:46:27.810]and actually, it's the Internet,
- [00:46:33.222]it's a big place.
- [00:46:35.470]So I wanna call attention to a different kind of murky case
- [00:46:37.740]where extramural speech is construed as intramural.
- [00:46:41.400]One of them, you might have heard of,
- [00:46:42.380]it involves a graduate student named Courtney Lawton.
- [00:46:44.970]Now, I'm sure there are people in the room
- [00:46:46.950]far more familiar with the grainy details of that case,
- [00:46:49.580]and week-by-week how it unfolded,
- [00:46:51.670]more familiar than I am.
- [00:46:52.900]Happy to talk about it in the Q&A if you'd like.
- [00:46:54.557]All I'm gonna remark on for now,
- [00:46:57.390]is the fact that really struck me as it was unfolding,
- [00:46:59.740]in that firestorm, everything proceeded,
- [00:47:02.368]and this was largely, though not entirely,
- [00:47:05.990]the doing of three Republican State Senators
- [00:47:07.980]who made the incident their cause to live
- [00:47:09.530]for the remainder of the academic year.
- [00:47:11.560]Everything proceeded as if Ms. Lawton's behavior
- [00:47:14.040]was dispositive evidence of how she,
- [00:47:16.937]and maybe other instructors who shared her beliefs,
- [00:47:19.530]treat conservative students in their classes.
- [00:47:22.000]Right?
- [00:47:23.336]Am I wrong about that?
- [00:47:24.169]There's a lot of that.
- [00:47:25.230]As if this was how students were treated in class.
- [00:47:28.680]Or as if Katie Mullen was Lawton's student
- [00:47:31.350]in some general sense,
- [00:47:32.610]insofar as Ms. Mullen was an undergraduate, right here,
- [00:47:34.837]even though the incident had nothing to do
- [00:47:37.090]with in classroom behavior.
- [00:47:38.980]Indeed, Lawton declared that she had undertaken her protest
- [00:47:41.590]in the belief that Mullen was not a student,
- [00:47:43.140]she was,
- [00:47:44.070]and Turning Point USA
- [00:47:45.230]was not a registered student organization,
- [00:47:46.950]it was not.
- [00:47:48.320]Nevertheless, as you well know,
- [00:47:49.747]the University spent much of the ensuring year,
- [00:47:52.530]and still now,
- [00:47:53.500]defending itself against charges
- [00:47:55.160]that the campus was not a welcoming place
- [00:47:56.880]for conservative students.
- [00:47:58.880]Perhaps some commentators operated in bad faith,
- [00:48:01.280]treating Lawton's exchange with Mullen
- [00:48:03.110]as if it occurred in the classroom,
- [00:48:04.670]even though they knew otherwise.
- [00:48:06.370]But for the most part the drama unfolded the way it did
- [00:48:08.440]because many people on campus and off
- [00:48:10.592]are unsure about what policies and expectations
- [00:48:14.520]are relevant to a situation
- [00:48:15.904]in which a graduate student or a professor,
- [00:48:18.250]although Lawton's status as a graduate student
- [00:48:20.750]made things more complicated,
- [00:48:22.440]interaction with a student who is not her student.
- [00:48:25.950]There's only one other case like that in recent history.
- [00:48:28.793]It's the case of John McAdams at Marquette,
- [00:48:31.250]and I want to do a compare and contrast here, all right?
- [00:48:33.120]McAdams was disciplined by his university,
- [00:48:34.770]and effectively fired,
- [00:48:36.050]after two semesters of suspension without pay,
- [00:48:38.560]for having criticized a graduate student by name
- [00:48:40.760]on his personal blog.
- [00:48:42.630]Professor McAdams made the comment in 2014
- [00:48:44.870]in reference to a graduate teaching instructor
- [00:48:46.610]in philosophy, Cheryl Abbate,
- [00:48:49.020]who had refused to allow one of her students
- [00:48:50.860]to debate gay rights in class.
- [00:48:52.230]Again, this goes back to that question, right?
- [00:48:53.710]If you feel passionately about gay rights,
- [00:48:55.592]can you quash a discussion about it?
- [00:48:58.420]So for those of you not familiar with the case,
- [00:48:59.880]I'm just gonna read a chunk from the AAUP's summary.
- [00:49:02.354]I was gonna summarize it myself,
- [00:49:04.070]I'm like, no, this is better.
- [00:49:06.760]This is from the AAUP's report, Century Marquette.
- [00:49:10.320]The blog post was picked up by the national media,
- [00:49:12.440]and Miss Abbute received numerous harassing
- [00:49:14.670]and offensive emails and other communications.
- [00:49:17.000]On December 16, 2014,
- [00:49:18.760]Dr. McAdams was suspended with pay and banned from campus.
- [00:49:21.720]And, again, that I can see.
- [00:49:23.410]I mean, this basically invited a mobbing
- [00:49:25.450]of a female graduate student.
- [00:49:27.620]On January 30, 2015, Marquette formally notified Dr. McAdams
- [00:49:31.150]that it was commencing the process to revoke his tenure
- [00:49:33.060]and terminate his employment.
- [00:49:34.970]Per Marquette's faculty statutes,
- [00:49:36.470]the matter was referred to a faculty hearing committee, FHC.
- [00:49:39.005]The FHC concluded that the suspension of Dr. McAdams,
- [00:49:42.190]pending the outcome of this proceeding,
- [00:49:44.000]imposed by the university with no faculty review,
- [00:49:46.420]and in the absence of any viable threat
- [00:49:48.250]posed by the continuation of his job duties,
- [00:49:50.380]was an abuse of the university's discretion,
- [00:49:52.090]granted under the faculty statues.
- [00:49:54.100]The FHC further concluded that it was not sufficient cause
- [00:49:56.680]for Marquette to terminate Dr. McAdams,
- [00:49:58.680]but that he could be suspended
- [00:50:01.149]for up to two semesters without pay.
- [00:50:02.830]On March 24 of that year, again 2016,
- [00:50:04.800]President Michael Lovell advised Dr. McAdams
- [00:50:06.880]that he was to be suspended without pay for two semesters
- [00:50:09.670]as the FHC had recommended,
- [00:50:11.160]but then the President went beyond that recommendation
- [00:50:13.032]and demanded that as a condition of his reinstatement
- [00:50:16.500]to the faculty,
- [00:50:18.172]Dr. McAdams provide him and Mrs. Abbate
- [00:50:20.210]with a written statement expressing deep regret,
- [00:50:22.397]and admitting that his blog post was reckless
- [00:50:25.618]and incompatible with the mission and values
- [00:50:27.010]of Marquette University.
- [00:50:28.774]I mean, basically they asked him to write an apology letter
- [00:50:30.390]that they were gonna write for him, right?
- [00:50:32.640]And then a couple of weeks later,
- [00:50:34.630]McAdams advised President Lovell
- [00:50:36.240]that he would do no such thing;
- [00:50:37.400]he would not say what he did not believe to be true,
- [00:50:39.430]and that Lovell was exceeding his authority
- [00:50:41.310]under the faculty statutes,
- [00:50:43.218]by demanding that he do so.
- [00:50:44.130]So he was not reinstated after the end of two years,
- [00:50:46.640]therefore effectively fired.
- [00:50:48.010]Now, that story (hands clapping together)
- [00:50:48.843]does end well.
- [00:50:50.557]McAdams took his case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court,
- [00:50:51.710]and just last summer he won.
- [00:50:52.989]And the Court cited AAUP principles.
- [00:50:55.460]Yay, whenever that happens,
- [00:50:56.470]an angel gets its wings. (audience laughing)
- [00:50:57.900]And the AAUP's amicus brief on McAdams' behalf,
- [00:51:00.729]ruling that the blog post constituted extramural speech
- [00:51:04.500]that did not provide any evidence of his unfitness to teach.
- [00:51:07.610]Again, it was, you know, like a nasty thing to do, right?
- [00:51:10.280]But not a firing offense.
- [00:51:12.440]So the contrast for me with the Lawton case is striking,
- [00:51:14.620]because no one apparently operated under the misapprehension
- [00:51:17.050]that McAdams had mistreated his own student.
- [00:51:19.450]And the court explicitly ruled
- [00:51:21.180]that his blog post constituted an extramural comment.
- [00:51:24.380]But still, you know, it was an extramural comment
- [00:51:26.640]in a gray area,
- [00:51:27.663]insofar as it involved a student at his own institution,
- [00:51:30.152]rather than a stray speculation about moon landings.
- [00:51:34.270]So, in closing, how are we doing?
- [00:51:37.597]I don't have any handy advice for my colleagues.
- [00:51:39.910]Well, I wrote that I didn't,
- [00:51:41.340]then I pulled up your statutes,
- [00:51:42.750]and yes I do.
- [00:51:44.464]You gotta fix this.
- [00:51:45.520]There is no telling what will become the occasion
- [00:51:47.860]for tomorrow's outrage fest.
- [00:51:49.222]Even the most innocuous utterance in which one points out,
- [00:51:52.870]for example,
- [00:51:54.322]that the ancient Greeks painted their statues,
- [00:51:55.810]can bring the fury of the mob,
- [00:51:57.460]harassment, and death threats.
- [00:52:00.020]That was Sarah Bond at the University of Iowa,
- [00:52:02.160]and I brought this to the attention of my own administration
- [00:52:04.434]because, as I was telling some people at dinner last night,
- [00:52:07.980]Iowa responded by putting out this really admirable booklet
- [00:52:11.010]called Faculty Support and Safety Guidance.
- [00:52:13.590]It is basically 14 pages on what to do
- [00:52:15.550]when the trolls come for one of your professors, okay?
- [00:52:18.740]And it is not,
- [00:52:20.413]it wasn't written by risk management,
- [00:52:22.710]which means it wasn't how to throw your faculty member
- [00:52:24.710]under the bus,
- [00:52:25.890]it was how to protect them, and how to defend them.
- [00:52:28.950]Oh, by the way, news flash:
- [00:52:30.546]the Greeks painted their statues.
- [00:52:32.020]All right, just get over it. (audience laughing)
- [00:52:34.670]And why.
- [00:52:35.870]I mean, first of all, I used to joke,
- [00:52:37.360]well, who knew that the Nazis really cared about art?
- [00:52:41.410]But they do.
- [00:52:43.350]And in fact, there's a lot of iceberg under this water.
- [00:52:45.580]It reminded me that one of the really interesting findings
- [00:52:49.740]of Martin Bernal's 1989 book, I think, Black Athena,
- [00:52:55.530]that raised, oh boy,
- [00:52:57.180]that was a thing back in the day,
- [00:52:59.173]that was one of the major items in the PC wars.
- [00:53:01.480]Black Athena.
- [00:53:02.490]Are you telling me the Greeks were black?
- [00:53:05.140]No!
- [00:53:06.424]He's telling you that the Greek civilization
- [00:53:07.930]drew a lot on Egyptian civilization,
- [00:53:10.120]is what he's telling you,
- [00:53:11.865]and other Mediterranean,
- [00:53:13.357]eastern Mediterranean, civilizations.
- [00:53:15.023]And that's kind of indisputable.
- [00:53:16.239]It's almost like the painting statues bit,
- [00:53:17.072]except that there was an entire branch
- [00:53:18.840]of 19th century German historiography
- [00:53:21.390]devoted to purging that connection,
- [00:53:23.800]and showing fallaciously the Greeks had no relation
- [00:53:26.795]to these darker peoples, to their east and south.
- [00:53:30.230]So there's a long history there too.
- [00:53:32.060]And what I say to my administration is,
- [00:53:33.760]you think it's gonna be
- [00:53:34.870]Women's Gender and Sexuality Department that's gonna get,
- [00:53:37.020]or Middle Eastern Studies,
- [00:53:38.260]it could be Classics;
- [00:53:39.700]who knew, right?
- [00:53:41.440]Person says, "Oh yeah, Greeks, painted their statutes,"
- [00:53:43.077]and the next thing you know,
- [00:53:45.012]you are surrounded by Breitbart and, you know,
- [00:53:46.150]and the lost boys.
- [00:53:49.330]It is usually customary, and I'll do it now,
- [00:53:51.400]to remind professors that when they speak extramurally,
- [00:53:53.524]especially on social media,
- [00:53:56.270]they should try to make it clear
- [00:53:57.220]that they're not speaking for their institution.
- [00:53:58.860]Now this is particularly a challenge on Twitter,
- [00:54:01.100]so I am gonna say this,
- [00:54:02.490]where one cannot plausibly preface every damn tweet
- [00:54:05.770]with a disclaimer that one is not speaking
- [00:54:07.520]for one's institution.
- [00:54:08.940]I do have a Twitter account.
- [00:54:09.930]I use it, maybe once every sun spot cycle.
- [00:54:12.590]And it contains, on the sidebar, the notice:
- [00:54:15.490]Opinions here are mine alone.
- [00:54:17.470]Mine, I say.
- [00:54:19.720]And yet, as many of you now know,
- [00:54:21.150]in the course of my journeys online,
- [00:54:22.570]I have managed to pick up a few stalkers of my own.
- [00:54:25.320]It literally can happen to anyone.
- [00:54:26.960]And analog, in online, and as in analog space,
- [00:54:30.010]the climate for women and racial and sexual minorities
- [00:54:32.270]can be dangerously toxic.
- [00:54:34.080]Now, in these cases,
- [00:54:35.500]I'm sure we'll see many more of them in coming years,
- [00:54:37.930]I don't think we're actually seeing a full-blown crisis
- [00:54:40.130]for academic freedom;
- [00:54:41.150]I'm not alarmist about that.
- [00:54:43.160]But I do think the real crisis (chuckling) is,
- [00:54:45.160]or broader and national crisis,
- [00:54:46.980]and, of course, it's not just us anymore,
- [00:54:48.600]it's also Brazil, Poland, Turkey.
- [00:54:51.011]The crisis precipitated by the ascendancy of a fascist,
- [00:54:54.370]and white supremacist, to the highest office in the land,
- [00:54:56.600]and the erosion of the fragile norms of democracy.
- [00:55:00.119]Bu I do believe we need to realize
- [00:55:01.670]that the foundations for academic freedom,
- [00:55:03.660]with regard to extramural speech,
- [00:55:05.150]and the very definition of extramural speech itself,
- [00:55:07.630]are shifting beneath our feet.
- [00:55:09.960]That they are doing so
- [00:55:10.793]in the midst of this crisis of liberal democracy
- [00:55:12.520]is all the more reason for faculty and students
- [00:55:14.560]to immerse themselves in the intellectual legacy of debates
- [00:55:17.210]over the parameters of academic freedom,
- [00:55:19.260]because the stakes really could not be higher.
- [00:55:21.720]Conservatives support for, and trust in,
- [00:55:23.840]American universities,
- [00:55:24.790]has eroded significantly in recent years.
- [00:55:26.890]It was never very strong at any point in my lifetime,
- [00:55:29.060]but in the last five years it has just cratered.
- [00:55:31.260]And then you have Donald Trump's ascendancy,
- [00:55:33.300]enabled by so many members of his party,
- [00:55:35.710]bringing the nation's most reactionary impulses
- [00:55:37.670]to the forefront,
- [00:55:38.503]working them into the threads of the social fabric,
- [00:55:41.400]so deeply that openly racist
- [00:55:43.440]and antisemitic speech and violence are,
- [00:55:45.380]once again, a daily fact of life in these United States,
- [00:55:48.850]this time, with swastikas.
- [00:55:51.250]Now is not the time to leave the protection
- [00:55:53.660]of extramural speech solely to the State,
- [00:55:56.800]which is why I was arguing with Judith Butler
- [00:55:58.820]45 minutes ago.
- [00:56:00.120]Now, instead, is the time to insist
- [00:56:01.850]that the extramural speech of university professors
- [00:56:03.880]is vitally important to the functioning of a free society,
- [00:56:07.200]especially when it involves expertise,
- [00:56:09.420]academic expertise, in things like climate change,
- [00:56:12.230]colonialism, race relations, gender and sexuality,
- [00:56:15.090]ethnocentrism, poverty, medicine, technology,
- [00:56:18.100]urban planning, ecology, and, among many other things,
- [00:56:20.740]you know, theories of justice.
- [00:56:22.380]Now is the time to insist that extramural speech
- [00:56:24.660]is a vital aspect of academic freedom,
- [00:56:27.080]precisely because the struggle for academic freedom
- [00:56:29.440]is the struggle for democracy.
- [00:56:31.907]Thank you.
- [00:56:33.228](audience applauding)
- [00:56:44.451]Questions?
- [00:56:48.240]If you're afraid to come to the microphone
- [00:56:49.650]I'll bring it to you. (all laughing)
- [00:56:56.931]Would you please tell me and the audience
- [00:56:58.410]what's wrong with the bylaws?
- [00:57:02.457]Did everybody hear the question?
- [00:57:03.715]I did not plant that question.
- [00:57:05.273]Okay.
- [00:57:06.910]So here's your bylaws.
- [00:57:10.930]We've, hello.
- [00:57:13.422]Almost all faculty bylaws in reputable universities
- [00:57:17.760]incorporate the AAUP statement in one way or another.
- [00:57:20.800]They move the words around and whatever,
- [00:57:22.220]but it really is the backbone.
- [00:57:24.070]So what you've done, is you've, sorry.
- [00:57:30.620]Put it into these two paragraphs,
- [00:57:33.554]entitled to freedom and research
- [00:57:35.386]and publication of the results;
- [00:57:36.946]good so far.
- [00:57:38.013]Limited only in the precepts of scholarship,
- [00:57:39.362]faithful performance of academic obligations.
- [00:57:40.560]You're entitled to freedom in the classroom
- [00:57:41.820]in discussing your subjects.
- [00:57:43.290]You don't have that bit
- [00:57:45.159]about the stuff unrelated to the subject.
- [00:57:46.030]You kind of need that.
- [00:57:47.500]Again, some people, not many, but they're headaches,
- [00:57:51.453]believe that academic freedom means
- [00:57:53.010]I can do whatever the hell I want.
- [00:57:54.770]And, no it doesn't, no it doesn't.
- [00:57:57.420]It's not, again, it's not freedom of expression.
- [00:58:00.340]And I don't get to go off
- [00:58:02.230]about the foolishness of the multiple universes hypothesis.
- [00:58:06.100]Actually, I like it, it's really great for science fiction.
- [00:58:09.550]But, not my area of expertise.
- [00:58:11.970]I don't get to go off on certain things, right?
- [00:58:14.150]So you need that.
- [00:58:15.090]Then, you have the extramural speech.
- [00:58:17.560]You're entitled to exercise your right
- [00:58:19.554]to speak as active citizens of the United States,
- [00:58:20.880]and the State of Nebraska.
- [00:58:22.711]Members of professional staff shall not suffer sanctions
- [00:58:26.940]or be discriminated against.
- [00:58:27.880]So far so good.
- [00:58:29.130]Pay or other emoluments, da da da,
- [00:58:31.020]this is all good, right?
- [00:58:33.439]Then, staff members who violate laws
- [00:58:35.840]prescribed by civil authorities
- [00:58:37.010]may incur penalties attached to such laws (humming).
- [00:58:41.645]That's okay, all right.
- [00:58:43.700]And also, you don't have to be respectful
- [00:58:46.350]and like the opinions of others,
- [00:58:48.010]that's good too.
- [00:58:49.170]You can be rude.
- [00:58:51.240]However,
- [00:58:52.900]I mentioned Garcetti versus Ceballos.
- [00:58:55.780]And the wonks in the room should be like,
- [00:58:57.557]"Oh yeah, yeah, Garcetti."
- [00:59:01.310]This is a bad one folks.
- [00:59:03.380]It didn't involve higher education.
- [00:59:07.380]It's a whistleblower thing.
- [00:59:08.930]So Garcetti was an Assistant DA in California,
- [00:59:13.010]who got it into his head in about 2005 thereabouts,
- [00:59:16.330]that a case was being cooked, right?
- [00:59:18.890]That evidence was being fabricated against a defendant.
- [00:59:22.220]He took it to his supervisor,
- [00:59:23.730]which turned out to be a bad idea,
- [00:59:25.060]because his supervisor was the one doing the cooking.
- [00:59:28.220]He got retaliated against.
- [00:59:30.210]And he's a whistleblower,
- [00:59:31.870]he was blowing the whistle on a corrupt case.
- [00:59:35.090]And so he got what the DA's office called highway therapy.
- [00:59:39.670]He got reassigned to a thing two hours away,
- [00:59:41.390]two hours each way each day.
- [00:59:43.505]He didn't get fired.
- [00:59:44.980]But anyway, he sued,
- [00:59:46.110]and I think first he lost,
- [00:59:49.200]then he won on appeal.
- [00:59:50.380]It went all the way to the Supreme Court.
- [00:59:52.640]And the AAUP, by the way their legal staff,
- [00:59:55.540]it has to be a very dark and cloudy night
- [00:59:57.230]that they miss anything,
- [00:59:59.350]they could see this coming and they said,
- [01:00:00.707]"You know what?
- [01:00:01.907]"This has implications for university professors
- [01:00:04.607]"at public institutions."
- [01:00:06.310]Because the argument against Garcetti
- [01:00:08.540]is that he has no protection under the first amendment
- [01:00:11.750]for things he says in the course of his duties.
- [01:00:15.200]Let that sink in.
- [01:00:16.950]It is so anti-whistleblower.
- [01:00:20.130]And the court is even worse now than it was before.
- [01:00:23.880]I will go off.
- [01:00:25.260]Merrick Garland should be a Justice,
- [01:00:28.945]and that too is part of the crisis of liberal democracy.
- [01:00:33.520]But back then,
- [01:00:35.190]it was almost even money
- [01:00:36.450]which way Kennedy was gonna go, right?
- [01:00:39.320]We knew the four conservative justices
- [01:00:40.680]were gonna rule against Garcetti
- [01:00:42.100]before liberal justices were gonna rule in favor of him,
- [01:00:44.740]and people trying to read tea leaves,
- [01:00:46.500]and Kennedy went the wrong way,
- [01:00:48.800]and so Garcetti lost.
- [01:00:50.390]Which means, by the way, for the faculty in the room,
- [01:00:52.870]anything you say about University of Nebraska policies,
- [01:00:57.560]anything you say in a committee,
- [01:00:59.430]does not have protection under the first amendment,
- [01:01:02.680]because it is related to your duties.
- [01:01:05.300]Holy shit! (audience laughing)
- [01:01:07.580]Feel free to quote me.
- [01:01:08.620]So I was going over stuff in Penn State,
- [01:01:12.640]and we, weirdly, our policy leads with the extramural stuff,
- [01:01:16.720]it's like, wow, okay, citizen first!
- [01:01:18.580]Then, the uncontroversial stuff, research and publication,
- [01:01:22.070]and instructional roles.
- [01:01:24.860]Again, you see the absence of the word persistently
- [01:01:25.968]in that last bit,
- [01:01:27.100]I have lost that argument so far.
- [01:01:28.460]But then look at this,
- [01:01:29.630]the events related to the university.
- [01:01:32.305]Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
- [01:01:33.250]blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
- [01:01:34.083]First two sentences.
- [01:01:35.050]Faculty members are free
- [01:01:35.920]to speak and write on governance issues
- [01:01:37.600]of their respective departments, colleges, units, libraries,
- [01:01:39.710]and of the university as a whole,
- [01:01:40.950]and are free to speak and write on all matters
- [01:01:42.870]related to professional duties
- [01:01:43.850]without institutional discipline or restraint.
- [01:01:46.410]Yes!
- [01:01:48.490]And I don't know who got at that,
- [01:01:51.050]because that wasn't there 10 years ago.
- [01:01:53.340]The Garcetti decision is 2006.
- [01:01:55.230]And I made it a point,
- [01:01:56.930]if I get to be in the Faculty Senate,
- [01:01:58.510]I get to be in any position of power.
- [01:02:00.080]First I was the chair of the faculty affairs committee,
- [01:02:01.690]now I'm the chair of the whole thing,
- [01:02:03.010]I'm gonna make sure that oh, it's already there.
- [01:02:05.330]Okay, good.
- [01:02:06.910]You need a fourth plank there.
- [01:02:08.090]You need something protecting people
- [01:02:09.520]from the Garcetti decision.
- [01:02:10.860]That's the hole you can drive a truck through.
- [01:02:13.250]So the next time you say,
- [01:02:14.277]"You know, I really don't want (clearing throat),
- [01:02:18.080]fill in the blank, to be our next President,"
- [01:02:20.100]or, "I don't like the process
- [01:02:21.137]"by which he or she was selected,"
- [01:02:24.270]you actually don't have protection for those statements.
- [01:02:26.740]They don't fall under your own academic freedom policies,
- [01:02:29.470]and they have to, they have to.
- [01:02:31.430]And again, you'll notice also that the 1940 statement
- [01:02:33.790]didn't say anything about this either,
- [01:02:34.930]because it didn't exist then!
- [01:02:36.960]The Supreme Court case was only in 2006,
- [01:02:39.130]and after that thing dropped,
- [01:02:40.860]everybody should have run screaming
- [01:02:42.930]to their academic freedom policies
- [01:02:44.786]with, you know, spatula and, you know, spackle,
- [01:02:49.160]to patch the hole.
- [01:02:51.110]That's really what it is.
- [01:02:52.100]You could also use the controversial material clause too.
- [01:02:56.910]Thank you. You're welcome.
- [01:02:58.800]Yeah?
- [01:02:59.633]I actually just wanted to encourage you
- [01:03:01.710]to talk about the explicit footnote in the Garcetti case,
- [01:03:04.600]in which academic freedom at universities
- [01:03:06.520]is kind of, like, put to the side,
- [01:03:07.910]before we completely freak everybody out, right?
- [01:03:10.136]I mean, like, it seems like the law still applies,
- [01:03:11.790]but there was at least a kind of a cap to that decision.
- [01:03:15.440]And I'm happy to say that we are on the verge
- [01:03:18.430]of releasing a statement for the university
- [01:03:21.610]on academic freedom that explicitly includes
- [01:03:24.670]the material that you just highlighted there,
- [01:03:26.960]in part for those reasons--
- [01:03:28.717]Great, my work here is done, good.
- [01:03:30.110]No, that's really good news.
- [01:03:31.240]Thank you for saying that.
- [01:03:32.920]And also, thank you for calling attention
- [01:03:33.753]to that wonderful footnote, which is...
- [01:03:36.280]Well no, there are two things.
- [01:03:37.360]So in his descent, David Souter,
- [01:03:39.630]which was also, David Souter,
- [01:03:40.810]the last time a Republican is going to nominate a guy
- [01:03:45.144]who turns out to be a liberal;
- [01:03:46.147]that was George Bush,
- [01:03:47.150]he gave us Clarence Thomas,
- [01:03:48.152]and he gave us David Souter.
- [01:03:49.155]And so Souter, almost, I think explicitly
- [01:03:51.040]reference the AAUP Amicus Brief.
- [01:03:53.610]And he said, you know,
- [01:03:54.660]the majority of this decision here
- [01:03:56.260]has potentially chilling effects
- [01:03:58.540]for university professionals at public universities.
- [01:04:02.530]And Rehnquist's response to that was, maybe.
- [01:04:06.700]Seriously.
- [01:04:07.900]The court need not, and therefore does not,
- [01:04:10.270]pass on this decision,
- [01:04:12.040]on that aspect of the case today.
- [01:04:14.240]And so, we started seeing the AAUP.
- [01:04:16.410]Okay, I'm not in the AAUP legal staff,
- [01:04:18.220]but again, I was on Committee A.
- [01:04:19.520]We started seeing what we called The Children of Garcetti
- [01:04:21.780]coming through.
- [01:04:22.830]And it was not a left/right thing.
- [01:04:25.010]One of the people who fell afoul with it
- [01:04:27.867]was a guy at University North Carolina, Greensboro
- [01:04:31.610]named Mike Adams,
- [01:04:32.780]who's a sort of low level, right wing wannabe pundit,
- [01:04:37.780]and who will occasionally write these sort of incendiary,
- [01:04:41.739]trollish things for the local paper,
- [01:04:45.326]you know, usually about gender and race.
- [01:04:48.990]And that actually held him up for promotion,
- [01:04:51.890]he got denied a promotion because of this extramural speech,
- [01:04:54.286]under Garcetti.
- [01:04:56.770]And the AAUP came to his defense,
- [01:04:58.630]'cause we are that way,
- [01:04:59.610]and we'll even defend a crank
- [01:05:01.950]who mouths off about his female students in the newspaper,
- [01:05:06.100]on the grounds that that actually doesn't...
- [01:05:08.144]Actually, it wasn't his students,
- [01:05:08.977]that would have crossed a line.
- [01:05:10.450]But yeah, Rehnquist quite clearly left the door open,
- [01:05:15.370]said, "You know, we're not gonna pass on this one,
- [01:05:17.147]"Souter has brought it up, he's right,
- [01:05:18.967]"it could pertain to it,
- [01:05:21.093]"and, you know, let the chips fall where they may."
- [01:05:22.690]So good to hear you're patching that one.
- [01:05:25.170]It's never too late.
- [01:05:28.960]So you have these suggestions
- [01:05:30.120]on things you might wanna see changed in the bylaws.
- [01:05:33.758]Do you have tactical advice on how we might go
- [01:05:37.260]about getting these changes implemented in an environment
- [01:05:40.140]where not all these ideals may be respected in all quarters?
- [01:05:45.110]Sure.
- [01:05:48.970]I'm trying to think what my batting average is with admin.
- [01:05:51.900]Again, I lost on the persistently thing, right?
- [01:05:54.520]And so far, no harm, until...
- [01:05:57.816]In fact, I did a presentation in my new capacity
- [01:06:01.270]as Senate Chair for the new faculty orientation,
- [01:06:04.460]and my new mantra for this thing is don't worry about it,
- [01:06:07.190]these policies will never affect you,
- [01:06:09.240]until they do, all right?
- [01:06:11.900]That's why you should care about them.
- [01:06:13.600]So that's one, again,
- [01:06:15.740]one of the responses is:
- [01:06:16.800]this is not a problem, right?
- [01:06:18.820]Thinks are fine, mostly,
- [01:06:20.120]except for a graduate student yelling at an undergraduate
- [01:06:23.180]at a table.
- [01:06:24.830]Or about what I heard yesterday.
- [01:06:26.978]Someone wants to take the word Armenian
- [01:06:29.060]out of a thing about Armenian genocide.
- [01:06:31.500]Again, newsflash, Armenian genocide happened.
- [01:06:33.720]Turks did it.
- [01:06:34.870]Am I gonna get shit there?
- [01:06:37.270]I thought that was pretty obvious.
- [01:06:38.560]That's, yeah, okay.
- [01:06:41.060]So, one thing is you wanna appeal, I think,
- [01:06:43.720]to people's sense of professionalism,
- [01:06:45.480]and their sense of working
- [01:06:46.870]at a legitimate, major university.
- [01:06:50.210]You can't really be a legitimate, major, public university,
- [01:06:52.426]if your faculty don't have the freedom
- [01:06:55.490]to speak about the operations of the university
- [01:06:57.380]in their professional capacities.
- [01:06:59.050]You have something else.
- [01:07:03.232]You have a quasi-military, or religious,
- [01:07:05.990]or whatever, institution,
- [01:07:08.770]where certain aspects of the free exchange of ideas
- [01:07:11.900]are just not welcome.
- [01:07:13.800]And if that's what you want, be careful.
- [01:07:18.900]Because that actually could
- [01:07:20.030]eventually speak to accreditation,
- [01:07:21.490]it could speak to your reputation.
- [01:07:24.440]Again, one of the few things the AAUP can do with censure.
- [01:07:27.550]What did we do with censure, right?
- [01:07:29.600]Did we dock anybody's pay?
- [01:07:32.250]Did we shut down a building?
- [01:07:34.110]It's all reputational.
- [01:07:36.021]How many people have actually looked at the censure list,
- [01:07:39.630]now that you're on it,
- [01:07:40.580]to see what kind of company you're keeping?
- [01:07:43.616]Yeah, there are some,
- [01:07:47.270]you're in the dungeon man! (audience laughing)
- [01:07:50.190]There are some real serious malefactors there.
- [01:07:52.430]The Savannah College of Art and Design,
- [01:07:54.130]holy Jesus, it's huge.
- [01:07:55.500]And it graduates so many people in art and design.
- [01:07:57.720]It is run as a personal family thiefdom.
- [01:08:00.960]There is no sense in which
- [01:08:01.793]that's a legitimate educational institution.
- [01:08:03.060]It still gives degrees and stuff, and people go to it,
- [01:08:04.880]but ugh.
- [01:08:05.870]And then the one that really kills me is SUNY,
- [01:08:07.743]State University of New York,
- [01:08:10.740]that has been on the censure list since 1976.
- [01:08:13.504](scattered laughing)
- [01:08:14.450]Who laughed?
- [01:08:15.410]It's not funny!
- [01:08:17.300]Because, and the reason is,
- [01:08:19.980]they have what may be
- [01:08:21.180]the worst collective bargaining agreement
- [01:08:22.690]in the history of collective bargaining.
- [01:08:25.270]The notorious Article 35 allows administration
- [01:08:28.040]just to shut down programs.
- [01:08:30.400]That's it, no more French or Italian today.
- [01:08:32.310]I mention that because SUNY Albany, in 2010,
- [01:08:34.690]did shut down French, Italian, Russian,
- [01:08:36.520]theater, and classics.
- [01:08:37.950]And this caused great outcry.
- [01:08:39.930]And the AAUP couldn't do jack about it
- [01:08:42.210]because we had already censured them.
- [01:08:43.980]There was no double secret censure, right?
- [01:08:47.230]And so we don't have any leverage over them any more.
- [01:08:49.216]But I can tell you, not too far from here,
- [01:08:52.110]University of Northern Iowa,
- [01:08:53.290]I led an investigation in 2012,
- [01:08:56.160]and you didn't hear about it because it worked.
- [01:08:59.240]We didn't censure UNI
- [01:09:00.360]because the administration came back to the table
- [01:09:01.980]and did not close the 72 programs they were gonna close,
- [01:09:05.700]and they did not lay off the faculty
- [01:09:06.850]they were gonna lay off,
- [01:09:08.220]partly because the general council who just interrupted me,
- [01:09:12.240]said, "C'mon, get to the chase!
- [01:09:13.857]"What's the worst case scenario here?"
- [01:09:14.900]I said, "The worst case scenario here is censure.
- [01:09:17.427]"You wanna look at the censure list?
- [01:09:18.447]"You wanna see who you join?
- [01:09:19.877]"You wanna take that risk with accreditors?
- [01:09:21.861]"You wanna take that risk with students?
- [01:09:23.141]"That's up to you."
- [01:09:25.610]That worked.
- [01:09:26.550]There are other places where it does not.
- [01:09:27.930]I made the same pitch to the University of Southern Maine,
- [01:09:29.940]they told me to go leave Southern Maine
- [01:09:31.590]and go someplace else.
- [01:09:34.270]So yeah.
- [01:09:35.270]This is the way...
- [01:09:36.370]And the last thing is.
- [01:09:37.990]And as you're watching who your next President might be.
- [01:09:40.270]Again, you look across the road at Iowa,
- [01:09:43.480]where Bruce Harreld, right?
- [01:09:45.480]He comes in with no faculty support whatsoever, right?
- [01:09:50.780]And he actually does work, to his credit,
- [01:09:52.916]and when I met him last year in this program,
- [01:09:55.839]I said, "Thanks for consulting the Faculty Senate
- [01:09:58.967]"on whether Richard Spencer gets to speak.
- [01:10:01.044]You know, it's an administrative decision in the end, right?
- [01:10:04.585]And whereas Spencer did speak at Florida, Gainesville,
- [01:10:08.730]I think that cost them, what, $800,000?
- [01:10:10.830]Berkeley, from Milo Yiannopoulos, something similar.
- [01:10:13.609]And at least he consulted the faculty,
- [01:10:15.370]he knew he had some fences to mend, right?
- [01:10:18.409]But let's say you have someone
- [01:10:19.320]come in from the business world,
- [01:10:20.620]who doesn't understand the strange beast that academia is.
- [01:10:23.420]This is one of the ways academia is a strange beast.
- [01:10:25.480]It has a thing called shared governance.
- [01:10:27.680]Most businesses don't.
- [01:10:29.090]They don't ask their employees for input on policy, right?
- [01:10:32.240]Administration is administration.
- [01:10:33.915]We don't work that way.
- [01:10:35.814]This is supposed to be a partnership.
- [01:10:38.210]Now, it doesn't go everywhere.
- [01:10:39.764]I can say anything I want about the Penn State budget,
- [01:10:42.330]it has no effect whatsoever.
- [01:10:44.180]Senate does not deal with budgetary matters by statute.
- [01:10:48.300]But about other things,
- [01:10:50.267]especially about the academic mission,
- [01:10:51.750]or about the effective governance of the university?
- [01:10:53.880]You should be able to say anything at all.
- [01:10:57.140]And you know, if some of it's not constructive,
- [01:10:59.208]yeah, that happens.
- [01:11:01.120]There are cranks.
- [01:11:02.600]Some of them are really brave whistleblowers
- [01:11:04.650]who are being ostracized
- [01:11:05.640]by their colleagues or their departments.
- [01:11:07.160]Others are just cranks, right?
- [01:11:09.469]But, that's the price you pay for a free society,
- [01:11:13.290]is you get a crank protection plan.
- [01:11:15.350]I wouldn't lead with that part,
- [01:11:16.520]I would lead with the legitimate exchange of ideas part.
- [01:11:19.540]But that's what I would say.
- [01:11:20.560]Yeah?
- [01:11:22.550]Thank you for your comments.
- [01:11:23.800]I am a graduate student instructor.
- [01:11:26.600]For all intents and purposes, I am Courtney Lawton.
- [01:11:29.370]In my experience I have to be a shape shifter,
- [01:11:31.510]because I am both a student and a staff member day-to-day.
- [01:11:35.212]Yup, yup.
- [01:11:36.060]The university designates us as one or the other,
- [01:11:39.240]student or staff, for various purposes,
- [01:11:41.335]usually whichever is less advantageous to us.
- [01:11:45.330]So my question to you is,
- [01:11:46.650]if you were in a position to advise UNL
- [01:11:49.290]on how this designation should be revisited
- [01:11:53.180]for graduate student instructors,
- [01:11:55.200]what would you advise them?
- [01:11:56.300]How ought we be classified for purposes of academic freedom
- [01:11:59.617]and freedom of expression?
- [01:12:03.330]I didn't expect the easy questions I guess.
- [01:12:05.820]No, this is really, really tough.
- [01:12:07.340]Because, and every time I've tried to raise it,
- [01:12:09.990]I've actually had a few,
- [01:12:11.330]I've posed a few panels, both of the AAUP and MLA,
- [01:12:15.483]on graduate students and academic freedom,
- [01:12:16.316]and I've gotten no takers,
- [01:12:17.520]because no graduate students wanted to go on record,
- [01:12:19.835]for precisely the reasons you described.
- [01:12:22.693]In fact, that was one of the things at stake
- [01:12:24.165]in the Courtney Lawton case, right?
- [01:12:25.200]That for some (burping), excuse me,
- [01:12:27.301]for some purposes she was treated
- [01:12:28.496]as if she were a professor,
- [01:12:29.904]and some cases,
- [01:12:30.971]in some aspects she was treated as if she were a student.
- [01:12:33.808]Here's the complicating thing.
- [01:12:37.060]Graduate students.
- [01:12:38.672]I'm gonna put this in shorthand first,
- [01:12:42.000]gonna sound silly.
- [01:12:43.100]But graduate students gradually accrete academic freedom,
- [01:12:45.940]like little particles attach it to them as they go.
- [01:12:49.120]Because when you first come in, obviously,
- [01:12:50.580]you don't have much in the way of academic freedom at all,
- [01:12:53.180]you don't have any academic expertise, right?
- [01:12:55.750]And obviously you have to meet the requirements
- [01:12:57.250]of your program, right?
- [01:12:59.100]So no one comes in and says,
- [01:13:01.037]"Well, under academic freedom,
- [01:13:02.187]"a person doesn't actually
- [01:13:03.020]"have to meet the language requirement,
- [01:13:04.387]"or doesn't have to have this historical breadth,
- [01:13:06.257]"or whatever."
- [01:13:07.590]Then, there's the question,
- [01:13:08.760]that when you're finished with your coursework,
- [01:13:10.030]and you go through comprehensive exams,
- [01:13:11.390]or you move on to the dissertation stage,
- [01:13:13.019]you are still subject to your committee.
- [01:13:16.830]And to refer to another scandal
- [01:13:21.296]that has nothing to do with this,
- [01:13:22.299]the Avital Ronell scandal from last fall and summer,
- [01:13:24.930]you know one of the things that became clear
- [01:13:26.459]from that scandal at NYU,
- [01:13:28.350]it opened this whole discussion about abusive mentors,
- [01:13:31.370]or abusive faculty-graduate student relations.
- [01:13:35.660]And I don't know to this moment
- [01:13:40.160]what kind of action NYU will or won't take
- [01:13:42.390]in regard to Ronell,
- [01:13:43.400]and what I think is clearly
- [01:13:44.570]a pattern of abuse of this student.
- [01:13:48.470]But it's one of the things that limits the academic freedom
- [01:13:50.310]of graduate students.
- [01:13:51.143]You're still subject to the requirements,
- [01:13:53.210]first of the general requirements of the program,
- [01:13:55.430]and then whatever your advisor reasonably asks you
- [01:13:58.650]or requires you to do.
- [01:14:00.380]So that's the hard part.
- [01:14:02.090]Otherwise, as you grow in academic expertise,
- [01:14:06.910]you should,
- [01:14:08.610]the more you can claim to be an authority on,
- [01:14:10.620]well, my project actually is on dredging
- [01:14:12.879]and Midwestern flooding.
- [01:14:16.557]And my attitude toward,
- [01:14:17.830]what we'll see over the next couple months,
- [01:14:20.550]that they're doing it all wrong,
- [01:14:22.110]and if in fact the US Army Corps of Engineers,
- [01:14:24.980]or the State of Nebraska doesn't like it,
- [01:14:26.500]they can go lump it, I'm an expert.
- [01:14:28.510]But you have to establish that expertise.
- [01:14:30.060]So it's really tricky.
- [01:14:31.330]And that's why I can call up what the AAUP has.
- [01:14:38.120]Let's see.
- [01:14:43.300]First of all, everyone should join this organization.
- [01:14:45.120]I should say that too.
- [01:14:46.890]And if you join, you actually do get a copy of the red book,
- [01:14:50.670]Policy, Documents, and Reports.
- [01:14:53.040]But online, here we go.
- [01:14:56.000]Recommended institutional regulation 14.
- [01:14:59.800]That's what we got.
- [01:15:02.756]That's the best we have so far.
- [01:15:07.180]So there too is mostly about appointment
- [01:15:11.750]and non-reappointment.
- [01:15:15.840]Basically copying and pasting as much of that as possible
- [01:15:18.950]into whatever governance document
- [01:15:20.610]you have for graduate students.
- [01:15:21.900]Even that doesn't fully answer your question,
- [01:15:23.840]because of the limitations I just mentioned,
- [01:15:26.480]but it's what we have.
- [01:15:30.309]We have a question here.
- [01:15:31.397]Go ahead. Sure.
- [01:15:32.440]Many majors and departments
- [01:15:33.950]are criticized for being biased,
- [01:15:36.240]especially on the basis of being over politicized.
- [01:15:38.780]Sure.
- [01:15:39.613]I am taking an upper level economics course
- [01:15:42.620]entitled Gender Economics and Social Provisioning.
- [01:15:45.870]This course mainly problematizes
- [01:15:47.560]the neoclassical economic literature on multiple fronts,
- [01:15:50.802]one of which is interpreting (mumbling)
- [01:15:53.390]through aggression models as informing of casualties,
- [01:15:55.830]not correlations.
- [01:15:57.800]I find it troubling, however,
- [01:15:59.170]that when non-mainstream economic thought is introduced,
- [01:16:02.810]it's not held to the same level of criticism
- [01:16:04.972]as is done to the neoclassical model.
- [01:16:07.982]In your opinion,
- [01:16:09.130]what conditions must be present in any course
- [01:16:11.870]that would make it a more open exploration
- [01:16:14.090]of various schools of thought,
- [01:16:16.160]as compared to a mere political propaganda?
- [01:16:18.950]To be clear, I'm not inquiring about any underlying values
- [01:16:21.780]which any discipline is advocating,
- [01:16:23.750]instead I'm asking about the proper,
- [01:16:25.904]or sufficiently unbiased methodology of construction.
- [01:16:29.550]Wow.
- [01:16:30.610]Thank you.
- [01:16:31.740]I hope I can get the right passage on this.
- [01:16:41.810]Dang, it's a PDF.
- [01:16:43.380]Hang on a sec.
- [01:16:46.970]I love the question,
- [01:16:48.276]and I love the fact that it comes out of economics,
- [01:16:49.705]that's really...
- [01:16:51.640]Okay let's see.
- [01:16:57.090]Oh, maybe, I hope it's searchable.
- [01:17:00.350]Because there's a specific word
- [01:17:01.620]that you wouldn't find too many.
- [01:17:03.913](computer dinging)
- [01:17:08.470]Oh wait.
- [01:17:10.930]There we go.
- [01:17:18.153]Okay.
- [01:17:24.591](grunting)
- [01:17:26.350]Okay, thanks for bearing with me.
- [01:17:29.930]Okay.
- [01:17:34.020]It starts with the university teacher in giving instruction.
- [01:17:36.950]But first, to go to your example from economics,
- [01:17:38.947]it's funny.
- [01:17:40.150]I just heard from an undergraduate, a woman of color,
- [01:17:43.320]at my own institution,
- [01:17:45.810]that although she's loved her education at Penn State,
- [01:17:49.520]she was especially annoyed with economics
- [01:17:51.410]not raising precisely the challenges
- [01:17:53.670]to the neoclassical model that you described.
- [01:17:55.760]Which is usually the case, all right?
- [01:17:57.720]And that led me to follow up by saying,
- [01:17:59.737]"You know, that's a shame,
- [01:18:01.627]"because in economics,
- [01:18:03.557]"once you leave Penn State or Nebraska,
- [01:18:05.627]"race and gender are gonna be a thing,
- [01:18:07.607]"even in economics,
- [01:18:08.637]"they're gonna structure the economic world you live in,
- [01:18:11.167]"and the markets you negotiate."
- [01:18:13.770]And I should say, the markets you navigate,
- [01:18:16.940]I don't mean that you, yourself,
- [01:18:18.560]would be fiddling with the markets.
- [01:18:21.880]And I worry, sometimes,
- [01:18:24.430]that in certain disciplines,
- [01:18:25.650]we don't have a single faculty member of color.
- [01:18:27.960]We have one, tenured, full professor of color,
- [01:18:31.810]in political science.
- [01:18:34.200]I hope that gets fixed.
- [01:18:36.820]We did just do a cluster hire of 10 people
- [01:18:39.210]in African-American Studies, which is great,
- [01:18:41.410]'cause they'll have affiliations with other departments.
- [01:18:44.110]But some departments just still operate
- [01:18:47.120]as if they're immune,
- [01:18:48.490]or their subject matter doesn't touch on this stuff.
- [01:18:50.530]And if it does, that it would be politicized, okay?
- [01:18:53.840]So that was a wrinkle I didn't expect from you comment.
- [01:18:55.450]Usually when I hear from students in economics,
- [01:18:57.820]and psychology is another one,
- [01:18:59.644]their complaint is that race, and gender, and sexuality,
- [01:19:02.880]and other modes of social being,
- [01:19:04.280]are under theorized in their discipline.
- [01:19:06.820]And that has the effect in a lot of places,
- [01:19:09.220]including my own,
- [01:19:10.330]of offloading all the questions about race, gender,
- [01:19:12.930]sexuality, et cetera,
- [01:19:14.170]to the two departments,
- [01:19:15.920]Women's Gender and Sexuality Studies,
- [01:19:17.507]and African-American Studies, or Ethnic Studies,
- [01:19:19.360]or what have you.
- [01:19:20.240]So A, I'm glad to hear that that's not the case,
- [01:19:21.953]that they have one course that, you know,
- [01:19:24.817]which challenges to the neoclassical model are welcome.
- [01:19:30.480]Now, as for the methodology in which they're taught,
- [01:19:34.450]and whether they are intrusions
- [01:19:36.220]upon the subject matter or what, okay.
- [01:19:39.281]So in 1915, the original AAUP statement on academic freedom
- [01:19:41.780]is really chatty.
- [01:19:42.940]It's nine pages long,
- [01:19:44.784]and it's an essay.
- [01:19:47.700]And about 10, 12 years ago,
- [01:19:51.150]I ran into a series of conservative thinkers,
- [01:19:53.530]who kept quoting this passage,
- [01:19:55.153]and I didn't know why.
- [01:19:57.010]I thought, why are they all on about the 1915 statement?
- [01:19:59.770]Well, it's 'cause of things like you're question.
- [01:20:02.812]The university teacher, who is like male,
- [01:20:05.520]while he is under no obligation to hide his own opinion
- [01:20:07.970]under a mountain of equivocal verbiage,
- [01:20:10.106]should, if he is fit for his position,
- [01:20:12.240]be a person of fair a judicial mind.
- [01:20:14.320]He should, in dealing with such subjects set forth justly
- [01:20:16.480]without suppression or innuendo,
- [01:20:20.170]the divergent opinions of other investigators,
- [01:20:22.210]he should cause his students to become familiar
- [01:20:23.850]with the best published expressions
- [01:20:25.888]of the great historic types of doctrine,
- [01:20:27.358]et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
- [01:20:28.380]And, of course, you still find this in the brochure.
- [01:20:30.570]His business is, liberal arts brochures everywhere,
- [01:20:33.120]not to provide his students with ready-made conclusions,
- [01:20:35.240]but to train them to think for themselves,
- [01:20:36.860]and to provide them access with those materials
- [01:20:38.610]which they need if they are to think intelligently.
- [01:20:40.885]Well, under pressure from various conservative commentators
- [01:20:44.760]and people like David Horowitz,
- [01:20:46.780]Penn State, for a while, actually had all this language
- [01:20:50.200]in its academic freedom policy.
- [01:20:52.171]And I wasn't in the Faculty Senate at the time,
- [01:20:55.730]but I did contact the Senators I knew and said,
- [01:20:57.487]"How about no?
- [01:20:59.267]"How about none of this."
- [01:21:00.250]Because, if I am fit for my position,
- [01:21:03.980]and I am a person of fair and judicial mind,
- [01:21:06.040]which I am,
- [01:21:07.078]I should always set forth justly
- [01:21:09.610]without suppression or innuendo
- [01:21:10.860]the divergent opinions of other investigators?
- [01:21:14.860]What?
- [01:21:16.870]So, look, this is my take on Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man.
- [01:21:23.220]How much time do I have to give
- [01:21:24.380]to the other 400 interpretations, that are relevant,
- [01:21:27.800]of Invisible Man?
- [01:21:29.270]Why isn't this my class?
- [01:21:31.671]On the other hand,
- [01:21:32.730]I'm also not doing people any good service
- [01:21:34.710]if I'm not indicating in some way
- [01:21:36.160]that there are other takes on this,
- [01:21:38.610]or on, in fact, gender disparities in pay,
- [01:21:42.600]or, you know, the kinds of protections available
- [01:21:46.010]to minoritized populations
- [01:21:47.830]in certain kinds of professions, right?
- [01:21:50.480]But the idea that it should be an iron law,
- [01:21:53.100]that I should set forth without suppression or innuendo.
- [01:21:55.780]I just love that phrase.
- [01:21:57.400]I'm setting forth Beth's opinion,
- [01:21:59.150]but I'm doing it with innuendo.
- [01:22:01.368](audience laughing)
- [01:22:02.380]Crank!
- [01:22:03.660]Or suppression.
- [01:22:04.760]It was even weirder
- [01:22:07.090]that in the course of making it into Penn State's policy
- [01:22:09.480]there was typo,
- [01:22:10.490]it was supersession or innuendo.
- [01:22:13.313](audience laughing)
- [01:22:14.313]Like, I don't know what this means at this point.
- [01:22:15.807]But I think this is a relevant question,
- [01:22:18.430]not only for challenges
- [01:22:21.100]to the neoclassical model of economics,
- [01:22:22.640]but for any course
- [01:22:24.280]in which there could be another take, right?
- [01:22:26.203]And, in fact, that other take might be taught
- [01:22:27.990]by another professor right down the hall
- [01:22:30.914]in the next class section, right?
- [01:22:33.160]And you have to allow for some of that idiosyncrasy, right?
- [01:22:36.200]You have to allow...
- [01:22:38.260]You're hiring people as experts,
- [01:22:40.130]you give them pretty much free reign,
- [01:22:42.460]as long as they stay within the parameters of their subject.
- [01:22:44.570]So for all the economists who think
- [01:22:46.168]there are challenges to the neoclassical model,
- [01:22:48.960]but I'm not gonna bother with them, right?
- [01:22:51.177]They're sort of not relevant
- [01:22:53.040]to the reversion analysis we're doing.
- [01:22:58.852]And if an entire discipline gets warped that way,
- [01:23:03.290]then that's not even a question of bias,
- [01:23:06.470]that's a question of, like,
- [01:23:08.241]how narrow are the parameters of that field?
- [01:23:10.710]That's the question Joan Scott was asking about history.
- [01:23:12.934]Why are we not writing about the history of women
- [01:23:16.040]in the French Revolution?
- [01:23:16.900]That was a big thing, also, by the way.
- [01:23:18.844]When that first was broached,
- [01:23:20.800]it was, oh yeah, women in the French Revolution.
- [01:23:22.897]Never had before,
- [01:23:25.230]even though they were there.
- [01:23:27.230]So, no, you want, I mean,
- [01:23:29.630]the impulse behind this is not wrong, right?
- [01:23:31.430]You don't want someone who's a doctrinaire,
- [01:23:34.210]hectorer of students, leading your classroom,
- [01:23:37.000]that's not a good way to go.
- [01:23:38.700]It also tends not to work.
- [01:23:40.430]Indoctrination doesn't usually work by that age.
- [01:23:42.890]I've tried.
- [01:23:44.166]No, I haven't.
- [01:23:45.480]But you want some sense of what the parameters,
- [01:23:47.640]the available intellectual options are in a field,
- [01:23:49.542]as much as possible,
- [01:23:51.220]without turning your classroom into,
- [01:23:53.420]I don't know, here's 400 options.
- [01:23:54.961]But thanks for the question.
- [01:23:56.850]Here's our final question.
- [01:23:58.694]Sure.
- [01:24:00.790]So I think one of the challenges
- [01:24:03.650]with extramural speech, and, I mean,
- [01:24:05.590]it can happen in academic freedom in research too,
- [01:24:08.680]is that, especially with the way things go viral,
- [01:24:14.500]the things that a faculty member says,
- [01:24:17.340]which might have no bearing directly on their teaching,
- [01:24:21.260]can still create an environment that affects students,
- [01:24:25.160]and affects students in their class,
- [01:24:26.340]even if in the classroom they say and do nothing related.
- [01:24:30.690]You know, the guy you were talking about in North Carolina
- [01:24:33.610]publishing Op Eds in the paper,
- [01:24:34.930]if those things are incredibly offensive
- [01:24:37.760]to certain groups of students,
- [01:24:39.110]that can create a really negative educational environment
- [01:24:42.860]that may actually make it
- [01:24:44.770]so that he is unable to effectively teach.
- [01:24:49.680]Except to people who like that stuff, right?
- [01:24:51.378]Well it depends Self-selecting audience.
- [01:24:53.047]on how you define effective teaching,
- [01:24:54.940]but what do you do with that?
- [01:24:57.397]This is why I've decided,
- [01:24:59.680]even though I've gotten literate in these things,
- [01:25:02.070]and I went to the academic leadership program last year,
- [01:25:04.530]I'm not moving into administration.
- [01:25:07.350]Because that's really a question
- [01:25:09.300]for the Vice Provost of Faculty Affairs or your equivalent.
- [01:25:11.434]And in fact, one of the things I...
- [01:25:15.860]The thing that literally has kept me up at night this year,
- [01:25:18.880]in my year as Senate Chair,
- [01:25:20.500]is this lingering thing.
- [01:25:21.950]It's a task force report that should turn into a committee,
- [01:25:25.130]about what to do about faculty
- [01:25:27.110]short of revocation of tenure.
- [01:25:31.701]I'm not gonna be the Senate Chair who gave admin
- [01:25:34.550]more arrows in the quiver to get us with.
- [01:25:38.480]But, let's take not only the Mike Adams case,
- [01:25:41.917]but we had, this thing went national very briefly,
- [01:25:46.750]it was mostly a Twitter phenomenon,
- [01:25:48.310]and then it exploded onto blogs,
- [01:25:49.706](hands clapping together)
- [01:25:51.219]but we had a professor in our own department, in English,
- [01:25:52.790]who was arguably transphobic.
- [01:25:56.740]And the fact that he was a gay man
- [01:25:59.340]made this really difficult,
- [01:26:01.330]because, if I can go into it just for a moment.
- [01:26:04.234]For those of you not even familiar
- [01:26:06.850]with what the stakes are, (hands clapping together)
- [01:26:09.020]there's two things.
- [01:26:09.853]One is a deep, philosophical and political debate,
- [01:26:12.768]disagreement, about surgery, (hands clapping together)
- [01:26:18.030]about sexual transition,
- [01:26:20.170]where some constituencies basically say,
- [01:26:24.067]"Don't do it, don't transition, don't do the surgery,
- [01:26:26.647]"just be gay.
- [01:26:28.917]"Because if you do the transition,
- [01:26:32.157]"you're reifying the idea that gender's biological."
- [01:26:36.750]Now, I don't buy that myself,
- [01:26:39.200]but that was the argument.
- [01:26:42.016]On the trans side,
- [01:26:42.849]it's like, you know what?
- [01:26:44.240]You fought back the, you know, first there was.
- [01:26:48.230]I'm old enough to remember. (hands clapping together)
- [01:26:49.063]I used to say, I used to think it was a joke, it's not.
- [01:26:51.183]But I'm so old that I remember when there was just G and L.
- [01:26:54.750]Right?
- [01:26:55.583]I'm so old that I remember
- [01:26:56.416]when Michelob was a premium beer, right?
- [01:26:59.050]And then Q came along.
- [01:27:00.213]And I was in the room for some of those,
- [01:27:02.720]the second annual graduate student conference
- [01:27:05.860]on gay and lesbian studies was at Urbana-Champaign,
- [01:27:08.550]University of Illinois.
- [01:27:09.650]A young woman named Judith Butler was the keynote.
- [01:27:12.360]She had just published this book, Gender Trouble.
- [01:27:15.050]Bliss wasn't (mumbling) that dawn to be alive,
- [01:27:16.670]but being Assistant Professor in the Humanities,
- [01:27:19.251]very heavenly.
- [01:27:20.532]And the older gay and lesbian activists
- [01:27:22.610]thought that queer would destroy them all.
- [01:27:25.530]Anybody can be queer, right?
- [01:27:27.250]You've dissolved all our political movement
- [01:27:30.720]into water vapor.
- [01:27:31.930]And now I'm seeing the same thing 30 years ago,
- [01:27:34.180]where the queer activists of 30 years ago are saying,
- [01:27:36.717]"Oh no, now the trans people have come,
- [01:27:38.117]"they're gonna undo all the queer work we did,
- [01:27:40.437]"and now we're gonna have gender as biological fact again."
- [01:27:43.480]So politically and intellectually, that's a debate.
- [01:27:46.620]Refusing to call one of your students
- [01:27:48.700]by their preferred name,
- [01:27:49.900]or by their preferred pronoun?
- [01:27:51.290]Which I can't say actually happened, I wasn't there,
- [01:27:53.320]it's alleged.
- [01:27:54.440]But that's another thing altogether, all right?
- [01:27:57.730]So what, in fact, do you do?
- [01:27:59.660]And it's not a firing offense, right?
- [01:28:03.240]And one of the things,
- [01:28:06.463]this gets down to a little, grainy details,
- [01:28:07.530]there are some case, (hands clapping together)
- [01:28:08.895]I don't know if you've been in meetings like this,
- [01:28:10.026]where everyone goes around before the meeting
- [01:28:10.859]with their pronouns, he/him/his, right?
- [01:28:13.311]There are two objections to this.
- [01:28:15.930]One, it puts people on the spot,
- [01:28:19.570]if they don't want to identify one way or the other.
- [01:28:22.847]So it actually outs people who are queerer than thou,
- [01:28:26.510]they're not even gonna go by they, right?
- [01:28:30.470]The other thing is that,
- [01:28:31.450]I can tell you in 30 years of meetings as a faculty member,
- [01:28:34.240]I have never once referred to a person around the table
- [01:28:36.240]by their pronoun.
- [01:28:37.260]I've always referred to them by name.
- [01:28:38.940]I would just never say, "Well, she said..."
- [01:28:40.660]I mean, it's kinda rude.
- [01:28:42.030]So why are we doing this?
- [01:28:43.796]But let's say you refuse to participate
- [01:28:45.972]in that pronoun thing before a meeting.
- [01:28:48.260]Have you transgressed something?
- [01:28:50.120]Have you offended someone, right?
- [01:28:51.860]Then you take this all the way up the spectrum
- [01:28:53.890]to real serious gender or sexual harassment,
- [01:28:57.151]and you've go the need for a policy.
- [01:29:00.210]And in fact, let me, one last thing,
- [01:29:02.910]I know we're a little over time.
- [01:29:04.720]But, like I say, this stuff really does keep me up.
- [01:29:08.730]Because I've been using this as an example,
- [01:29:10.610]not only because it's timely and totally relevant.
- [01:29:16.340]Oh, sorry.
- [01:29:18.730]Yup.
- [01:29:22.350]The title alone, God damn, you know.
- [01:29:26.450]All the horrors.
- [01:29:28.310]And I put this up at the last Faculty Senate meeting,
- [01:29:35.250]I'm not skipping over the content,
- [01:29:37.597]it's a hell of a policy.
- [01:29:41.155]But look, sanctions!
- [01:29:43.040]It's already in there.
- [01:29:45.080]Termination from university, unpaid suspension,
- [01:29:46.730]restrictions from all or portions of campus,
- [01:29:48.360]change in working facility, mandated education,
- [01:29:50.620]written reprimand in personnel file,
- [01:29:51.900]that's like the lightest thing, right?
- [01:29:54.457]Really, what in fact do you do?
- [01:29:56.800]And should there, at the very least,
- [01:29:58.330]I thought there should be an appeals process
- [01:30:00.070]for people who were accused unjustly.
- [01:30:02.030]In our research fraud policy,
- [01:30:04.835]there's a clause at the end of it that says,
- [01:30:07.317]"If you believe that you have been accused
- [01:30:09.207]"of research fraud in bad faith,
- [01:30:10.657]"you can turn the tables."
- [01:30:13.004]But that's what you do.
- [01:30:14.740]You do this, and you make sure those policies are in place,
- [01:30:17.010]and there's a reasonable and reliable way of enforcing them
- [01:30:21.470]that doesn't turn into a device
- [01:30:24.230]for actually retaliating against innocent faculty
- [01:30:28.930]who are just raising questions.
- [01:30:31.224]But yeah, as far as Penn State is concerned, TBD.
- [01:30:33.820]I just charged that committee last week.
- [01:30:36.610]And it's among the most politically sensitive things
- [01:30:38.680]I've done as Senate Chair,
- [01:30:40.459]because a lot of faculty don't want to go this route at all.
- [01:30:41.656]But one last thing about things going viral on social media.
- [01:30:46.627](coughing) Excuse me.
- [01:30:49.699]The part of that email that accused me of racism,
- [01:30:52.520]accused me of calling people of color, monkeys.
- [01:30:55.880]Okay.
- [01:30:56.713]I mentioned the multiple universes hypothesis?
- [01:30:58.410]There is no universe in which I would ever do that!
- [01:31:00.880]And if I did, I should be fired.
- [01:31:03.070]That should be a career ending thing, right?
- [01:31:05.470]Here's what I actually said.
- [01:31:07.780]Of all the things I've seen on the Internet,
- [01:31:10.140]nothing was weirder than having my Wikipedia page attacked
- [01:31:13.160]by a band of flying monkeys.
- [01:31:15.070]And I kind of assumed
- [01:31:15.940]that everyone has seen the Wizard of Oz.
- [01:31:20.047]That's, right?
- [01:31:22.958]So talk about things.
- [01:31:24.195]It had nothing to do with anything in a classroom.
- [01:31:25.180]It had to do with a conversation after a conference,
- [01:31:27.710]in which people were talking about Internet aggression
- [01:31:30.280]and trolling and what have you,
- [01:31:31.490]and someone asked me,
- [01:31:32.447]"You had a blog, you must have seen weird behavior?"
- [01:31:34.360]I said, "Yeah, nothing as weird
- [01:31:35.257]"as having your Wikipedia page attacked by flying monkeys."
- [01:31:39.340]And maybe I was implying
- [01:31:40.870]that there was a Wicked Witch of the West somewhere,
- [01:31:42.270]but otherwise, it's really not a racially-tinged comment.
- [01:31:46.230]Now, let's say though,
- [01:31:48.067]that I did say something racially-tinged.
- [01:31:52.526]You know, then what?
- [01:31:53.800]Have I chilled the environment for students of color
- [01:31:56.200]at Penn State in my own classes, and about the campus?
- [01:31:58.220]Yeah, probably.
- [01:31:59.560]And something really ought to be done.
- [01:32:01.390]What to be done is TBD.
- [01:32:05.860]But thanks for the question.
- [01:32:07.997]And on that note, thanks.
- [01:32:09.250]Let's give our thanks to Dr. Berube.
- [01:32:11.491](audience applauding)
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/10900?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Talking Out of School: Academic Freedom and Extramural Speech" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments