Professor Koplow on Art. 4
Amanda Berman
Author
03/08/2019
Added
35
Plays
Description
Professor Koplow discusses Art. 4 of the OST.
Searchable Transcript
Toggle between list and paragraph view.
- [00:00:01.110]Hello, I'm Amanda Berman
- [00:00:02.660]from the University of Nebraska College of Law
- [00:00:04.700]with our Space, Cyber and Telecommunications Program.
- [00:00:07.250]Recently, the College of Law earned a grant
- [00:00:10.350]from NASA Nebraska to create a space law network.
- [00:00:14.300]To that end, we're creating these videos
- [00:00:16.260]about general space law with some of the industry's experts.
- [00:00:20.980]Today with me, is Professor Koplow of Georgetown University
- [00:00:25.350]to discuss Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty.
- [00:00:28.340]Professor.
- [00:00:30.080]Thank you, and it's a great pleasure to be with you
- [00:00:32.320]and to talk about one aspect of this very important treaty.
- [00:00:35.780]I'm gonna zoom in on Article IV
- [00:00:38.500]and try to dissect what it does and what it doesn't do.
- [00:00:42.120]But let me give you just a bit of broader background.
- [00:00:45.440]This treaty was negotiated
- [00:00:47.750]shortly after the opening of the Space Age.
- [00:00:50.370]In fact, one of the remarkable things about this instrument
- [00:00:53.310]was the way it demonstrates
- [00:00:54.940]that, sometimes, the international community
- [00:00:59.010]can respond with remarkable speed and finesse
- [00:01:04.650]in crafting new norms of international law quickly.
- [00:01:08.820]Ordinarily, the process of negotiating in a treaty
- [00:01:11.560]or creating norms of customary international law
- [00:01:13.650]can take years or decades.
- [00:01:16.490]And here, within 10 years, the world had come together
- [00:01:20.310]on the fundamentals of the Outer Space Treaty
- [00:01:22.323]that is still the most important norm in the areas,
- [00:01:26.580]still the constitution for the exploration of outer space.
- [00:01:32.220]But, as a result of that, the treaty is brief.
- [00:01:35.430]It does not have the elaborate, dissected aspects
- [00:01:40.720]that many more recent
- [00:01:42.860]international arms control agreements have.
- [00:01:44.570]It does not have the creation
- [00:01:46.310]of an international organization.
- [00:01:47.720]It does not have detailed specifications for verification
- [00:01:52.420]of other countries' compliance with their norms.
- [00:01:54.390]Instead, what we've got, is a pretty terse statement
- [00:01:59.140]of a few proscriptions,
- [00:02:00.920]and Article IV is a good example of that.
- [00:02:02.860]And so, we can dive right into what it says.
- [00:02:06.080]Article IV is often overstated.
- [00:02:11.130]People often say that Article IV
- [00:02:14.050]is a general prohibition on nuclear weapons
- [00:02:17.760]or other activities of that sort in outer space.
- [00:02:21.870]It's not quite that broad.
- [00:02:24.040]So let's take a look at what Article IV says.
- [00:02:27.000]Article IV requires that parties to the treaty undertake,
- [00:02:30.160]and then there are three specific verbs,
- [00:02:33.260]three specific actions, that countries cannot take
- [00:02:35.910]with respect to nuclear weapons
- [00:02:38.100]or other weapons of mass destruction.
- [00:02:40.110]They undertake not to place those devices
- [00:02:42.680]in orbit around the Earth.
- [00:02:44.840]They undertake not to install such weapons
- [00:02:47.310]on celestial bodies.
- [00:02:49.610]And not to station such weapons
- [00:02:51.160]in outer space in any other manner.
- [00:02:53.540]And that covers a lot.
- [00:02:54.610]In fact, that's why they were able to agree on that,
- [00:02:57.190]was that it was the basic prohibition
- [00:02:59.930]on what was seen at the time as the most threatening,
- [00:03:03.620]the most dangerous aspects of activities
- [00:03:06.020]that might stir a nuclear arms race in outer space.
- [00:03:10.700]But, just as important,
- [00:03:12.010]is what the treaty does not prohibit.
- [00:03:14.640]First of all, this part of the Outer Space Treaty
- [00:03:17.750]is confined only to nuclear weapons
- [00:03:20.120]and other weapons of mass destruction.
- [00:03:22.470]That means this part has nothing do to with other weapons,
- [00:03:27.090]conventional weapons, laser beams.
- [00:03:29.830]Other kinds of weapons
- [00:03:30.910]that would not be weapons of mass destruction,
- [00:03:33.820]not covered by this prohibition at all.
- [00:03:36.550]Secondly, this provision does not cover other verbs
- [00:03:40.910]that might be of interest, such as using a nuclear weapon
- [00:03:44.980]in a transit of outer space, going from a launch on Earth,
- [00:03:50.670]up into outer space and back to a target on Earth.
- [00:03:54.520]There's a nuclear weapon going into outer space,
- [00:03:57.240]but it is not in orbit around the Earth.
- [00:04:00.250]It is not installed on a celestial body.
- [00:04:03.130]It is not stationed in outer space.
- [00:04:04.810]It transits outer space.
- [00:04:07.240]And that's, I think, a good example
- [00:04:09.870]of a general practice in arms control.
- [00:04:13.430]It might not be too cynical to say,
- [00:04:16.580]that what the negotiators undertook
- [00:04:18.660]was to prohibit the specific activities
- [00:04:23.560]that none of them was interested in doing anyway,
- [00:04:26.090]or that none of them had the capability of doing
- [00:04:28.770]and preserving the legal right to do the things
- [00:04:31.580]they did want to do.
- [00:04:33.210]In 1967, the countries thought
- [00:04:35.350]they might want to have
- [00:04:36.780]a continued legal process for using nuclear weapons
- [00:04:41.530]on intercontinental ballistic missiles, ICBMs,
- [00:04:45.140]or submarine-launched ballistic missiles.
- [00:04:47.290]And therefore they did not prohibit that.
- [00:04:48.930]It prohibited putting nuclear weapons in orbit,
- [00:04:52.440]installing them on celestial bodies
- [00:04:54.129](loud humming) (mumbles) in space.
- [00:04:55.950]And that's a valuable contribution,
- [00:04:57.580]but it's by no means everything.
- [00:05:00.130]Second aspect of Article IV
- [00:05:01.610]that we'll talk about more briefly is the second paragraph.
- [00:05:04.520]That says the moon and other celestial bodies
- [00:05:06.420]shall be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.
- [00:05:10.380]There, it's noteworthy that peaceful purposes
- [00:05:13.150]is a phrase that has its own ambiguity.
- [00:05:17.670]Some people wanted to say that the contrast,
- [00:05:22.130]the opposite of peaceful purposes is military purposes,
- [00:05:26.800]and that the moon and other celestial bodies
- [00:05:28.857]should be preserved for non-military applications only.
- [00:05:33.140]The United States and, I think the dominant interpretation
- [00:05:36.090]around the world, is different.
- [00:05:38.430]The dominant interpretation is that the opposite of peaceful
- [00:05:41.590]is aggressive, and therefore military activities
- [00:05:46.060]on the moon and other celestial bodies are allowed
- [00:05:48.100]as long as they are not aggressive.
- [00:05:51.060]And the rest of that paragraph in Article IV
- [00:05:53.780]says that you can't establish military bases,
- [00:05:56.670]installations and fortifications,
- [00:05:58.610]you can't test weapons of any type,
- [00:06:01.270]you can't conduct military maneuvers on celestial bodies.
- [00:06:04.480]But you can use military personnel for scientific research
- [00:06:07.640]or other peaceful purposes,
- [00:06:09.420]and the use of military equipment and facilities,
- [00:06:13.210]in support of those peaceful purposes, is not prohibited.
- [00:06:16.310]So that in a nutshell is what Article IV is all about.
- [00:06:19.250]Tremendously important, a monumental accomplishment
- [00:06:22.780]in the evolution of international law
- [00:06:25.680]for peaceful applications in outer space,
- [00:06:28.720]but at the same time quite a limited set of proscriptions.
- [00:06:31.720]It's easy to overstate what Article IV
- [00:06:34.260]of the Outer Space Treaty actually accomplishes.
- [00:06:37.110]And, Professor, how do you see Article IV,
- [00:06:39.980]do you see it changing or adapting
- [00:06:42.110]with the rise of private sector space capabilities?
- [00:06:46.260]So Article IV is not much concerned
- [00:06:48.020]with private activities in outer space.
- [00:06:50.260]The growth in the private sector activities in outer space
- [00:06:53.580]probably not have much to do with Article IV,
- [00:06:56.180]but there are other efforts
- [00:06:57.830]to expand the coverage of Article IV,
- [00:07:01.260]to elaborate additional tools
- [00:07:03.360]of arms control in outer space.
- [00:07:06.720]The sad story is that, so far, none of those proposals
- [00:07:10.820]has gotten very far, and the immediate prospects
- [00:07:16.370]for arms control in outer space
- [00:07:17.960]that would elaborate the control regime
- [00:07:20.330]beyond what's currently in Article IV
- [00:07:23.509]is not a hopeful outlook.
- [00:07:27.260]Well, thank you for your time, and for you diligence
- [00:07:30.860]and your expertise on this matter.
- [00:07:33.470]We really appreciate having you with us for this.
- [00:07:35.857]Thank.
The screen size you are trying to search captions on is too small!
You can always jump over to MediaHub and check it out there.
Log in to post comments
Embed
Copy the following code into your page
HTML
<div style="padding-top: 56.25%; overflow: hidden; position:relative; -webkit-box-flex: 1; flex-grow: 1;"> <iframe style="bottom: 0; left: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; border: 0; height: 100%; width: 100%;" src="https://mediahub.unl.edu/media/10757?format=iframe&autoplay=0" title="Video Player: Professor Koplow on Art. 4" allowfullscreen ></iframe> </div>
Comments
0 Comments