WEBVTT

1
00:00:08.160 --> 00:00:09.860
<v Kristina>Hello, plant scientists.</v>

2
00:00:09.860 --> 00:00:12.960
Today we're going to learn about Dr. Sam Wortman

3
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:16.640
and a study he conducted on biodegradable plastic

4
00:00:16.640 --> 00:00:18.910
and fabric mulch performance.

5
00:00:18.910 --> 00:00:22.570
So we're going to learn a little bit about Dr. Wortman,

6
00:00:22.570 --> 00:00:25.810
we're going to learn about the study he conducted,

7
00:00:25.810 --> 00:00:29.180
and at the end, we're going to look at some data

8
00:00:29.180 --> 00:00:33.630
he collected and how we can read that data.

9
00:00:33.630 --> 00:00:37.030
So Dr. Sam Wortman is an assistant professor

10
00:00:37.030 --> 00:00:39.540
at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln

11
00:00:39.540 --> 00:00:42.670
and he focuses on environmental horticulture.

12
00:00:42.670 --> 00:00:44.860
His interest is in local, urban,

13
00:00:44.860 --> 00:00:47.430
and organic vegetable production,

14
00:00:47.430 --> 00:00:49.520
and he's studying biomulches

15
00:00:49.520 --> 00:00:51.850
because they can be used as alternatives

16
00:00:51.850 --> 00:00:53.790
to polyethylene mulch,

17
00:00:53.790 --> 00:00:57.170
which is commonly used in vegetable production.

18
00:00:57.170 --> 00:00:59.300
And growers are concerned

19
00:00:59.300 --> 00:01:02.100
about the disposal of polyethylene film

20
00:01:02.100 --> 00:01:06.170
and are seeking alternatives that provide the same benefits,

21
00:01:06.170 --> 00:01:09.103
and so that is why he is conducting this recent.

22
00:01:11.690 --> 00:01:13.820
So growers use polyethylene mulch

23
00:01:13.820 --> 00:01:16.570
because it helps control weed growth,

24
00:01:16.570 --> 00:01:18.330
it increases yields,

25
00:01:18.330 --> 00:01:20.560
it helps with temperature management,

26
00:01:20.560 --> 00:01:24.510
it has a low cost and it helps improve growth.

27
00:01:24.510 --> 00:01:26.120
And it's an environmental concern

28
00:01:26.120 --> 00:01:28.430
because it has to be removed and disposed of

29
00:01:28.430 --> 00:01:30.750
after each growing season.

30
00:01:30.750 --> 00:01:32.700
The most common way it is disposed of

31
00:01:32.700 --> 00:01:35.610
is by being stockpiled on farms.

32
00:01:35.610 --> 00:01:39.430
There are options to recycle it, but they are very limited,

33
00:01:39.430 --> 00:01:43.050
and hauling it to a landfill is very costly,

34
00:01:43.050 --> 00:01:46.903
and burning isn't an option because they are carcinogenic.

35
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:53.120
Alternatives to polyethylene mulch are organic mulches,

36
00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:58.070
paper-based mulches, bioplastics and biofabrics.

37
00:01:58.070 --> 00:02:02.430
But bioplastics and biofabrics were used in the experiment

38
00:02:02.430 --> 00:02:05.890
because previous research that was conducted

39
00:02:05.890 --> 00:02:08.810
shows that they have the greatest potential

40
00:02:08.810 --> 00:02:10.263
to be an alternative.

41
00:02:12.310 --> 00:02:15.270
So seven treatments were used in the study.

42
00:02:15.270 --> 00:02:20.240
Bare soil was used as a control to compare six biomulches,

43
00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:24.370
and of the six biomulches, there were four biofabrics

44
00:02:24.370 --> 00:02:27.160
that varied in thickness, weight, and color,

45
00:02:27.160 --> 00:02:29.510
and highlighted in the yellow box

46
00:02:29.510 --> 00:02:31.953
there are two bioplastics.

47
00:02:33.510 --> 00:02:38.510
From 2013 to 2015 at the University of Illinois

48
00:02:39.220 --> 00:02:43.210
in Urbana, Illinois, the experiment was conducted.

49
00:02:43.210 --> 00:02:45.290
A total of five trials were conducted

50
00:02:45.290 --> 00:02:47.180
over that span of time,

51
00:02:47.180 --> 00:02:49.270
and you can see in the photos

52
00:02:49.270 --> 00:02:52.770
that each trial was arranged as a randomized block design

53
00:02:52.770 --> 00:02:55.120
with four replicate blocks.

54
00:02:55.120 --> 00:02:58.660
In 2013, you can see in the photo on the left

55
00:02:58.660 --> 00:03:02.330
was the cucumber trials, and that had two trials,

56
00:03:02.330 --> 00:03:04.940
one in the field and one in high tunnels.

57
00:03:04.940 --> 00:03:09.143
In 2014, which is the photo on the right,

58
00:03:10.290 --> 00:03:12.310
again, two trials were conducted,

59
00:03:12.310 --> 00:03:14.590
one in the field and one in high tunnel

60
00:03:14.590 --> 00:03:16.670
using tomatoes and peppers.

61
00:03:16.670 --> 00:03:20.030
And in 2015, only one trial was conducted

62
00:03:20.030 --> 00:03:22.393
in the field using cucumbers.

63
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:27.350
So what type of data did Dr. Wortman collect?

64
00:03:27.350 --> 00:03:31.640
He collected data on soil temperature, soil moisture,

65
00:03:31.640 --> 00:03:34.050
weed emergence, crop yield,

66
00:03:34.050 --> 00:03:36.450
decomposition of biomulches in the soil,

67
00:03:36.450 --> 00:03:38.740
and mulch deterioration.

68
00:03:38.740 --> 00:03:42.070
In a few slides we are going to look at data,

69
00:03:42.070 --> 00:03:44.100
and the data that we are going to look at

70
00:03:44.100 --> 00:03:48.500
will be from the 2013 cucumber field trials

71
00:03:48.500 --> 00:03:52.223
for the decomposition of biomulches in the soil.

72
00:03:54.720 --> 00:03:58.130
So we need to learn how the data was collected.

73
00:03:58.130 --> 00:04:01.970
So the biomulch was incorporated into the soil

74
00:04:01.970 --> 00:04:03.680
after each growing season,

75
00:04:03.680 --> 00:04:07.450
and it was incorporated into the top 15 centimeters

76
00:04:07.450 --> 00:04:09.210
using a rotary tiller.

77
00:04:09.210 --> 00:04:11.300
And you can see in the photo

78
00:04:11.300 --> 00:04:16.113
the biomulch before and after incorporation into the soil.

79
00:04:19.030 --> 00:04:22.440
After the mulch was incorporated into the soil,

80
00:04:22.440 --> 00:04:26.073
it was then sampled at zero, six, and 12 months.

81
00:04:26.960 --> 00:04:29.570
And to get the samples, a golf hole cutter,

82
00:04:29.570 --> 00:04:31.050
which you can see in the photo,

83
00:04:31.050 --> 00:04:35.060
was used to remove eight core samples per plot at random

84
00:04:35.060 --> 00:04:37.510
from each experimental unit.

85
00:04:37.510 --> 00:04:39.770
The soil samples once collected

86
00:04:39.770 --> 00:04:42.840
were then sieved to recover mulch residues

87
00:04:42.840 --> 00:04:44.020
and then recovered mulch

88
00:04:44.020 --> 00:04:46.713
was then washed, dried, and weighed.

89
00:04:48.270 --> 00:04:50.900
So now we have background information

90
00:04:50.900 --> 00:04:54.880
on the experiment conducted by Dr. Wortman.

91
00:04:54.880 --> 00:04:57.780
So let's think, if we conducted this study,

92
00:04:57.780 --> 00:05:02.270
and in our cucumber field trial for 2013

93
00:05:02.270 --> 00:05:06.330
for the decomposition of the biomulches in the soil,

94
00:05:06.330 --> 00:05:10.470
here is data for two of the biodegradable fabrics.

95
00:05:10.470 --> 00:05:12.740
This is what you would be looking at.

96
00:05:12.740 --> 00:05:16.690
And so here is BK-1-270,

97
00:05:16.690 --> 00:05:21.540
and below it is BK-2-360, my two biofabrics.

98
00:05:21.540 --> 00:05:24.270
I have the four replicates for each,

99
00:05:24.270 --> 00:05:28.240
and I have their mass of the remaining biomulch in the soil

100
00:05:28.240 --> 00:05:31.140
at zero, six, and 12 months.

101
00:05:31.140 --> 00:05:34.440
So we're writing our article and we want our reader

102
00:05:34.440 --> 00:05:39.440
to be able to easily look at this data

103
00:05:39.440 --> 00:05:42.640
and understand what is happening.

104
00:05:42.640 --> 00:05:46.010
So to easily compare the biofabrics

105
00:05:46.010 --> 00:05:47.980
at zero, six, and 12 months,

106
00:05:47.980 --> 00:05:51.820
the first thing that we want to do is create a graph.

107
00:05:51.820 --> 00:05:53.250
And so to create the graph,

108
00:05:53.250 --> 00:05:56.850
we wanna take the averages of each replicate

109
00:05:56.850 --> 00:06:00.240
for each treatment at zero, six, and 12 months,

110
00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:02.973
and so we're going to find our average.

111
00:06:04.220 --> 00:06:06.840
So we're going to start by finding the average

112
00:06:06.840 --> 00:06:11.370
for our biofabric BK-1-270.

113
00:06:11.370 --> 00:06:13.483
And so to find the average,

114
00:06:14.412 --> 00:06:17.130
and the average is also considered the mean,

115
00:06:17.130 --> 00:06:18.970
we're gonna take the sum of the data,

116
00:06:18.970 --> 00:06:21.960
so step one, sum up all data points.

117
00:06:21.960 --> 00:06:25.840
So we're gonna add up at for zero months

118
00:06:25.840 --> 00:06:29.070
each mass for each of the four replicates.

119
00:06:29.070 --> 00:06:32.220
So down here, you can see that I've done that

120
00:06:32.220 --> 00:06:37.220
and I come up with 317.58.

121
00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:39.830
And then because we had four replicates,

122
00:06:39.830 --> 00:06:43.570
I'm going to divide that number by four

123
00:06:43.570 --> 00:06:45.580
and I get my average.

124
00:06:45.580 --> 00:06:49.020
And I will do that for six and 12 months

125
00:06:49.020 --> 00:06:52.263
and I will do that for my other treatment as well.

126
00:06:53.960 --> 00:06:56.280
So now that I've calculated my averages

127
00:06:56.280 --> 00:06:59.040
for both of my biofabric treatments

128
00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:01.610
at zero, six, and 12 months,

129
00:07:01.610 --> 00:07:03.420
I'm going to take this data

130
00:07:03.420 --> 00:07:07.423
and put it into Excel to create a graph.

131
00:07:10.130 --> 00:07:14.500
So I created a bar graph in Excel from my averages.

132
00:07:14.500 --> 00:07:15.880
So I have a graph

133
00:07:15.880 --> 00:07:18.980
of the average biomulch remaining in the soil.

134
00:07:18.980 --> 00:07:22.640
And as you can see, my biomulch treatments,

135
00:07:22.640 --> 00:07:25.187
I have BK-1-270 and BK-2-360.

136
00:07:28.570 --> 00:07:30.640
And I can easily compare them,

137
00:07:30.640 --> 00:07:34.870
the blue being immediately after incorporation,

138
00:07:34.870 --> 00:07:38.000
the orange is six months after incorporation,

139
00:07:38.000 --> 00:07:41.430
and the silver is 12 months after incorporation.

140
00:07:41.430 --> 00:07:44.840
So I can easily see what's happening during that timeline

141
00:07:44.840 --> 00:07:47.510
and it's also easier for my readers

142
00:07:47.510 --> 00:07:49.840
to understand what is happening.

143
00:07:49.840 --> 00:07:53.200
And there is more that we can do to understand the data

144
00:07:54.860 --> 00:07:57.630
for the decomposition of biomulch in the soil,

145
00:07:57.630 --> 00:08:00.733
but we are going to save that for a future lecture.

